Saturday, October 17, 2026

the university-for-free fairy tale: what about the rest of us, langara?

 the university-for-free fairy tale: what about the rest of us, langara?

When education is advertised as easy to afford, whose reality are we being asked to believe?

I just saw an advertisement aimed at Langara College alumni featuring a young woman talking about how she went through university for free, using bursaries, as though it were all so easy.

Excuse me?

I attended Langara. I walked away with $22,000 in student loans and just $500 in bursary money.

Twenty-two thousand dollars in debt. Five hundred dollars in bursaries.

And now I'm watching an advertisement that makes getting an education without paying for it sound like an easy accomplishment.

What exactly are you selling here, Langara? Education, or a fairy tale?

one student's success story is not everyone's reality

I'm not suggesting this young woman is lying about her personal experience. Perhaps she qualified for substantial financial assistance. Perhaps her circumstances, eligibility, program or funding opportunities were different from mine.

Good for her if she managed to graduate without student debt.

But there is a significant difference between saying one student received enough financial assistance to cover her education and creating the impression that going to university for free is an easy, realistic option for everyone.

Where is the context?

How much did she receive in bursaries? Did she receive government grants? Was her tuition covered by a special program? Did she have help with rent, food, transportation and other living expenses?

And how many students who applied for assistance received nowhere near enough to cover their costs?

If an institution wants to promote a success story, it should be prepared to explain the circumstances behind that success. Otherwise, it risks selling an illusion to prospective students who are already struggling to figure out how they can afford an education.

the numbers tell another story

I investigated Langara's published financial aid information.

The college acknowledges that student loans and grants are intended to supplement students' own financial resources, not replace them. Its current estimate for a typical domestic student taking a full course load is approximately $6,989 for one year of tuition, student fees and books — before rent, groceries and the other costs of living.

Langara also explains that bursaries are awarded to eligible applicants who demonstrate financial need, and that students should not count on those funds to cover tuition or books because the money is generally awarded near the end of the term.

Sources: Langara's financial aid information, student loans, and Langara bursaries.

That doesn't sound like a guaranteed, easy, free ride to me.

And it certainly wasn't my experience.

who gets left behind?

Students are routinely encouraged to pursue higher education as a pathway to a better future. They are told to invest in themselves, build their skills and work toward their dreams.

But what happens when the investment means years of debt?

What happens when the bursary you receive barely makes a dent in the cost of your education?

What happens when you do everything you're supposed to do, yet still leave school owing thousands of dollars?

Not every student has family money, a partner paying the bills, savings in the bank or the luxury of concentrating on school without worrying about survival.

Some students are working while studying. Some are supporting children. Some are struggling to afford housing and food. Some have no financial safety net whatsoever.

These students deserve more than a polished promotional video suggesting that the solution is simply to apply for bursaries.

They deserve honest information about the odds, the eligibility requirements, the amounts available and the financial risks.

langara, answer the questions

If this advertisement is intended to inspire future students, I would like to know:

  • How much financial assistance did this particular student receive, and from which sources?
  • What proportion of applicants receive bursaries, and what is the typical amount awarded?
  • How many students receive enough grants and bursaries to cover their full education costs, including living expenses?
  • What information does Langara provide to students whose financial assistance falls far short of their actual needs?
  • Does the college acknowledge that a success story about studying for free can create unrealistic expectations when presented without financial context?

I'm not asking Langara to stop celebrating students who succeed. I'm asking it to be honest about what those stories represent.

education should open doors, not disguise the cost of walking through them

My experience at Langara left me with $22,000 in student loans and $500 in bursaries.

That is my reality. It is not necessarily every student's reality, but it is a reality that deserves to be heard alongside the feel-good stories.

Education can change lives. I believe in learning, creativity and giving people opportunities to build a better future.

But opportunity without financial transparency is not enough.

If a college wants to advertise that someone went to university for free, show us the full picture. Explain how it happened. Tell prospective students what assistance is available, who qualifies and what they may still owe.

Don't sell students the dream of a free education without being honest about the price.

And don't confuse one person's exceptional circumstances with a system that works for everyone.

I know what my education cost me.

What I want to know is why the story being advertised makes it sound so easy.

This post reflects my personal experience and questions raised by Langara's published financial aid information. I have not independently verified the student's individual funding or the full circumstances behind the advertisement.

Friday, October 16, 2026

modern carol: a tale of two aunts

 

a modern carol: a tale of two aunts

Originally written November 28, 2024

Chapter 1: The bitter rich

Victoria Parker sipped her designer bourbon in a penthouse overlooking the city skyline. She had recently returned from her annual trip to New York, her luggage filled with Broadway programs and luxury purchases.

A successful businesswoman, Victoria prided herself on her hard work. She believed that determination was the key to success and often reminded others that anyone could get ahead if they simply tried hard enough.

“Everyone has to work hard,” she would say. “If you want something, you have to earn it.”

She was particularly fond of offering this advice to her Aunt Margie, who still lived in the family's aging farmhouse, struggling to make ends meet.

Victoria's teenage twins sometimes listened to these lectures, although they were usually more interested in their phones. They barely knew their cousin Emily, Margie's daughter, who had left home at seventeen, determined to escape the suffocating poverty of their small town.

Emily had worked tirelessly, including through the pandemic, hoping to build a better future and attend college. But hard work alone hadn't been enough. There was never quite enough money, never quite enough security, and every setback pushed her dreams a little further away.

The family history was complicated. Victoria's parents, Carol and Richard, had acquired the family home decades earlier under circumstances Margie considered deeply unfair. What one side of the family called an inheritance, the other remembered as a betrayal.

Carol and Richard now spent much of their time travelling the world on cruise ships. Whenever Margie mentioned her financial struggles, they reminded her that there were always jobs available for those willing to look.

Margie's sister Linda was somewhat more comfortable, thanks to a modest inheritance from her late husband. But she, too, struggled with the difficult balance between helping her family and protecting her own financial security.

The family remained connected by blood, Christmas cards, and occasional obligatory gifts. What had disappeared was the feeling that they were responsible for one another.

It was Christmas Eve when Victoria finished wrapping the customary cheques she sent to Margie and Linda. Outside, the city glittered with holiday lights.

Then the lights flickered.

The room grew cold.

And somewhere in the silence, a voice called her name.

Chapter 2: The ghost of Christmas past

A golden glow filled the room. From its centre emerged an ethereal figure: a young girl clutching a battered teddy bear.

“Who are you?” Victoria demanded.

“I am the Ghost of Christmas Past,” the girl replied. “Come with me. There are things you have forgotten.”

Before Victoria could protest, the room dissolved around her.

They stood in her grandmother's old farmhouse. The kitchen smelled of cinnamon and freshly baked cookies. Laughter drifted through the rooms, and the Christmas tree leaned slightly to one side, decorated with handmade ornaments.

Little Margie was baking beside their grandmother. Young Victoria sat on her grandmother's lap, listening to a story.

“Your grandmother loved you both,” the ghost said. “She never measured that love by money, achievement, or possessions.”

Victoria watched herself laugh as her grandmother kissed the top of her head.

Then the scene changed.

She saw the family gathered around a table, voices raised, faces tight with anger. The dispute over the farmhouse had torn through the family. Margie stood in tears while Victoria's parents insisted they had every right to what they had taken.

Young Victoria watched from the doorway, frightened and confused.

“Do you remember?” the ghost asked.

Victoria looked away.

She remembered the arguments. She remembered Margie's tears. She remembered feeling that something wasn't right.

But she had been young, and the adults had told her not to interfere. Over time, silence became easier than asking questions.

“People tell themselves stories to live with what they have,” the ghost said. “Sometimes those stories become more important than the truth.”

The farmhouse faded.

Victoria was left wondering how much of her success had been built on a history she had never wanted to examine.

Chapter 3: The ghost of Christmas present

A second spirit appeared, a large, warm figure draped in green.

“I am the Ghost of Christmas Present. Let us see what your world looks like today.”

They arrived at Margie's farmhouse.

The kitchen was small and drafty. The walls needed repair, and the heating struggled against the winter cold. Margie and Emily were preparing Christmas dinner with what they could afford.

Their meal was simple, but they laughed as they worked. Emily told her mother about a course she hoped to take. Margie listened carefully, offering encouragement even though she had no idea how they would pay for it.

Victoria watched them stretch every dollar, make do with what they had, and find moments of happiness despite their circumstances.

“Why don't they simply move somewhere better?” Victoria asked.

The ghost turned toward her.

“With what money? And where would they go? Do you imagine that everyone has the choices you have?”

Victoria had no answer.

Next, they visited Linda. She sat alone at her kitchen table, looking over her bills. She wanted to help Margie, but her own savings were limited. She had spent years feeling guilty that she couldn't do more.

The ghost showed Victoria something else: a series of unanswered messages, conversations that never happened, and invitations that stopped coming.

Sometimes the family had offered money instead of companionship. Sometimes they had offered advice instead of listening. Sometimes they had done nothing at all.

Then they visited Victoria's home.

Her twins were scrolling through social media, looking at photographs of expensive holidays and glamorous destinations.

“Why does Aunt Margie even send Christmas cards?” one remarked. “It's so lame.”

The other laughed.

Victoria felt a sudden sting of shame.

She had taught them about success, ambition, and achievement. She had taught them how to recognise the appearance of wealth.

