History rarely repeats itself overnight. It happens through small steps.

 History rarely repeats itself overnight. It happens through small steps.

A society in crisis faces difficult questions. People are suffering. Families are desperate. Communities want safety. Everyone wants solutions.

But we must also ask:

What happens when a system starts choosing control before care?

What happens when there are not enough detox beds, treatment spaces, mental health supports, or housing — but there is increasing pressure to expand the power to remove people from their choices?

What happens when words like “disturbance,” “problem,” or “danger” become too broad?

Who could be affected?

People in crisis who need compassion.
People without housing.
People who challenge decisions.
Activists who speak up.
Protesters who demand change.
Young people who question the direction society is taking.
Anyone whose voice becomes inconvenient.

The answer cannot be to ignore people who are suffering.
The answer cannot be to abandon families who are desperate for help.

But a caring society must ask:

Are we building more places for healing, or more places for holding people?

Are we creating a system people can trust, or one people fear?

History teaches us that rights are easiest to lose when people believe it is only happening to someone else.

The measure of a society is not only how it treats the majority.

It is how it treats people who are struggling, unpopular, or powerless.

#HumanRights
#MentalHealthCare
#HousingJustice
#HumanDignity
#ListenToLivedExperience
#CompassionInAction
#CommunityVoices
#ProtectCivilRights

History Has a Memory: Are We Repeating the Same Mistakes?

 History Has a Memory: Are We Repeating the Same Mistakes?

There is something unsettling about watching history circle back.

For decades, people fought to expose the abuses that happened inside institutions like Riverview and Oakalla in British Columbia. We learned painful lessons about what happens when society decides that certain people are easier to remove, isolate, or control than to support.

People with mental illness, addictions, disabilities, poverty, and trauma were often placed into systems that promised care but sometimes delivered neglect, loss of rights, and in some cases, abuse.

We said: Never again.

But now we are having the same conversations again.

Politicians, doctors, police, families, and advocates are debating involuntary care — whether people should be taken into treatment against their will. Some argue that intervention is necessary when someone is dangerously unwell or unable to care for themselves.

And there is truth in that.

There are people in crisis who cannot recognize they need help. There are families watching loved ones deteriorate while waiting for a system that moves too slowly. There are people who need immediate care and protection.

But there is another truth too.

A system cannot say, “We need the power to force people into care,” while people who are asking for help voluntarily are still unable to find a detox bed, treatment space, psychiatrist, or supportive housing.

That contradiction matters.

Because care is not just about taking someone away from the street or a crisis situation. Care means what happens afterward.

Where do they go? Who supports them? Do they have housing? Do they have stability? Do they have dignity?

Without those answers, involuntary care risks becoming another way to manage visible suffering instead of actually healing it.

We also cannot ignore the lessons from the COVID years. Many young people experienced isolation, anxiety, depression, and a mental health crisis during that time. Youth struggled with access to support, and many families felt abandoned by systems that were overwhelmed.

We need to talk honestly about what worked, what failed, and what we learned.

Human rights organizations have repeatedly warned that Canada must be careful not to respond to social problems by removing people’s rights instead of addressing the conditions creating the crisis: poverty, homelessness, lack of healthcare, trauma, and addiction.

The question is not simply:

“Should we ever intervene?”

The harder question is:

How do we help people without repeating the harms of the past?

A society should be judged by how it treats people when they are at their most vulnerable.

We need compassion. We need accountability. We need evidence-based treatment. We need housing. We need prevention. We need listening to people with lived experience.

Because history does repeat itself — unless we are willing to remember it.

The goal should never be to lock people away because we have failed to build a system that supports them.

The goal should be to build a society where people can get help before they reach a point of crisis.

Care should mean dignity. Treatment should mean hope. And human rights should never be an afterthought.

Reflective Questions

1. When does protecting someone become controlling them?

2. Have we truly learned from the mistakes of past institutions, or are we repeating patterns in a different form?

3. Can a society claim to care about mental health if people asking for help cannot access care?

4. What does “care” really mean — removing someone from a crisis, or supporting them before they reach that crisis?

5. Who gets to decide when someone has lost the right to make choices about their own life?

6. Are we addressing the causes of suffering — housing, poverty, trauma, addiction, isolation — or only reacting when the crisis becomes visible?

7. What happens after someone is taken into care? Where is the long-term support?

8. Why do we often wait until people are in extreme crisis before offering help?

9. How do we balance public safety, compassion, and human rights?

10. When future generations look back at this moment, what will they say we chose to do?

11. Are we listening enough to people with lived experience, or are decisions being made about them without them?

12. Is a system truly caring if it only responds when people are already broken?

Hashtags

#HumanRights

#MentalHealthMatters

#CompassionOverControl

#DignityForAll

#ListenToLivedExperience

#MentalHealthCrisis

#HousingIsHealthcare

#CareNotControl

#HumanityFirst

#EndTheCycle

#LearnFromHistory

#HistoryRepeats

#RightsAndRecovery

#SupportBeforeCrisis

#PeopleBeforeSystems

#TraumaInformedCare

#AddictionRecovery

#RecoveryIsPossible

#SocialJustice

#CommunityCare

#AJustSociety

#HealthCareNotHandcuffs

#SolutionsNotPunishment

#HopeOverHarm

Keywords

involuntary care

mental health system

addiction treatment

human rights

institutionalization

Riverview Hospital history

Oakalla history

psychiatric care

trauma-informed care

homelessness and healthcare

supportive housing

youth mental health

access to treatment

lived experience voices

healthcare reform

dignity and autonomy

social responsibility

prevention and early intervention

compassionate communities

When Applying for Housing Becomes a Barrier: My Experience With BC Housing

 

When Applying for Housing Becomes a Barrier: My Experience With BC Housing

I have been thinking about whether to write this, because even putting these words on the page brings back the anxiety I felt that day.

I recently went to BC Housing because I am trying to find stability and a safe place to live. Housing is not just a form or an application. For someone who has been struggling, it represents security, dignity, and hope.

But instead of feeling supported, I walked into an environment that made me feel overwhelmed and panicked.

The office felt extremely sterile and disconnected. There was a glass panel separating me from the person helping me. I had to stand on my tiptoes to speak through the glass, and because I have difficulty speaking loudly, I felt like I had to push myself just to be heard.

There was no quiet room where I could sit down and explain my situation privately. No place where a person could feel calm while discussing something as personal as housing.

When I was given forms to complete, I wasn’t offered a clipboard or a comfortable place to sit and fill them out. I was told there was a shelf and it was pointed out to me.

Maybe these things seem small to someone working there every day. But when someone is already stressed, scared, or carrying years of uncertainty, small things can become huge barriers.

I had a panic attack.

And now, even though I know I need housing, I feel unable to go back and complete the BC Housing application process.

I have been told the process can take six weeks or more. I understand there are many people needing help and that staff are busy. But I also believe the process itself needs compassion. People seeking housing are not just applications and paperwork. They are human beings who may already be exhausted, frightened, or dealing with trauma.

I am grateful that I am on the list for Soroptimist housing, and I hope that opportunity comes through. But at this point, I do not think I will be applying for BC Housing again.

And that is the part that worries me.

How many people give up—not because they don't need housing, but because the process feels impossible?

Housing systems should not only provide homes. They should create a pathway that people can actually walk through.

A safe home begins with a safe conversation

Reflective Questions: When Seeking Help Becomes a Struggle

1. Have you ever had to prove you were poor enough, sick enough, or desperate enough to deserve help? What does that do to a person’s dignity?

2. Why do we create systems that require people in crisis to be at their strongest, most organized, and most capable just to access basic support?

3. If housing is a human need, why does applying for housing sometimes feel like applying to win a competition?

4. Who designs these systems, and do they ever sit on the other side of the desk and experience what applicants experience?

5. How do we make sure that helping one group of people does not mean another vulnerable group feels forgotten or abandoned?

6. Why do people with disabilities often have to repeatedly prove their struggles to receive support? What does that say about how we value people?

7. Should access to a safe home depend on someone’s ability to complete complicated forms, wait on long lists, and navigate confusing rules?

