Tuesday, September 29, 2026

What will it take for you to stand up?

 Housing First March on October 10, 2026, in Vancouver, beginning at Victory Square at 1:00 p.m. and ending at the Vancouver Art Gallery.

I’d add it right into the ending so the Spain story becomes a bridge to something Canadians can actually participate in:

what will it take for us to stand up?

What will it take?

How many people have to lose their homes?

How many seniors have to choose between rent and food?

How many people have to sleep outside?

How many families have to move again and again because the rent keeps climbing?

How many people have to become vulnerable before the rest of us decide that vulnerability is a problem we all have a responsibility to confront?

Look at what is happening in Spain.

An 87-year-old woman named Maricarmen Abascal was evicted from the Madrid apartment where she had lived since 1956.

When she was finally removed from her home, she was taken out on a stretcher.

People took to the streets.

Tens of thousands protested Spain's housing crisis. Hundreds camped in Madrid's Puerta del Sol, demanding stronger protections for tenants.

And something happened.

The Spanish government has now proposed extending protections against evictions of vulnerable tenants until 2030, along with other housing measures. The proposals still need parliamentary approval — so this isn't finished — but public pressure has helped put housing at the centre of the political conversation.

And Maricarmen?

She has accepted an agreement that could allow her to return home, with her rent limited to roughly 30% of her income.

One woman.

One eviction.

One enormous public reaction.

So what will it take here?

what will it take for Canadians to stand up?

Canada has housing programs.

British Columbia is building housing.

The federal government is investing in housing.

There are new projects, new funding announcements and new policies.

And those things matter.

But people are still struggling to find homes they can actually afford.

The Province itself says more than 95,000 homes have been delivered or are underway since 2017.

So the question isn't whether governments are doing something.

The question is whether what is being done is enough for the people who are struggling right now.

Because this isn't only about people sleeping outside.

It is seniors.

It is young people who can't afford to leave home.

It is workers who can't afford to live near their jobs.

It is families living in overcrowded housing.

It is people couch-surfing.

It is people living in SROs.

It is people one rent increase, illness or job loss away from losing everything.

It is people who have spent decades contributing to their communities and suddenly discovering they can no longer afford to live in them.

and now we have a chance to show up

There is a Housing First March happening in Vancouver.

October 10, 2026

1:00 p.m.

Victory Square

The march is planned to travel west along Hastings, south on Granville and west on Robson to the Vancouver Art Gallery.

Bring your friends.

Bring your signs.

Bring your questions.

Bring your voice.

Come from Vancouver.

Come from Surrey.

Come from the Fraser Valley.

Come from the Island.

Come from the Interior.

Because housing isn't only a Vancouver problem.

It isn't only a downtown problem.

And homelessness isn't somebody else's problem.

this is what peaceful public pressure looks like

I'm not talking about violence.

I'm not talking about destroying property.

I'm talking about people standing together peacefully and saying:

We see what is happening.

We care about what is happening.

And we expect action.

Spain just gave us a very powerful example of what can happen when people refuse to accept a housing crisis as normal.

We don't have to wait until an 87-year-old Canadian is carried out of her home on a stretcher.

We don't have to wait until another family is sleeping in a vehicle.

We don't have to wait until another senior has nowhere to go.

We don't have to wait until someone we love becomes homeless.

We can show up now.

October 10.

Housing First.

Vancouver.

Maybe this is the moment we stop asking:

"Why doesn't somebody do something?"

And start asking:

"What can I do?"

Because democracy isn't only something that happens inside government buildings.

Sometimes it looks like thousands of ordinary people standing together in the street and saying:

Housing is a human necessity.

Vulnerable people matter.

And we are paying attention.

One small factual point I deliberately kept nuanced: the Spanish measures are proposals rather than enacted law, so the post doesn't overstate what the protests have accomplished.

what will it take for us to stand up?

 

what will it take for us to stand up?

What will it take?

How many people have to lose their homes?

How many seniors have to choose between rent and food?

How many people have to sleep outside?

How many families have to move again and again because the rent keeps climbing?

How many people have to become vulnerable before the rest of us decide that vulnerability is a problem we all have a responsibility to confront?

Look at what is happening in Spain.

An 87-year-old woman named Maricarmen Abascal was evicted from the Madrid apartment where she had lived since 1956. Her rent had reportedly risen from about €500 to a demand of €1,650. When she was finally removed from her home, she was taken out on a stretcher.

People took to the streets.

Tens of thousands protested Spain's housing crisis. Hundreds camped in Madrid's Puerta del Sol, demanding stronger protections for tenants.

And something happened.

The Spanish government has now proposed extending protections against evictions of vulnerable tenants until 2030, along with other housing measures. The proposals still need parliamentary approval, so this isn't finished — but the government responded to public pressure.

And Maricarmen?

She has accepted a preliminary agreement that could allow her to return home, paying about 30% of her pension — roughly €533 a month.

One woman.

One eviction.

One enormous public reaction.

And suddenly the housing crisis became impossible to ignore.

So what will it take here?

Canada counted more than 65,000 people experiencing homelessness on a single night in 75 communities in 2025 — and that number does not represent everyone experiencing housing insecurity. The federal government says homelessness remains substantially higher than before the pandemic.

And this isn't only about people sleeping outside.

It is seniors.

It is people working full-time who cannot afford market rent.

It is people living in SROs.

It is people couch-surfing.

It is families doubled up in tiny apartments.

It is people one rent increase, illness, job loss or landlord decision away from losing their home.

It is people who have spent decades contributing to their communities and suddenly discovering that they can no longer afford to live in them.

And yes — governments are doing things.

British Columbia points to more than 99,000 homes delivered or underway since 2017, rent protections, the speculation and vacancy tax, and other measures.

But there is still a housing crisis.

So perhaps the question isn't simply:

What is government doing?

Perhaps we should also ask:

What are we doing?

Where is our line?

Why do we accept seeing people sleeping outside in the rain?

Why do we accept seniors worrying about whether they can remain in their homes?

Why do we accept people being moved from one temporary place to another?

Why do we accept encampments as though they are simply part of the scenery?

Why do we talk about vulnerable people as statistics instead of neighbours?

And why aren't more of us standing together?

I'm not talking about violence.

I'm not talking about destroying property.

I'm talking about peaceful, organized, persistent public pressure.

People gathering.

People carrying signs.

People writing letters.

People showing up at city halls, legislatures and Parliament.

People demanding answers.

People refusing to let the issue disappear when the cameras leave.

People standing beside seniors.

People standing beside families.

People standing beside people who have nowhere else to go.

People saying:

Housing is not optional.

Human dignity is not optional.

A safe place to live should not be a luxury.

Spain's protesters didn't solve their entire housing crisis in a week.

They didn't magically create hundreds of thousands of homes.

But they demonstrated something powerful:

People can make housing impossible for governments to ignore.

And perhaps that is the question Canada needs to ask.

Not:

"Why are those people protesting?"

But:

"Why aren't more of us?"

Because today it might be someone else standing outside.

Tomorrow it could be you.

Or your parent.

Or your child.

Or your neighbour.

Or the person who has worked beside you for twenty years.

We don't have to wait until someone is carried out of their home on a stretcher before we decide that enough is enough.

What will it take for Canadians to stand up for the vulnerable?

And perhaps an even harder question:

What are we waiting for?

why isn't housing the biggest investment?

 

why isn't housing the biggest investment?

I've been looking at the numbers in Canada's 2025 federal budget.

And one thing keeps jumping out at me.

Canada says it is planning approximately $280 billion in capital investment over five years.

The government's broad breakdown includes:

$110 billion — infrastructure

$105 billion — productivity and competitiveness

$30 billion — defence and security

$25 billion — housing

And I keep asking:

WHY?