But had she taught them how to recognise another person's suffering?

“Your children have learned from what you do,” the ghost said. “Not merely from what you tell them.”

Victoria watched her twins return to their screens, unaware of the lives unfolding beyond their comfortable world.

For the first time, she wondered whether her own indifference had become a family inheritance.

Chapter 4: The ghost of Christmas yet to come

The final ghost appeared without a word.

Its face was hidden beneath a dark hood. It extended one hand, and Victoria followed.

They stood in a quiet cemetery.

Before them was a gravestone bearing Margie's name.

Victoria stared at it, unable to speak.

The scene shifted. Emily stood at her mother's funeral, grief etched across her face. The gathering was small. Years of distance had left the family with little to say and even fewer reasons to come together.

Victoria reached toward her cousin, but the vision moved on.

She saw her twins as adults. They had become successful in their own ways, but their relationships were fractured. Old resentments had hardened into lifelong habits. They competed with one another, kept score, and rarely spoke unless there was something to gain.

Victoria watched them turn away from her, too.

“Is this what will happen?” she whispered.

The ghost remained silent.

Another scene emerged.

Emily, older now, stood outside a modest home surrounded by flowers. She held a diploma in her hands. Her life had not been easy, but she had built something of her own through perseverance, friendship, and help from people who had chosen to care.

Victoria wanted to believe this was the future she could create for her family.

But the ghost showed her something else: Emily's life continuing without her, Margie's memory fading from family conversations, and the farmhouse standing empty.

Victoria understood that she could not command the future. She could not undo every injustice, guarantee forgiveness, or purchase back the years that had passed.

She could only decide what to do with the time she had left.

“No,” she cried. “Please. I can change. I can do something.”

The shadow raised its hand.

Then everything disappeared.

Chapter 5: A different kind of Christmas

Victoria woke in her own bed.

Morning light spilled through the windows. For a moment, she lay still, uncertain whether the night's visions had been dreams or warnings.

Then she reached for her phone.

There were messages she had never answered, conversations she had avoided, and family photographs she had looked at without really seeing the people in them.

She began making calls.

First, she contacted a lawyer to review the history of the family farmhouse. She would not pretend that a phone call could settle years of disputed claims, but she was finally willing to examine the facts and pursue a fair resolution.

Next, she called Margie.

There was a long silence after Victoria said hello.

“I owe you an apology,” she began. “I've spent years telling you how to live without understanding what your life has actually been like. I've judged you when I should have listened.”

Margie said nothing for a moment.

Victoria resisted the urge to fill the silence with explanations.

“I don't expect you to forgive me today,” she continued. “But I want to do better. If you'll let me, I'd like to start by asking what you need.”

It was the first time in years that she had asked without already deciding what the answer should be.

She also contacted Emily. Together, they discussed realistic ways to support her education, including a commitment to contribute toward tuition and other expenses.

Victoria reached out to Linda, too. Rather than making promises on behalf of the family, she asked how they might work together without placing the entire burden on one person.

That afternoon, Victoria drove to Margie's farmhouse.

She brought groceries, a small Christmas tree, and an envelope containing money for immediate expenses. But she understood that these gestures were only a beginning.

“I can't change what happened,” she told Margie. “And I know a gift doesn't make everything right. I want to show you that I'm serious.”

Margie accepted the gifts, but she did not suddenly forget the past. Emily remained cautious. Trust, Victoria realised, was not something she could demand simply because she had finally decided to offer it.

They sat together at the kitchen table.

They talked about their grandmother, the farmhouse, the years of silence, and the things they wished had been different.

There were tears. There were uncomfortable moments. There was no magical solution.

But for the first time in a long while, they were speaking honestly.

Victoria's life began to change, not because she gave away her wealth or abandoned everything she had achieved, but because she stopped treating success as proof that she had done everything right.

She began examining the assumptions she had passed on to her children. She learned that hardship was not always the result of poor choices, that opportunity was not distributed equally, and that generosity meant more than writing a cheque at Christmas.

Her twins did not transform overnight, either. They resisted some of the conversations and questioned some of their mother's decisions. But they began to understand that the world beyond their comfortable lives was not a distant abstraction. It was made up of people they knew, people they had overlooked, and people whose stories deserved to be heard.

As for Victoria, she discovered that the most meaningful measure of her life was not the size of her home, the places she had travelled, or the things she could afford.

It was whether she had used what she possessed to make life a little less difficult for someone else.

Christmas came and went. The family still had problems to resolve, and not every wound healed.

But a door had opened.

And Victoria finally understood that the greatest poverty in a family is not always a lack of money.

Sometimes, it is a lack of compassion.


Reflection questions

  1. What did Victoria learn about the difference between working hard and having equal opportunities?

  2. How can family history, inherited wealth, and unresolved injustice shape relationships across generations?

  3. What is the difference between giving money and offering meaningful support?

  4. Can reconciliation happen without accountability? What might rebuilding trust require?

  5. How do social status and material possessions influence the way we judge other people's lives?

  6. What responsibilities, if any, do people with greater resources have toward struggling family members and their wider communities?

  7. If the Ghosts of Christmas Past, Present, and Yet to Come visited you, what might they ask you to reconsider?

A final thought: We cannot change every circumstance into which we are born. But we can question the stories that justify indifference, acknowledge the advantages we have received, and choose not to look away when someone needs help.

marguerite brulé, née sook

 

marguerite brulé, née sook: finding the woman behind the family records

historical and genealogical preservation note

This post is shared for family-history, genealogical, educational, and historical preservation purposes. It draws on a published local history and historical records referenced within that publication. Historical terminology is retained where necessary to represent the original sources accurately. Some relationships and dates remain under investigation, and interpretations may change as additional evidence is found. Original sources are credited for further research.

a name that brought the pieces together

Sometimes genealogy is not about finding a new name. It is about finally understanding how the names you already know belong together.

For years, I have been researching my family history across the Pacific Northwest: T’Sou-ke, Iroquois, Kalapuya, French Canadian, the fur trade, the Oregon Country, and Vancouver Island.

I had already been writing about Mary Ann Brulé Voutrin, her testimony about her parents, and the church records that document her family.

But there was another woman whose story deserved its own place in my research.

Marguerite Brulé, née Sook of T’Sou-ke.

I found her story in The Sooke Story – The History and The Heartbeat, published by the Sooke Region Museum in 1999. Reading the account again brought together several details I had encountered in my research but had not fully connected.

Here was Marguerite in the historical record, not simply as somebody's mother or wife, but as a woman associated with the T’Sou-ke community and remembered in local oral history.

a marriage recorded in 1838

The book reproduces a Catholic marriage entry dated 11 February 1838 at Fort Vancouver.

It records the marriage of Jean Baptiste Brulé, a French Canadian engagé, and Marguerite, identified in the record as Sook by nation.

The entry also mentions Joseph, aged seven, whom Marguerite acknowledged as her legitimate child from an earlier marriage.

That detail is important because another marriage record, from the Willamette Valley in 1848, identifies Joseph Brulé as the son of the late Jacques Iroquois and Marguerite Brulé.

The records therefore give us a family connection spanning two marriages and two regions. Jean Baptiste Brulé became part of Joseph's family, while the earlier record identifies Jacques Iroquois as Joseph's biological father.

These distinctions matter. Historical relationships can be complicated, and the records do not always use family terminology in the same way we might today.

a family travelling north

According to the Sooke Region Museum's account, the Brulé family travelled north around 1850 with other Hudson's Bay Company employees and their families.

The group included Jean Baptiste and Marguerite, Joseph and his wife Mary Ann, and their children.

The account places them on Vancouver Island near the T’Sou-ke village along the Sooke River. It describes a developing community of interconnected First Nations and French Canadian families, including the Brulés, Josephs, Armours, Jolibois, and Poiriers.

These were families living through a period of profound change. The fur trade connected people across enormous distances, while emerging colonial boundaries increasingly divided territories that families had long travelled through.

Their lives cannot be understood through modern borders alone.

They married, raised children, maintained relationships, and established communities in a changing world.

remembered for the bone game

One detail in the book stopped me.

The account preserves a recollection attributed to Queesto, Chief Charlie Jones of the Pacheedaht, who described Marguerite visiting the village with a deerskin and the pieces used for the traditional bone game.

The recollection portrays her playing with women in the community and being known for her skill.

This is a different kind of historical evidence from a baptism or marriage entry. It is a memory passed down through people who knew the community and its traditions.

It gives us a glimpse of Marguerite participating in social and cultural life rather than appearing only in records created by colonial institutions.

I was especially interested in this passage because my carving instructor had once spoken about someone who was particularly skilled at the bone game. I do not yet know whether the person my instructor described was Marguerite. That connection remains a question for further research, but it is another lead I want to follow.

The account in the 1999 book deserves to be preserved and read in its original context, alongside the voices and knowledge of the communities whose traditions it describes.

what the census tells us

The book reports that the 1881 federal census listed Marguerite, or Margaret Brulé, as 90 years old.

If that reported age is accurate, it suggests she lived through decades of enormous change in the Pacific Northwest. However, ages in historical records can be approximate, so the original census entry should be consulted before using it to calculate a birth year.

The book also describes a family burial place on a rise overlooking the Sooke River.

That description is another lead for historical research, although the precise location and present condition of the burial place require independent confirmation.

more than a name in a family tree

I have spent years trying to understand the people who came before me.

