Thursday, January 22, 2026

Imagine If We Spent the Money on Healing ๐Ÿ’”

 Imagine If We Spent the Money on Healing ๐Ÿ’”

Today I read a sentence that stopped me cold.

“Canada is quadrupling its defence spending.”

Quadrupling.

Not doubling.
Not a small increase.
Four times.

And my first reaction wasn’t strategy or geopolitics.

It was:

How many homes is that? ๐Ÿ 
How many meals? ๐Ÿฒ
How many detox beds?
How many youth centres?
How many elders cared for with dignity? ๐Ÿ‘ต๐Ÿฝ
How many people wouldn’t have to write “Emergency contact: NONE” on a form?

Because that’s what security looks like to me.

Not jets. ✈️
Not submarines.
Not bigger guns in the Arctic.

Security is a warm place to sleep. ๐Ÿ›️
Security is food in the fridge. ๐Ÿฅ–
Security is mental health care when you’re spiralling. ๐Ÿง 
Security is knowing someone would pick up the phone if you called. ❤️

We’re told defence spending keeps us safe.

But safe from what?

And safe for who?

If even a fraction of those billions went into housing, treatment, and community care, we wouldn’t just be “defended” — we’d actually be stronger.

Healthier.
Kinder.
More connected. ๐Ÿค

I keep thinking about that young person entering assisted living with no family listed. No emergency contact. No one.

And I wonder what would protect them more:

Another fighter jet?

Or one stable adult.
One affordable apartment.
One counsellor who isn’t overwhelmed.
One system that doesn’t abandon them. ๐ŸŒฑ

Sometimes it feels like our priorities are upside down.

We keep investing in how to fight wars.

But not in how to prevent despair.

If we really wanted security, we would defend people first.

Homes are defence. ๐Ÿ 
Food is defence. ๐Ÿฒ
Care is defence. ๐Ÿฉบ
Community is defence. ❤️

Imagine if we spent the money on healing instead.

Maybe that’s the kind of country I still hope we can build. ✨


Monday, January 19, 2026

When the Sun Sneezes and Humans Feel It

When the Sun Sneezes and Humans Feel It

Yesterday I didn’t feel like doing anything.

No errands. No plans. No ambition.
Just paint. So I painted.

Today felt… strange too. Heavy but buzzy. So I forced myself into “human mode”:
hand-washed clothes, cleaned the bathroom, did the responsible earth-dweller things.
Then I surrendered — straight into the hammock. ๐ŸŒด

And then I read a post about what’s happening in the sky.

Apparently the Sun decided to throw a tantrum.
A big one. Like… historic solar storm big. ๐Ÿ˜ฌ๐Ÿ‘€

Suddenly my “blah” made a little more sense.

I’m not saying solar storms control our moods — but I am saying we are walking, breathing electrical systems living inside a giant magnetic field that just got smacked by a cosmic wave. So maybe, just maybe, feeling off isn’t so dramatic after all.

What I love is how we still pretend we are separate from nature.

We accept that the Moon moves oceans.
We accept that seasons shift emotions.
But the Sun? Our literal life source?
“Oh no, that couldn’t possibly affect us.” ๐Ÿ™„

Meanwhile:

  • People can’t sleep.
  • Minds feel foggy.
  • Emotions spike.
  • Bodies feel wired or tired or both.

And I’m over here in my hammock like:
“Oh. So it’s not just me being lazy.”

What comforts me most is this:

Nothing is broken.
Nothing is wrong with us.
We’re just riding a wave — a solar one.

So today I’m not pushing.
I painted yesterday.
I cleaned today.
Now I rest.

And I let the Sun do whatever dramatic thing it’s doing up there, while I do my small, human thing down here — breathe, observe, and try to stay gentle with myself.

Because honestly…

If the universe is having a moment,
we’re allowed to have one too. ✨


When Your Tongue Gets Lazy: The Curious Case of Spanish “R”s

When Your Tongue Gets Lazy: The Curious Case of Spanish “R”s

Ever noticed how a single letter can be a whole workout for your mouth? Welcome to the world of the Spanish “r.”

I’m sitting in my hammock this morning, coffee in hand, roosters crowing ๐Ÿ“, thinking about clay and whales and… pronunciation. Yes, pronunciation. Because I just realized: my tongue is lazy. Really lazy. And when it comes to rolling “r”s in Spanish, it’s a disaster.

Take this simple sentence I practiced today:

"Hola, ¿tendrรกs un poco de barro para modelar?"
(Hi, do you have a little clay for modeling?)

Sounds easy, right? But look at the variety of “r”s I have to juggle:

  • No r at allHola, un, poco, de
  • Soft trill / taptendrรกs
  • Full rolled trillbarro
  • Soft / end-of-word rpara, modelar

That’s four different “r” sounds in one tiny sentence! And if my tongue gets lazy… well, suddenly barro comes out sounding completely wrong, and people tilt their heads like, “What did she just say?” ๐Ÿ˜…

It’s funny, frustrating, and fascinating all at once. Language is alive — your tongue is like a tiny instrument, vibrating in different ways, making different sounds, and if you slack off, the melody gets lost.

I realized today that lazy tongue syndrome isn’t just a quirk. It’s a reminder that speaking another language is physical. Your mouth, your lips, your tongue, your teeth — they all have to train for new sounds. And some of us just need a little extra practice, a little patience… and maybe a lot of coffee while roosters cheer us on. ☕๐Ÿ“

Even if my “r”s aren’t perfect, the attempt is part of the fun. It’s part of being human, part of learning, part of connecting — whether it’s asking for clay in Pochutla, chatting with local artisans, or just rolling my Rs for the sheer joy of sound.


Sunday, January 18, 2026

The Rising Cost of Tortillas in Zipolite

 ๐ŸŒž The Rising Cost of Tortillas in Zipolite

If you’re visiting Zipolite, you might notice something small but important at the local tortillerรญa: the price of tortillas has gone up. What used to be 14 pesos for a half kilo is now 15 pesos, and the kilo has risen proportionally.

It may seem tiny, but this small increase matters a lot to local families. Tortillas are a staple food here — they appear at almost every meal, from breakfast tacos to dinner quesadillas. For households buying several kilos each week, that extra peso adds up quickly.

Who this affects:

  • Local families who rely on tortillas as a daily staple.
  • Elderly people on fixed incomes.
  • Street vendors, small restaurants, and community kitchens that make a living from food.

A scenario:
Imagine a family of four, eating tortillas every day. They buy 10 kilos per week — that’s 140 pesos before, now 150 pesos. Over a month, that’s an extra 40 pesos (about $2 USD). It doesn’t sound like much for a visitor, but for locals, it’s a noticeable squeeze on already tight budgets.

A moment to be grateful:
Despite the price, tortillas are still warm, soft, and fresh from the comal. That smell, that taste — it’s a daily gift, a connection to centuries of tradition, and a reminder of the care that goes into making every batch.

