Policy Reality: What a Lifetime of Work Actually Looks Like
I started working when I was young. Over the years, I watched wages slowly rise — but stability never kept pace with the cost of living, housing, or basic security.
In the early 1980s, I earned between $3.75 and $5.00 an hour. By 1982 I was at $4.00, and by 1986 I was around $4.75 to $5.00. Later I reached about $9.00 an hour, then $12, but that job ended after an injury.
After that, I went back to school and took on student debt. What was meant to be a short program turned into years due to cancellations and disruptions — meaning more debt, more delay, and more uncertainty.
In 1995, I worked as a photographer on cruise ships, already carrying debt, even covering basic job requirements like uniforms. That same year I earned between $12 and $16 an hour scanning aerial photography, before being affected by downsizing.
By 2001, I was self-employed while pregnant and financially unstable. Like many people in precarious work, there was no safety net that covered the gaps between jobs, health, and life changes.
Over the years, I continued moving through different forms of work:
- Around 2014, minimum wage was about $11/hour
- I asked for a $1 raise and instead received a disciplinary letter, and I had to leave that job — and I couldn’t access EI
- In 2018, I worked as a nanny starting at $20/hour, later $21 with occasional bonuses
- During COVID, I worked in housekeeping and cleaning at around $20–$25/hour, but nothing was steady
- I also experienced housing instability and being financially taken advantage of
More recently, work became even more unstable. One job ended and shifted into something completely different — effectively becoming nanny work for an elderly person and a dog for about $20 a day, compared to what was once $20 an hour.
This is the Policy Gap
When governments and city councils discuss “affordable housing” or “market rents,” they often assume a stable, full-time income that many people simply do not have.
But the reality for many workers is:
- wages that rise slowly over decades
- jobs that are part-time, temporary, or unpredictable
- no benefits or paid sick time
- and constant gaps between employment
At the same time, rents in cities like Vancouver have reached levels such as:
- $2,400+ for a one-bedroom
- $3,300–$3,800+ for a two-bedroom
This creates a basic mismatch between policy assumptions and lived reality.
Because even when hourly wages look “higher” than decades ago, what has changed is not stability — it is insecurity. Many people are not working fewer hours because they choose to, but because full-time, stable work is harder to find.
The Core Question
So when someone at City Hall asks:
“Who actually makes $5,300 a month?”
The deeper question is not just about income.
It is:
“What kind of economy are we designing — and who is it actually for?”
Because for a growing number of people, the issue is not willingness to work. It is whether work, in its current form, is still enough to guarantee housing, safety, and dignity.
Reflective Questions
- What happens to a system when full-time work no longer guarantees housing or stability?
- If your sister went through a divorce today, could she afford to rent a one-bedroom on her own in this city?
- What happens to a child when their parent is working multiple jobs but still cannot keep up with rent?
- What happens to a nephew or niece when one parent is absent and the other is overwhelmed, exhausted, or unsupported?
- What happens to families when grandparents can no longer age in place and must enter care homes because housing is unaffordable?
- How does a society function when seniors cannot afford a basic one-bedroom after a lifetime of work?
- What happens to LGBTQ2S youth when they are rejected by family and have no affordable housing safety net to fall back on?
- What happens to mental health when employment is unstable, unpredictable, and without benefits?
- What happens to community safety when people are forced into survival mode — juggling bartering, unstable work, and housing insecurity?
- Who benefits when policy discussions are based on ideal incomes that many people have never actually experienced?
#HousingCrisis #IncomeInequality #WorkingPoor #PrecariousWork #AffordabilityCrisis #Vancouver #SocialJustice #RentBurden #LabourRights #CostOfLiving #Dignity #AffordableHousing #CommunityVoices
No comments:
Post a Comment