I have found church records, family testimony, changing spellings, different descriptions of ancestry, and clues scattered across the Pacific Northwest.

Mary Ann's testimony helps illuminate her parents and childhood. Joseph's marriage record connects him to Marguerite and Jacques Iroquois. The Sooke history places Marguerite within a T’Sou-ke community and preserves a recollection of her participation in the bone game.

No single source answers every question.

Together, however, they provide a stronger starting point for further research.

I also want to be careful about the words used to describe these families. My family research includes people who identified, or were described, in different ways, including Métis, Iroquois, Kalapuya, and T’Sou-ke connections. Those terms have distinct histories and meanings. A historical label in one record does not automatically settle every question about a person's identity, ancestry, or community belonging.

The task is to preserve what the evidence says, listen to family and community knowledge, and remain honest about what we have yet to establish.

Marguerite deserves more than a passing mention in somebody else's story.

She deserves to be remembered as a person whose life connected families, communities, and histories that are still being pieced together today.

And I am still following the trail.

original source

The Sooke Story – The History and The Heartbeat.

Sooke Region Museum, limited first edition, copyright 1999.

ISBN 0-9694942-2-X.

Relevant pages: 40–42, 54–55, and 59.

The book's notes reference Catholic Church records of the Pacific Northwest, including the Fort Vancouver marriage entry and the St. Paul marriage entry, as well as British Columbia land registry records and historical notes attributed to Chris Baker of the Juan de Fuca Historical Society.

This post summarizes and discusses the published account rather than reproducing it in full. Readers are encouraged to consult the original publication and underlying records.


They experienced the loss of old political and social systems and the emergence of new ones.

And they carried their families forward.

That is my history.

Not a simple category.

Not a neat little box.

A tangled, complicated Pacific Northwest story.

T’Sou-ke. Iroquois. Kalapuya. French Canadian. Fur trade. Oregon Country. Vancouver Island.

And me.

Still trying to learn what happened to the people who came before me.

Because the more I learn, the more I realize:

They weren't living on the margins of history.

They were living through history.

Thursday, October 15, 2026

the things we forget: what people have been through

 ***content warning & support resources-See below



the things we forget: what people have been through

We talk about homelessness, addiction, poverty, and people who seem to have given up. But how often do we stop and remember everything that happened before someone reached that point?

People don't all begin in the same place, and they don't all have the same support when life falls apart.

Here are some of the challenges people have faced, especially over the last several years.

1. the pandemic years

  • Losing jobs, contracts, businesses, and livelihoods.
  • Losing homes because the income needed to keep them disappeared.
  • Being separated from family and friends.
  • Living with isolation, fear, uncertainty, and grief.
  • Facing travel restrictions, testing expenses, quarantine requirements, and lost time.
  • Having relationships damaged by disagreements over vaccination and public-health rules.
  • Trying to rebuild a life after the emergency measures ended, often without the resources to do so.

Some people, including me, experienced quarantine twice. I spent 30 days in quarantine, wasn't sick, and had to pay for tests before I could return home. Those were real days out of my life, and the experience stayed with me.

Canada's travel rules changed repeatedly throughout the pandemic. For some travellers, testing and quarantine requirements were substantial burdens. Official Canadian border-measures timeline.

2. losing a home

  • Rents rising beyond what ordinary people can afford.
  • Losing a job and then losing the home that depended on it.
  • Being unable to save enough for a damage deposit, first month's rent, or moving expenses.
  • Having to rely on friends and family, sometimes at the cost of independence.
  • Being told to share a home when privacy and personal safety matter deeply.
  • Living with strangers, noise, conflict, insecurity, and the constant worry about belongings.
  • Being offered shelter options that don't feel safe or suitable.
  • Spending money on storage because there is nowhere permanent to put your possessions.
  • Having no car, no stable address, and limited income while trying to navigate an expensive city.

Homelessness isn't always sleeping outside. Sometimes it means sleeping on somebody's couch, watching the calendar, trying not to outstay your welcome, and wondering where you'll go next.

3. poverty that keeps taking

  • Living on an income that barely covers food, transportation, telephone bills, and storage.
  • Having to choose which bill can wait.
  • Losing money to debts, deductions, or benefit repayments.
  • Being unable to afford the upfront costs that might help you escape poverty.
  • Having to explain your circumstances repeatedly to people who assume you simply haven't tried hard enough.
  • Being unable to afford the things that make life feel ordinary: a private room, a quiet night, a decent meal, or a little breathing room.
  • Watching an unexpected $100 expense become a crisis.

When you have very little, a small financial setback can have enormous consequences. What looks minor to one person can mean groceries for another.

4. family, friendship, and belonging

  • Estrangement from children, parents, siblings, and lifelong friends.
  • Losing relationships during the pandemic and never finding a way back.
  • Being judged for being poor, unhoused, unemployed, or struggling.
  • Depending on someone who later withdraws their help.
  • Feeling unwelcome in the very places where you hoped to find safety.
  • Carrying grief without having anyone you feel comfortable talking to.
  • Watching friends age, become ill, struggle with addiction, or die.
  • Being surrounded by people and still feeling profoundly alone.

A person can have family and still have nowhere they feel they belong.

5. the daily exhaustion people don't see

  • Poor sleep because the environment is noisy, crowded, or unpredictable.
  • Worrying about personal safety while sleeping.
  • Having no secure place to keep a phone, money, identification, or a computer.
  • Struggling to eat properly or prepare food safely.
  • Living with chronic stress while trying to manage ordinary tasks.
  • Being physically exhausted from work that is difficult, poorly paid, or insecure.
  • Having health concerns without reliable access to care.
  • Being expected to make good long-term decisions while dealing with immediate survival needs.

Peace and privacy aren't luxuries for everyone. Sometimes they are what allow a person to recover enough to keep going.

6. young people growing up in a world of loss

Think about the young people in Vancouver who have lost friends to the toxic drug supply.

Some have lost a parent. Some have attended funerals for friends they thought would grow old beside them. Some have watched people they love struggle with addiction, homelessness, trauma, or mental illness.

They are left with grief, unanswered questions, and the knowledge that another phone call could bring more terrible news.

British Columbia recorded 2,253 deaths from unregulated drug toxicity in 2024. Preliminary reporting for 2025 later recorded 1,826 deaths. Even with that decrease, thousands of families, friends, and communities have been affected. BC Coroners Service, 2024 data and 2025 data.

Behind every number was a person. Someone had a favourite song, a laugh, a history, and people who cared about them.

7. why might someone turn to drugs, or feel like checking out?

There is no single explanation, and we should never assume we know an individual's story.

But people may use substances to cope with physical pain, trauma, grief, loneliness, mental distress, or circumstances that feel unbearable. Some are trying to quiet their thoughts for a little while. Some are trying to feel something other than pain. Some are dealing with dependence that has become very difficult to manage.

Others may reach a point where they cannot imagine how their circumstances could change.

That doesn't mean every person who uses drugs wants to die. It doesn't mean poverty inevitably leads to addiction. And it doesn't mean we should give up on anyone.

It means we need to look beyond the behaviour and ask what is happening in that person's life.

And fentanyl makes an already dangerous situation far deadlier. In an unregulated drug supply, people may not know exactly what they are taking or how potent it is.

Understanding someone's pain is not the same as accepting that they should be left to suffer.

8. what happens when society stops seeing people?

We start describing people as burdens, addicts, failures, freeloaders, or lost causes.

We ask why they don't work harder, move somewhere cheaper, find a room, reconcile with their family, or simply make better choices.

But what if they have already tried?

What if they are exhausted? What if their family is gone? What if every affordable room requires sharing with strangers? What if they cannot afford to move? What if they have been trying for years?

What if the person standing in front of us is not someone who never tried, but someone who has run out of options?

We cannot know without listening.

9. what we need to remember

  • Housing is stability, not just a roof.
  • Food security is dignity, not a reward for being productive.
  • Privacy and safety matter.
  • Grief can change a person's life for years.
  • Addiction is not a complete description of a human being.
  • Poverty is not proof of laziness.
  • A person can be struggling without being incapable.
  • People need support before a crisis becomes a catastrophe.
  • Young people need hope, connection, and places where they are wanted.
  • Saving lives requires more than counting deaths after they happen.

We cannot bring back everyone who has died. But we can stop treating the people who remain as if their suffering is an inconvenience.

the question we should be asking

I think about how many people have lost their footing since 2019. I think about people who once worked, paid rent, raised children, made art, travelled, and had plans for their future.

Then something happened. Sometimes several things happened, one after another.

And now they are expected to explain why they haven't recovered.

Perhaps we should ask a different question.

What happened to you? What have you lost? What are you carrying? And what would help you feel safe enough to begin again?

We cannot undo every injustice. We cannot promise that life will be fair. But we can listen without humiliating people, offer help without demanding that they prove their worth, and make sure our neighbours know they have not become invisible.

Because the people we call homeless, addicted, broken, or lost are still people.

They are somebody's child, somebody's friend, somebody's parent. They are people who have lived through things we may never fully understand.

And they are still here.

Let's remember that.


**

content warning & support resources


Trigger warning: This article discusses homelessness, poverty, grief, addiction, the toxic drug supply, overdose deaths, and thoughts of suicide. Some of these subjects may be painful for readers who have experienced loss, trauma, or difficult circumstances themselves. Please take care of yourself while reading, and step away if you need to.