So next time you enjoy your breakfast tortilla or a taco on the beach, take a moment to appreciate the work, the tradition, and the resilience of the people behind it. ๐ŸŒฎ❤️


When People Go Missing Between the Lines ๐Ÿ’”➡️๐Ÿ’™

 By Tina Winterlik (Zipolita)

This week I read a statement from The Vanished Project about the end of drug decriminalization in BC. It wasn’t political. It wasn’t ideological. It was street-level truth. ๐Ÿ‘ฃ

And what they said matters.

They reminded us of something many still confuse:

Decriminalization is legal ⚖️
Safe supply is medical ๐Ÿฅ

Two different questions.
Two different responsibilities.

BC tried to roll both out halfway — and then blamed both when the system buckled.

Safe supply stayed underfunded.
Treatment beds stayed scarce.
Housing stayed out of reach.
Outreach carried what institutions dropped.

And into that space rushed the same toxic supply. ๐Ÿ’Š๐Ÿ’€

Vanished described where they work:

Between paperwork and people.
Between court orders and real life.
Between “they’re engaged with services” and “no one has actually seen them.”

That sentence alone explains why families reach out. ๐Ÿ’”

Because people don’t just disappear.
They slip into systems that stop seeing them.

Now decriminalization is reversed — but the poisoned supply remains. Housing is still scarce. Treatment is still limited. And people are still being routed through clinics, conditions, and compliance instead of stability.

And let’s say it clearly:

WE NEED HOUSING.
๐Ÿ ๐Ÿ ๐Ÿ 
Not someday. Not later. Not in reports.
We need it now.

No policy works without housing.
No recovery works without housing.
No dignity exists without housing.

WE NEED HOUSING.

Vanished doesn’t argue politics.
They argue presence. ๐Ÿค

They keep looking when others stop.
They keep asking when files are closed.
They remind families they are not alone.

They remind us that harm reduction didn’t fail — it was never fully built.

You can’t remove law without building health.
You can’t build health without funding it.
And you can’t abandon people in the middle and expect peace.

So on this quiet Sunday morning ☕๐ŸŒฟ
instead of louder arguments…
let’s ask for better systems.
Let’s ask for real housing.
Let’s ask for care that lasts longer than headlines.
Let’s support the people who refuse to stop searching. ๐Ÿ”๐Ÿ’™

Because people are not statistics.
They are not disposable.
They are not invisible.

They are still here.
And they are still worth finding. ✨

๐Ÿ’™ Thank you, Vanished Project, for standing between the cracks.


Saturday, January 17, 2026

When a Banking Error Becomes an Eviction: Why Tenants Must Stand Together

When a Banking Error Becomes an Eviction: Why Tenants Must Stand Together

Over the holidays, a Vancouver tenant named Pat — a 29-year resident of her building — nearly lost her home because a routine e-transfer failed. No warning. No courtesy call. Just an eviction notice waiting at the post office.

That is how fragile housing has become.

Not because Pat did anything wrong.
But because the system allows landlords to weaponize technicalities against human lives.

What saved Pat was not policy.
It was people. ๐Ÿค

Her neighbours and fellow tenants showed up together and demanded accountability. And the eviction was dropped.

This story matters because it exposes something deeper than one landlord or one building. It shows how eviction processes can be used as pressure, intimidation, and control — especially against long-term tenants who stand in the way of profit.

It also shows that collective action still works. ✨

Next week, Vancouver City Council will hear a motion that could allow the City to suspend or revoke business licenses from landlords who repeatedly violate tenant protections. Whether or not it passes, it represents something important: public recognition that the system is broken.

Housing is not a luxury product.
It is not a tourist commodity.
It is not an investment toy.

It is where people age. Heal. Survive. Belong. ๐Ÿ 

Mega-events like the FIFA World Cup bring money into cities, but they also bring displacement when housing is treated as a hotel industry instead of a social foundation. When long-term homes become short-term profit, communities disappear.

So what can we do?

We can:

• Pay attention ๐Ÿ‘€
• Share tenant stories ๐Ÿ—ฃ️
• Support pro-tenant policy ๐Ÿ›️
• Write to councillors ✍️
• Stand with neighbours ๐Ÿค
• Refuse to normalize eviction culture ๐Ÿšซ

And most importantly: we can remember that dignity is not negotiable.

Pat’s story is not rare.
But neither is tenant courage.

And every time people stand together, the system is forced to blink.

Housing justice doesn’t start in City Hall.
It starts when we decide that no one should lose their home over a technical glitch.


Questions for reflection ๐Ÿค”

Have you or someone you know ever feared losing their home?
Should housing be treated as a business first — or a human right first?
What kind of city do we want to leave for future generations?
Who really pays the price when profit comes before people?


A gentle call to action ๐ŸŒฑ

If this story moved you, here are small but real ways to help:

• Follow and support tenant organizations
• Share tenant stories instead of scrolling past them
• Speak up at council or write in support of pro-tenant motions
• Check in on neighbours in your building
• And remind people that homes are not disposable

Because silence always helps power — never people.

And because dignity, once defended together, becomes unstoppable. ✨


Thursday, January 15, 2026

The Hidden Story Behind a West Vancouver Mansion — Why Zhang vs. Lin/Yin Matters to Everyone

 When a West Vancouver Mansion Becomes the Center of an International Legal Battle

A lavish mansion perched above English Bay in West Vancouver — one of the most desirable views in all of British Columbia — isn’t just a beautiful home. It’s a central piece in a major court case now unfolding in the British Columbia Supreme Court: Zhang versus Lin (or Zhang versus Yin).

What sounds like the plot of a novel is very real: huge sums of money crossing international borders, allegations of hidden ownership, disputes between extended families, and legal questions about how foreign wealth is invested in Canadian real estate.


What Is the Case About?

At its core, this legal battle is about who really owns — and who should benefit from — a portfolio of expensive properties in Metro Vancouver, including:

  • Luxurious homes on West 41st Avenue in Vancouver
  • Two West Vancouver mansions with panoramic views of English Bay (including one at 1160 Queens Ave. and another at 2185 Westhill Wynd)
  • Multiple properties in Burnaby and Richmond
  • Even a coffee shop in Surrey

All told, these properties are worth roughly $60 million.

The lawsuit was brought by members of the Zhang family against the Yin/Lin family (sometimes referenced in media as Lin) — long-time associates who, according to the Zhangs, were entrusted with large sums of money from China to invest in Canadian real estate but then kept control of the assets.


Why This Case Has Sparked So Much Attention

This case is more than just a property dispute. It sheds light on several important issues:

1. How Money Gets From China to Canadian Real Estate

China strictly limits how much money individuals can transfer out of the country — typically no more than US$50,000 per year without special approval. Yet in this case, millions of dollars were reportedly transferred — raising eyebrow-raising questions about how such funds made their way to Vancouver’s property market.