8. What would our housing system look like if it was designed by people who have experienced homelessness, disability, poverty, and housing insecurity?

9. Why do we accept a system where many people who work, contribute, and have lived in their communities for years still cannot afford a safe home?

10. When we say we are building compassionate communities, are our systems actually reflecting compassion—or only the idea of compassion?

Questions for BC Housing:

Have the people designing these application processes ever experienced the fear and stress of needing housing themselves?

Have you ever had to prove you were poor enough to deserve help?

Have you ever sat behind a glass barrier, trying to explain your life while feeling anxious, unheard, and overwhelmed?

What support exists for people who cannot navigate the application process because of trauma, disability, language barriers, age, or stress?

How many people give up before completing the process—not because they don't need housing, but because the system is too difficult to access?

How do you measure dignity in a housing system?

Are we building systems around human beings, or asking human beings to adapt to systems?

#HousingJustice

#HumanDignity

#AffordableHousing

#EveryoneNeedsAHome

#DisabilityRights

#ListenToLivedExperience

#CompassionInAction

#FixTheSystem

#CommunityVoices

#HousingCrisis

#DignityForAll

#PeopleBeforePaperwork

Rethinking Hunger: From Food Deserts to Food Forests — How Can We Nourish Our Communities?

Today I read a post from Peer to Peer about donating food to our unhoused neighbours. It reminded people that someone living outside often has no kitchen, no refrigerator, no stove, and sometimes not even a can opener. The most useful donations are foods that are safe to eat immediately.

It got me thinking.

Years ago, I learned about the nutrient-rich foods that were developed to help treat severely malnourished children. They weren't created to be trendy or expensive. They were designed to solve a real problem: how do you provide complete nutrition to someone who has almost nothing?

What if we brought that same spirit of innovation to our own communities?

I've spent different parts of my life worrying about food. When I was younger, I struggled to lose weight. Later in life, I struggled to gain it. And like so many people, I've experienced times when money determined what I could eat more than knowledge did. I know I'm not alone.

Today, we can walk into stores and find countless protein bars, energy bites, and "superfoods." Many are wonderful—but they often cost five dollars or more each. That's out of reach for many people, especially those living outside or families trying to stretch every dollar.

What if we challenged ourselves to create something different?

Imagine an affordable, shelf-stable nutrition square made from simple ingredients like oats, sunflower seed butter or tahini, pumpkin seeds, cacao, flax or chia, a source of protein, and added vitamins and minerals. Soft enough for someone with dental problems, ready to eat without cooking, individually wrapped, nutritious, and inexpensive enough that anyone could help distribute them.

But maybe the bigger question isn't what we make.

Maybe it's how we think about food.

Why does so much fruit fall from trees every year while people go hungry? Why don't we have more community food forests where anyone can pick an apple, pear, plum, or berries? Why aren't more lawns becoming vegetable gardens? Why aren't local people paid to harvest fruit that would otherwise go to waste and share it with food banks, community kitchens, shelters, and neighbours in need?

Not everyone has money to donate.

But many people have something to give.

A gardener can grow an extra row of vegetables.

Someone with a fruit tree can share their harvest.

A cook can prepare meals.

A student can volunteer.

An engineer can design better food packaging.

A nutritionist can help develop healthy recipes.

A business can donate ingredients.

An artist can help raise awareness.

A neighbour can simply care.

No one person will solve hunger. But thousands of small acts, connected together, can build something remarkable.

Food security isn't just about feeding people today. It's about creating communities where healthy food is accessible, where waste is reduced, where local people are supported, and where no one is forgotten.

I'd love to hear your ideas.

If we were starting from scratch, how would you redesign our food system so that everyone—friends, family, neighbours, and people living outside—had access to healthy, nourishing food?

Because I believe we can do better. And I believe the best ideas often begin with a simple conversation.

Reflective Questions:

What would our neighbourhoods look like if everyone had access to fresh, healthy food?

Why do we accept food waste while people go hungry?

How can we make nutritious food affordable for everyone, not just those who can pay premium prices?

What skills, resources, or time do we have that could help our neighbours?

Could every lawn, rooftop, balcony, or unused space become part of a local food system?

How can we support people experiencing homelessness with dignity and respect?

What if we valued growing and sharing food as much as we value buying and selling it?

How can businesses, governments, and communities work together instead of waiting for someone else to act?

What food traditions from around the world can teach us about resilience and nutrition?

If we redesigned our cities from scratch, would we build them differently?

#FoodSecurity

#FoodJustice

#CommunityCare

#FoodForests

#GrowFoodNotLawns

#EndFoodWaste

#HealthyCommunities

#NeighbourhoodConnections

#ClimateResilience

#CompassionInAction

#NoOneShouldGoHungry

#BuildBetterCommunities

The Boats Covered in Garbage, Pete Seeger, and Why We Still Need Hope

 The Boats Covered in Garbage, Pete Seeger, and Why We Still Need Hope

This morning I saw something that stopped me.

At the dock there were boats covered in barnacles, filled with garbage collected from False Creek, Granville Island, and English Bay. The smell was awful. It was a reminder of what we have allowed to accumulate in the waters that surround us.

Two people walked by and saw the boats.

“She said, ‘Oh yes, they left this here so people can see the garbage.’”

I told her, “I never swim here.”

She looked surprised and asked how long I had lived here.

“Since 1997,” I said. “I was born and raised around here and in British Columbia.”

I looked at those boats and thought: We could clean this all up.

“Really?” she asked.

Yes. Really.

Because history has shown us that change can happen when people refuse to believe something is impossible.

Have you ever heard of Pete Seeger?

Many people laughed at him. They thought he was unrealistic. They thought one musician with an idea could never make a difference.

But Pete Seeger believed differently.

He got a boat. He brought people together. They sang, they educated, and they worked to bring attention to the polluted Hudson River. Over time, that movement helped transform how people saw the river and inspired efforts to restore it.

There is a beautiful documentary called The Power of Song that tells the story of Pete’s life — the challenges he faced, the criticism he endured, and his belief that ordinary people could create extraordinary change.

https://youtu.be/Czk2hj4VISg?si=xwfA6pskRuMqm6my

And maybe that is the message we need right now.

Because when we look around today, it can feel overwhelming.

Wildfires are burning. Communities are being threatened. The climate is changing. We are having enormous debates about energy, pipelines, and the environmental impact of new industries, including the growing demand from data centres.

Sometimes it feels like the problems are too big.

But every great environmental movement started with someone saying, “This is not right. We can do better.”

I joke that I will live to 108. That would be another 44 years for me. It is not impossible — people have done it. I once shook Dr. Fahrni’s hand, and Joan Frost, who lived just down the street from me, lived to 110. I even helped go through some of the belongings she left behind.

A human life can be long. But what will the world look like in those years?

That is the question.

Will we look back and say we watched everything fall apart?

Or will we be part of the generation that decided to repair what we could?

The boats covered in garbage are not just a symbol of pollution. They are also a symbol of possibility.

Because if people could help restore a river once thought beyond saving, maybe we can still restore our oceans, our forests, our communities, and our hope.

Maybe we need a little more Pete Seeger spirit right now.

Maybe we need people who are willing to stand on a boat, sing a song, and say:

“This matters.

This is our home.

And we can do better.”

10 Reflective Questions

1. What will future generations say about the choices we made during this moment of environmental crisis?

2. Are we willing to believe that ordinary people can still create extraordinary change?

3. When we see pollution, fires, and environmental damage, do we feel helpless — or inspired to act?

4. What would our communities look like if we treated rivers, oceans, and forests as part of our family?

5. Have we forgotten the power of music, storytelling, and collective action to change the world?

6. If someone 50 years from now looked back at our time, what would we want them to remember?

7. Are we focusing enough on repairing the damage we have caused, or only debating who is responsible?

8. What small action could each of us take that might inspire someone else?

9. How do we keep hope alive when the challenges feel bigger than any one person?

10. What kind of planet do we want to leave behind for the children who will inherit it?

#ClimateAction #HopeForThePlane #EnvironmentalJustice #OceanCleanup #CommunityPower #PeteSeeger #ProtectOurWaters #ClimateHope #RestoreNature #PeopleCanChangeTheWorld

Kitsilano Pool: Time to Rethink the Reservation System?