Why is housing getting only $25 billion when Canada is facing a housing crisis?

Why isn't housing receiving an investment closer to the scale of the $110 billion for infrastructure or the $105 billion for productivity and competitiveness?

I'm not saying roads, bridges, technology or economic investment aren't important.

Of course they are.

But housing is infrastructure too.

A home is infrastructure.

An apartment building is infrastructure.

Supportive housing is infrastructure.

Affordable housing is infrastructure.

A place for a senior to live is infrastructure.

A place for a family to raise children is infrastructure.

A place for someone experiencing homelessness to finally get inside is infrastructure.

So why only $25 billion?

If Canada can find $110 billion for infrastructure...

If Canada can find $105 billion for productivity and competitiveness...

Why can't we put that same level of urgency into housing?

I'm asking for the government to explain the numbers.

Not with slogans.

Not with press releases.

With the actual plan.

How many homes will $25 billion build?

How many will be affordable?

How many will be permanently affordable?

How many will be supportive housing?

How many will be built for seniors?

How many for families?

How many for people currently experiencing homelessness?

And when will they be ready?

Because Canada's housing crisis isn't waiting five or ten years.

People are struggling right now.

Renters are being priced out.

Families are overcrowding homes.

Seniors are worried about where they will live.

People are staying in unsafe situations because they cannot afford to leave.

People are sleeping outside.

Winter is coming.

So I'm asking Mark Carney:

Why isn't housing receiving an investment on the scale of infrastructure and productivity?

If housing is truly an emergency, treat it like one.

Give Canadians the numbers.

Give us the construction targets.

Give us the timelines.

Give us the locations.

And most importantly:

BUILD THE HOMES.

Because Canadians don't need another announcement about housing.

They need somewhere to live.

a benefit doesn't create a home

 a benefit doesn't create a home

My friend is 77.

We were talking about immigration, housing, social assistance and what is happening to people across Canada.

And he asked me a simple question:

“Are people coming into Canada properly screened?”

That led to another question:

“And what happens when families arrive with children and qualify for several different government benefits, while Canadians who are already here can't find a place to live?”

These aren't unreasonable questions.

But we need to look at the actual numbers—not rumours, not Facebook posts, not assumptions.

Let's start with housing.

Statistics Canada reported that in 2024, approximately 1.8 million Canadian households were in core housing need.

That means their housing was inadequate, unsuitable or unaffordable, and they couldn't afford an acceptable alternative.

Among renters, the rate was about 22%.

Think about that.

One in five renter households.

And that doesn't tell the whole story.

Some people are couch-surfing.

Some are living with relatives because they have nowhere else to go.

Some are sleeping in vehicles.

Some are staying in relationships or homes they desperately want to leave because they cannot afford another place.

Some are working and still cannot afford rent.

Some are seniors.

Some are families with children.

Some are people receiving assistance.

And here's the problem with saying “there is assistance.”

Suppose a single person can receive up to roughly $1,060 a month in B.C. income assistance, including the maximum shelter allowance.

That's food and basic needs plus shelter.

But what good is a shelter allowance if you cannot find a place to rent for that amount?

A benefit doesn't create a home.

That's the part I think governments keep missing.

You can give someone money.

But if there are no affordable apartments available, they're still homeless.

Now consider a family.

A family with four children may qualify for several programs depending on their circumstances, including child benefits and other supports.

The Canada Child Benefit can be thousands of dollars per child each year for eligible low-income families.

There can also be provincial benefits.

There may be health coverage and other supports depending on immigration status and eligibility.

I'm not saying families shouldn't receive help.

Children shouldn't go hungry.

People fleeing war or persecution shouldn't be abandoned.

But we also have to ask whether Canada's housing and social-support systems have enough capacity for everyone who is here.

Because if they don't, somebody gets left behind.

And right now, millions of Canadians are struggling with housing.

What about the co-ops?

This is where things become particularly frustrating for people.

Affordable co-op housing is limited.

People can wait years.

A person can be eligible and still not get a unit.

So imagine being a Canadian senior, a person with a disability, a low-income worker or someone experiencing homelessness.

You apply.

You wait.

You can't find anything you can afford.

And winter is coming.

What are you supposed to do?

And then there is employment.

My friend has also raised concerns about businesses hiring people who speak particular languages.

This needs to be discussed carefully.

People naturally hire through networks. Immigrant communities often help newcomers find work, just as established Canadian communities do.

But employers cannot legally discriminate against people on protected grounds.

So the question isn't:

“Why are these people hiring Indians or South Asians?”

The useful question is:

“Are Canadian employers following employment laws, and are qualified Canadians being given a fair opportunity to apply and compete for jobs?”

That's something worth investigating with evidence rather than assuming an entire community is doing something wrong.

What is happening in places like Nelson?

I've heard people talk about communities changing quickly, with new restaurants and businesses appearing and particular immigrant communities becoming much more visible.

Businesses opening isn't automatically a bad thing.

But rapid population change raises legitimate questions:

Does the town have enough housing?

Enough doctors?

Enough schools?

Enough childcare?

Enough public transportation?

Enough jobs?

Enough affordable rentals?

Those are infrastructure questions.

And governments should answer them before housing shortages become humanitarian problems.

We need to stop fighting each other.

This isn't about whether one group of Canadians deserves housing more than another.

It is about whether Canada has built enough housing and infrastructure to support the population it has chosen to accept.

If the answer is no, ordinary people end up fighting over scarce apartments, jobs and services.

That creates resentment.

And resentment doesn't build a single home.

So, Mark Carney, provincial governments and municipal governments:

Show us the numbers.

How many people are currently homeless?

How many are living in inadequate housing?

How many are living in overcrowded housing?

How many are trapped in housing they cannot afford?

How many are staying in unsafe or abusive situations because they have nowhere else to go?

How many affordable homes are actually available?

How many are being built?

How many people are waiting for co-op and subsidized housing?

How long are they waiting?

And how much money is actually reaching bricks, walls, kitchens and bedrooms?

Because we keep hearing about billions of dollars.

We keep hearing about investment.

We keep hearing about programs.

But Canadians need something very basic:

A safe place to live.

And with winter approaching, this isn't a political talking point.

It is time.

People cannot eat promises.

People cannot sleep in a budget.

People cannot turn a benefit cheque into an apartment when there is nowhere affordable to rent.

Build the housing.

Show us the money.

And show us the homes.

20 hard questions for Canadian high school students

 

20 hard questions for Canadian high school students

  1. Where does Canada's federal government get its money, and where does every dollar go?

  2. How much does Canada spend on housing and homelessness compared with defence, infrastructure, business incentives and other major priorities?

  3. If Canada has a housing shortage, why aren't we building enough homes? What are the actual barriers?

  4. How much would it cost to provide enough affordable and supportive housing for people currently experiencing homelessness?

  5. Who owns Canada's land, and how much publicly owned land could potentially be used for housing?

  6. How much does it actually cost to build an average home in Canada—and how much of the final price comes from land, construction, taxes, fees and financing?

  7. What happens to the price of housing when supply increases? What happens when demand increases? Can students find Canadian evidence for both?

  8. How much of Canada's housing is owned by individuals, corporations, investors and different levels of government?

  9. How much does Canada collect from oil, gas, mining, forestry and other natural resources—and who receives those revenues?

  10. Should natural-resource wealth be spent today, saved for future generations, or divided between the two? What have different countries actually done?

  11. Why does Norway have a sovereign wealth fund, and could Canada create or expand similar mechanisms using Canadian resource revenues?