2. Questions of Beneficial vs. Registered Ownership

Just because a property is legally owned by someone (or by a numbered company) doesn’t necessarily mean they are the real, beneficial owner — the person who truly controls or benefits from it. That’s a legal distinction that’s crucial in cases like this, and it’s one the courts have grappled with intensely.

3. A Glimpse Into Real Estate and Global Capital Flows

Economists have noted that foreign capital — especially from China — has been a big force in cities like Vancouver and Toronto. At the height of this trend, analysts estimate that around one-third of property investments in these markets were tied to Chinese buyers.

This case reveals how complex and opaque those flows can be and why governments, courts, and communities care about transparency in property ownership.


What the Court Found — And What Still Isn’t Clear

After extensive hearings, Justice Gordon Funt ruled that:

  • The Zhang family can recover some proceeds from the disputed investments.
  • However, the judge could not conclusively prove that the original source of the funds came from alleged corruption or misappropriation in China linked to the Zhang family patriarch.
  • Instead, it appears more likely that the money used to buy these properties was earned legitimately — not extracted illegally — by the Zhang son, Tong “Tony” Zhang, and his partner through rapid property flipping in China.

In short, parts of the Zhang family’s story of misappropriation weren’t fully supported by the court. But the court did find that the Yin family, who held the properties through various numbered corporations, must return some value to the Zhangs.


A Story with International Dimensions

This case touches on:

  • International money movement
  • Trust and partnership disputes
  • Property ownership and hidden beneficial interests
  • Global real estate markets
  • Justice systems in more than one country

It’s not just about a beautiful mansion. It’s about how global capital affects local communities, who gets to own property in Canada, and how legal systems unravel complicated cross-border disputes.


Why You Should Care

This isn’t just lawyer-speak and headlines:

  • It affects housing affordability and transparency in Canadian real estate.
  • It shows how wealthy global players can influence local markets.
  • It raises questions about who benefits from foreign investment — and whether ordinary residents are priced out as a result.

Even if you’ve never set foot in West Vancouver, the outcome of this case matters because it spotlights big questions about fairness, transparency, and global wealth in local real estate markets.


Wednesday, January 14, 2026

When Policy Meets the Pavement: What I Saw During B.C.’s Decriminalization Pilot

I didn’t learn about B.C.’s drug crisis from policy papers.

I learned it from sidewalks.

I learned it from bodies slumpEternal pdoorways.
From people shaking, gasping, disappearing.
From moments when I honestly didn’t know if someone was still alive.

And that — in my lifetime — was new.

I grew up in a world where addiction existed, yes. But not like this. Not with this scale. Not with this visibility. Not with this silence around human collapse.

So when the B.C. government announced it was ending its drug decriminalization pilot, part of me understood the political reasoning. But another part of me felt something much heavier:

Grief. And anger. And truth.

Because what failed wasn’t compassion.
What failed was commitment.

Decriminalization was never meant to stand alone. It was supposed to be part of a health-based system — with housing, safe supply, treatment, trauma support, and dignity. Instead, it was dropped into a society already hollowed out by housing scarcity, poverty, colonial trauma, and isolation.

We didn’t give people a bridge.
We removed a charge and called it progress.

And then we watched people die anyway.

Former Vancouver mayor Kennedy Stewart said the policy was set up to fail. I believe him. Because what I witnessed wasn’t a community being healed — it was a crisis being tolerated.

People weren’t suddenly safe because they weren’t criminalized.
They were still poisoned.
Still homeless.
Still alone.

And the public was left to absorb the trauma of watching human beings disappear in real time.

This is the part politicians never speak about:

When a society witnesses repeated overdoses, repeated collapse, repeated death — something breaks in all of us. Not just in the person using drugs. But in the witnesses. In the neighbours. In the children walking past. In the elders who don’t recognize their own streets anymore.

We were asked to normalize something no human should have to normalize.

And now, instead of fixing what was missing, the government is walking away from the experiment entirely.

That worries me.

Because the lesson shouldn’t be: “Decriminalization doesn’t work.”

The lesson should be: “Abandonment doesn’t work.”

Addiction is not a moral failure. It is a wound.
A wound shaped by housing loss, colonial history, poverty, mental health, family breakdown, and systemic neglect.

No law — criminal or decriminal — can heal that by itself.

What I fear most is that ending this pilot will make it easier to return to blame. Easier to return to punishment. Easier to forget the faces.

But I can’t forget them.

I can’t forget the bodies I wasn’t sure were still alive.
I can’t forget the silence after the ambulances.
I can’t forget how normal it started to feel — and how wrong that was.

This crisis is not about drugs.

It is about dignity.

And until our policies are built around protecting human dignity first — we will keep repeating the same tragedy with different headlines.

I don’t pretend to have all the answers.

But I know this:

We cannot heal a society by looking away from its most broken people.

And we cannot call something a failure when we never truly gave it what it needed to succeed.


Monday, January 12, 2026

Canada’s Foreign Interference Law Exists — But Democracy Is Still Unprotected

 Canada’s Foreign Interference Law Exists — But Democracy Is Still Unprotected

Canada is not facing a hypothetical threat. Foreign interference is real, ongoing, and already documented. The Hogue Commission clearly identified China and India as the most aggressive and sophisticated actors targeting Canadian democracy.

Yet despite this, Canada’s response has been slow, incomplete, and dangerously weak.

In 2024, Parliament passed the Foreign Influence Transparency and Accountability Act with rare all-party cooperation. It was supposed to be a turning point — a commitment to transparency, accountability, and protection of our democratic institutions.

But today, that law still has no teeth.

There is no Foreign Influence Transparency Commissioner.
There is no functioning oversight body.
There is no enforcement system.

Canadians are being asked to trust a system that does not yet exist.

A Law Without Leadership Is Just Paper

By law, political party leaders must be consulted before appointing the Commissioner. That has not happened. Without this appointment, the government knows there is no one to administer or enforce the Act. The delay is not accidental — it is a political choice.

And every day this continues, Canadian democracy remains exposed.

Regulations That Undermine the Law

Even more troubling: the government’s proposed regulations do not fully reflect what Parliament intended.

The Act was meant to cover federal, provincial, and municipal officials. The regulations quietly ignore this — promising that other levels of government will be included “eventually,” with no timeline.

That is not accountability. That is avoidance.

The regulations also fail to clearly define what an “arrangement” is. This creates two dangerous outcomes:

  • Legitimate civic engagement becomes risky and uncertain.
  • Sophisticated foreign actors gain room to operate through loopholes.

Vagueness does not protect democracy — it weakens it.

Ignoring How Modern Interference Actually Works

Foreign interference rarely operates openly. It works through intermediaries, proxies, corporations, institutions, and informal networks.

Yet the regulations:

  • Do not require disclosure of corporate or organizational affiliations.
  • Do not require registration for individuals tied to foreign-funded institutions or media outlets.
  • Do not seriously address proxy influence.