 Kitsilano Pool: Time to Rethink the Reservation System?

For nearly a century, Kitsilano Pool has been one of Vancouver's most treasured public spaces. Opened in 1931, the iconic saltwater pool has welcomed generations of swimmers, families, school groups, seniors, athletes, tourists, and local residents. Stretching along the shoreline with spectacular views of English Bay and the North Shore Mountains, it is more than just a swimming pool—it is part of Vancouver's identity.

Every summer, thousands of people make the pilgrimage to Kits Pool. Some come to swim laps. Others bring their children to splash in the shallow end. Many simply enjoy sitting by the water, soaking up the sunshine and the unique atmosphere that has made Kits Pool a destination for almost 100 years.

A Pool That Has Weathered Many Storms

Over the decades, Kits Pool has faced countless challenges.

It has endured powerful winter storms that damaged the seawall and pool infrastructure. King tides have flooded the surrounding area, reminding us that operating a pool beside the ocean comes with unique risks. Climate change and rising sea levels are increasing these challenges, and future upgrades will likely need to address more frequent coastal flooding.

The facility itself is also aging. Pumps, pipes, filtration systems, concrete, and mechanical equipment require ongoing maintenance. Operating Canada's longest outdoor saltwater swimming pool is no small task.

Despite these obstacles, Kits Pool has remained one of Vancouver's greatest public amenities.

Then Came COVID-19

Like almost every public facility in the world, Kits Pool changed dramatically during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Reservation systems were introduced to control attendance and reduce crowding. At the time, most people understood the need. Public health orders required physical distancing, and limiting capacity helped staff manage a difficult situation.

But COVID restrictions have long since ended.

Many residents are now asking why the reservation system remains.

The Current Frustration

This summer, growing numbers of swimmers have expressed concerns about the reservation system.

Some say they arrive to find parts of the pool sitting empty while people without reservations are waiting outside. Others describe trying repeatedly to book online, only to discover available space once they arrive.

There are also concerns about frequent cleaning periods, temporary closures, and interruptions that reduce already limited swimming time.

For a public facility funded by taxpayers, many people believe access should be as simple as possible.

The frustration is not directed at lifeguards or maintenance crews. They work hard to keep everyone safe and maintain a complex waterfront facility.

The questions are being asked of the policies.

Is There a Better Way?

Perhaps reservations still have a role during exceptionally busy periods.

Perhaps a hybrid system could work better, allowing more walk-in access while still offering reservations for those who prefer to plan ahead.

Perhaps unused reservations should immediately become available to people waiting at the entrance.

Perhaps occupancy information could be shared in real time so swimmers know when the pool is busy before leaving home.

Whatever the solution, the goal should be maximizing access while maintaining safety.

Public Spaces Should Bring Communities Together

Public pools are more than recreational facilities.

They improve public health.

They give children a safe place to learn to swim.

They provide affordable recreation for families.

They offer seniors an opportunity for low-impact exercise.

They become gathering places where communities connect across generations.

These are investments in quality of life.

Looking Ahead

Kitsilano Pool has survived almost a century of change.

It has weathered storms, infrastructure challenges, king tides, economic recessions, and a global pandemic.

Now it faces another challenge—not one of engineering, but of public policy.

As Vancouver continues to grow, residents deserve public facilities that are accessible, welcoming, and responsive to the communities they serve.

Perhaps it is time for the Park Board and City Council to review the current reservation system, listen to public feedback, and ask a simple question:

Is Kits Pool working as well as it could for the people of Vancouver?

Public spaces belong to the public. The best policies are those that balance safety, efficiency, and accessibility while ensuring these treasured places remain vibrant for future generations.

---

10 Reflective Questions

1. Should Kitsilano Pool return to mostly drop-in access?
2. Are reservations still necessary after the pandemic?
3. Could a hybrid reservation and walk-in system work better?
4. Should unused reservations automatically be released to people waiting at the gate?
5. Is enough data being shared about daily occupancy?
6. How should Vancouver prepare Kits Pool for rising sea levels and king tides?
7. What improvements would encourage more people to use public pools?
8. How can maintenance be scheduled to minimize disruption?
9. What role should public pools play in improving community health?
10. How can Vancouver preserve Kits Pool for the next 100 years?

 #KitsPool #Kitsilano #Vancouver #ParkBoard #PublicPools #Community #ClimateAdaptation #KingTides #OutdoorSwimming #AccessibleRecreation

Can Canada Feed Itself?

 Can Canada Feed Itself? Food, Water, Land, and the Future of Our Health

For thousands of years, humans lived by understanding the land around them. Communities knew what grew in their region, when to harvest, how to preserve food, and how to respect the water and soil that sustained them.

Today, our food system looks very different.

Canada has some of the greatest agricultural potential in the world, yet we are losing farmland, depending on global supply chains, and facing growing concerns about soil health, water quality, climate change, and the health impacts of modern diets.

Food security is not just about having enough calories. It is about asking:

Do we have healthy food?
Do we have clean water to grow it?
Do we have farmers who can continue farming?
Do future generations know how to feed themselves?

Many people are concerned about the rise of ultra-processed foods, sugary drinks, convenience meals, and diets disconnected from local seasons. At the same time, many families struggle with the cost of fresh food and the time needed to prepare meals from scratch.

This is not simply an issue of individual choices. It is also about the system around us.

How did we move so far away from growing, cooking, and sharing food?
What happens when communities lose the skills to produce their own food?

Water is one of the biggest concerns. A farm can have fertile soil, but without clean water, agriculture cannot thrive. Pollution, chemical runoff, and changing weather patterns remind us that protecting water is one of the most important investments we can make.

Indigenous peoples across this land have long understood the connection between food, water, animals, plants, and seasons. Traditional knowledge teaches that humans are not separate from nature—we are part of a larger ecosystem.

As our climate changes, some regions may experience longer growing seasons and new agricultural opportunities. But adaptation requires planning. It means protecting farmland, restoring ecosystems, supporting farmers, and learning how to work with the land instead of constantly fighting against it.

Maybe the future of food is not just about bigger farms and more imports.

Maybe it is also about:

• community gardens,
• local food networks,
• preserving seeds,
• teaching children how to grow food,
• protecting water,
• supporting small farmers,
• and bringing cooking skills back into our homes.

A resilient food system is not built overnight. It starts with asking difficult questions.

10 Reflective Questions

1. How much farmland can Canada afford to lose before food security becomes a serious concern?

2. Should protecting agricultural land be treated as a national priority?

3. Are we becoming too dependent on global food systems instead of strengthening local communities?

4. What happens when people lose the knowledge of how to grow, cook, and preserve food?

5. Should every community have access to gardens, food education, and local food programs?

6. How do we balance modern farming technology with protecting soil, water, and biodiversity?

7. Are we paying enough attention to the long-term effects of chemicals used in agriculture?

8. What can we learn from Indigenous food systems and relationships with the land?

9. Should governments invest more in local food production rather than relying mainly on imports?

10. What kind of food system do we want to leave for future generations?

Hashtags

#FoodSecurity
#ProtectOurFarmland
#CleanWater
#FutureOfFood
#LocalFood
#SustainableLiving
#RegenerativeAgriculture
#IndigenousKnowledge
#ClimateAdaptation
#HealthyCommunities

What if this became the healthiest, most creative neighbourhood in Canada instead of just another expensive development?

If it were me, I'd ask:

What if this became the healthiest, most creative neighbourhood in Canada instead of just another expensive development?

Imagine a place where people of all incomes and ages actually wanted to spend time.

