When Housing Policy Traps People in Abusive Relationships ๐ ๐
I recently saw a question posted in a DTES Facebook group that stopped me cold.
Someone living in BC Housing, on disability, paying under $500 a month, asked what would happen if they got married and their spouse moved in.
The responses were almost unanimous:
“Don’t do it.”
“Everything gets f*cked up.”
“You’ll lose your housing.” ๐
That reaction isn’t cynicism.
It’s experience.
The part no one wants to say out loud ๐ค
Policies that tie housing to household income don’t just affect rent calculations.
They shape people’s most intimate life decisions.
They:
- Discourage people from forming families ๐จ๐ฉ๐ง
- Punish people for partnership ๐
- And most dangerously — trap people in abusive relationships ๐จ
If your housing depends on:
- who you live with
- how much they earn
- whether you are “single” on paper ๐
Then leaving a partner — even an abusive one — can mean:
- losing affordable housing ๐️
- going back on waitlists that are years long ⏳
- risking shelters, couch-surfing, or homelessness ๐งณ
That is not a “personal choice.”
That is structural coercion.
Violence or homelessness is not a choice ⚠️
Middle-class people are often told:
“If it’s abusive, just leave.”
But if you are disabled, poor, or living in subsidized housing, leaving can trigger:
- loss of rent-geared-to-income housing
- benefit reassessments
- bureaucratic delays that don’t care about safety ๐งพ
So people stay. Not because they want to. But because the system makes survival conditional on endurance ๐
This reality hits hardest for:
- women
- disabled people ♿
- queer and trans folks ๐ณ️๐
- people without family backup
- people already marginalized by poverty
This is economic abuse reinforced by policy.
This should not be normal ❌
Housing is supposed to provide safety ๐
Disability supports are supposed to support dignity ✊
When policies instead:
- keep people single
- keep people silent
- keep people afraid to report harm ๐ถ
Something is deeply wrong.
A New Year, a New Series ๐✍️
In the New Year, I will be writing a 10-part blog series examining how housing and social assistance policies in BC affect real lives — not on paper, but in practice.
Topics will include:
- Housing and intimate relationships
- Disability and forced dependency
- Why people stay in unsafe situations
- The gap between “policy intent” and lived reality
- What dignity would actually look like ๐ฑ
I’m looking for people willing to share their stories ๐ฃ️
If you:
- have lived in BC Housing
- have been on disability or income assistance
- have stayed in a relationship because leaving felt impossible
- or have been punished for honesty about your household
Your story matters.
You can:
- share anonymously ๐️
- share as much or as little as you want
- simply describe what the policy did to your choices
You can message me privately or comment with
“I want to share”
and I will reach out.
We are not broken.
The system is. ๐งฑ
And the first step to changing it is telling the truth.
Reflective Questions ๐ค✨
- Have you ever stayed in a relationship because leaving felt financially impossible?
- How do housing and income rules influence who you can live with — or love?
- Should access to safe housing depend on marital or household status?
- Who benefits from policies that discourage partnership among low-income people?
- What would a housing system designed around safety and dignity actually look like?
- If these policies existed for middle-class households, would they be tolerated?
- What stories are missing from policy discussions about “housing stability”?
- How does fear of losing housing affect people’s willingness to report abuse?
- What supports would make it possible — not just theoretical — to leave harm?
- What does dignity mean to you, and where does housing fit into that? ๐ ❤️
No comments:
Post a Comment