This is not situational awareness. It is willful blindness.

Weak Penalties, Weak Message

With fines as low as $50, the government sends a clear message: foreign interference is not being treated as a serious national security issue.

That message is dangerous.

Democracy Deserves Better

Canada is expanding international trade relationships while leaving its democratic defenses unfinished. This contradiction should alarm every citizen.

Foreign interference is not just about elections.
It is about trust.
It is about transparency.
It is about whether Canadians can believe their institutions truly serve the public.

Right now, the answer is uncertain.

What Must Happen Now

If Canada is serious about protecting democracy, it must:

  • Appoint the Foreign Influence Transparency Commissioner immediately
  • Strengthen and clarify the regulations
  • Address proxy interference directly
  • Fully align regulations with the Act
  • Treat foreign interference as an urgent national priority

Democracy cannot be protected with half-measures, vague language, or political delay.

Foreign interference is real.
Canadians deserve action — not excuses.


Sunday, January 11, 2026

Last Sunday

 Last Sunday morning I was wandering the airport ✈️, sketching the Bill Reid and Don Yeomans sculptures ✏️๐Ÿ—ฟ while waiting for my 8:30 direct flight to Huatulco. I had been awake for 24 hours ๐Ÿ˜ต‍๐Ÿ’ซ. My body was exhausted, but my heart was already somewhere else ๐Ÿ’ญ๐ŸŒด. I slept on the plane, squished between two strangers who turned into stories — one Mexican man living in Montreal ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, visiting family, and another born in Canada ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, living in the Lower Mainland, running a fish supply company ๐ŸŸ. We talked and talked. I talked too much ๐Ÿ˜…. I was tired, nervous, and grateful for the distraction. Conversation made the time pass.

Customs took forever, as usual ๐Ÿ›‚. They always get curious about my crystals and beads ✨๐Ÿ“ฟ — but all went well ๐Ÿ™. By the time I reached the highway to catch the Rapid Van ๐ŸšŒ, a group of six guys with luggage rushed ahead of me and filled it. I missed it ๐Ÿ˜ญ. The next one came twenty minutes later ⏳. I didn’t mind — I watched the sunset ๐ŸŒ… from the van, feeling that familiar mix of relief and distance. The highway is rough now, broken in places ๐Ÿšง, and by the time we reached Cruceros it was fully dark ๐ŸŒ™.

I stood on the roadside with a couple of others ๐ŸŒ‘. They said a camioneta would come in fifteen minutes. A taxi pulled up ๐Ÿš• and asked for 200 pesos. I hesitated ๐Ÿค”. Save money… or trust my instincts? My mind whispered: fifteen minutes can be long in the dark. I chose safety ๐Ÿ™Œ. I took the taxi.

I had forgotten how far Zipolite really is ๐ŸŒŠ. Two years changes your memory. I never like arriving at night ๐Ÿ˜ฌ. But I arrived ๐Ÿ’›. I got my room ๐Ÿ›️. And then I saw my friends — my family ๐Ÿค—. We hugged. They hugged back. And suddenly everything felt right again.

Then I saw Shakira ๐Ÿ•๐Ÿค. Fourteen years old now. Slow, stiff, confused at first — then realizing it was me ๐Ÿฅน. I saw her face soften. I saw her happiness. My poor baby. That night she slept by my door ๐Ÿšช, protecting me and the cat ๐Ÿˆ, just like always. I felt so deeply grateful ๐Ÿ™.

And honestly… thank God I escaped Vancouver ๐Ÿ™️➡️๐ŸŒด.
I am safe in Zipolite ๐ŸŒŠ✨.
Held by friends ๐Ÿค, protected by love ๐Ÿพ, and finally breathing again ๐Ÿ˜Œ๐Ÿ’จ.

And that was my Sunday ๐Ÿ’ซ


Amazing Axolotls & Birthday Traditions

 Amazing Axolotls & Birthday Traditions ๐ŸฆŽ๐ŸŽ‚

There’s a new exhibit at the Vancouver Aquarium, and somehow it feels like it belongs in our story.

For years, the aquarium has been our birthday tradition. My kid and I. Walking past the seal and sea lion tanks, always stopping longest at the otters — my absolute favourites. Especially Seรฑor Cinco. Our brave rescue boy. Shot, blind, and still full of life. We love him so much.

We’ve only missed a couple birthdays in all these years. Now my kid is turning 24, and I can hardly believe how fast time has moved.

I still remember when the Amazon exhibit had butterflies. They would land right on us, like tiny blessings. We stood so still, barely breathing, hoping they wouldn’t fly away.

One year we touched stingrays. Another year, my kid went straight for the slimy things — sea cucumbers, of course — laughing while I pretended not to be brave enough. Some traditions are about courage. Some are about slime.

Now the aquarium has a new permanent exhibit: Amazing Axolotls. With their feathery gills, gentle smiles, and magical ability to regenerate, they feel like little reminders that healing is possible.

The exhibit also honours their roots in Mexico, which makes it even more special to me.

I still have a tiny axolotl toy my kid once bought me at the aquarium. It sits quietly, holding years of love inside something small.

I can already picture us there again. Pointing. Laughing. Remembering. Making one more memory in a place that has held so many of ours.

Some traditions don’t disappear.
They grow with us. ๐Ÿฉต๐ŸฆŽ๐Ÿฆฆ


Saturday, January 10, 2026

When Statistics Don’t Match the Streets:

When Statistics Don’t Match the Streets: Why I Question Vancouver’s “Improving” Narrative

By Tina Winterlik (Zipolita)

Recently, CBC published an article suggesting that Vancouver is becoming more affordable and safer. According to the data, rental prices are down, assaults are declining, and overdose deaths are decreasing. On paper, it sounds like a city finally turning a corner.

But I don’t recognize this Vancouver.

I’ve lived here long enough to know what real improvement feels like — and what managed appearances look like. What I see today is not a city healing. It is a city struggling to look better for cameras, investors, and international events like FIFA, while everyday people quietly carry heavier burdens.

Statistics Can Improve While Lives Get Harder

Numbers are not lies — but they are not truth either. They are selections. They depend on what is measured, what is excluded, and who is no longer counted.

If people are displaced out of Vancouver, rental demand drops. If people stop reporting assaults because they no longer trust the system, crime appears lower. If overdose deaths fall because toxic supply shifts, not because treatment and housing improved, the root crisis remains.

Statistics can improve when suffering becomes invisible.

The Vancouver I See

I see seniors choosing between food and rent.

I see working people living in vehicles or sharing overcrowded spaces.

I see artists, caregivers, and community builders leaving the city they once loved.

I see tent clearings framed as solutions.

I see help that is harder to access, not easier.

And I see exhaustion in people’s eyes — not relief.

Optics Matter in Political Storytelling

Mega-events like FIFA change narratives. Cities polish themselves. Language softens. Headlines become hopeful. Declines are celebrated without context.