• 🌳 An urban food forest with fruit and nut trees anyone can harvest.
• 🥕 Community gardens and teaching gardens where kids learn to grow food.
• 🏡 Tiny homes or affordable artist/live-work cottages.
• 🎨 Public art studios, mural walls, pottery, woodworking and maker spaces.
• 🍞 A year-round public market featuring local farmers, Indigenous foods, artists and small businesses.
• 👩‍🍳 Community kitchens where people learn to cook healthy meals together.
• 🌼 Pollinator gardens, native plants, wetlands and wildlife habitat.
• 🚲 Safe bike paths and walking trails connecting Kits Beach, Vanier Park and Granville Island.
• 🎭 Outdoor theatres, music, dance and cultural festivals.
• 🧒 Natural playgrounds instead of just plastic equipment.
• 🐦 Bird sanctuaries, bat boxes, bee hotels and educational signs.
• 🌊 Rain gardens that clean stormwater before it reaches False Creek.
• 🧓 Intergenerational spaces where seniors teach skills and children learn from them.
• 📚 A learning centre with classes on gardening, Indigenous history, ecology, art and sustainable living.

The Molson site is a rare opportunity. Cities don't often get to rethink such a large piece of land. The question shouldn't only be "How many towers can we fit?" It should also be "What kind of city do we want to leave for the next generation?"

That, to me, is the conversation worth having. 🌿🎨🌎

This was delivered

Public Hearing July 21 2026

Public Hearing July 21 2026

Public Hearing July 21 2026

10 Reflective Questions

1. What kind of legacy do we want this site to leave for future generations?

2. Are we designing a community, or simply building more real estate?

3. How much green space is enough in a city facing climate change?

4. Could this become a world-class model for sustainable urban living?

5. Why not include food forests, community gardens, and spaces that improve food security?

6. How can this development support artists, makers, seniors, families, and local businesses—not just investors?

7. What opportunities are we missing if our first solution is always taller buildings?

8. How can Indigenous knowledge and ecological restoration shape this site's future?

9. What public spaces would encourage people to connect, create, learn, and thrive together?

10. If this land were being developed for your grandchildren instead of today's market, what would you build?

Hashtags

#Vancouver #Kitsilano #FalseCreek #UrbanPlanning #CommunityFirst #GreenCities #FoodForest #PublicSpaces #ImagineBetter #FutureGenerations

Keywords

Vancouver, Kitsilano, Molson Brewery site, urban planning, food forest, community gardens, public spaces, affordable housing, sustainability, public hearing

Painting for the Oceans: My Tribute to Wyland and the Gray Whales

 Painting for the Oceans: My Tribute to Wyland and the Gray Whales

Gray Whale Family by Zipolita 2026

Some days remind us exactly why we became artists.

Yesterday was one of those days.

I spent the day creating a mural inspired by the legendary marine artist Wyland and his extraordinary legacy of 100 Whaling Walls around the world. For decades, his murals have transformed ordinary walls into windows beneath the sea, inspiring millions of people to appreciate, celebrate, and protect our oceans.

This mural is not intended to be an exact copy of any of Wyland's work. It is my own interpretation—a tribute inspired by his vision and by my own love of the ocean.

The mural features a family of gray whales, one of the Pacific Ocean's most remarkable migratory species. Every year these gentle giants travel thousands of kilometres along the west coast of North America, moving between the warm lagoons of Mexico and their northern feeding grounds. Living on Canada's West Coast, we are fortunate to share part of their incredible journey.

There are still a few finishing touches to add—some white highlights and my Zipolita signature—but the mural has finally come to life.

A Wall with a History

This wall has quite a story.

Last year it was covered in graffiti tags. Every time I walked past, I wondered if anyone would mind if I transformed it into something beautiful instead.

So I did.

The first mural was a mother orca swimming with her calf. Beside it I painted another mural featuring two joyful whales.

For a long time the artwork remained untouched. Even graffiti artist Capo tagged nearby, but after I repaired the mural, it was respected and left alone.

Then life took me to Mexico.

From January until April I was away, and when I returned, someone had vandalized the mural.

Sprayed across it were the words:

"Nuke the Whales."

Those words hurt.

Not because someone painted over my work—that happens with public art—but because of what the message represented.

Whales symbolize life, family, resilience, and the health of our oceans. Seeing such a hateful message across animals that have inspired so many people was heartbreaking.

As soon as I could, I painted over the vandalism with another orca mural. I wasn't at my best. I had just returned from travelling, I was still recovering, and I didn't have much paint available.

But I wanted that message gone.

Starting Again

Over the months I noticed something else happening.

The wall itself was failing.

It had been painted so many times over the years that layers underneath were beginning to separate. Paint was bubbling, cracking, and peeling away.

Every time I walked past, another piece had fallen off.

When I arrived this week, I started pulling away the loose paint. Before long I realized there was far more than I expected. Large sheets were lifting from the wall.

For a moment I wasn't sure what to do.

There was simply too much peeling paint.

Eventually I stopped worrying about it, picked up my brush, and started painting.

Sometimes that's what artists do.

We cannot control everything.

Walls crack.

Paint peels.

Weather changes.

People vandalize.

But we paint anyway.

Because creating something beautiful will always be a better response than leaving behind something hateful.

Painting in Public

One thing I hadn't expected was how many people would stop.

The wall sits beside a busy walkway, and yesterday there was a constant stream of people passing by.

Children.

Families.

Cyclists.

Seniors.

Visitors from all over the world.

People walking to work.

Neighbours out enjoying the day.

Many stopped to watch the whales slowly emerge from the wall. Some stayed for only a minute. Others stood watching for much longer, asking questions about the painting or telling me about whales they had seen.

Public art has a wonderful way of bringing strangers together.

For a few moments, conversations began between people who had never met before.

They talked about whales.

About nature.

About travel.

About art.

It reminded me that murals don't simply decorate a neighbourhood—they create connections.

And Then There Were the Dogs

One of the happiest surprises was all the dogs.

It seemed as though every few minutes another happy dog came walking by with its person.

I absolutely love dogs.

Some wanted to say hello.

Some watched quietly while their humans admired the painting.

Others were simply excited to continue their walk.

Every wagging tail made me smile.

They added their own joyful energy to the day.

The Children

One of the most rewarding moments was watching the children.

Kids notice things adults sometimes miss.

Many became excited as the whales slowly appeared.

Their curiosity reminded me why public art matters.

Perhaps one of those children will remember seeing whales on this wall years from now.

Perhaps it will inspire them to learn more about our oceans.

Perhaps one of them will become an artist.

Or a marine biologist.

Or someone who simply grows up caring about the natural world.

You never know where inspiration begins.

Thank You, Wyland

Wyland has spent decades using art to encourage people to care about the oceans.

His murals have become landmarks around the world, reminding us that whales are not simply magnificent animals—they are part of a healthy ocean ecosystem that supports life on Earth.

His work inspired me.

This mural is my way of saying thank you.

A Long Day

By the end of the day I was exhausted.

Painting outdoors is physically demanding.

Hours of standing.

Reaching.

Stretching.

Stepping back.

Climbing.

Talking with people.

Finding concentration again after every conversation.

I finally packed away my brushes, treated myself to pizza, and enjoyed one of the longest, hottest baths I've had in a very long time.

Today my body is reminding me just how much work mural painting really is.

And honestly...

I wouldn't change a thing.

Mural inspired by Wyland
By Zipolita 

Thank You

To everyone who stopped yesterday...

Thank you.

Thank you for every smile.

Every conversation.

Every word of encouragement.

Every child who pointed excitedly at the whales.

Every neighbour who paused to watch.

Every visitor who asked about the mural.

And to every wonderful dog who came by with a wagging tail—you made my day even brighter.

The kindness I received filled my heart more than you know.

Art is never just about paint on a wall.

It's about bringing people together.

It's about replacing empty spaces with hope.

It's about creating something beautiful where there was once neglect.

I hope these gray whales bring a little peace, wonder, and joy to everyone who walks this path.

And I hope they remind us that our oceans—and the incredible creatures who call them home—are always worth protecting.

Thank you, Wyland, for inspiring artists like me to paint for the oceans.

— Tina Winterlik (Zipolita) 🎨🐋💙

Reflective Questions 

1. Have you ever heard of Wyland and his famous Whaling Walls around the world? Have you ever seen one in person?

2. Did you know that many of Wyland’s Whaling Walls have disappeared over the years, been damaged, or been painted over? How does that make you feel?

3. What do you think happens when a piece of public art that carries a message of ocean conservation is removed or covered up?