  12. Norway is considered a climate leader while remaining a major oil and gas producer. How can both things be true?

  13. Which countries are simultaneously pursuing climate targets while producing and exporting fossil fuels? Why do they do it?

  14. Canada is investing heavily in artificial intelligence and data-centre infrastructure. What are the expected economic benefits, costs and environmental impacts?

  15. How much electricity and water do large data centres require, and who pays for the infrastructure needed to support them?

  16. If governments say there isn't enough money to solve a problem, what does “can't afford it” actually mean? Is the limitation money, resources, labour, political choices, inflation, debt or something else?

  17. What are Canada's federal, provincial and municipal governments each responsible for when it comes to housing—and where does responsibility overlap or fall through the cracks?

  18. What are Indigenous Nations' rights and roles in decisions involving natural resources, fisheries and development on their territories? How have those rights changed Canadian decision-making?

  19. What happened to Canada's wild Pacific salmon over the past several decades, and what evidence exists concerning the causes—including climate change, habitat loss, fishing and salmon farming?

  20. If you were given Canada's entire federal budget for one year, what would you change—and what evidence would you use to defend every change?


If Canada is wealthy in resources, human talent and economic capacity, why do some Canadians still struggle to afford the basic necessities of life?

Don't tell us what you think the answer is. Investigate it. Follow the money. Check the evidence. Talk to people affected. Look at what other countries have done. Then tell us what you found.

where does Canada's money actually come from?

 

where does Canada's money actually come from?

I keep hearing that Canada can't afford to solve our housing crisis.

So I decided to ask a different question:

Where does Canada's money actually come from?

Because I don't understand government finances well enough to pretend I know the answer.

And maybe that's exactly why we should all be looking at it.

the federal government

In the 2024–25 fiscal year, the federal government collected approximately $511 billion in revenue.

That came largely from:

$234.3 billion — personal income taxes

$97.0 billion — corporate income taxes

$52.5 billion — GST

$31.5 billion — Employment Insurance premiums

$71.9 billion — other taxes and duties

$49.2 billion — other revenues

That's more than half a trillion dollars coming into the federal government in one year.

But Canada also spends more than it collects.

That's where the deficit and government borrowing enter the picture.

So no, there isn't an unlimited pile of money sitting in Ottawa.

But Canada is also not a country with no resources or economic capacity.

We have oil and gas.

Minerals.

Forests.

Fisheries.

Hydroelectricity.

Agriculture.

Technology.

Manufacturing.

Millions of people working and paying taxes.

And now we are talking about enormous investments in artificial intelligence and data-centre infrastructure.

So I keep coming back to one question:

if we can mobilize billions for other priorities, why can't we mobilize enough to house our people?

I'm not suggesting that everything is free.

I'm not suggesting governments can simply print money without consequences.

I'm asking Canadians to look at the numbers and ask what we are choosing to prioritize.

Because there are people living outside right now.

There are seniors who cannot afford housing.

There are families choosing between rent and food.

There are young people who cannot imagine ever owning a home.

There are working people who are still homeless.

There are people falling through the cracks.

And meanwhile, governments are capable of moving enormous amounts of money when they decide something is a priority.

So where is that urgency for housing?

“If Canada can mobilize enormous amounts of capital for energy, technology, infrastructure and investment, why can't we mobilize the same determination to make sure Canadians have somewhere affordable to live?”

Because somewhere along the way, people stopped being the priority.

Or at least, that's what it feels like when you watch billions move while human beings are left waiting for a home.

Where is the urgency for the baby?

The single mother?

The senior?

The person who worked their whole life?

The family one rent increase away from losing everything?

If governments can move mountains when something is considered a priority, why isn't housing being treated like one?

Canadians deserve an answer.

and that is the question

I'm not an economist.

I'm a Canadian trying to understand where the money goes.

Maybe we should all understand it.

Because once ordinary people start following the money, we can ask much better questions.

How much comes in?

How much goes out?

What are we borrowing?

What are we investing in?

What resources are generating wealth?

Who benefits?

What is being preserved for future generations?

And perhaps the biggest question of all:

How can a country this wealthy still have people without homes?

I don't think Canadians should be afraid to ask.

Where is the money?

Where is the housing?

Where is the accountability?

And where is the humanity?

billions for data centres — but what about people?

 

billions for data centres — but what about people?

I don't support the rush to build massive data centres.

And I don't believe we should pretend that every investment in AI infrastructure is automatically an investment in Canada's future.

A future for whom?

Before we pour billions into enormous data centres, I think we need to ask some very basic questions.

Do Canadians have homes?

Do Canadians have enough food?

Can seniors afford to live?

Can young families afford to raise their children?

Can people who work full-time afford a place to live?

What happens to the people who fall through the cracks?

Because technology doesn't need a house.

A data centre doesn't need a pension.

A server doesn't need a warm bed.

People do.

And when governments can mobilize billions for technological infrastructure while human beings are living outside, I think Canadians have every right to question our priorities.

I am not against technology.

I am asking:

Why aren't we putting human beings first?

If we have billions available for the infrastructure of an AI future, why can't we demonstrate the same urgency when it comes to housing, health, food security, pensions, Indigenous communities, children and people experiencing homelessness?

We keep hearing that there isn't enough money.

There isn't enough housing.

There isn't enough time.

There isn't enough capacity.

And yet, when governments decide something is a priority, enormous amounts of money and resources can suddenly be found.

So perhaps the question isn't what Canada can afford.

Perhaps the question is:

What does Canada choose to prioritize?

how could Canada actually solve our housing problem?

 

how could Canada actually solve our housing problem?

Yes, Canada has many of the tools needed.

The question is whether governments will use them at the scale and speed required.

According to the latest CMHC Fall 2026 Housing Supply Report, Canada needs approximately 417,000 to 469,000 housing starts every year to restore pre-pandemic affordability by 2036.

Under current projections, that leaves an annual supply gap of approximately 187,000 to 238,000 homes.

That's a massive number.

So what could Canada actually do?

1. build housing people can actually afford

Canada needs more than expensive condos and luxury housing.

We need a much larger supply of:

  • non-market housing
  • co-ops
  • social housing
  • supportive housing
  • deeply affordable rentals
  • affordable family housing
  • seniors' housing
  • accessible housing

Housing isn't one giant category.

Different people need different kinds of homes.

2. use public land for public housing

Federal, provincial and municipal governments own public land.

Instead of simply selling valuable land to the highest bidder, governments can use that land for long-term affordable housing.

The federal government's Build Canada Homes initiative specifically includes leveraging public land as part of its approach.

Why shouldn't public land help create a permanent public benefit?

3. build faster with modern construction

We already know that standardized and prefabricated construction can help reduce construction time and costs.

In British Columbia, Canada and BC have committed to an initial 1,100 homes through a partnership involving 700 supportive and transitional homes and 400 affordable rental homes.

The project uses standardized designs and prefabricated, Canadian-made components.

That's the kind of approach worth expanding.

4. stop making every housing project take years

Zoning.

Permits.

Development charges.

Regulatory barriers.

These can all affect how quickly and affordably housing gets built.

Canada's new Improving Housing Supply Act provides $1.7 billion to provinces and territories to help remove barriers and increase housing supply, including measures such as reducing development fees and levies.

But money alone isn't enough.

We need measurable results.

How many homes?

How quickly?

At what price?

And most importantly:

How many will actually be affordable to people who need them?

5. build the infrastructure too

If we're going to increase housing density, we also need the infrastructure that makes communities work:

  • water
  • sewer
  • transit
  • roads
  • schools
  • parks
  • community services

You can't simply build thousands of homes and expect everything around them to magically appear.

6. protect the affordable housing we already have

This one is huge.

Canada doesn't only need to build new affordable housing.