This article is intended to encourage understanding, compassion, and discussion. It is not intended to diagnose, judge, or diminish anyone's personal experience.


If you or someone you know is struggling, support is available:


- Canada Suicide Crisis Helpline: Call or text 988, free, 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

- BC Mental Health Support Line: Call 310-6789 (no area code required), 24 hours a day.

- Crisis Centre BC: Visit "crisiscentre.bc.ca" (https://crisiscentre.bc.ca/) for support and resources.

- Immediate danger: Call 911.


If you are grieving someone who has died, struggling with substance use, or simply finding life difficult to manage, you deserve compassion and support. You do not have to wait until things become unbearable to reach out.


Please remember: behind every statistic is a human life, and behind every loss are people who continue to grieve. Let's talk about these realities with care, respect, and kindness.

THE DAY

 

THE DAY

eat the rich now

It started like any other day.

The sun was shining. Dogs barked behind garden fences. Children hurried past with their parents, backpacks bouncing, shoes untied, breakfast still clinging to the corners of their mouths. Buses sighed at the curb. Coffee machines hissed. Somewhere, a radio played an old love song.

And then the newspapers arrived.

It was the headline that turned heads.

EAT THE RICH.

Three words.

No explanation. No byline. No photograph.

Just those three words, printed in enormous black letters across the front page of every major newspaper in the country.

People stopped walking.

A man lowered his coffee cup. A woman standing at a bus stop slowly unfolded her paper, then unfolded it again, as though a different message might appear beneath the first.

Someone laughed.

Someone else said, "What the hell?"

By nine o'clock, the headline was everywhere.

On television screens. On phones. Across digital billboards that had advertised luxury watches and investment opportunities only minutes earlier.

The stock market stumbled.

The news anchors smiled nervously.

The government called an emergency meeting.

And somewhere in a glass tower overlooking the city, a billionaire locked his office door.

Because he had seen something the others hadn't.

There was a photograph on the back page of his newspaper.

It showed a dining room.

A long table. White linen. Silver cutlery. Twelve empty chairs.

At the far end sat a thirteenth chair.

And on the plate in front of it was a human tooth.


By noon, the first rumours had begun.

A technology mogul had disappeared from his private island. A property developer had been found hiding in a maintenance room beneath one of his own apartment towers. An investment banker had abandoned his car in the middle of a highway and run barefoot into the woods.

The stories grew stranger by the hour.

A video appeared online showing a crowd outside an exclusive restaurant. The windows were blacked out. Something scraped against the glass from the inside.

Then came the screaming.

The video ended.

Nobody knew who had filmed it.

Nobody knew what had happened inside.

But by evening, the internet was filling with photographs that no one could explain.

A dinner plate on a velvet cushion.

A pair of expensive shoes beside a drain.

A handwritten menu featuring the names of people who, according to the news, were still alive.

The authorities called the images fabricated.

The platforms began deleting them.

That only made them spread faster.

And beneath every image, beneath every rumour, beneath every shaky recording uploaded in the middle of the night, appeared the same three words.

EAT THE RICH.

People began to panic.

Some cheered. Some prayed. Some bought weapons and barricaded their doors. Others stood in the streets holding cardboard signs, unable to decide whether they were witnessing a revolution or the beginning of something far older.

The billionaires hired security.

They moved their families into bunkers.

They turned off their phones.

But the strange thing was this: the people disappearing weren't always the richest.

They were the ones who had become famous for believing themselves untouchable.

The ones whose names appeared in court documents, leaked messages, private flight logs.

The ones who had laughed when asked how ordinary people were supposed to afford a place to live.

One by one, their photographs appeared on the front pages.

Then their names disappeared from the news.

Then their photographs disappeared.

And finally, people began to notice that the stories were no longer about missing men and women.

They were about empty chairs.


Sarah had been reading for nearly an hour when she reached the chapter titled The First Supper.

She had picked up the book at a secondhand shop. No author was listed. No publisher. The cover was plain black, with three words embossed in a dull, metallic red.

EAT THE RICH NOW.

She'd thought it was satire.

A strange little underground novel. Something written by an angry person with too much time on their hands.

But the details were unsettling.

The dates.

The locations.

The names.

Some of them were real.

She turned the page.

A photograph had been printed between two chapters. It showed a banquet room, with a chandelier shaped like a crown hanging above a table set for twenty.

Sarah frowned.

She knew that room.

She had seen it on the news last week, in a story about a private gathering of the world's wealthiest investors.

Only the photograph in the book was different.

There were twenty place settings.

Twenty silver plates.

And at the head of the table, a single black napkin folded into the shape of an open mouth.

Sarah felt a cold sensation creep up her spine.

She turned the page.

A list of names.

She recognized the first one.

Then the second.

The third belonged to a man who had vanished two nights earlier. His family had released a statement saying he was taking time away from public life.

The fourth had died in a private hospital, according to an announcement that had been quietly removed from the internet.

Beside each name was a date.

And beside each date, written in red ink, was a single word.

SERVED.

Sarah's hands began to tremble.

She flipped ahead, faster now, pages whispering beneath her fingers.

There were photographs of dining rooms, private jets, underground garages.

There were transcripts of conversations that had never been made public.

There were descriptions of things she couldn't quite bring herself to read.

And then she reached the final page.

It contained a single paragraph.

You laughed when you first heard the rumours. Everyone did. You thought it was a joke, a metaphor, a slogan printed on a protest sign. You thought the world was too civilized for such things.

Below it was a line of text.

Civilization is a very thin tablecloth.

Sarah stared at the words.

Her mouth went dry.

Outside, a dog began barking.

Then another.

Then all the dogs on the street seemed to erupt at once.

Her phone vibrated on the table.

A breaking-news alert.

She looked down.

BILLIONAIRE REPORTED MISSING — POLICE INVESTIGATE UNUSUAL SCENE.

A second alert appeared.

Then a third.

Sarah stood so quickly that the chair toppled behind her.

She remembered the rumours now. The jokes people had made. The strange posts that appeared and vanished. The stories about private kitchens and locked rooms, about people who had paid fortunes to keep certain things quiet.

She had laughed at those stories.

She had told her friends they were ridiculous.

The room seemed to tilt.

She looked back at the book.

The final page had changed.

Or perhaps she simply hadn't noticed the words at the bottom before.

A sentence had been written beneath the paragraph, in the same red ink.

SARAH WILL READ THIS AT 8:17 P.M.

She checked the clock.

8:17.

Her face went white.

The book slid from her fingers.

She stumbled toward the bathroom, barely making it to the sink before she began to vomit.

When she finally raised her head, she saw her reflection in the mirror.

Behind her, on the open book, another line had appeared.

She has finished the first chapter.

And somewhere downstairs, the front door opened.

Sarah stopped breathing.

A voice called her name.

It sounded almost friendly.

Then came the soft, unmistakable scrape of a chair being pulled out at the dining table.

And a voice she had never heard before whispered:

"Whose hungry?"

Wednesday, October 14, 2026

David Eby: Two Chances, Broken Promises and a Housing Crisis That Won't Go Away

David Eby: Two Chances, Broken Promises and a Housing Crisis That Won't Go Away

Housing, groceries and the promises British Columbians are still waiting to see fulfilled.

Dear David Eby,

How many chances does a premier get?

You became premier in 2022, and British Columbians gave your government another mandate in 2024. You had time to understand the housing crisis, the cost of groceries, the growing number of people living without homes, and the struggles of ordinary people just trying to survive.

Yet here we are, still asking the same questions.

Where are the results for the people who need help the most?

1. The $1,000 household relief promise

During the 2024 election campaign, you promised a household tax break worth more than $1,000 for an average family, with relief beginning in 2025. You connected that promise to the cost of groceries and everyday essentials.

The original plan for immediate relief was subsequently shelved. Families who were counting on that form of help did not receive the promised payment as originally advertised.

A campaign promise is not the same as money in people's pockets.

Source: BC NDP: David Eby announces household relief

2. 300,000 homes: Where are the affordable options?

In October 2024, Eby announced a plan to unlock 300,000 middle-class homes over the next decade.

But a target is not a completed home, and a completed home is not necessarily an affordable home.

People need to know how many homes have actually been completed, how many are available at rents ordinary people can afford, and how many are within reach of people living on pensions or very low incomes.

There have also been questions about the delivery timeline for the government's proposed first-time buyer financing program, which was intended to support 25,000 homes annually.

Where is the clear public accounting showing whether these promises are reaching the people who need help most?

Source: The Tyee: Eby made promises that connected. What happened to them?

3. Affordable housing put on hold

In July 2026, The Tyee reported that at least 3,500 affordable homes across 25 Metro Vancouver projects were affected by provincial funding decisions.

The reported breakdown included 486 homes cancelled, 1,484 paused and 1,533 left in limbo.

These categories matter. Not every affected home was cancelled, but thousands of homes faced uncertainty.

For someone who already has a home, a delayed development might sound like a bureaucratic problem.

For someone sleeping outside, couch-surfing or watching their last affordable rental disappear, it can mean another year of uncertainty.

How can we talk about solving homelessness while affordable housing projects are being cancelled, paused or left waiting for funding?