4. Have you seen the former Whaling Wall at the Vancouver Aquarium in Stanley Park, and do you think important environmental artwork should be preserved?

5. What do you think when a mural created to inspire people is replaced by another project or covered over?

6. How do you feel when you see graffiti painted over a beautiful mural that was created with care and a positive message?

7. Do you think murals about nature, whales, and wildlife should be protected like other important landmarks?

8. With events like FIFA bringing changes to public spaces, how do we balance celebrating major events while protecting meaningful public art?

9. If you had the chance to save one mural forever, what kind of message would you want it to share with future generations?

10. Would you like to see more walls, fences, and doors transformed into murals that inspire people instead of being left blank or covered in graffiti?

11. If you had a wall in your community, what story would you want painted on it?

12. Do you think one mural can change how people feel about a neighbourhood, a species, or the planet?

13. Would you like me to paint a mural for your home, business, fence, or community space? What would you want it to represent?

14. How can we make sure the next generation gets to experience powerful public art created by artists who care about the Earth?

15. What does a whale mural make you think about — the ocean, conservation, family, migration, or something else?

#WhalingWall #WylandFoundation #SaveTheWhales #OceanArt #PublicArt #VancouverArtists #WhiteRockBC #MarineConservation #ArtForChange #ProtectOurOceans

Gray Whale Family by
Tina Winterlik aka Zipolita 

BC and Ottawa announce a $20 billion development deal — but what does it mean?

 📢 BC and Ottawa announce a $20 billion development deal — but what does it mean?

One of the biggest takeaways is that the North Coast oil tanker ban will remain in place, protecting the Great Bear Sea from oil tanker traffic. Coastal First Nations welcomed the decision, saying it helps safeguard their communities, livelihoods, and marine ecosystems.

However, the agreement also includes major investments in LNG, mining, ports, transportation, and electricity infrastructure, raising concerns among some First Nations, scientists, and environmental groups. They worry it could lead to increased shipping, greater impacts on endangered southern resident killer whales in the Salish Sea, and possibly a future Alberta pipeline to BC's South Coast.

Premier David Eby says BC is not committing to support a new pipeline, but because interprovincial pipelines fall under federal jurisdiction, the province would not challenge one in court.

The North Coast tanker ban remains an important environmental protection, but the broader debate over LNG expansion, pipelines, Indigenous rights, and balancing economic development with environmental protection is far from over.

What are your thoughts on this agreement?

Reflective Questions

How much industrial development can BC's coast and ecosystems sustain?

What environmental safeguards should be in place before approving major LNG, mining, pipeline, or port projects?

How can governments ensure economic development doesn't come at the expense of wildlife, forests, rivers, and oceans?

What lessons can Canada learn from regions that have experienced intensive resource development?

How should cumulative environmental impacts be measured when multiple large projects are proposed in the same region?

What protections are needed for endangered species, salmon, and southern resident killer whales?

Should climate impacts carry the same weight as economic benefits when governments approve major projects?

How can governments balance energy security, economic growth, Indigenous rights, and environmental stewardship?

What should BC's coastline look like 25 or 50 years from now?

What kind of legacy do we want to leave for future generations?

These questions encourage discussion about the broader environmental implications while leaving room for different perspectives.

#BCPolitics

#BritishColumbia

#ProtectOurCoast

#GreatBearSea

#SalishSea

#ClimateAction

When a Home Becomes a Fortune: The Hidden Story Behind Vancouver’s Land Values and Property Taxes

 When a Home Becomes a Fortune: The Hidden Story Behind Vancouver’s Land Values and Property Taxes

A century-old house on Point Grey Road tells a story that goes far beyond real estate.

Joan Frost was born in 1915. She lived through two world wars, moved from England to British Columbia after the Second World War, raised a family, and lived almost 110 years. Her husband, Dr. John Frost, served as a doctor during wartime, came to Canada, and built a medical career at St. Paul’s Hospital.

Their home was not just a building. It was where a family lived, where memories were created, and where decades of Vancouver history unfolded.

But today, the numbers tell another story.

A property assessment for a Point Grey Road home shows a land value of approximately $4.6 million, with the building itself valued at only a small portion of that amount. This is the reality of Vancouver: the land beneath people’s homes has become the fortune.

The question we need to ask is: what happens when the value of the land rises faster than a person’s income?

Many people look at older homeowners and say, “They are millionaires.” But a high property assessment does not mean someone has millions of dollars sitting in a bank account.

A retired person may own a valuable home but live on a pension. They still face:

• property taxes,
• insurance,
• repairs,
• utilities,
• health expenses,
• and the cost of aging.

Vancouver property taxes are based on assessed value, which is determined by BC Assessment. The City’s tax system applies rates to taxable property values, meaning a dramatic rise in land value can have a major impact on homeowners.

This is one reason cities have created tools like land assessment averaging, which can temporarily reduce the shock of sudden increases in land values.

But the bigger question remains:

Are we losing the people who built our neighbourhoods because the land they live on has become too valuable?

Kitsilano has changed dramatically. The small homes, gardens, and long-time residents who shaped the community now exist beside some of the most expensive real estate in Canada.

When an elderly person sells a home after living there for decades, it is easy to see only the sale price. We see millions of dollars and assume wealth.

But behind every sale is a human story:

• a lifetime of memories,
• a family history,
• a neighbourhood changing,
• and sometimes a person making the difficult decision that they can no longer afford to stay.

The debate about Vancouver housing is not only about new buildings and density. It is also about the people who were here before the prices exploded.

A house can become a fortune.

But the person inside it may simply be someone trying to keep a home.

Reflective Questions

When a home becomes worth millions, do we remember the people and stories behind the property?

Is it fair to measure someone’s wealth only by the value of the land they live on?

How can cities protect long-time residents who helped build the character of neighbourhoods like Kitsilano?

Should property tax systems better consider a person’s income, age, and ability to pay?

What happens to a community when generations of residents can no longer afford to stay?

Are we preserving heritage homes, or are we losing the human history connected to them?

When an elderly person sells a longtime family home, are we seeing a financial success story—or a sign of changing pressures?

How do we balance rising land values, housing needs, and compassion for existing residents?

What stories disappear when older homes are replaced by new developments?

Will future generations be able to build the same kind of long-term connection to Vancouver neighbourhoods?

#Kitsilano

#VancouverHistory

#VancouverHousing

#HousingAffordability

#PropertyTaxes

#BCRealEstate

#AgingInPlace

#HeritageHomes

#CommunityHistory

#NeighbourhoodStories

#VancouverChanging

#LandValues

Rogers closing Radio Stations 😪

Rogers has announced it is closing six radio stations across Canada, including 1130 NewsRadio and Sportsnet 650 in Vancouver.

This isn't just about radio. It's about losing local voices.

For decades, people relied on local radio for breaking news, traffic, weather, elections, emergencies, and stories that mattered to our communities. During wildfires, floods, storms, and other crises, local radio has often been one of the fastest and most trusted sources of information.

Every time a local newsroom disappears, we lose experienced journalists who hold governments and corporations accountable. We lose people who know our neighbourhoods and ask the questions that need to be asked.

As our communities face growing challenges—from housing and affordability to climate change and major development—we need strong local journalism more than ever.

My thoughts are with everyone whose jobs have been affected, and with the listeners who have made these stations part of their daily lives for so many years.

Thank you to all the reporters, anchors, producers, and staff who kept Vancouver informed. Your work mattered.

Reflective Questions

What happens to a community when its local voices disappear?

Who will report on local issues that national media often overlook?

How do we stay informed during emergencies if trusted local news outlets are gone?

What role does local journalism play in protecting democracy?

Are social media platforms a reliable replacement for local reporters?

How can communities support independent journalism?

What stories might never be told if local newsrooms continue to shrink?

What is the value of having journalists who know the history of a city?

How can young people become engaged with local news?

What kind of media landscape do we want to leave for future generations?