We need to stop losing existing affordable housing.

The federal Canada Rental Protection Fund is now a $1.5-billion program designed to help community housing providers acquire and preserve existing affordable rental properties.

Sometimes preserving an affordable apartment building is faster than building another one.

And once an affordable home is lost, replacing it can take years.

7. build housing for different income levels

We need a housing continuum.

That can include:

Emergency shelter — when necessary

↓

Transitional housing

↓

Supportive housing

↓

Deeply affordable housing

↓

Affordable rentals

↓

Market rentals

↓

Co-ops and ownership

These aren't interchangeable.

A person who needs supportive housing shouldn't be expected to solve their situation by finding a $2,500-a-month apartment.

And someone who simply cannot afford Vancouver's rental market shouldn't automatically be treated as though they need a shelter.

8. address homelessness with both housing AND support

Homelessness isn't one single experience.

Some people need affordable housing.

Some need supportive housing.

Some need mental-health or addiction services.

Some need help getting identification, income or employment.

Some primarily need a place they can afford.

And many people need several things at once.

So let's stop pretending that one housing model can solve every situation.

9. make construction cheaper

Canada needs to look carefully at the cost of building.

That means examining:

  • development charges
  • permitting
  • regulations
  • construction productivity
  • skilled-trades shortages
  • materials
  • financing
  • unnecessary duplication between jurisdictions

The federal government has already put $1.7 billion toward measures intended to increase housing supply and reduce barriers to construction.

Now we need to see what happens with that investment.

10. don't pretend that "build more" is the entire solution

This may be the most important point.

Canada could build hundreds of thousands of homes and still have people sleeping outside if those homes are priced beyond their means.

Supply matters.

But affordability matters too.

And people who are homeless today cannot wait for a housing supply solution that may take years.

That's why I believe Canada needs two tracks at the same time.

BUILD FOR THE FUTURE

→ Build affordable, non-market and rental housing at enormous scale.

→ Use public land.

→ Expand modular and factory-built construction.

→ Speed up approvals.

→ Build infrastructure alongside housing.

→ Preserve existing affordable rentals.

HELP PEOPLE NOW

→ Mobile outreach.

→ Transitional housing.

→ Supportive housing.

→ Rent assistance.

→ Emergency shelter when necessary.

→ Rapid pathways from homelessness into permanent housing.

Build for tomorrow.

Help people today.

We need both.

And here's something else worth remembering:

No single level of government controls the entire housing system.

Ottawa, the provinces, territories and municipalities each control different pieces.

So Canada needs governments working together rather than pointing at one another.

The federal government can provide funding and national programs.

Provinces control important areas such as health, housing programs and much of the regulatory framework.

Municipalities control zoning, permitting and local planning.

The pieces already exist.

The question is whether we can finally put them together.

Because behind every statistic is a person.

A family.

A senior.

A young person.

A worker.

A neighbour.

Someone who simply wants a safe place to call home.

And while governments debate the details...

people are waiting.

So I have a question for all of us:

How would YOU solve Canada's housing crisis?

Because maybe it's time Canadians stopped waiting for someone else to come up with all the answers.

Maybe we should start demanding them.

sources

CMHC — Fall 2026 Housing Supply Report

Canada — Improving Housing Supply Act

Canada — Canada Rental Protection Fund

Canada & British Columbia — 1,100-home housing partnership

dear canadians, ai says it knows how to solve our housing problem

 

dear canadians, ai says it knows how to solve our housing problem

Do you?

Because apparently, I asked AI a very simple question:

How could Canada solve our housing crisis?

And it gave me an answer.

Not a magic answer.
Not an overnight answer.

But a list of things Canada could actually do.

So now I have a question for the people running this country:

Do you know how to solve it?

Because after years of escalating housing costs, homelessness and people being pushed further and further from any possibility of a secure home, I'm beginning to wonder.

Canada doesn't lack ideas.

We have public land.

We have construction workers.

We have architects and engineers.

We have modular and prefabricated construction.

We have housing organizations, co-ops and non-profits.

We have government-owned buildings and land.

We have infrastructure programs.

We have communities that already know what they need.

And we have people who desperately need somewhere to live.

So what are we waiting for?

build housing people can actually afford

We need more than luxury towers and expensive condos.

We need non-market housing, co-ops, social housing, supportive housing and genuinely affordable rentals.

We need housing for seniors.

Housing for families.

Housing for people with disabilities.

Housing for people leaving homelessness.

Housing for people who work but simply cannot afford today's rents.

And we need different solutions for different people.

use public land for the public good

Why sell valuable government-owned land to the highest bidder when it could be used for housing?

Governments could lease land for long-term affordable housing rather than permanently disposing of public assets.

build faster

If a building can be safely constructed using standardized designs, modular components or prefabrication, why should every project take years?

We need to examine every unnecessary delay, fee and bureaucratic barrier that adds cost.

Speed matters when people are sleeping outside.

preserve what we already have

We shouldn't only count new units.

We also need to protect existing affordable housing from disappearing.

Sometimes keeping an existing affordable apartment building affordable is faster than building another one.

and help people NOW

This is the part I keep coming back to.

People cannot wait five or ten years for the housing supply to catch up.

Winter doesn't wait.

Rain doesn't wait.

Illness doesn't wait.

People living outside don't get to put their lives on hold until another housing announcement is made.

We need immediate, mobile and community-based services alongside permanent housing.

We need transitional housing.

We need supportive housing.

We need outreach.

We need pathways from the street into actual homes.

Build for tomorrow. Help people today.

That shouldn't be a radical idea.

so, dear Canadians...

AI says Canada has tools that could be part of the solution.

But AI isn't the one with the authority to change zoning.

AI doesn't control public land.

AI doesn't approve housing projects.

AI doesn't control provincial or municipal budgets.

AI doesn't write federal housing policy.

People do.

So perhaps the question isn't:

"Can Canada solve the housing crisis?"

Perhaps the question is:

"Why aren't we doing everything we reasonably can to solve it?"

And maybe we, the public, need to start asking that question much louder.

Not just during elections.

Not just when another tent encampment appears.

Not just when another person is pushed onto the street.

Every day.

Because housing isn't an abstract policy discussion.

It is someone's home.

Someone's family.

Someone's safety.

Someone's dignity.

So, dear Canadians...

AI says it has some ideas.

Do you?

And more importantly—

do the people in charge?

What would you do if you were given the responsibility of solving Canada's housing crisis?

#housingcrisis #housing #homelessness #affordablehousing #canada #canadianhousing #socialhousing #supportivehousing #housingfirst #publicland #communityhousing #housingforall

ARTICLE 25: CANADA, WE NEED HELP

 ARTICLE 25: CANADA, WE NEED HELP

UNITED NATIONS — RIGHT TO ADEQUATE HOUSING

Brr, cold out there.

Bang! Shut window.

Brr.

Grateful I have a place to couchsurf today.

And then I think about the people who don't have a couch.

The people sleeping outside.

The people in shelters.

The people being turned away.

The people who have nowhere safe to close a window.

We are desperate.

And I don't think we can keep waiting for another housing announcement, another promise, another election or another five-year plan.

Article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights recognizes housing as part of an adequate standard of living.

So I am asking the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the right to adequate housing to look at what is happening in Canada.

I am asking you to do the same.

Send your own letter.

Tell them what is happening where you live.

Tell them what rent costs.

Tell them what assistance provides.

Tell them how long you have been unhoused.

Tell them about shelters.

Tell them about waiting lists.

Tell them about couchsurfing.

Tell them about seniors, young adults, families and single people who simply cannot find housing they can afford.

Don't exaggerate. Don't make things up. Tell the truth about your own experience.