Source: The Tyee: BC set to lose 3,500 affordable homes because of budget cuts

4. Building homes is not enough

The province has introduced zoning reforms, supported housing construction and funded projects. Those actions should be acknowledged.

But the housing crisis cannot be measured only by how many homes are announced or how many developments are underway.

We also need to ask:

  • How many homes are affordable to people living on disability assistance, pensions or very low incomes?
  • How many supportive and non-market homes have actually opened?
  • How many people remain homeless while waiting?
  • What happens to people who cannot afford market rent and do not qualify for middle-income programs?

A new condo does not automatically become a home for someone living on a few hundred dollars a month.

People need housing they can actually afford, not simply assurances that more housing is coming.

5. Grocery relief: Promises versus reality

In 2024, Eby promised a household tax break to help with everyday expenses. The original plan for immediate relief was subsequently shelved.

Now the BC NDP is promoting proposed measures to tackle grocery prices through competition and limits on profits on basic food items.

Those are different approaches, but neither should be confused with a guaranteed $1,000 payment to every family.

Competition may help reduce prices over time, but people need affordable groceries today.

When a government makes a specific financial promise during an election, voters deserve a clear explanation of what happened to it.

6. What about the people falling through the cracks?

What about people who have been unhoused for years?

What about older people who have worked, raised children, contributed to their communities and now cannot afford a room of their own?

What about people living on small pensions who cannot afford today's rents, never mind save for a down payment?

What about those who need a safe, independent place to live rather than an overcrowded shelter or a housing arrangement that does not suit their needs?

Where is the urgency for them?

Housing policy must include people at the bottom of the income scale, not just first-time buyers, middle-income households and people who can afford market rentals.

A government cannot declare success while people are still being left behind.

7. Two chances. What happens now?

David Eby, you have had two opportunities to lead this province through a housing crisis that has been building for years. Your government has introduced policies and built housing, but important promises have been delayed, changed or left without clear delivery timelines.

British Columbians deserve a straightforward accounting of what was promised, what was delivered, what was cancelled and what remains unfinished.

Not another glossy announcement. Not another list of future intentions.

Actual results.

And this is not just about one premier or one political party. Vancouver Mayor Ken Sim and municipal leaders must also answer for the decisions within their own responsibilities. Housing is a shared responsibility, and passing the blame between levels of government does not give anyone a place to live.

I want to see politicians held accountable for their records, not simply rewarded for making new promises.

If two opportunities to deliver meaningful change have not been enough, voters are entitled to ask whether they want to give the same leadership another chance.

Because a home is not a luxury. Food is not a luxury. Dignity is not a luxury.

They are the foundations of a decent society.

People should not have to wait indefinitely for the basics of life.

Two chances. Now show us the results.

People need homes, food and dignity. Not another election promise.

#housingcrisis #affordablehousing #homelessness #costofliving #groceryprices #housingforall #accountability #britishcolumbia #vancouver #politics



A note about sources and accuracy: I have made every effort to keep the information in this article accurate and to link to sources where possible. Figures and policy details are based on published reports and public announcements available at the time of writing. Promises, proposals, funding decisions and completed projects are not the same thing, and I have tried to distinguish between them. Readers are encouraged to consult the original sources and check for updates, as government policies and housing figures can change. The purpose of this article is to encourage transparency, accountability and an honest conversation about housing affordability and the cost of living in British Columbia.

people aren't products

 people aren't products: whatever happened to understanding one another?

Maybe we've become so focused on asking “What's wrong with this person?” that we've forgotten to ask “How does this person experience the world?”

We live in a time when there seems to be a label for everything. How we think, how we learn, how we remember, how we react to noise, how we socialize, how we grieve, how we move through the world.

Sometimes these labels are useful. They can help people understand themselves, find community, access support, and receive treatment when they need it.

But somewhere along the way, I wonder whether we've started confusing the label with the person.

when everything becomes a market

We live in an economy that finds ways to turn human needs into business opportunities.

There is money in assessments, diagnoses, prescriptions, therapies, programs, and lifelong management. Some of these services are necessary and life-changing. People deserve access to care, and nobody should be shamed for seeking help.

But we should also be willing to ask difficult questions about a society that can profit from identifying problems while investing far less in preventing suffering in the first place.

What about the loneliness that comes from being excluded? The exhaustion of living in poverty? The anxiety created by housing insecurity? The distress of watching the natural world disappear while being told to carry on as usual?

Not every struggle originates inside the individual.

Sometimes we need to look at the world we've built around them.

how did we forget to listen?

Imagine a person who notices patterns before others do. Someone who remembers conversations from decades ago. Someone who hears ordinary sounds more intensely, needs solitude to recover, or sees a situation from a perspective nobody else seems to understand.

Must we immediately decide what that person is?

Could we first ask questions?

What do they notice that others miss? What overwhelms them? What brings them peace? What have they learned through experience? What do they need from the people around them?

Human beings are complicated. Two people can experience the same moment and walk away with entirely different memories of it.

We don't all process the world in the same way. Why should we expect everyone to fit the same mould?

what can we learn from Indigenous knowledge?

Many Indigenous knowledge systems place importance on relationships, community, Elders, responsibilities, and learning through lived experience. Knowledge is not simply information to collect; it can be something carried, shared, practised, and passed between generations.

Indigenous peoples and cultures are diverse, with their own traditions and understandings of human differences. There is no single Indigenous worldview. But there is much to reflect on in approaches that emphasize relationship and responsibility rather than viewing a person in isolation.

What if we spent more time learning from one another?

What if an older person had opportunities to share what they had learned, rather than being dismissed as out of touch? What if a young person who questioned the status quo was heard rather than immediately judged? What if someone who needed a different way of living was met with curiosity instead of suspicion?

We don't have to romanticize the past to recognize that community, intergenerational knowledge, and belonging matter.

people aren't problems to be managed

I worry that we've become too comfortable treating human beings as categories to sort, statistics to measure, risks to manage, and consumers to target.

We see it in healthcare, education, housing, employment, and social media. We measure productivity. We count economic contributions. We assess whether someone fits the system.

But what happens to people who don't fit?

What happens when someone is poor, unconventional, sensitive, independent, or unwilling to follow the crowd? What happens when a person has something valuable to offer but doesn't have the credentials, money, connections, or personality that society rewards?

A person's worth should not depend on how easily they fit into an institution or how much money they generate.

And understanding someone does not mean ignoring their difficulties or refusing them help. It means seeing the whole person, not reducing them to a diagnosis, a problem, or a stereotype.

perhaps we need to recover our curiosity

I don't pretend to have all the answers. I simply wonder whether we've lost something important in our rush to explain everything.

Perhaps we need to become better listeners.

Perhaps we need to make more room for people who experience life differently.

Perhaps we need to remember that a diagnosis can describe certain characteristics or difficulties without defining an entire human being.

And perhaps we need to question an economic system that can place a price on almost anything while struggling to recognize the value of kindness, patience, wisdom, creativity, and genuine human connection.

Not everything valuable can be measured.

Not every difference needs to be corrected.

Not every struggle is an individual failure.

And not every person needs to be put into a box before we can treat them with respect.

People aren't products. They're not problems to be solved or markets to be captured. They're human beings to be understood.

Maybe a better starting point — for healthcare, for education, for our communities, and for how we treat one another — is a simple question:

How does this person experience the world?

And then, instead of rushing to answer for them, we could do something that seems increasingly rare.

We could listen.

Because understanding one another shouldn't have to be profitable to matter.

Reflective Questions

Have we become too quick to label people instead of understanding them?

Can a label help someone while still limiting how others see them?

What have we lost by placing so much value on productivity and profit?

How can we make more room for people who experience the world differently?

dear mark carney: your big ideas aren't working for vancouver

 

dear mark carney: your big ideas aren't working for vancouver

dear prime minister carney,

you talk about building a stronger canada, economic growth, investment and a future filled with opportunity. but have you looked at vancouver lately? have you looked at the people who can no longer afford to live here?

vancouver sucks.

there, i said it.

a city surrounded by breathtaking mountains, forests and ocean has become a place where ordinary people struggle to afford a roof over their heads. artists are pushed out. workers can't afford to live near their jobs. young people wonder whether they'll ever own a home. longtime residents watch their neighbourhoods change while the cost of staying keeps climbing.

and now we're hearing about more than $4 billion worth of unsold condos in vancouver — roughly 5,400 units in june.

how does this make sense?

we have people without homes and homes without buyers. we have housing treated as an investment while human beings are left wondering where they'll sleep. we have luxury developments and unaffordable rents, while people who contribute to their communities are increasingly priced out of them.

this didn't begin yesterday. vancouver's housing crisis has been building for years, through successive governments and policies that have failed to make housing affordable for enough people.

so here's my question, prime minister: when do we stop measuring success by investment dollars and start measuring it by whether people can actually afford to live in canada?

your government has presented big ideas about building homes, attracting investment and strengthening the canadian economy. but announcements aren't homes, investment isn't affordability, and economic growth means very little to someone who can't pay the rent.

we need to know whether these plans will produce homes people can afford, not simply more expensive properties or another opportunity for investors.

we also need transparency and accountability in real estate. when people see properties sitting empty, luxury businesses that appear barely active, and extraordinary wealth beside growing hardship, they ask questions. allegations of money laundering must be investigated on evidence, not rumours. financial rules must be enforced fairly, whoever the people involved happen to be.

and let's talk about displacement.