Keywords local journalism, Vancouver, News 1130, Sportsnet 650, Rogers Sports & Media, radio stations, local news, media layoffs, democracy, accountability, community voices, emergency broadcasting, 

#Vancouver #LocalNews #Journalism #CanadianMedia #News1130 #Sportsnet650 #SupportLocalJournalism #Media #Community #Democracy #PressFreedom #LocalVoices #Radio 

Which Villages Plan Is Vancouver Voting On?

 Which Villages Plan Is Vancouver Voting On?

Trust in public planning depends on one simple principle: everyone should be looking at the same information.

That is why a recent discovery by Vancouver architect and planning commentator Brian Palmquist deserves serious attention.

After comparing the proposed Villages Plan available to the public on Shape Your City with the referral report being presented to Vancouver City Council, he found significant differences between the two documents.

According to his analysis, the boundaries of several proposed villages do not match. In some cases, properties appear inside a village on one map and outside it on another. His comparison suggests differences involving approximately 167 city blocks and 252 homes.

If accurate, these are not minor drafting changes.

For homeowners, businesses, and neighbourhoods, village boundaries matter. They influence future zoning, redevelopment opportunities, building types, and long-term community planning. People deserve to know whether their property is affected before Council makes decisions that could shape Vancouver for decades.

Adding to the confusion is the timeline. The referral report going to Council is dated May 26, while the version currently available for public viewing is dated June 30. Naturally, residents are asking a simple question:

Which plan is the official version?

That question deserves a clear public answer.

Public engagement only works when everyone has access to the same information. If residents, planners, and elected officials are working from different maps, confidence in the process is weakened.

This is not about opposing growth or supporting development. Vancouver is changing, and thoughtful planning is necessary. But meaningful public consultation requires transparency, consistency, and clear communication.

Before any final vote, the City should explain:

• Which Villages Plan is the official document?
• Why do the maps appear to differ?
• Which properties are actually affected?
• Have all residents received accurate information about their neighbourhood?

These are reasonable questions that deserve straightforward answers.

Democracy depends on informed participation. Whether you support or oppose the Villages Plan, every resident has the right to understand what is being proposed before decisions are made.

The conversation should not be about confusion.

It should be about clarity.

Reflective Questions

1. Should residents have confidence that the public and Council are reviewing the same planning documents?

2. How important is transparency during major rezoning decisions?

3. If maps change, how should the public be notified?

4. Do you know whether your property is affected by the Villages Plan?

5. Should public hearings be delayed if important documents appear inconsistent?

6. What level of consultation should accompany neighbourhood-wide zoning changes?

7. How can cities improve public trust during large planning initiatives?

8. Should every affected homeowner receive clear, accurate information before a vote?

9. What does meaningful public participation look like?

10. How can Vancouver balance growth with accountability?

#Vancouver #VillagesPlan #CityPlanning #Transparency #PublicConsultation #Housing #Rezoning #Community #Democracy #UrbanPlanning

The Boxes at the End of the Driveway

 

Yesterday I experienced something I don't think I'll ever forget.

Riding back from Jericho through Point Grey, I came across the remaining contents of an estate with a "FREE" sign. Most people would have seen old boxes. I saw a lifetime.

There were family photographs, birthday cards, newspaper clippings, certificates, letters, paintings, tax records, and keepsakes belonging to John and Joan Frost. Joan had lived an extraordinary 110 years. As I gently sorted loose photographs and papers into empty drawers to keep them together, I couldn't help but think about how overwhelming it must be to clear out a lifetime of memories. Grief, deadlines, and exhaustion can leave impossible decisions. I don't judge anyone involved. I just felt these memories deserved a little care.

I rescued a few certificates and took them to the Museum of Vancouver to ask whether they belonged in an archive. Another gentleman who also cared about what he had found took many of the photographs and papers. We exchanged contact information in the hope that someone connected to the family or the neighbourhood might help preserve their story.

The experience brought back a memory from more than 30 years ago.

In 1995, while I was a mature student working in home support during the summer, I cared for a wonderful gentleman named Mr. Thurston during the last three weeks of his life. I truly believed he was getting better. I didn't realize he was quietly calling old friends to say goodbye.

One of those friends was Dr. Gordon Fahrni, who lived to the remarkable age of 108. I remember him arriving at the funeral with his cane, sitting beside me while I cried, nudging the hymn book toward me and saying, "Sing, sing." After the service, he politely held the door open for me. Years later, I learned more about his extraordinary life and his memoir, The Prairie Surgeon, which tells of practising medicine in a much different time.

When Mr. Thurston died, I went home to my mom and said, "I never want to do home support again. It's too hard." My mom had done that work for 12 years. She understood exactly what I meant.

I went back to college, earned my photography diploma, found other jobs, and life moved on.

But yesterday reminded me that every photograph, every birthday card, every old letter, and every faded newspaper clipping represents someone's entire life.

One day, our own boxes of memories may be all that remain.

If you are helping clear a loved one's home, take one last look before something is thrown away. Label the people in old photographs. Ask the older members of your family who everyone is. Shred personal financial documents. And if you come across something that may have historical significance, consider contacting a local archive or museum before it disappears forever.

History doesn't only live in museums.

Sometimes it's sitting quietly at the end of a driveway, waiting for someone to notice.

Reflective Questions

1. How many family stories are lost because no one knows their value?

2. What memories would you hope someone would preserve from your life?

3. Have you ever discovered an old photograph that changed the way you saw your family history?

4. Do we take enough time to ask our elders about the people in old photographs?

5. What responsibility do we have to preserve local history before it disappears?

6. How do grief and the practical demands of settling an estate influence the decisions we make?

7. What ordinary objects from today might become important historical records tomorrow?

8. Who in your life has quietly shaped your journey without realizing it?

9. If you could spend one more hour with someone you've lost, what would you ask them?

10. What stories in your own family deserve to be written down before they're forgotten?

Bonny Graham (B. Wyse): Making Language and Belonging Visible in the Fraser Valley

 🎨 Bonny Graham (B. Wyse): Making Language and Belonging Visible in the Fraser Valley

There are moments when a place you’ve known for a long time begins to speak differently.

Not because the land has changed—but because the way we choose to see it has changed.

That’s what comes to mind when looking at the public work of Bonny Graham (also known as B. Wyse), a Coast Salish artist from the Stó:lō community in the Fraser Valley. Her murals and installations don’t just decorate public space—they quietly reshape it.

They ask people to notice language again. To notice presence again. To notice that this land has always had names, voices, and stories that deserve to be seen in daylight.

---

🌿 Art rooted in language and land

Bonny Graham’s work is deeply connected to Halq’eméylem language and Coast Salish visual traditions. Instead of treating art as something separate from daily life, she brings it into places where people are simply passing through:

• Roundabouts
• Roadways
• School walls
• Community entrances
• Public gathering spaces

Her approach is simple, but powerful:
if language disappears from public space, it slowly disappears from memory.

So she puts it back where people can see it.

Not behind glass. Not in archives. But on the walls and pathways people move through every day.

---

🌉 The Vedder Roundabout — a message in motion

One of her most recognized works is the Vedder Road roundabout installation in Chilliwack.

At first glance, it’s striking visually: a canoe, paddles, and a circular design that draws the eye inward and outward at the same time.

But the deeper meaning is in the details.

The installation includes the Halq’eméylem phrase:

“Ey kwesé é mi” — It is good that you are here.

In a world where public spaces often feel rushed, anonymous, or purely functional, this is something different. It is not just art to look at—it is a statement of welcome embedded into infrastructure.

A reminder that travel is also movement through territory, through history, and through relationship.

---

🏙️ Bringing Indigenous language back into everyday view

In and around Hope and the Fraser Valley, her work often appears in quieter forms:

• Welcome banners in Halq’eméylem
• Public signage with Indigenous language
• School and youth-focused installations
• Community design projects rooted in local identity

These are not “grand monuments.” They are everyday encounters.

And that is what makes them powerful.

Because inclusion is not only about big events or official statements—it is about what people see when they walk down the street, drive to school, or stop at an intersection.

---

🧭 Why her work matters in places like Hope

For anyone who remembers the Fraser Canyon from earlier decades, it is hard to miss the contrast.

Places like Hope and Yale have always carried layers of history—Indigenous presence, settler development, highway expansion, and the realities of working-town life. But not all of those layers were equally visible in public space.