And ask the UN to look at Canada.

SEND YOUR LETTER

UN Special Rapporteur on adequate housing

📧 hrc-sr-housing@un.org

You can write your own letter, use the letter below as a starting point, or simply send a few paragraphs explaining what is happening in your community.


WHAT WE ARE ASKING

We are asking the United Nations to:

• examine Canada's housing crisis through the Special Rapporteur's mandate;

• communicate with Canadian governments about the situation;

• examine whether people are being denied meaningful access to adequate housing;

• look at the gap between housing costs, incomes and available assistance;

• listen to people experiencing homelessness and housing insecurity;

• and urge Canada to take urgent, concrete action.

We are also asking Canadian lawyers and human-rights organizations to examine what legal options may be available to people experiencing homelessness and housing insecurity, including whether a class-action proceeding could be appropriate.

I don't know whether a class action is legally possible.

That's why we need lawyers to investigate it.

But I do know this:

People are suffering now.

And winter is coming.

WHO IS RESPONSIBLE?

Federal.

Provincial.

Municipal.

Three levels of government.

Different responsibilities.

Different programs.

Different explanations.

But there is only one person experiencing homelessness.

That person doesn't care which level of government is responsible when they are standing outside in the cold.

They need a home.

They need somewhere safe to sleep.

They need somewhere they can actually afford.

AFFORDABLE FOR WHOM?

That is the question.

We have heard “affordable housing” for years.

But affordable according to what income?

What about someone receiving assistance?

What about a senior?

What about a young adult?

What about a single woman?

What about someone who has worked most of their life but hasn't reached full pension age?

What about someone who has been unhoused since 2019?

What about me?

I am grateful for a couch today.

But couchsurfing is not housing security.

And gratitude should not be the measure of whether someone has an adequate place to live.

So I'm asking people across Canada:

Write the letter.

Send the email.

Tell the truth.

Tell the United Nations what housing looks like where you live.

Maybe one letter won't change anything.

Maybe hundreds will get someone's attention.

Maybe thousands will.

I don't know.

But I know what happens if we remain silent.

Nothing changes.

And we have been waiting long enough.

ARTICLE 25.

HOUSING IS A HUMAN RIGHT.

CANADA, WE NEED ACTION.

UNITED NATIONS, PLEASE LISTEN.

We are desperate.

And we are asking for help.

ARTICLE 25

 ARTICLE 25


ARTICLE 25

UNITED NATIONS — UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Article 25 recognizes the right to a standard of living adequate for health and well-being, including housing.

Housing.

A human right.

And yet here we are in British Columbia in 2026, still talking about people who cannot afford a place to live.

Shane Pointe, Musqueam, Squamish Elder, was right.

No one will listen until you say: CLASS ACTION.

So let's get this party started.

Enough is enough.

Let's make everyone sit up and take notice.

We're not f*cking around anymore.

For more than 20 years, Canadians have heard promises about affordable housing.

We hear announcements.

We hear plans.

We hear targets.

We hear politicians tell us things are turning around.

But people are still sleeping outside.

People are couchsurfing.

People are filling shelters.

Single women are being turned away.

Seniors are struggling.

Young adults can't find somewhere they can afford.

Families are stretched to the breaking point.

And people like me — people who have been unhoused for years — are still trying to survive.

So perhaps it is time to stop asking governments nicely.

Perhaps it is time to ask the legal system some very serious questions.

Could people experiencing homelessness and housing insecurity in British Columbia have common legal issues that could support a class proceeding?

What government actions, policies or failures would need to be examined?

Who could represent the class?

What evidence would we need?

How many people have experienced the same barriers?

What would we actually be asking the court to do?

And could a case potentially involve more than one level of government?

These aren't questions I think one person can answer from a couch.

They need lawyers.

They need researchers.

They need advocates.

They need people who understand housing law, constitutional law, human rights and class proceedings.

Under B.C.'s current Class Proceedings Act, a proposed class proceeding has to meet specific certification requirements, including an identifiable class, common issues, a suitable representative plaintiff and a workable plan for advancing the case.

So let's find out.

Let's find the lawyers.

Let's find the organizations.

Let's find the people who have been documenting this crisis for years.

Let's bring the evidence together.

Not rumours.

Not political spin.

Evidence.

How many people are unhoused?

How many are living in shelters?

How many are couchsurfing?

How many are being turned away?

How many seniors cannot afford market rent?

How many people receive assistance that doesn't come close to covering actual rent?

How many people have been waiting years for stable housing?

And how much has this crisis cost people — financially, physically, emotionally and socially?

Then let's put those questions where they belong.

In front of people who can actually do something about them.

I don't know whether a class action is legally possible.

That's exactly why I want lawyers to look at it.

Maybe the answer is yes.

Maybe the answer is no.

Maybe there is another legal route that makes more sense.

But after decades of promises, I think we have earned the right to ask.

When does someone hold Canada accountable?

When does housing stop being a promise and start becoming something governments are actually held responsible for?

Article 25 has been sitting there for decades.

People have been waiting.

People are still waiting.

And winter is coming.

So...

Who wants to help get this started?

Who knows a lawyer?

Who knows a housing-rights organization?

Who has evidence?

Who has lived this?

Who has been told to wait?

Who has been told there is nothing available?

Who has been told their income is too low?

Who has been told they don't qualify?

Who has spent night after night wondering where they will sleep?

Maybe it is time we stopped treating all of these stories as isolated tragedies.

Maybe it is time to ask whether they form a much bigger legal question.

ARTICLE 25.

HOUSING.

HUMAN RIGHTS.

ACCOUNTABILITY.

Let's find out what the law can actually do.

And let's get started.


Brr, cold out there.

 Brr, cold out there.


Brr, cold out there.

Bang! Shut window.

Brr.

Grateful I have a place to couchsurf today.

That thought hits differently when you know there are thousands of people who don't have somewhere safe to close a window.

And here we are, talking about housing again.

I just read another promise about making housing more affordable in British Columbia — including turning empty condos into homes people can afford.

Okay.

But affordable for whom?

Because $2,400 rent isn't affordable to someone whose income simply doesn't stretch that far.

And when shelter assistance provides only around $500 toward rent, where exactly is that person supposed to find the rest?

This is where the language starts to bother me.

We hear affordable housing over and over again.

But affordable according to what income?

Affordable for a couple with two incomes?

Affordable for someone with a professional salary?

Affordable for a student whose parents can help?

What about seniors?

Young adults?

Single women?

People living on assistance?

People who have worked their whole lives but haven't reached full pension age?

People who have been unhoused for years?

Affordable is not a slogan. It is a number.

And that number has to match the reality of the people who actually need the housing.

I have been unhoused since 2019.

I know what it is like to move from one temporary place to another and be grateful for every couch, spare room and safe place to sleep.

So when I hear another announcement about how housing is becoming more affordable, I look around.

Where?

Because from where I am standing, British Columbia is the worst I have ever seen it.

And I am exhausted by the spin.

This isn't just about one political party or one level of government.

We have three levels of government in Canada, with different responsibilities, and somehow the person without housing is still expected to navigate all of it.

Federal.

Provincial.

Municipal.

Meanwhile, winter arrives whether governments have figured out how to cooperate or not.

The cold doesn't care which government is responsible.

Neither does hunger.

Neither does an empty wallet.

Neither does having nowhere to go.

And families can't simply keep filling the gap.

Families are struggling too.

Food costs more.

Housing costs more.

Everything costs more.

People can help their parents, their children, their siblings or their friends for a while.

But eventually many families reach the point where they simply cannot do any more.

“I'm sorry. You have to go.”

Then what?

Another shelter?

Another waiting list?