a city shouldn't become a place where only the wealthy can remain. people who have lived here for decades shouldn't feel like strangers in their own neighbourhoods. indigenous communities shouldn't have to fight endlessly for their rights and land. artists shouldn't have to abandon the places where they create. young people shouldn't have to leave their home province to find a future.

canada can welcome newcomers and still protect existing communities. those goals aren't mutually exclusive. the problem is an economic system that gives people with money far more choices than people without it.

i've watched vancouver become increasingly difficult for ordinary people to live in. i know what housing insecurity feels like. this isn't an abstract debate about market trends or economic theory. it's about dignity, stability and whether a person has a place in the world.

your big ideas must work for ordinary people, prime minister — not just look impressive on paper.

build housing people can afford. protect renters. address speculation and vacant properties. enforce financial regulations. work with provinces and municipalities to make housing a human necessity rather than simply an investment vehicle.

and publish measurable results. how many genuinely affordable homes are being delivered? how many people are able to remain in their communities? are rents becoming more manageable? are people experiencing less housing insecurity?

show us the outcomes, not just the announcements.

because people are tired. they're worried about their children, their neighbours and their own futures. they're losing faith that governments understand what life has become for those without wealth.

vancouver shouldn't be a cautionary tale about what happens when a beautiful city becomes too expensive for the people who give it life.

canada needs a future where ordinary people can afford to live, where communities remain communities, and where prosperity isn't reserved for those who already have the most.

mark carney, the question isn't whether canada can attract more money. it's whether canada can build a country where people can afford to live.

right now, too many people are still waiting for that answer.


— tina winterlik
blogger, artist, and a person who believes people should matter more than property values


5,400 unsold condos. Billions of dollars in inventory. People struggling to find homes. Dear Canada, something is seriously wrong. When will we start putting people before property values?

#VancouverHousing #HousingCrisis #AffordableHousing #HousingIsAHumanRight #MarkCarney #Canada #HousingInequality #EmptyHomes #CostOfLiving #PeopleBeforeProfit

Monday, October 12, 2026

what happens to people living in high-rise towers when disaster strikes?

 

what happens to people living in high-rise towers when disaster strikes?

I keep thinking about Vancouver, Burnaby and Surrey, and how many people live dozens of floors above the ground.

We talk about hurricanes, atmospheric rivers, flooding and extreme weather. We talk about power outages and roads becoming impassable.

But what happens when all these things happen at once?

What happens when the power goes out for days and the elevators stop working?

I have lived in a building where elevators break down regularly. One was out of service for two months before it was finally repaired, and now another is broken.

Imagine that happening during a major storm.

Think about seniors, people with disabilities, people who are ill, parents with small children, and anyone who cannot walk down dozens of flights of stairs.

How do they get food, drinking water and medication?

Who checks on them?

What happens if water pumps fail and the water supply to upper floors is disrupted?

What happens if roads are flooded, deliveries stop, emergency services are overwhelmed, and people cannot safely leave their buildings?

Where do these people go? What is the plan?

Vancouver, Burnaby and Surrey have enormous numbers of people living in apartment towers. We need to ask whether emergency planning accounts for the needs of everyone inside them, especially during prolonged power outages caused by severe weather.

This isn't about earthquakes. I'm talking about hurricanes, atmospheric rivers, flooding and destructive storms that can knock out essential services.

We have seen what happened during Hurricane Katrina. We have seen what happened during the 2021 floods in British Columbia.

We cannot assume that because someone has a roof over their head, they will be safe when disaster strikes.

I want to know what our municipalities, building managers and emergency planners are doing to prepare for these situations.

If the power goes out for a week, the elevators stop and the roads flood, who makes sure nobody is left stranded in their own home?

These are questions we should be asking now, not after the disaster.

I sincerely hope we never have to find out the hard way.


#EmergencyPreparedness #Vancouver #Burnaby #SurreyBC #ExtremeWeather #FloodPreparedness #PowerOutage #HighRiseLiving #ClimateResilience #NobodyLeftBehind

i am scared. and i think we need to pay attention

 

i am scared. and i think we need to pay attention.

I have been studying hurricanes for many years, ever since learning about Hurricane Pauline (Paulina), which devastated Mexico's Pacific coast in 1997, and the destruction it brought to places including the region around Shambhala.

My dear friend Gloria once told me about being trapped in a room during a hurricane with a young man. For hours, she had to hold the roof down with one arm because, if she let go, it threatened to blow away.

Imagine that. Holding a roof over your head while a hurricane tries to tear your world apart.

Then came Hurricane Agatha in 2022, which struck the Oaxaca coast. I watched it hit Zipolite, a place I love, and tried to warn people as the storm approached.

Then I watched the little green lights on Messenger disappear, one by one.

No power. No communication. No way of knowing who was safe.

Days of watching, waiting, wondering and worrying.

Finally, after five days, I heard from my friends. They were okay.

But the restaurant where I had painted all my murals was destroyed.

I have experienced major storms in British Columbia and in Mexico. I have watched the weather, studied the patterns and listened to people who have lived through things most of us can barely imagine.

I also watched the Spike Lee film When the Levees Broke: A Requiem in Four Acts, about Hurricane Katrina and the catastrophic failures surrounding it.

People told to evacuate without having the means to leave. People sent to shelters that could not adequately protect them. Families stranded, people dying, loved ones left behind. Communities abandoned while they waited for help.

And now I watch what is happening in Mexico and the United States, and I worry.

Because a hurricane is one thing. What happens when the power goes out, communications fail, roads flood and emergency services cannot reach people is another.

What happens when governments aren't prepared, when resources don't reach those who need them, and when vulnerable people are left to fend for themselves?

I worry about Vancouver. Are we truly prepared for a major disaster?

I remember what happened in the Fraser Valley during the November 2021 atmospheric river. Floodwaters overwhelmed communities, roads and farms. Millions of dollars in agricultural losses were reported, including devastating livestock losses. People were cut off, and supply chains were disrupted.

We have seen what extreme weather can do here, too.

And we know that climate change is increasing the risks associated with many extreme weather events, although no one can tell us exactly when or where the next catastrophe will strike.

LOOK. LEARN. PAY ATTENTION. PREPARE.

Learn what happened before. Learn from the people who survived. Ask difficult questions about evacuation plans, emergency shelters, communications, food supplies and who will help people who cannot help themselves.

Don't wait until the power goes out to wonder what you will do.

I hope I am wrong about how serious things could become. I really do.

But I have watched friends disappear from the radar during a hurricane. I have waited days to find out if people I love were alive. I have seen places I care about destroyed.

I know these things are not just headlines.

They are people's lives.

And if we repeat the failures of Katrina on a large scale, the consequences could be catastrophic.

We cannot stop every storm. But we can learn from the last one. We can prepare. And we can refuse to accept that people being abandoned is simply the way things have to be.

Please take this seriously. Look around. Ask questions. Pay attention to what is happening.

I hope I am wrong. ❤️


10 questions Vancouver and Surrey need to answer before the next big storm


I keep thinking about Hurricane Katrina, the film When the Levees Broke, and the terrible lessons we should never forget.


We have our own history here. The 1962 Columbus Day windstorm brought destructive winds to the Lower Mainland. In 2021, an atmospheric river flooded highways, isolated communities and devastated farms across British Columbia.


So I have some questions for our local governments and emergency planners.


1. If a storm like the 1962 windstorm hit Vancouver or Surrey today, how prepared are we? Are our buildings, trees, power systems and emergency services ready?


2. Where do people go when their homes become unsafe? Are there designated emergency shelters, and how will residents find out which ones are open?


3. What happens to people who have no car? How will seniors, people with disabilities, families with children and people experiencing homelessness evacuate safely?


4. What is the plan if the power goes out for days? How will people access drinking water, food, heating, medical supplies and reliable information?


5. What happens if mobile networks and internet services fail? Will emergency information be broadcast over radio, delivered door to door, or made available through other reliable methods?


6. Are Vancouver and Surrey prepared for major flooding? What happens if roads are underwater, bridges are closed, and neighbourhoods are cut off?


7. What happens to people who have nowhere else to go? Will emergency accommodation be available to people who cannot stay with friends or family? What about their pets and essential belongings?


8. How will emergency services cope if several neighbourhoods need help at once? Are there clear priorities, backup resources and plans for prolonged emergencies?


9. Who checks on the most vulnerable residents? What happens to people living alone, people who are ill, and those who cannot receive or act on emergency warnings without assistance?


10. Have we genuinely learned from Katrina and the 2021 floods? Are our emergency plans tested, publicly understood and properly resourced, or are we hoping that nothing this serious will happen here?


I am not asking these questions because I know a disaster is coming. I am asking because we cannot predict every storm, and preparation is not something we should leave until the last minute.


I have watched hurricanes hit places I love in Mexico. I have watched friends disappear offline as the power failed, waited days to hear they were safe, and seen places I cared about destroyed.


I have also watched what happened when people were left waiting for help after Katrina.


We cannot afford to assume that someone else will take care of everything when disaster strikes.


Vancouver. Surrey. British Columbia.


Where is the plan? Where do people go? And how do we make sure nobody is left behind?


I would genuinely like to hear from our emergency planners and local governments. What provisions are in place, what gaps remain, and what should residents know now?