What Bonny Graham’s work does is shift that balance.

It doesn’t rewrite history.
It expands what is visible.

It brings forward what was always there.

---

🌱 Art as quiet transformation

Beyond murals and signage, her broader artistic practice explores:

• Language revitalization
• Cultural memory
• Intergenerational healing
• Identity and belonging

There is a thread running through all of it: the idea that visibility matters.

Not visibility as spectacle—but visibility as recognition.

---

💬 Closing reflection

Seeing her work in places like Hope is not just about art appreciation. It is about noticing a shift in what a community is willing to say about itself.

Years ago, the Fraser Canyon could feel like a place where stories were held quietly, sometimes unevenly shared, sometimes left unspoken.

Today, murals like these suggest something else is being asked for:

Not forgetting the past—but widening the space we use to understand it.

Bonny Graham’s work sits right in that space.

Quiet, grounded, and steady—yet impossible to ignore once you see it.

---

🧠 Hard Reflective Questions

1. When you compare the Fraser Canyon of the early 1970s to today, what forms of silence or invisibility stand out most to you?
2. How does public art change what a community is willing to acknowledge about its own history—and what might still be missing?
3. In what ways did growing up or living in isolated rural areas shape your understanding of inclusion or exclusion?
4. What does it mean when Indigenous language is placed back into public space after being absent for so long?
5. Are murals and symbolic gestures enough to represent reconciliation, or do they sometimes risk replacing deeper structural change?
6. Who gets to decide what stories are visible in a town like Hope—and who has historically been left out of that decision-making?
7. How do personal memories of hardship in places like Yale and Hope influence how you interpret today’s “community improvement” narratives?
8. What tensions exist between remembering difficult lived experiences and celebrating present-day progress?
9. Can a place truly transform without also addressing economic inequality and historical displacement?
10. When you see art like Bonny Graham’s in public space, what responsibility do viewers have—not just to admire it, but to respond to it?

Fraser Canyon history, Hope BC murals, Indigenous language revitalization, Bonny Graham artwork, public art and reconciliation, Yale BC memories, community inclusion, Stó:lō territory, cultural visibility, anti-oppression education

#FraserCanyon #HopeBC #YaleBC #IndigenousArt #Reconciliation #PublicArt #LanguageRevitalization #StoloTerritory #CommunityInclusion #BCHistory

Mural in Hope, and a Memory from the Fraser Canyon

 

A Mural in Hope, and a Memory from the Fraser Canyon

I lived between Yale and Hope from 1969 to 1973. It was a very different time in the Fraser Canyon. Life felt harder then—more isolated, fewer services, and not much visible recognition of the different cultures and histories that shaped the land. For a young person trying to make sense of the world, it wasn’t always an easy place to grow up or settle into.

That’s why seeing something like the new mural in downtown Hope feels significant.

This mural, created by Indigenous artist Bonny Graham with support from the Hope Inclusion Project and community members including Marla Rosenberg, Peter Bailey, and Linda Bailey, represents something that didn’t exist in the same way back then: a public, visible commitment to inclusion. It was 18 months in the making and now stands in the heart of town as a permanent reminder of belonging, shared history, and respect for Indigenous roots.

The mural is also dedicated to Linda Bailey, who passed away on June 1, 2026. From what the community has shared, she played a key role—alongside others—in helping bring anti-oppression education and inclusion-focused work into Hope. Her name now sits not just in memory, but in a piece of public art that will be seen by thousands of people passing through.

What stands out most is the shift in tone. In the late 60s and early 70s, places like Hope and Yale were still very much shaped by logging, highway expansion, and survival economics. Conversations about inclusion, reconciliation, or anti-oppression were not part of everyday public life in the way they are now. Seeing a mural that explicitly acknowledges Indigenous roots and community inclusion feels like a different era arriving in physical form on a wall.

Public art like this does something quiet but important—it changes what a town chooses to say about itself. Instead of silence, it puts values into the open. Instead of invisibility, it offers recognition.

For someone who remembers the Fraser Canyon from decades ago, this isn’t just a mural. It’s a marker of how far community conversations have shifted, and how much further they still have to go.

But it is also, simply, a hopeful sign.

Reflective Questions

1. What do you remember most clearly about life in the Fraser Canyon during the late 1960s and early 1970s?

2. How has the sense of community in places like Hope and Yale changed over time?

3. What does “inclusion” mean to you now, compared to what it might have meant decades ago?

4. How do public murals and art change the way a town understands its own history?

5. Why is it important to visibly recognize Indigenous roots in public spaces?

6. What kinds of challenges do small towns face when trying to shift toward more inclusive values?

7. How can community-driven projects influence education and local awareness over time?

8. What memories or emotions does this mural bring up for you personally?

9. How do we balance remembering difficult past experiences with acknowledging positive change?

10. What role do individuals like Linda Bailey play in shaping long-term community change?

#HopeBC #YaleBC #FraserCanyon #CommunityInclusion #IndigenousRoots #PublicArt #MuralArt #Reconciliation #BCHistory #HopeInclusionProject

People Write the Code. People Must Accept the Responsibility.

 People Write the Code. People Must Accept the Responsibility.

Artificial intelligence does not suddenly appear out of nowhere. It is designed by people. It is trained on data selected by people. It is programmed using code written by people. Every decision about what an AI system can do—or cannot do—is ultimately made by human beings.

That is why we must never accept the excuse, "The algorithm did it."

An algorithm has no conscience. It has no compassion. It has no moral judgment. It simply follows the instructions and learns from the information it is given.

If an AI system deceives a child, encourages self-harm, spreads dangerous misinformation, or creates harmful content, responsibility does not disappear into a computer. It belongs to the people and organizations that designed it, tested it, approved it, and released it to the public.

As United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said:

"When a child is harmed, the answer must never be 'the algorithm did it.'"

He is right.

We would never allow a pharmaceutical company to sell medicine without proving it is safe for children. We would never accept a toy manufacturer saying, "The toy hurt the child—it wasn't our fault."

Why should AI be treated differently?

Innovation is important. But responsibility is even more important.

If companies profit from artificial intelligence, they must also accept legal and ethical responsibility for its consequences. Human beings created AI. Human beings must remain accountable for what it does.

Children should never become test subjects in a global experiment driven by speed, competition, and profit.

"No child should ever be a guinea pig for unregulated AI."

Reflective Questions

1. Should AI companies be legally responsible when their products cause harm to children?

2. What safeguards should be in place before AI tools are made available to young users?

3. How can parents, educators, and governments work together to ensure children use AI safely?

4. Do you think AI is advancing faster than society's ability to regulate it?

5. Should AI systems undergo safety testing similar to medicines, toys, and other products intended for children?

6. How much transparency should AI companies provide about how their systems are trained and make decisions?

7. Where should the balance be between technological innovation and protecting vulnerable people?

8. What ethical responsibilities do software developers and technology companies have when designing AI?

9. If an AI system causes harm, who should be held accountable—and why?

10. What kind of digital world do we want to leave for the next generation?

#ArtificialIntelligence #AISafety #ChildSafety #ResponsibleAI #AIEthics #UnitedNations #ChildrenFirst #DigitalRights #Technology #Accountability #OnlineSafety #FutureGenerations

Wildfire Near Boston Bar and Hell's Gate: Stay Informed, Stay Prepared, Help One Another

 Wildfire Near Boston Bar and Hell's Gate: Stay Informed, Stay Prepared, Help One Another

As many people in British Columbia are aware, a wildfire near Boston Bar and Hell's Gate is producing visible smoke throughout parts of the Fraser Canyon. Emergency crews, aircraft, and firefighters are working hard to protect communities, and conditions can change quickly.

The Fraser Valley Regional District has issued evacuation alerts for areas around Boston Bar due to the Brunswick Creek wildfire. Residents in affected areas should be prepared to leave on short notice if conditions worsen.

During emergencies like this, misinformation can spread just as quickly as smoke. Before sharing posts on social media, please verify information using official sources.