Another couch?

Another night outside?

We have been talking about this for decades.

So yes, let's talk about empty condos.

Let's talk about speculation.

Let's talk about foreign investment.

Let's talk about every part of the housing system that needs changing.

But let's also talk about the person standing outside in the cold tonight.

Because a vacant condo becoming occupied doesn't automatically make housing affordable.

A tax doesn't automatically create a home.

An announcement doesn't put a roof over someone's head.

And a promise doesn't keep someone warm.

We need to stop asking only:

“How many homes are we building?”

We also need to ask:

“Who can actually afford them?”

“Who is being left out?”

“What happens to the people who cannot wait another five years?”

And perhaps the biggest question of all:

Affordable for whom?

Brr.

I'm going to be grateful for this couch today.

But gratitude for having somewhere temporary to sleep shouldn't become the standard we expect people to live by.

People deserve homes they can actually afford.


ARTICLE 25

UNITED NATIONS — UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Article 25 recognizes a person's right to a standard of living adequate for their health and well-being, including housing.

So when does someone hold Canada accountable?

When does the right to adequate housing become more than words on paper?

I want to see this challenged.

I want lawyers, advocates and people who have experienced homelessness to seriously explore a class-action lawsuit — and whatever other legal avenues may be available — to ask what obligations governments actually have toward people who cannot secure adequate housing.

Because after decades of promises, I think we are allowed to ask:

How much longer?

How many more people have to suffer?

How many more winters?

How many more families have to say, “We can't help you anymore”?

How many more people have to live without a home before Canada says:

Enough.

Housing shouldn't just be something we promise people.

It should be something people can actually afford.


life before apps

 

life before apps

If you're 25, there's a pretty good chance you don't remember a world without apps.

I do.

And sometimes I wonder what it must sound like when someone my age says that.

So let me take you back.

Not that far, really.

But far enough that the internet was something you went to rather than something you carried around in your pocket.

before the smartphone

When I was younger, there was no Google Maps guiding you down the street.

No Uber.

No Airbnb.

No Instagram.

No Facebook.

No WhatsApp.

No TikTok.

No little glowing rectangle telling you where to eat, where to sleep, who was nearby, what happened five minutes ago or what someone on the other side of the planet thinks about it.

Computers existed, of course.

And software existed.

But an application meant something very different.

Word was an application.

Photoshop was an application.

Dreamweaver was an application.

You installed software on your computer. You bought it, borrowed it, copied it — and yes, software piracy became a very real problem.

The internet itself was still becoming a thing.

And then everything started changing.

remember internet cafés?

In British Columbia, we gradually went from dial-up connections and computers that seemed enormous to faster internet, websites, email and eventually wireless connections.

But in Mexico, I watched something particularly interesting happen.

Internet cafés spread everywhere.

You could walk into a little shop, sit down at a computer and pay for internet time.

For people who didn't own a computer, didn't have internet at home or didn't have the latest technology, those places were a doorway into another world.

And Mexico caught up incredibly fast.

I remember people in Zipolite having basic cell phones while the rest of the world was racing toward smartphones.

Many businesses had little or no web presence.

A hotel might have a phone number.

A restaurant might have a sign.

Someone might tell you, "Go down the road, turn left and ask for Miguel."

That was the search engine.

People were the search engine.

and then came Facebook

Facebook was still something people were figuring out.

Seriously.

People barely understood Facebook.

There weren't necessarily polished business pages, social-media managers, influencers and carefully constructed online identities.

There were people.

Friends.

Photos.

Messages.

And eventually businesses started realizing:

Wait... people can actually find us here.

That changed everything.

I was there when apps were still a question

In 2014, I learned app design.

And this is the part I really want a 25-year-old to understand.

We didn't know.

We didn't know exactly what this was going to become.

We knew smartphones were growing.

We knew people were getting connected.

We knew there was enormous potential.

But the app ecosystem we now take for granted wasn't simply sitting there waiting for us.

We were figuring it out.

I actually created an app.

And I put a tremendous amount of work into it.

Other people put tremendous amounts of work into it too.

But eventually I discovered a problem:

it could be hacked.

So I didn't release it.

That decision still stays with me.

Because sometimes an idea can be good.

The people working on it can be good.

The intention can be good.

And yet the technology isn't ready — or you aren't comfortable putting something into the world that could be exploited.

So the app stayed on the shelf.

but the idea behind it mattered

The app was connected to something I cared deeply about: Mexico, especially Zipolite.

Hotels and restaurants were willing to provide information.

The idea was to create something useful for visitors while also creating possibilities for fundraising.

For me.

For dogs.

For people in Zipolite.

For the community.

It wasn't simply:

"Let's make an app."

It was:

"What if this technology could actually help people?"

That was the excitement.

We were still imagining what the internet could become.

then Mexico got connected

One of the most amazing things to watch was how quickly technology spread.

A person who might once have relied on an internet café eventually had a smartphone.

A tiny business that once depended entirely on word-of-mouth could suddenly have a Facebook page.

Someone could send photographs instantly.

Someone could message family on another continent.

A hotel could reach travelers without having a giant advertising budget.

A person in a little Mexican village could suddenly participate in the same digital world as someone in Vancouver.

That was extraordinary.

And honestly?

It still is.

but somewhere along the way...

We didn't just connect people.

We connected everything.

The little computer in our pocket became our bank.

Our camera.

Our map.

Our newspaper.

Our television.

Our telephone.

Our address book.

Our calendar.

Our shopping mall.

Our dating service.

Our entertainment centre.

Our workplace.

Our advertising billboard.

Our photo album.

Our diary.

Our passport into an increasingly digital world.

And now artificial intelligence is sitting right beside all of it.

We went from:

"Wouldn't it be amazing if we could do this?"

to:

"Why doesn't this app already do that?"

in what feels like the blink of an eye.

Alice fell down the rabbit hole

Sometimes I think about that little moment in 2014.

We were experimenting.

We were excited.

We were building.

We thought technology was going to move us forward.

And it did.

But perhaps we didn't spend enough time asking:

Forward toward what?

Technology solved enormous problems.

It also created enormous ones.

Privacy became complicated.

Scams became sophisticated.

Algorithms learned what keeps us looking.

Businesses learned how much data is worth.

People became reachable at every hour of the day.

And somewhere along the way, being connected started becoming very different from actually being connected.

That's the part I worry about.

Not technology itself.

Technology is just a tool.

It's what we do with it.

so, if you're 25...

You were born into a world where apps were already becoming normal.

You probably don't remember paying for internet by the hour at an internet café.

You probably don't remember waiting for a website to load.

You probably don't remember taking photographs and having to wait to see whether they turned out.

You probably don't remember looking something up in an encyclopedia.

You probably don't remember having a phone that couldn't take a photograph.

And you certainly probably don't remember when application meant something you installed on a computer rather than something you tapped with your thumb.

I remember.

I remember the excitement.

I remember believing the internet might help ordinary people reach one another.

I remember watching Mexico connect.

I remember trying to build something myself.

And I remember walking away from my own app because I couldn't make it safe enough.

Maybe that's an important lesson from the early internet.

Just because we can build something doesn't necessarily mean we should release it.

Perhaps the next generation needs to rediscover that question.

Because we haven't reached the end of the technological revolution.

We're still falling down the rabbit hole.

And maybe it's time to occasionally stop, look around and ask:

Where exactly are we going?

What are we gaining?

What are we losing?

And can we still find our way home?

#lifeBeforeApps #internetHistory #technology #digitalLife #Mexico #BritishColumbia #Zipolite #socialMedia #apps #generations

September 30 is almost here.

September 30 is almost here.