But improvement for headlines is not the same as improvement for people.

A 14% rent decrease after years of explosive increases does not make housing affordable. A 36% reduction in overdose deaths after record-breaking loss does not mean the crisis is solved.

It means we are measuring decline from catastrophe — not from stability.

Who Benefits From the Narrative?

We must always ask:

Who benefits when a city is described as “improving”?

Developers. Investors. Tourism. Political careers.

And who struggles to be heard?

Renters. People on assistance. People with disabilities. Seniors. Unhoused citizens.

Their stories do not fit neatly into trend lines.

Lived Experience Is Data Too

My perspective is not academic — it is lived. And lived experience is not inferior to statistics. It is the context statistics depend on.

A city is not healed when numbers soften. A city is healed when people feel secure.

We are not there.

Why I Speak Up

I am not writing this to deny hope. I am writing this to protect honesty.

Hope built on selective framing collapses. Hope built on truth can actually change things.

Vancouver deserves better than cosmetic recovery. Its people deserve more than improved charts.

Until everyday life becomes more livable, I will continue to question any headline that tells me everything is getting better — when my community tells me otherwise.

Because cities are not statistics. They are people.





When You Break the Rules and Become a Pariah ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ 

 When You Break the Rules and Become a Pariah ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ 

I didn’t start out trying to break the rules.

Like many of my generation, I was sold a simple story:
meet someone ๐Ÿ’, marry, have kids ๐Ÿ‘ถ, buy a house ๐Ÿก, grow old safely ๐Ÿ‘ต.

But then life happened.
And the truth of life became obvious — fast.

That story only works if everything goes right.
And if it doesn’t, the system doesn’t bend — it punishes ⚠️.


The lie of “choice” ๐ŸŽญ

We’re told we have freedom now.
Freedom to love who we want ❤️, live how we want ๐ŸŒ, work flexibly ๐Ÿ’ป, delay marriage ⏳, explore life ✨.

But that freedom comes with fine print ๐Ÿ“„.

You are only “free” if:

  • You never need help ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿค
  • You never fall behind ๐Ÿƒ‍♀️
  • You never age without assets ๐Ÿ’ฐ
  • You never raise a child outside the approved structure ๐Ÿ‘ฉ‍๐Ÿ‘ง

The moment you do — you become a problem ❌.


I didn’t reject responsibility — I rejected denial ๐Ÿ‘€

I lived fully ๐ŸŒŠ.
I loved ๐Ÿ’ž, I traveled ✈️, I worked ๐Ÿ› ️, I learned ๐Ÿ“š.

I didn’t rush into marriage out of fear ๐Ÿ˜จ.
I didn’t build a life on illusion ๐ŸŽช.

When the reality of relationships, economics, and power became clear, I chose truth over performance ๐Ÿง  — and that choice is not forgiven in our society.

Later, I had a child ๐Ÿ‘ถ.
And that’s when the rules hardened ๐Ÿงฑ.

Motherhood is celebrated ๐ŸŽ‰ — only if you can carry it entirely alone ๐Ÿ’ช.
If you can’t, the admiration disappears and judgment takes its place ๐Ÿ‘€⚖️.


Technology didn’t save us — it enclosed us ๐Ÿ“ฑ๐Ÿ”’

I believed, honestly, that technology would help.

That it would:

  • Allow flexible work ๐Ÿ’ป
  • Support caregiving ๐Ÿคฑ
  • Level the playing field ⚖️
  • Create new ways to belong ๐ŸŒ

Instead, tech became the gatekeeper of survival ๐Ÿšช.

No device? No access ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ“ฑ.
No constant connection? No services ๐Ÿ”Œ.
No compliance? You vanish ๐Ÿ‘ป.

Children are plugged in ๐ŸŽง because the world is too loud ๐Ÿ”Š, fast ⚡, and overstimulating ๐Ÿคฏ.
Elders are sedated by screens ๐Ÿ“บ because community has collapsed ๐Ÿง“➡️๐Ÿ“ฑ.
Adults cope with dopamine rituals — streaming ๐ŸŽฌ, games ๐ŸŽฎ, porn ๐Ÿ”ž — because real security is gone.

This isn’t liberation.
It’s dependency disguised as progress ๐ŸŽญ๐Ÿ“ˆ.


Vancouver and the cult of “success” ๐Ÿ™️✨

In cities like Vancouver, you feel it sharply.

Rents are so high ๐Ÿ’ธ that housing becomes a moral filter ๐Ÿงน.
Wealth is treated as virtue ๐Ÿ†.
Poverty as contagion ๐Ÿฆ .

People don’t say it out loud ๐Ÿค, but the message is clear:
If you’re struggling, something must be wrong with you.

That’s how a society creates pariahs ๐Ÿšท — not through crime, but through non-conformity.


A pariah is not a failure ๐ŸŒฑ

A societal pariah is someone punished for revealing the truth:

  • That independence is conditional ๐Ÿ”—
  • That freedom has limits ๐Ÿงญ
  • That care is not actually supported ๐Ÿฅ
  • That aging without property is treated as deviance ๐Ÿ‘ต๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ 

I didn’t fail the system.

The system failed the test of humanity — and my life made that visible ๐Ÿ”.


Looking back to look forward ๐Ÿ•ฐ️➡️๐ŸŒ…

My mother’s generation ๐Ÿ‘ฉ‍๐Ÿฆณ, my grandmother’s ๐Ÿ‘ต, my great-grandmother’s — they lived with fewer choices, but more interdependence ๐Ÿค.

We were promised more freedom ๐Ÿ•Š️.
What we got was more isolation ๐ŸงŠ.

And now, if you step away from the script ๐Ÿ“œ — even thoughtfully, even honestly — you are quietly punished ๐Ÿ”‡.

No prison walls.
Just exclusion ๐Ÿšช.


It’s time to question this ❓

Questioning this doesn’t make you bitter ๐Ÿ˜ .
It makes you awake ๐Ÿ‘️.

Technology should serve life — not replace it ๐Ÿง ❤️.
Freedom should include care — not punishment ๐Ÿค⚖️.
Motherhood ๐Ÿ‘ฉ‍๐Ÿ‘ง, aging ๐Ÿ‘ต, and truth ๐Ÿ—️ should not exile you from society.

If that makes me a pariah ๐Ÿšท,
then maybe pariahs are simply the people who stopped pretending ๐ŸŽญ.


Friday, January 9, 2026

When “The Perfect Gift” Isn’t: Why Many Canadians Quietly Skipped Gift Cards This Christmas

When “The Perfect Gift” Isn’t: Why Many Canadians Quietly Skipped Gift Cards This Christmas

This year, something subtle happened in my family: no gift cards.

No big discussion. No warning story exchanged over dinner. Just an unspoken shift — and in hindsight, a sensible one.