Please look, learn, ask questions and prepare. I sincerely hope we never need these plans on a catastrophic scale. But I would rather ask these questions today than wish we had asked them yesterday.

#EmergencyPreparedness #Vancouver #SurreyBC #ExtremeWeather #StormReady #FloodPreparedness #DisasterPlanning #ClimateResilience #CommunitySafety #NobodyLeftBehind

why i love frida kahlo 💔🌺

 

FRIDA painting by Zipolita

why i love frida kahlo 💔🌺

Many people recognize Frida Kahlo’s face, her flowers, her colourful dresses and her extraordinary paintings. But how many really know what she lived through?

In 1925, Frida was involved in a devastating bus accident that left her with serious, lifelong injuries. She endured years of chronic pain, numerous operations and long periods of recovery. Painting became a way to express what words sometimes couldn't.

Her father, Guillermo Kahlo, was a German-born professional photographer. Through photography, Frida was exposed to composition, light, contrast and the art of really seeing. Those visual skills would become part of the artist she grew into.

Then there was Diego Rivera.

Their relationship was passionate, complicated and painful. Diego had numerous affairs, including one with Frida's younger sister, Cristina. Imagine that heartbreak. Betrayal by the man you loved was devastating enough, but betrayal involving your own sister must have cut even deeper.

Frida and Diego separated, divorced in 1939, and remarried in 1940. Frida also had relationships of her own, including relationships with women, at a time when being open about such things could carry serious social consequences.

But Frida was never simply Diego Rivera's wife.

She was an artist in her own right. She painted her pain, her identity, her Mexican heritage, her experiences as a woman and the complicated realities of being human. Her paintings began finding international audiences during her lifetime, although her fame grew enormously after her death in 1954.

What I love about Frida is that she didn't paint a pretty picture of life just to make other people comfortable. She painted what she knew. She made her suffering visible without allowing it to be the only thing that defined her.

She deserved tenderness. She deserved loyalty. She deserved a life with less pain.

And yet, through everything, she created art that continues to speak to people decades later.

Perhaps that's why her work means so much to so many of us. Not because suffering makes someone a great artist, but because Frida found a way to express what suffering, love, betrayal and resilience can feel like.

Frida Kahlo wasn't just a face on a canvas. She was a whole human being, with a complicated life, an extraordinary eye and a voice that still refuses to be silenced. 🌺

#FridaKahlo #WomenInArt #ArtHistory #WomenArtists #PhotographyAndArt #Resilience #MexicanArt #FridaKahloForever #ArtAndLife #WomenWhoInspire

Sunday, October 11, 2026

HEY! WHERE IS THE WARNING? CYANOTYPE IS CHEMISTRY, NOT JUST CRAFTS!

 HEY! WHERE IS THE WARNING? CYANOTYPE IS CHEMISTRY, NOT JUST CRAFTS!

I’m seeing cyanotype printing everywhere on social media lately, and as a photographer who has hand-printed hundreds of photographs, I’m concerned and frankly upset by the lack of safety information in some demonstrations.

Traditional cyanotype uses two chemicals: ferric ammonium citrate and potassium ferricyanide. These are not simply harmless art supplies. They require proper handling, storage and disposal.

I’m watching people rinse their prints with garden hoses directly onto lawns without any discussion of where the chemical runoff goes or what it might mean for the environment.

Potassium ferricyanide can release highly toxic hydrogen cyanide gas under strongly acidic conditions. Skin and eye protection, safe handling and proper disposal instructions matter.

And what happens when these kits become Christmas presents for children?

Will parents know what chemicals are in the box? Will children understand the precautions? Will leftover solutions be poured down the sink or rinsed into the garden? Will anyone explain what NOT to do?

Where are the warnings in these videos? Where is the information about chemical safety and environmental responsibility?

I’m not saying people shouldn’t enjoy cyanotype photography. I’m saying that demonstrating a chemical photographic process without discussing its risks and precautions is irresponsible.

As artists, photographers and educators, we have a duty to share the whole picture — not just the pretty blue prints.

BEAUTIFUL ART SHOULD NEVER COME AT THE EXPENSE OF INFORMED SAFETY.

#Cyanotype #ArtSafety #ChemicalSafety #EnvironmentalProtection #ResponsibleArt

Saturday, October 10, 2026

world homelessness day — october 10

 


world homelessness day — october 10

Today, October 10, is World Homeless Day, a day to bring attention to homelessness around the world and the need for safe, affordable housing for everyone.

Today is also the day of a housing march, bringing people together to raise their voices and demand change.

Homelessness is not just about sleeping on the street. It includes people couch-surfing, living in temporary accommodations, staying wherever they can find a place, and those one missed paycheque away from losing their homes.

Behind every statistic is a human being. Someone's mother, father, daughter, son, friend or neighbour. People who deserve dignity, security and a place to call home.

I've been without a permanent home since 2019. I know firsthand that housing insecurity isn't always visible. You can be resourceful, creative and determined, and still struggle to find a place you can afford.

Housing is a basic human need, not a luxury. We cannot keep treating homelessness as though it is an inevitable part of society.

Today's housing march is an opportunity to stand together, be heard and remind decision-makers that people need real solutions, not just promises.

A home should be a human right, not a privilege reserved for those who can afford it.

On World Homeless Day, let's remember those who are struggling, those who are fighting to keep a roof over their heads, and those who have been left behind.

Everyone deserves a safe place to sleep, a door they can close, and the peace of mind that comes with knowing they have a home.

#WorldHomelessDay #HousingIsAHumanRight #HousingMarch #EndHomelessness #AffordableHousing

housing is a human right — march for homes, not just promises

 

housing is a human right — march for homes, not just promises





Today, October 10, people are taking to the streets for housing. I wish we lived in a world where we didn't have to march to remind governments that everyone deserves a safe place to call home.

I've been without a permanent home since 2019. I've couch-surfed, looked after cats, cleaned houses, and done what I can to survive. I'm still trying to get by until my pension begins in February. I know firsthand that being without a home isn't a personal failure. Sometimes, life changes in ways you never expected, and finding your way back becomes almost impossible.

We need more than temporary solutions. We need affordable housing that people can actually afford on their incomes. We need options that respect people's dignity, privacy, independence, and individual circumstances.

A shelter isn't the same as a home. A single room isn't necessarily a solution. And telling people to pull themselves up by their bootstraps doesn't help when the cost of living keeps rising and the places people once could afford are disappearing.

Housing is a basic human need. It should not be a privilege reserved for those who can afford increasingly unrealistic rents or qualify for limited programs.

Today, I stand with everyone marching for housing, everyone who has a home but fears losing it, and everyone still searching for a place to belong.

People before profits. Homes before speculation. Dignity before bureaucracy.

Because everyone deserves a roof over their head and a little peace of mind.

#HousingIsAHumanRight #HousingForAll #AffordableHousing #Homelessness #EndHomelessness #HousingCrisis #RightToHousing #Vancouver #PovertyIsNotAChoice #DignityForAll

Thursday, October 8, 2026

Tell me history of Mad Max

 I asked ai

Tell me history of Mad Max

Absolutely — Mad Max has a surprisingly interesting history, especially because the first movie was made for very little money in Australia and became a worldwide phenomenon.

🚗 Where it began — Mad Max (1979)

The original Mad Max was created by Australian filmmaker George Miller, who had worked as a doctor before becoming a filmmaker.

Miller and producer Byron Kennedy made the movie on an extremely small budget. The basic premise was:

What happens when society starts breaking down and ordinary people become desperate?

It takes place in a near-future Australia where fuel is becoming scarce, violence is escalating and the police are struggling to maintain order.

Max Rockatansky, played by a very young Mel Gibson, is a police officer who wants to leave the increasingly violent world behind.

Then his family is targeted by a vicious motorcycle gang.

That transforms Max from a man trying to escape the violence into the "Mad Max" of the title.

Interestingly, the first movie isn't really the post-apocalyptic wasteland people associate with Mad Max. It's more like a society on the edge of collapse.


🔥 Mad Max 2: The Road Warrior — 1981

This is where the mythology really exploded.

Mad Max 2 takes place after civilization has essentially collapsed.

Oil and gasoline have become incredibly valuable, and survivors fight over fuel.

This introduced much of the visual language people now think of as "Mad Max":

  • enormous customized vehicles
  • leather and scavenged clothing
  • desert wastelands
  • gangs
  • fortified settlements
  • people fighting over gasoline
  • Max as the mysterious wandering outsider

It was released internationally as The Road Warrior in the United States, partly because American distributors thought audiences might not know what "Mad Max" meant.

And it became hugely influential.


⚡ Beyond Thunderdome — 1985

Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome moved even further into mythology.

Max arrives at Bartertown, a bizarre settlement run by Aunty Entity, played by Tina Turner.

And of course:

"Two men enter. One man leaves."

That's the famous Thunderdome.

The movie is unusual because it has more of a fairy-tale quality than the previous films. Max eventually encounters a group of children who have grown up isolated from the old world.


🏜️ Then came a VERY long wait

George Miller wanted to make another Mad Max movie, but the project spent decades in development.

There were financing problems, changing plans and eventually even the September 11 attacks and the Iraq War affected production logistics.

Meanwhile, the Mad Max idea became enormously influential on popular culture.

You can see its fingerprints in countless post-apocalyptic movies, video games, costumes and even car culture.