“It’s important for us to remember, we learn from it. And until people show they have learned from this, we will never forget.”

— Murray Sinclair

Murray Sinclair was an Anishinaabe lawyer, judge and Senator, and served as Chair of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada, which spent years documenting the history and lasting impacts of the residential school system and listening to Survivors.

His message is simple: remembering is not enough. We have to learn from the past — and our actions have to show that we have learned.

As September 30 approaches, perhaps we should all ask ourselves:

What have I learned?
What biases do I still carry?
And what am I willing to do differently?

After what happened in Kamloops this past weekend, I think we all need to stop for a moment and look inward.

What are our biases?
What have we been taught?
What do we believe without questioning it?

And perhaps most importantly:

What do we do when we see racism, hatred or denial happening around us?

We cannot build a better Canada while allowing racism and hatred to continue causing such deep pain to Indigenous peoples, Survivors, families and communities.

Calling out racism isn't about attacking people. It is about refusing to normalize behaviour that causes harm.

Truth and Reconciliation asks something of all of us:

Listen. Learn. Question what we were taught. And have the courage to speak up when something is wrong.

September 30 is not simply a day to wear orange.

It is a day to remember the children who never returned home, honour Survivors and families, listen to Indigenous voices, and consider what reconciliation actually requires from each of us.

The Native Women's Shelter of Montreal has shared these words from Murray Sinclair about why we must never forget what happened to Indigenous peoples in Canada — and why the truth must continue to be heard.

On September 30, the Permanent Peoples' Tribunal is scheduled to release its final judgment following its 2026 session concerning missing and disappeared Indigenous children and unmarked burials in Canada. The Tribunal says it reviewed more than 2,000 pieces of evidence and heard testimony during its May hearings.

So I ask:

How can Canada grow if we refuse to face the truth?

How can reconciliation move forward if racism is allowed to go unchallenged?

And what will I do — what will you do — when we see it?

Listen.
Learn.
Speak up.

The truth matters.

And every child matters. 🧡


10 reflective questions

1. What have I learned about the history of Indigenous peoples in Canada?

2. What biases might I carry without realizing it?

3. Where did those beliefs come from?

4. Have I ever accepted something as “truth” without questioning it?

5. How do I respond when I witness racism?

6. Am I willing to listen when an Indigenous person tells me something is harmful?

7. What does reconciliation actually mean to me?

8. Am I doing anything that helps create understanding rather than division?

9. What am I willing to learn, unlearn and change?

10. When I see racism or hatred, will I stay silent — or speak up?

Keywords: Truth and Reconciliation, Indigenous peoples, Murray Sinclair, residential schools, Survivors, racism, reconciliation, September 30, Every Child Matters, Canada



#TruthAndReconciliation #EveryChildMatters #EndRacism #IndigenousRights #September30 #NationalDayForTruthAndReconciliation #ListenAndLearn #Reconciliation #Canada


not a lost cause — yet!

 not a lost cause — yet!

I have been talking about mobile outreach units because something important is happening in Victoria — people are taking services to the streets and meeting people where they are.

And Vancouver has outreach teams doing this too.

There is some fabulous work already happening. ❤️

Now we need to ask:

WHY AREN’T WE DOING MORE OF IT?

We are heading into the cold, wet season. People who are sleeping outside are exposed to rain, cold, poor sleeping conditions and all the health problems that can come with them.

TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE.

Look at the numbers:

🇨🇦 CANADA

The latest 2025 national Point-in-Time enumeration identified more than 65,000 people experiencing homelessness on a single night in 75 Canadian communities.

Of those, 17,620 people were in unsheltered locations — outdoors rather than in shelters or transitional housing.

And the national count found homelessness was still 59% higher than in 2020–2022.

🇨🇦 BRITISH COLUMBIA

B.C. conducted its latest community homeless counts in 2025, with 20 communities counted by the province, alongside federally funded and independent counts. BC Housing says the full 2024–25 report brings these together to provide a broader provincial picture.

🇨🇦 METRO VANCOUVER

The 2025 count identified 5,200 people experiencing homelessness across Metro Vancouver, an increase of 9% from 2023.

Within the City of Vancouver, 2,715 people were identified — 763 unsheltered and 1,952 sheltered.

🇨🇦 GREATER VICTORIA

The 2025 Point-in-Time count identified 1,749 people experiencing homelessness, compared with 1,665 in 2023.

These are snapshots, not everyone who experiences homelessness over an entire year. They can miss people who are hidden, moving around, staying temporarily with others or simply not encountered during the count.

And behind every number is a person.

Some people have been failed by housing systems.

Some have health or substance-use challenges.

Some have lost employment, family support or stability.

Some may have simply reached the point where they no longer believe the system can help them.

That does NOT mean they are a lost cause.

It means we need to find them.

We need people going out into communities — not waiting for everyone to walk through the right door, fill out the right form and navigate the right bureaucracy.

Bring the help to them.

Bring housing workers.

Bring health professionals.

Bring outreach workers.

Bring food and warm clothing.

Bring identification assistance.

Bring connections to shelters and supportive housing.

And, where appropriate, bring mental-health and addictions support.

Put multiple services together in mobile units and go where people actually are.

Victoria is already showing us pieces of this model.

Vancouver is already doing street outreach.

So let's build on what is working.

NOT A LOST CAUSE — YET.

The weather is changing.

People are outside.

Let's get the help moving before winter gets harder.


Absolutely — I’d make them firm but genuinely reflective, so they invite accountability rather than simply telling readers what to think.


10 reflective questions for Mark Carney

1. If homelessness is increasing, what will you do differently now that previous approaches clearly aren't enough?

2. How quickly can federal funding actually translate into a safe place for someone sleeping outside tonight?

3. What would you say to someone who has lost faith that government will ever help them find a home?

4. Why shouldn't mobile outreach become a much larger part of Canada's homelessness response?

5. Can Canada build enough affordable and supportive housing fast enough to keep up with the people falling into homelessness?

6. How will your government measure success — money announced, housing built, or people actually housed?

7. What happens to people who cannot navigate Canada's existing systems, forms and waiting lists?

8. If winter is predictable every year, why are we still scrambling to respond when the cold arrives?

9. What would you personally want to see happen for a person sleeping outside tonight?

10. When Canadians look back five years from now, what will you have done to make sure fewer people are living on the streets?



homelessness • housing crisis • affordable housing • street outreach • mobile outreach • supportive housing • poverty • winter • mental health • Canada

#NotALostCauseYet #Homelessness #Housing #StreetOutreach #MobileOutreach #Vancouver #Victoria #BritishColumbia #Canada #TimeIsOfTheEssence

Monday, September 28, 2026

Canada has new bail and sentencing laws — now let's see them enforced.

 Canada has new bail and sentencing laws — now let's see them enforced.

The federal Bail and Sentencing Reform Act (Bill C-14) became law this year, with more than 80 changes to the Criminal Code. The reforms make bail harder to obtain in certain cases involving repeat and violent offending, and introduce tougher sentencing provisions for serious and repeat offences.

That matters when we see what happened in Guelph this weekend.

Vandalism. Violence. Property damage. Dangerous behaviour. Police are reviewing footage and investigating.

If you come to Canada — whether you are a student, visitor or anyone else — respect our laws and our communities.

If you commit a serious offence, there should be real consequences.

And if you are a foreign national, criminal convictions can also have immigration consequences under Canadian law, including possible removal depending on the circumstances.

Canada is a welcoming country. But being welcomed here does not mean being free to destroy property, hurt people or terrorize a community.

The message should be simple:

Come here. Study. Work. Build a life. Enjoy yourself.

But respect the people and communities around you.