Across Canada, gift card scams have been quietly spreading, particularly involving major retailers like Shoppers Drug Mart and third-party gift card processors such as Blackhawk Network. Even people who didn’t personally lose money seem to be adjusting their habits — opting out before becoming the next cautionary tale.

How the gift card scam works (in plain language)

There isn’t just one scam — there are several variations:

• Barcode tampering Scammers place fake barcode stickers over legitimate gift cards in stores. When the card is scanned at checkout, the money is loaded onto a different card controlled by the scammer — not the one you purchased.

• Pre-drained cards Some cards are compromised before purchase. By the time the recipient tries to use them, the balance is already gone.

• The accountability gap When fraud happens, consumers are often bounced between the retailer and the third-party processor. One says “call the issuer,” the other says “the funds were already redeemed.” The result? The customer absorbs the loss.

Why this matters — even if you didn’t buy one

I didn’t buy gift cards this year either. Even my Visa Rewards points, which can be redeemed for gift cards, were put straight back as a credit on my card instead. That choice wasn’t about paranoia — it was about control.

A credit applied to your account:

  • Can’t be intercepted
  • Can’t be drained remotely
  • Has a clear paper trail
  • Keeps responsibility with the bank, not a third-party processor

Gift cards, on the other hand, exist in a strange consumer-protection grey zone.

A system built on “buyer beware”

Gift cards are marketed as:

“Just like cash — but easier!”

In reality, they’re often worse than cash:

  • No fraud guarantees
  • No chargeback rights
  • Limited refunds
  • Complicated dispute processes

And yet, billions of dollars flow through this system every year — especially during the holidays.

A quiet consumer shift

What’s most telling isn’t just the scams themselves, but how people are responding:

  • Families choosing cash, transfers, or experiences
  • Shoppers hesitating at gift card racks
  • Rewards points being redeemed as credits instead of cards

This isn’t panic. It’s adaptation.

If you do use gift cards

If gift cards are unavoidable:

  • Inspect cards carefully for tampering
  • Keep receipts and activation slips
  • Use them immediately
  • Consider digital gift cards from the issuer directly

And if something goes wrong, report it — not just to the retailer, but to the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre. Silence is what allows these systems to continue unchanged.

Final thought

The most telling part of this story isn’t the scam — it’s that many people are quietly opting out.

Sometimes the safest gift is the simplest one.


Thursday, January 8, 2026

When Journalism Escapes the Gatekeepers

 When Journalism Escapes the Gatekeepers

How a Canadian Broadcast Undermined a Quiet Act of Censorship

For years, people have warned that important journalism doesn’t always disappear — it gets buried. Quietly delayed. Softened. Shelved “for review.”

That’s why the recent 60 Minutes controversy matters so much.

A completed investigation into El Salvador’s CECOT mega-prison — documenting allegations of abuse against migrants deported under U.S. policy — was pulled from American broadcast at the last minute. Official explanations cited “editorial review.” Inside the newsroom, journalists reportedly saw something else: political pressure and risk avoidance.

But here’s the part that didn’t go according to plan.

Because 60 Minutes episodes are distributed internationally, the full segment — including “Inside CECOT” — had already been sent to foreign broadcast partners. One of those partners was Global TV in Canada.

The segment quietly aired on Global’s streaming platform.

And then something very modern happened.

Viewers watched it. Screen-recorded it. Shared it. Archived it. Within hours, clips were spreading across social media, journalism circles, and human-rights networks. What was meant to be contained became impossible to control.

This wasn’t a leak in the dramatic sense. It was journalism doing what it has always done best when institutions hesitate: finding daylight.

The irony no one planned for

There’s an irony here that’s hard to ignore. Attempts to suppress or delay uncomfortable reporting often create far more attention than simply airing it would have. By pulling the segment, CBS didn’t protect itself — it turned a serious investigation into “forbidden content,” instantly magnifying public interest.

And Canadians played a role in that, whether intentionally or not.

Why I’m proud of Global — and why I still expect better

I’ll be honest: I’ve criticized Global News before, particularly around sensationalized reporting on welfare fraud that reinforces harmful stereotypes. I gave them a hard time — publicly — because journalism shapes how society treats its most vulnerable people.

That’s exactly why this moment matters.

This time, Global didn’t sanitize. They didn’t spike. They didn’t pre-emptively comply. They aired what they were given, as journalists are supposed to do. And in doing so, they reminded us that cross-border media still matters, especially when domestic outlets flinch.

A troubling signal for press freedom

It should worry all of us when citizens have to access investigative journalism through foreign streams, VPNs, or screen recordings — like they’re hunting down a banned documentary. That’s not how a healthy democracy works.

Censorship today doesn’t always look like book burnings or blacked-out screens. More often, it looks like:

  • “Not ready yet”
  • “Needs more balance”
  • “Let’s revisit after the election”
  • “Legal wants another pass”

And sometimes, it looks like forgetting that the internet exists.

The takeaway

The real story here isn’t just about one prison, one segment, or one executive decision. It’s about how fragile editorial independence becomes when news organizations are entangled with political power, corporate interests, and regulatory pressure.

And it’s about how — occasionally — those efforts fail spectacularly.

This time, journalism slipped through the cracks.


Thanks, in part, to a Canadian broadcast schedule.


Wednesday, January 7, 2026

There Was No “24-Hour Rule” — There Was Neglect

 There Was No “24-Hour Rule” — There Was Neglect

And People Are Still Missing

For years, many of us believed there was a rule:
that you had to wait 24 hours before reporting someone missing.

That belief didn’t come from nowhere.
It came from experience.

From families who called police and were told to wait.
From friends who were brushed off.
From communities who learned, painfully, that some lives were treated as disposable.

The Pickton Case: When Warnings Were Ignored

In Vancouver, during the 1990s and early 2000s, women from the Downtown Eastside began disappearing.

They were daughters. Sisters. Mothers. Friends.

Many were Indigenous. Many were poor. Many were sex workers. Many struggled with addiction.
And because of that, their disappearances were not taken seriously.

Families reported them missing.
Again and again.

Police responses often sounded like this:

  • “She’s an adult.”
  • “She probably left town.”
  • “She’ll turn up.”
  • “She’s transient.”

There was no legal waiting period then.
Police could have acted.

They didn’t.

Robert Pickton was finally arrested in 2002, after years of missed warnings, ignored tips, and failed investigations. By then, dozens of women were dead.

The myth of the “24-hour rule” was born not from law, but from systemic indifference.

A Pattern, Not an Exception

The Pickton case wasn’t an anomaly. It exposed something much deeper:

  • Whose disappearances trigger urgency
  • Whose lives are considered “high risk” — and therefore less protected
  • Whose families are believed

Indigenous women and girls continue to be disproportionately represented among the missing and murdered. So are people living in poverty, unhoused people, and those struggling with mental health or addiction.

When someone lives at the margins, their absence is too often treated as expected rather than alarming.

What Changed — and What Hasn’t

Today, police agencies say clearly:

There is no waiting period to report someone missing.