🔥 Mad Max: Fury Road — 2015

Then Miller came back and absolutely blew the doors off.

Mad Max: Fury Road starred Tom Hardy as Max and Charlize Theron as Imperator Furiosa.

And here's the fascinating part:

Furiosa practically became the main character.

The story follows Furiosa stealing five women from the tyrant Immortan Joe and trying to get them to safety.

It was filmed largely with real vehicles and practical stunts, rather than relying entirely on computer effects.

The result was one of the most visually spectacular action films ever made.

It won six Academy Awards.


👑 Furiosa — 2024

Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga went backward in the timeline.

Instead of continuing Max's story, Miller told Furiosa's origin story.

Anya Taylor-Joy plays the older Furiosa, while Alyla Browne plays her as a child.

It explains where Furiosa came from, how she ended up in Immortan Joe's world, and how she became the warrior we meet in Fury Road.


🧩 And the really interesting thing about Mad Max...

The movies aren't necessarily meant to be a perfectly consistent historical timeline.

George Miller has described Max almost like an Australian myth or legend.

Different stories are told about him. Details don't always line up perfectly. Even Max himself becomes almost a mythical figure wandering through the ruins of civilization.

So the overall evolution is:

1979: Society is collapsing
↓
1981: Civilization has collapsed
↓
1985: Survivors create strange new societies
↓
2015: Full-blown post-apocalyptic mythology
↓
2024: We go back and learn Furiosa's story

And underneath all the crazy cars and explosions, there's a recurring theme Miller keeps returning to:

What happens to human beings when resources disappear and civilization's rules stop protecting them?

That's why Mad Max has lasted so long. It's not really about cars. It's about what people become when the world they depended on disappears.


#MadMax, #GeorgeMiller, #MelGibson, #TheRoadWarrior, #BeyondThunderdome, #FuryRoad, #Furiosa, #PostApocalyptic, #AustralianCinema, #MovieHistory

Aging can be harder than people realize.

 Aging can be harder than people realize.


There’s a strange attitude that if you aren’t currently in a conventional paid job, somehow you have never worked, never contributed, and have nothing of value to offer.


Dog walking, caregiving, cleaning, helping others, raising children, volunteering, creating art, supporting family and friends — apparently some kinds of work only count when someone is handing you a paycheque.


It can be heartbreaking to feel that people see you as less intelligent, less capable, or even a burden simply because your circumstances have changed.


A person’s worth does not disappear when their employment does.


We are more than our job title, our income, our age, or what we can produce for someone else.


People deserve dignity throughout their whole lives. ❤️


#Aging #Dignity #TheValueOfWork #CareWork #Caregiving #InvisibleWork #HumanWorth #Classism #Community #Kindness

Wednesday, October 7, 2026

Il était une fois... Approchez, les enfants

 IL ÉTAIT UNE FOIS — APPROCHEZ, LES ENFANTS

Il était une fois...

Approchez, les enfants.

J’ai une histoire triste à vous raconter.

C’est une histoire vraie.

Et je vous la raconte parce que cela pourrait se reproduire — peut-être plus tôt que nous aimerions le penser.

Je ne veux pas vous faire peur.

Je veux que vous sachiez.

Parce que lorsque nous savons ce qui s’est passé auparavant, nous avons de meilleures chances de nous préparer, de nous protéger, de protéger les personnes que nous aimons et de protéger toute notre famille humaine, autant que nous le pouvons.

Alors prenez une tasse de thé.

Prenez un biscuit.

Et peut-être un mouchoir.

Parce que celle-ci est un peu triste.

Ensuite, nous parlerons de ce que nous pouvons faire.


Il était une fois, dans les années 1870...

C’était un monde sans satellites.

Sans applications météo.

Sans téléphones qui vibraient pour annoncer une alerte d’urgence.

Sans ordinateurs qui surveillaient les océans.

Les gens devaient regarder le ciel, les rivières, les récoltes et les animaux — et essayer de comprendre ce que le monde en train de changer essayait de leur dire.

Et puis quelque chose d’extraordinaire s’est produit.

Les océans ont changé.

L’atmosphère a changé.

Le temps a changé.

Et en 1877–78, un phénomène El Niño exceptionnellement puissant est devenu une partie d’une histoire climatique beaucoup plus vaste.

Ce qui a suivi fut l’une des crises alimentaires liées au climat les plus dévastatrices de l’histoire moderne.

Les gens n’ont pas simplement connu du mauvais temps.

Ils ont connu la faim.

Et des millions de personnes ont perdu la vie.

Maintenant, approchez-vous un peu, parce que c’est ici que cette vieille histoire devient importante pour nous...

Elle ne s’est pas arrêtée à l’autre bout du monde.

Le climat ne respecte pas les frontières.

Une sécheresse dans un endroit peut affecter l’alimentation ailleurs.

Les inondations peuvent détruire les fermes.

Les mauvaises récoltes peuvent faire exploser le prix des aliments.

Et lorsque les gens ne peuvent plus survivre là où ils vivent, ils partent.

Ils cherchent un endroit sûr.

Un endroit où il y a de l’eau.

Un endroit où il y a de la nourriture.

Un endroit où vivent des gens prêts à aider.

Et cela nous ramène à notre vieille histoire...

À **Victoria.

À Seattle.

À la vallée du Fraser.

À l’endroit qui allait bientôt devenir Vancouver.

Et à Ottawa.**

Parce que même si Vancouver n’était pas encore une ville, le fleuve Fraser montrait déjà aux gens de quoi il était capable.

En 1879, après les terribles années qui venaient de s’écouler, le Fraser est de nouveau monté de façon spectaculaire.

La région de Sumas a été inondée.

Les terres agricoles ont été endommagées.

Un pont a été emporté par les eaux.

Les gens regardaient l’eau emporter des morceaux de ce qui leur permettait de vivre.

Imaginez-vous là, sans radar météorologique.

Sans téléphone.

Sans notification d’urgence.

Simplement à regarder le fleuve monter.

Et à vous demander :

Jusqu’où va-t-il monter ?

C’est cette partie de l’histoire que je veux que nous retenions.

Pas parce que je pense que l’histoire va se répéter exactement.

Elle ne se répétera pas de la même façon.

Mais parce que la nature a une mémoire plus longue que la nôtre.

Et aujourd’hui, nous voyons se développer un autre phénomène El Niño très puissant.

Alors cette fois, peut-être pouvons-nous faire quelque chose que les gens des années 1870 ne pouvaient pas faire.

Nous pouvons regarder en arrière.

Nous pouvons regarder autour de nous.

Et nous pouvons nous préparer.

Pas dans la panique.

Avec amour.

Pour nous-mêmes.

Pour nos voisins.

Pour les agriculteurs.

Pour les enfants.

Pour les aînés.

Pour les personnes qui n’ont nulle part où aller en sécurité.

Pour les personnes à l’autre bout du monde.

Pour toute notre famille humaine.

Parce que c’est vraiment de cela que parle cette histoire.

Pas de peur.

De préparation.

Et peut-être que, si nous sommes suffisamment intelligents...

la prochaine génération n’aura pas à raconter cette histoire comme une tragédie.

Peut-être la racontera-t-elle comme l’histoire du moment où l’humanité a vu les signes avant-coureurs...

et a réellement écouté.


Questions pour réfléchir

Enseignants et enseignantes :

1. Qu’enseignez-vous à la prochaine génération sur la façon de survivre et de prendre soin d’un monde en changement — au-delà du contenu des manuels scolaires ?

Élèves et étudiants :

2. Que pouvez-vous apprendre et faire dès maintenant pour ne pas être démunis lorsque votre communauté fera face à une crise ?

Politiciens et responsables publics :

3. Si vous savez que les bouleversements climatiques peuvent menacer l’alimentation, le logement et la sécurité, que faites-vous réellement pour préparer votre communauté — et où est le plan ?

Infirmiers et infirmières :

4. Lorsque la prochaine urgence submergera le système de santé, qui prendra soin des personnes qui n’ont nulle part ailleurs où se tourner — et êtes-vous prêts ?

Médecins et médecins :

5. Traitez-vous les maladies liées au climat et les catastrophes comme des réalités qui affectent déjà la santé humaine, ou attendons-nous encore que la crise devienne impossible à ignorer ?

Agriculteurs et agricultrices :

6. Si une sécheresse, une inondation ou des conditions météorologiques extrêmes menacent vos récoltes, que pouvons-nous faire dès maintenant pour protéger l’approvisionnement alimentaire ?

Scientifiques :

7. Qu’observez-vous que les gens ordinaires doivent comprendre — et quel avertissement sommes-nous en train de ne pas entendre ?

Stars du rock et du cinéma :

8. Des millions de personnes vous écoutent. À quoi allez-vous utiliser cette voix lorsque votre message pourrait réellement sauver des vies ?

Dirigeants d’entreprises :

9. Lorsque la prochaine urgence climatique arrivera, votre priorité sera-t-elle de protéger les personnes et les communautés — ou de protéger les profits ?

Nous tous :

10. Lorsque l’histoire se penchera sur ce moment, dira-t-elle que nous connaissions les signes avant-coureurs et que nous avons agi — ou que nous les connaissions et que nous n’avons rien fait ?

Tina Winterlik — mercredi 7 octobre 2026

Aucun commentaire

Publier un commentaire

Remarque : Seuls les membres de ce blog peuvent publier un commentaire.