Break the law and there can be consequences. The new laws are on the books. Now they need to be enforced.

stern warning: if you come to Canada, respect the community

 A stern warning: if you come to Canada, respect the community you are entering.

What happened in Guelph this weekend should concern all of us. Vandalism, violence, property damage and dangerous behaviour aren't harmless partying. They affect residents, businesses, emergency workers and everyone who has to deal with the aftermath.

Canada welcomes students, visitors and newcomers from around the world. But coming here comes with responsibilities.

If you deliberately break the law and cause serious trouble, expect consequences. And for foreign nationals, serious criminal offences can have immigration consequences, including possible removal from Canada.

This isn't about someone's nationality. It's about behaviour.

There seems to be a growing lack of respect for other people, for property and for the communities we live in.

Come here to study. Come here to work. Come here to build a life. Enjoy yourself.

But if you come here to cause destruction, don't expect Canada to simply look the other way.

Respect the community. Follow the law. Take responsibility for your actions.

🎨 GET READY, KITSILANO! 🎨

🎨 GET READY, KITSILANO! 🎨


Oil painting by Tina Winterlik aka Zipolita 2026

Artwork by Tina Winterlik aka  Zipolita 2026 

I finally took inventory — 45 original oil paintings!

But I’m definitely not carrying all 45 to one pop-up! 😂

Instead, I’m putting together TWO themed Kitsilano Pop-Up Art Shows:

🌊 WATER IS LIFE

🔥 THE FIRE NEXT TIME!

Two very different collections, each with its own story.

There will be paintings in different sizes and price points, including some with gold-leaf details.

I’m sorting, pricing and getting everything ready now.

More details coming soon — I hope to see you at the pop-ups! 🎨❤️

#WaterIsLife #TheFireNextTime #Kitsilano #KitsilanoArtist #VancouverArtist PopUpArt OriginalOilPainting CanadianArtist SupportLocalArtists

how many chances do we give them?

 how many chances do we give them?

For years, we give politicians a chance.

Maybe this guy will do it.

Maybe this government will finally fix housing.

Maybe this leader will actually help people who are struggling.

Maybe the next budget will change things.

Maybe this time.

And then…

disappointment.

After disappointment.

After disappointment.

At some point, you have to stop asking people to wait.

We have given Ken Sim, David Eby and Mark Carney enormous opportunities to use their positions to make life better for millions of people.

And I keep thinking:

What could they have done with that opportunity?

Imagine having the power, the money, the staff, the influence and the microphone.

Imagine being able to leave office knowing you actually helped lift people out of poverty.

You helped people find homes.

You helped people stay in their homes.

You made healthcare easier to access.

You protected the environment.

You gave young people hope.

You made life a little less frightening for seniors.

You helped people get back on their feet.

That would be a legacy.

Instead, here we are.

People are still sleeping outside.

People are dying without stable housing.

Winter is coming.

And we still don't have enough affordable housing.

Meanwhile, governments announce billions in programs, infrastructure and economic initiatives.

The federal government says housing and homelessness are priorities, and its 2026–27 plan includes more than $1 billion in planned spending specifically under its Housing and Homelessness responsibility. But the government's own data also shows chronic homelessness among shelter users was 34% higher in 2024–25 than the 2016 baseline.

That number should stop us in our tracks.

Because behind every statistic is a person.

And then look at the safety net.

B.C.'s current disability-assistance table lists a maximum shelter allowance of $500 a month for one person.

Try finding a safe, decent place to live for that.

Go ahead.

I'll wait.

😪

This isn't about expecting politicians to perform miracles.

It's about asking them to recognize reality.

People cannot eat promises.

People cannot sleep in policy documents.

People cannot pay Vancouver-area rent with political speeches.

And we cannot keep building a society where people are forced to wait for help while their lives fall apart.

I believe in giving people chances.

But chances aren't unlimited.

At some point, we have to look at the results.

Not the slogans.

Not the photo opportunities.

Not the announcements.

The results.

Because leadership is an opportunity.

Power is an opportunity.

Public office is an opportunity.

And what you do with that opportunity matters.

I would love to see a politician leave office and have people say:

“That person made my life better.”

Not because they were perfect.

Not because they fixed everything.

But because they actually lifted people.

Helped people.

Built something.

Protected something.

Changed something.

That's what I want from government.

And honestly?

Winter is coming.

People are outside tonight.

People are hungry tonight.

People are wondering where they're going to sleep tonight.

So maybe it's time to stop asking:

“How much longer should we give them?”

And start asking:

“What are we going to do differently?”

Because people deserve more than another chance.

They deserve a chance of their own. ❤️

Teachers please educate the youth, they arecour future! 


Here are 10 questions that could work well as a high-school classroom discussion — open-ended enough that students can disagree and think critically:

1. If you were given the opportunity to lead a city, province or country, what would you change first — and why?

2. How many chances should voters give a political leader before judging their record?

3. Is a government successful because of what it promises, what it spends, or what actually changes for people's lives? Explain.

4. What responsibilities does a government have toward people who cannot afford housing?

5. Why might homelessness continue even when governments spend large amounts of money addressing it?

6. Should governments prioritize helping people today, preparing for the future, or finding a balance between the two?

7. What makes someone a good political leader: their intentions, their decisions, their results, or something else?

8. If a government gives financial support to a corporation, what should the public receive in return?

9. How should young people decide whether a politician deserves their trust?

10. Imagine you became premier tomorrow. What is one thing you would want people to say about your leadership when your term ended?

#PoliticalLeadership #GovernmentAccountability #HousingCrisis #Homelessness #CivicEngagement #YouthVoices #CriticalThinking #Democracy #PublicPolicy #FutureLeaders


greens, we need you more than ever 🌿

 greens, we need you more than ever 🌿

I have always voted Green.

Except now I live in Surrey and there are no Greens running here. 😪😪😪

And honestly, I miss having that choice.

Because look around.

Housing is a mess.

Climate change isn't waiting.

People are struggling with the cost of living while governments keep talking about growth, investment and big projects.

But what about the people who can't afford a home?

What about renters?

What about people living outside?

What about the environment we're leaving behind?

This is why I'm paying attention to Emily Lowan, the new BC Green leader.

She's a climate organizer, a renter and has worked on housing, labour, Indigenous issues and corporate accountability.

Her platform puts housing, climate, healthcare and economic fairness right up front. 🌿🏠

Compare that with the bigger political conversations happening around Carney federally and Eby provincially.

Different parties. Different approaches.

But I keep coming back to the same question:

Where are the people who can't afford to keep up?

We need Green voices asking that question.

We need people in government who will keep pushing housing and climate even when those issues get pushed aside by the next shiny announcement.

I don't expect any political party to magically fix everything.

But I absolutely want the Greens at the table.

And I want to see what Emily Lowan brings to that table.

Now...

WHERE ARE THE GREENS IN SURREY?! 😪🌿

That's what I want to know.

what issues matter most to you this election?

🏠 housing
🌿 climate
🏥 healthcare
💰 cost of living
🚆 transit
🌊 protecting our environment

Let's talk.

Reflective questions

1. What does affordable housing actually mean to you?

2. Are governments doing enough about the housing crisis?

3. How important should climate action be in this election?

4. Can economic growth happen without leaving people behind?

5. Should housing be treated primarily as a home rather than an investment?

6. What should governments do about homelessness?

7. Do smaller political parties bring important issues into the conversation?

8. What do you want your MLA to fight for?

9. Why are some communities left without candidates from certain parties?

10. What kind of British Columbia do we want to leave for the next generation?


#BCGreens #EmilyLowan #HousingCrisis #ClimateAction #AffordableHousing #CostOfLiving #Healthcare #SurreyBC #BCPolitics #GreenParty