And that’s important.

But policy on paper does not automatically erase:

  • Bias
  • Under-resourcing
  • Fragmented systems
  • Public desensitization

People are still missing.
Families are still searching.
Communities are still carrying grief without answers.

Why Early Action Matters

The first hours and days after someone goes missing are critical.

Waiting — officially or unofficially — can mean:

  • Lost evidence
  • Missed sightings
  • Reduced chances of finding someone alive

When reports are dismissed or delayed, the damage is often irreversible.

Remembering the Missing Means Changing How We Respond

Honouring the women lost in the Pickton case — and the many still missing today — means more than memorials.

It means:

  • Believing families
  • Acting immediately
  • Valuing every life equally
  • Holding institutions accountable when they fail

There was never a rule that said “wait 24 hours.”

There was a culture that said: some people matter less.

That is the rule that must never be allowed to return.


Tuesday, January 6, 2026

This Didn’t Surprise Me — And That’s the Problem

 

This Didn’t Surprise Me — And That’s the Problem

A recent report reveals hundreds of founded misconduct cases involving CBSA employees.

I wish I could say I was shocked. I’m not.

I was treated badly more than once, and for years people have shared similar stories quietly — humiliation, intimidation, abuse of power. When authority goes unchecked, harm becomes routine, and those on the receiving end are often made to feel small, invisible, or “at fault.”

What matters here is the word founded.
These aren’t rumours. These are complaints that were investigated and upheld.

And for every case that makes it into a report, many more never get filed — because people are afraid, exhausted, or don’t believe the system will protect them.

This isn’t about attacking workers. It’s about accountability, transparency, and basic human dignity. Agencies with enforcement power must be held to the highest standards — not shielded by silence.

If this report makes some people uncomfortable, good. Discomfort is often the first step toward change.

For those who were treated badly and told to “move on” — this is validation.
You weren’t imagining it. You weren’t alone.

Real reform starts by listening to lived experience, not dismissing it.


Monday, January 5, 2026

Vacancy Didn’t Rise. Affordability Failed.

 Vacancy Didn’t Rise. Affordability Failed.

Why CMHC’s “good news” on Vancouver rentals doesn’t match lived reality

For the first time in nearly four decades, Metro Vancouver’s rental vacancy rate has reached approximately 3.7%, according to the Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC). Housing officials and politicians have been quick to frame this as positive news, pointing to the familiar idea that a 3–5% vacancy rate is “healthy” because it gives renters more choice.

On paper, this sounds encouraging.

In real life, it feels disconnected.

What CMHC’s vacancy rate actually measures

CMHC’s vacancy data applies only to purpose-built rental apartments. It does not include:

  • Condos rented by investors
  • Basement suites and secondary units
  • Informal or precarious housing
  • Units priced so high they are effectively unreachable

This distinction matters.

So when we hear “vacancy is rising,” what it often really means is this:
new, expensive buildings are sitting empty because people cannot afford them.

Vacancy didn’t rise.
Affordability failed.

A “healthy market” isn’t the same as healthy people

The idea of a “healthy vacancy rate” is a market benchmark, not a measure of human well-being. It assumes rents rise alongside wages, that people have stable incomes, and that displacement is rare.

None of that reflects Vancouver’s reality.

Vacancy can increase at the same time homelessness increases — because empty units are not accessible to the people who need housing most. A unit renting for $2,800 a month does nothing for someone on social assistance, a senior on a fixed income, or a worker earning close to minimum wage.

Healthy for the market does not mean healthy for communities.

CMHC’s uncomfortable role in the housing crisis

CMHC often presents itself as a neutral observer, but its history tells a more complicated story. For decades, it has insured investor mortgages, enabled large landlords and REITs to expand, and supported housing as a financial asset rather than a human necessity.

That doesn’t make the data false — but it does make the framing selective.

Why B.C. Housing’s optimism rings hollow

B.C. Housing has also struggled to earn public trust. High executive salaries, chronic maintenance issues, and a tendency to count “units announced” instead of homes people can actually live in have left many British Columbians skeptical of official optimism.

When officials say rising vacancy means people “have options,” the question remains: options for whom?

The story governments need right now

Housing affordability has become politically explosive. Governments are under pressure to show progress, even if the underlying system remains broken.

So the narrative becomes:

Vacancy is rising. Pressure is easing. Things are improving.

Instead of:

The market is rejecting overpriced units while affordability continues to collapse.

That difference matters.

Lived experience still tells the truth

CMHC measures units. Governments track markets. But people live in homes — or struggle without them.

For those who have spent years navigating B.C.’s housing system, advocating for change, or living on the margins, this sudden optimism feels premature at best and misleading at worst.

Until housing policy centers dignity instead of market optics, vacancy statistics will continue to ring hollow.

Because vacancy alone doesn’t house people.


Sunday, January 4, 2026

Floating Saunas, Beached Barges, and Our Housing Priorities

 

Floating Saunas, Beached Barges, and Our Housing Priorities

Vancouver knows how to move money when it wants to.

A few years ago, a massive industrial barge broke loose in a windstorm and ended up smashed against the rocks at English Bay. It couldn’t be refloated. It had to be cut apart on site. The removal cost ran into the millions.

Now, we’re being asked to welcome a floating sauna barge in Kitsilano — a luxury, fee-based waterfront amenity. Early estimates for projects of this type elsewhere put them anywhere from the low millions to tens of millions of dollars.

And here’s the uncomfortable question we’re not supposed to ask:

Why is money always available for leisure, spectacle, and damage control — but somehow never available for housing?


What that money could do instead

Even conservative numbers tell a stark story:

  • $20 million could fund dozens of modular or tiny homes
  • It could help purchase land and build permanent supportive housing
  • It could retrofit existing buildings faster than new luxury projects get approved

Meanwhile, people sleep in tents within walking distance of these proposed amenities.


It’s not about saunas — it’s about priorities

This isn’t an argument against wellness, cold plunges, or enjoying the ocean. It’s about who our city is being designed for.

When a barge crashes into a beach, we find the engineers, permits, and contractors. When a spa wants to float on public water, approvals move forward.

But when people need shelter?

Suddenly it’s complicated. Suddenly it’s expensive. Suddenly it takes years.


Public space should serve the public

Waterfront land and water access are public assets. Using them primarily for high-end experiences — while basic needs go unmet — sends a clear message about whose comfort matters most.

We should be asking:

  • What problem does this project solve?
  • Who benefits?
  • And what opportunities are being lost?

Because we already know one thing for sure:

If we can afford floating saunas and million-dollar barge removals, we can afford housing.


Saturday, January 3, 2026

Screen Play 33 Kilos

 Blog Post Draft: January 2026

Title: 33 Kilos at YVR: What the Headlines Don’t Tell Us

INT. VANCOUVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT – CHECK-IN HALL – DAY

The camera sweeps past luggage carts and rushing travelers. Security scanners beep in the distance. A woman moves carefully toward the gate, her bags unusually heavy. She smiles at airline staff, concealing the weight, the tension, the impossible risk she’s been forced into.