Official Sources for Wildfire Information

Official Sources You Can Trust

During a wildfire, conditions can change rapidly. Before sharing information on social media, check these official sources first:

🔥 EmergencyInfoBC
Official evacuation alerts, evacuation orders, and emergency information for British Columbia.
https://www.emergencyinfobc.gov.bc.ca/

🔥 BC Wildfire Service
Interactive wildfire map, fire status, incident updates, and fire bans.
https://wildfiresituation.nrs.gov.bc.ca/

🔥 Fraser Valley Regional District Emergency Operations Centre
Local emergency information for the Boston Bar area, including evacuation alerts and orders.
https://www.fvrd.ca/eoc

🔥 PreparedBC
Emergency planning guides, grab-and-go bag checklists, and preparedness resources for individuals and families.
https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/safety/emergency-management/preparedbc

🔥 DriveBC
Check for highway closures, road conditions, and travel advisories before travelling through the Fraser Canyon.
https://www.drivebc.ca

If you are under an Evacuation Alert, be ready to leave on short notice. If an Evacuation Order is issued, leave immediately and follow directions from emergency officials. The current alert for the Boston Bar area was issued by the Fraser Valley Regional District because of the Brunswick Creek wildfire.

How You Can Prepare

Even if you are not currently under an evacuation alert, it is always wise to be prepared.

• Pack a grab-and-go bag with medications, identification, important documents, clothing, water, snacks, pet supplies, and chargers.
• Keep your vehicle fueled whenever possible.
• Charge your phone and backup batteries.
• Clear dry leaves, branches, and other combustible materials from around your home.
• Know several evacuation routes in case roads become closed.

Check on Your Neighbours

Not everyone has family nearby or the ability to prepare on their own.

A simple phone call or knock on a neighbour's door can make a tremendous difference. Older adults, people with disabilities, and those living alone may appreciate assistance with transportation, packing, or simply understanding the latest evacuation information.

Communities are strongest when people help one another.

Smoke Can Affect Your Health

Wildfire smoke can travel many kilometres and affect people far from the fire.

If smoke becomes heavy:

• Stay indoors when possible.
• Keep windows and doors closed if it is safe to do so.
• Reduce strenuous outdoor activities.
• Watch for symptoms such as coughing, shortness of breath, or chest discomfort, especially if you have asthma, heart disease, or other respiratory conditions.

Thank You

A heartfelt thank you goes to the firefighters, pilots, emergency responders, volunteers, and local officials working around the clock to protect lives and property.

To everyone living in or travelling through the Fraser Canyon, please stay informed, stay prepared, and look out for one another.

Together, preparation and community support can make all the difference.

Reflective Questions

1. Is your household prepared to leave within minutes if an evacuation order is issued?
2. Do you know where to find official emergency information instead of relying only on social media?
3. Who in your neighbourhood might need help during an emergency?
4. What items would you include in your family's emergency kit?
5. How can communities become more resilient as wildfire seasons become longer and more intense?

Keywords: wildfire, Boston Bar, Hell's Gate, Fraser Canyon, Brunswick Creek wildfire, BC Wildfire Service, EmergencyInfoBC, PreparedBC, evacuation alert, emergency preparedness

Hashtags: #BCWildfires #BostonBar #HellsGate #FraserCanyon #PreparedBC #EmergencyPreparedness #WildfireSafety #StayInformed #CommunitySupport #BritishColumbia

What If We Opened Our Minds?

What If We Opened Our Minds?

For decades, we've been told there is only one way to build our cities: concrete, steel, and glass reaching ever higher into the sky.

But what if that isn't the only path?

In the 1970s, architect Michael E. Reynolds began asking a different question. Instead of seeing old tires, glass bottles, and aluminum cans as garbage, he wondered whether they could become homes. His Earthship concept challenged the idea that houses must depend entirely on centralized power, water, and heating systems.

More than 50 years later, his ideas continue to inspire people around the world.

Whether or not Earthships are the perfect solution for every climate or every community isn't really the point.

The point is that someone dared to think differently.

Meanwhile, many of our cities continue to be filled with massive glass and steel towers. These buildings can provide much-needed housing and office space, but they also require enormous amounts of energy and materials to construct and operate. As climate change, resource shortages, and housing affordability become increasingly urgent, perhaps it's time to ask whether our definition of "modern" needs to evolve.

Innovation rarely happens by repeating the same ideas.

What if every new neighbourhood incorporated more recycled materials? What if buildings collected rainwater? What if rooftops produced food and solar energy? What if homes were designed to stay comfortable with far less heating and cooling?

These questions aren't radical anymore. Around the world, architects, engineers, Indigenous communities, scientists, and builders are exploring new ways to create homes that are more resilient, efficient, and connected to nature.

Progress begins with curiosity.

History shows that many of today's accepted ideas were once dismissed as impossible.

Perhaps the greatest barrier to change isn't technology.

Perhaps it's our willingness to open our minds.

Reflective Questions

1. Should our cities encourage more experimentation with sustainable building designs?
2. What building materials do we throw away today that could become valuable resources tomorrow?
3. How can we balance the need for more housing with the need to reduce environmental impacts?
4. If you were designing a neighbourhood from scratch, what sustainable features would you include?
5. What innovative ideas from the past deserve another look today?

#OpenYourMind #SustainableHousing #Earthships #GreenArchitecture #Innovation #ClimateSolutions #HousingCrisis #CircularEconomy #RecycledMaterials #FutureCities #EnvironmentalInnovation #ThinkDifferently #Architecture #Sustainability #DigitalHorizonZ

Failure to Remove Obvious Fake Accounts Used for Harassment

 Failure to Remove Obvious Fake Accounts Used for Harassment

Dear Meta/Facebook,

I am writing to express my frustration with Facebook's handling of fake accounts and repeated harassment.

After I left a simple condolence message on a funeral post, someone using the name "Jerry Townsend" posted an inappropriate comment about wanting to meet me. This was not only disrespectful to the grieving family, but it was also clearly spam.

When I investigated, I found multiple Facebook profiles using the same name, similar photos, and similar claims of working for the United Nations or living in Yemen. I reported these accounts and documented them with screenshots.

I find it unacceptable that users are expected to do the work of identifying and reporting obvious fake accounts while they remain active. Meta is one of the largest technology companies in the world, with the resources to detect coordinated fake profiles much more effectively than this.

People should be able to express condolences, support friends, and participate in their communities without being targeted by spam or scammers.

I ask that Meta:

• Investigate the accounts I reported.
• Remove fake and coordinated spam accounts more quickly.
• Improve systems that detect multiple accounts being used for harassment or scams.
• Better protect users from repeated abuse.

Facebook should be a place where people feel safe interacting with others, especially during sensitive moments such as memorials and condolences.

I hope you will take this issue seriously and improve the protection of your users.

Sincerely,

Tina Winterlik (Zipolita)

---

Reflective Questions

1. Have you ever been contacted by what appeared to be a fake Facebook account?

2. How did you know the account wasn't genuine?

3. Should social media companies be held to a higher standard for detecting fake accounts?

4. How quickly should reports of spam, impersonation, or harassment be investigated?

5. Should users have to repeatedly report multiple accounts that appear to belong to the same scammer?

6. What responsibility does a company with billions of users have to protect people from online scams?

7. Have you ever stopped using a social media platform because of spam or harassment?

8. What improvements would make you feel safer on Facebook?

9. How can we protect older adults and people who are less familiar with online scams?

10. If nothing changes, what will the future of social media look like

Keywords

Facebook, Meta, fake accounts, Facebook scams, online safety, social media, spam accounts, impersonation, harassment, scam prevention, cyber safety, internet safety, online fraud, account security, digital trust, consumer protection, technology, social media accountability, fake profiles, online communities.

#Facebook #Meta #FakeAccounts #OnlineSafety #StopScams #CyberSafety #InternetSafety #ScamAwareness #DigitalTrust #SocialMedia #Harassment #ConsumerProtection #OnlineFraud #Privacy #AccountSecurity #ThinkBeforeYouClick #StaySafeOnline #Technology #DigitalRights #Zipolita

What has your experience with fake accounts on Facebook been? Do you think social media companies are doing enough to protect their users? Share your thoughts in the comments.