NARRATOR (V.O.)
Thirty-three kilos. Seventy-three pounds. That’s not a personal choice. That’s more than a lifetime supply — and yet the headlines make it sound like a single act of stupidity.

INT. SECURITY CHECKPOINT – DAY

A wave of new security staff — many recent immigrants, trained quickly, underpaid, under pressure — pass travelers through. They follow protocol, but there’s no system-wide oversight, no institutional memory. The woman’s bags pass the scales, pass the sensors, pass the nose of anyone who might notice.

NARRATOR (V.O.)
Ask yourself: how does luggage that heavy not trigger alarms? How does cannabis that massive not announce itself? Something bigger is moving in the shadows. And someone is paying attention — but it isn’t the people caught in the spotlight.

EXT. RUNWAY – DAY

The plane to Frankfurt waits. In the shadows, networks, organizers, and money flow unseen. The person arrested — labeled a criminal, a headline — is just one node in a larger system that exploits the vulnerable and protects the powerful.

NARRATOR (V.O.)
And yet nobody asks:

  • Who else is moving product while she’s being stopped?
  • Who benefits from this operation?
  • How do undertrained, precarious security staff fit into a chain that lets networks slip through the cracks?

INT. BLOG SCREEN – DAY

We scroll through the news, seeing the arrest, the shocking numbers, but missing the angles that matter. Vancouver is changing. Security is changing. Ports, airports, and borders are increasingly controlled by low-paid, temporary, inexperienced workers, while the real networks operate in the gaps.

NARRATOR (V.O.)
If we only look at the person caught, we miss the story. We miss the coercion, the exploitation, the systemic failures. We miss the city becoming one where headlines punish the visible, while invisible systems profit from human vulnerability.

Closing Reflection:
This isn’t just a story about cannabis. It’s a story about who we protect, who we punish, and who is left invisible in the process. It’s about calling out the people in charge, the policies that fail, the underpaid staff who carry responsibility without power. And it’s about noticing the angles we never see — because understanding them is the first step toward change.

Reflective Questions:

  1. Who really controls the flow behind headlines like this?
  2. How do new security systems and staffing models fail to protect both travelers and vulnerable people?
  3. What could Vancouver do differently to stop exploitation before someone is forced into impossible choices?

FADE OUT.


Friday, January 2, 2026

33 Kilos, 73 Pounds, and the Invisible Forces Behind Headlines


 January 2026

 33 Kilos, 73 Pounds, and the Invisible Forces Behind Headlines


You might have seen the shocking news: a woman caught at YVR trying to fly to Frankfurt with 33 kilos of cannabis. The headline makes it sound like a wild stunt, or a “bad choice.” But pause — 33 kilos is about 73 pounds. That’s not a casual mistake. That’s a load heavy enough to crush any ordinary person under the weight of consequences.

The Human Angle:
We don’t know her story — and that’s exactly the point. Most people in headlines like this never get to tell their side. At this scale, it’s impossible that this was a simple “oops.” People are coerced, pressured, groomed, or cornered by circumstances that outsiders can barely imagine.

We live in a city like Vancouver, a global hub with sprawling ports, airports, and rising inequality. When systems fail — from low-paid security staff to fractured law enforcement — vulnerable people are the ones who get caught, while the networks that exploit them often remain invisible.

Patterns Behind the Shock:

  • Organized crime exploits gaps and vulnerabilities.
  • Many so-called “security” workers themselves are overworked, undertrained, or precarious.
  • People carrying drugs across borders are rarely doing it out of free choice; coercion, threats, or deception are more common than headlines admit.

Why This Matters:
This story isn’t about judgment. It’s about noticing the cracks in our systems — the way poverty, immigration status, desperation, and city-wide inequality intersect with borders and law enforcement. It’s about empathy and holding space for the invisible side of these headlines.

Reflective Questions:

  1. How do systems protect the powerful while punishing the visible “mules”?
  2. What pressures might drive someone to take a risk this enormous?
  3. How can Vancouver avoid normalizing exploitation in the shadow of its globalized economy?

Closing Thought:
We may never know her story, but we can recognize the forces that corner people into impossible choices. Paying attention to the human side of headlines — even when it’s uncomfortable — is one small way to resist a system that too often punishes the vulnerable.



Thursday, January 1, 2026

When Airlines Stopped Caring: How Flying Became a Class System

 UPDATE – January 2026

Since publishing this article, WestJet has announced it is reversing its decision to reduce legroom and install non-reclinable economy seats on some aircraft, following widespread public backlash. Viral videos and passenger complaints highlighted just how uncomfortable and degrading the new layout felt for many travelers.

WestJet has now confirmed it will remove the extra row of seats and return to a more standard configuration. While this does not solve the larger problem of shrinking airline comfort, it proves that public pressure still matters. Passengers are not cargo. We are human beings with bodies, health needs, and dignity — and airlines ignore that at their own reputational risk.

This reversal does not erase the trend of squeezing travelers for profit, but it does show that silence is not the only option.

-------------------------------------

When Airlines Stopped Caring: How Flying Became a Class System

There was a time when airlines actually cared about passengers.

Flying felt human.
You bought a ticket, you got a seat, your bag came with you, and dignity wasn’t an add-on.

Now? Flying has become a scam dressed up as “choice.”

Want to keep your laptop safe?
Carry-on now costs extra.

Afraid your luggage will be lost — again?
Pay more.

Want to sit next to the person you’re traveling with?
Pay more.

Want to avoid being shoved into a middle seat at the back of the plane, knees jammed into your chest, unable to recline because the seats are zip-tied upright?
Pay more.

What airlines call “basic fares” are really punishment fares.

If you’re poor or budget-conscious, you don’t just get fewer perks — you get treated like you don’t matter.

This isn’t about luxury.
It’s about function, safety, and dignity.

Most people carry laptops, medication, cameras, or personal items they cannot afford to lose. Charging extra just to keep essential belongings with you isn’t a service — it’s a shakedown.

Airlines have figured out how to take one ticket and break it into ten separate fees, then blame passengers for wanting basic decency.

They say:

“You can choose a cheaper ticket.”

What they really mean is:

“You can choose discomfort, anxiety, and risk.”

This is classism in the sky.

If you have money, you glide through airports with legroom, overhead space, priority boarding, edible food, and calm.

If you don’t, you are herded, charged, shamed, and crammed — seat by seat.

Flying used to connect people.
Now it sorts them.

And the worst part? We’re told this is normal. Efficient. “Just how the market works.”

No.

This is what happens when empathy is stripped out of a system and replaced with profit extraction.

Airlines didn’t just shrink seats.
They shrank humanity.

Flying shouldn’t feel like a reminder of where you rank in society.