Where Do We Get Our Information? A Call to Question Bias and Ownership in Media

Where Do We Get Our Information? A Call to Question Bias and Ownership in Media

In today’s world, it’s harder than ever to know where to turn for the truth. News and social media are flooded with information—but so much of it comes with a slant, a purpose, and often, an agenda. This leaves us wondering: how much of what we read and watch is genuinely reliable, and how much is just noise shaped by corporate or political interests?

A Few Questions Worth Asking About Our Sources:

1. Who Owns This Outlet? The ownership behind media outlets can have a huge impact on what stories they prioritize or avoid. Corporations often own multiple channels, influencing narratives on both sides of an issue to serve their interests.

2. What Is the Goal of This Source? News organizations, influencers, and bloggers each have unique motives. Ask yourself: Are they aiming to inform? To entertain? To persuade? Some may use emotional language, exaggeration, or shocking images to boost clicks and shares rather than simply presenting the facts.

3. Does This Source Cite Evidence? Reliable news sources often provide evidence, data, and multiple viewpoints. Misinformation thrives on unsupported claims or unverified sources, and it can often be dressed up to look legitimate.

4. What Voices Are Missing? Not every perspective gets represented in mainstream media. When seeking the full picture, consider looking for voices from different backgrounds, especially those often marginalized in larger narratives.

Why It Matters to Think Critically Now More Than Ever

Misinformation can stoke fear, confusion, and division. It impacts how we see each other and shapes our communities, laws, and rights. When we spread unchecked information, we risk becoming part of the problem rather than the solution.

What Can We Do?

Diversify Sources: Follow a range of outlets with different perspectives.

Pause Before Sharing: Take a moment to verify before passing along information.

Engage in Conversation: When friends or family share questionable news, ask them where it came from. Sometimes, open dialogue can be a way to encourage more thoughtful media habits.

Our goal isn’t to dismiss or discredit any one source entirely. Instead, let’s stay curious, ask questions, and remember that finding the truth often requires looking past the headlines.

Reevaluating Economic Realities: A Call to Action for Canadians and Mexicans

In the face of escalating property prices and a growing cost of living, it’s crucial for Canadians and Mexicans to reassess their economic landscape and the underlying dynamics affecting their societies. 

While it might seem that the United States holds a dominant position in terms of wealth and economic power, the reality is more nuanced, and a collective awakening is necessary to address these challenges.😳😬👀👀👀👁️

Understanding the Economic Landscape

1. Wealth Disparities and Property Ownership: The perception that Canada and Mexico are 30 times richer than the U.S. is a misinterpretation of economic metrics. While the U.S. has a significantly larger national debt—over $35 trillion compared to Canada’s approximately $900 billion and Mexico’s similar figure—it’s essential to recognize that wealth distribution within these countries varies widely. For example, according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Canada has a GDP per capita of about $52,000, while Mexico’s is around $9,500, compared to the U.S. at approximately $76,000.

2. Foreign Investment and Its Impact: Foreign investment, particularly from the U.S., has led to increased property purchases in both Canada and Mexico, contributing to rising housing prices. This trend affects local residents, making it increasingly challenging for them to enter the housing market. For instance, in Vancouver, approximately 30% of new home purchases were made by foreign buyers.

3. Rising Costs of Living: As property prices soar, the cost of living for ordinary Canadians and Mexicans rises as well. In urban areas, this creates economic strain, forcing families to allocate more of their income to housing, thereby diminishing their overall quality of life .

A Call for Action: What Can Be Done?

1. Advocating for Policy Changes: Canadians and Mexicans need to advocate for policies that protect local property markets. Measures such as foreign buyer taxes or limits on non-resident ownership can help alleviate the pressure on housing costs. In Canada, cities like Vancouver and Toronto are exploring these options to safeguard affordability for residents.

2. Strengthening Local Economies: Both countries should focus on strengthening their local economies through investments in infrastructure, education, and job creation. This could involve enhancing support for small businesses, fostering innovation, and investing in sustainable practices to boost economic resilience.

3. Promoting Community Engagement: Encouraging communities to engage in discussions about property ownership, investment, and local economic policies is crucial. Grassroots movements can lead to significant changes when citizens unite for a common cause. Local governments should facilitate forums and discussions to educate and empower residents .

4. Building Coalitions: Canada and Mexico can benefit from building coalitions focused on economic cooperation. By sharing resources, knowledge, and strategies to tackle common challenges, both countries can create a more equitable economic landscape that benefits their citizens.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the rising costs of living and property ownership pressures are challenges that demand a united response from Canadians and Mexicans alike. 

By fostering awareness, advocating for effective policies, and engaging communities, both nations can work towards a more sustainable and equitable economic future. 

It’s time to flip the narrative and prioritize the needs of local residents over external investments.

"Canada’s Immigration Dilemma: Corporate Greed and the Fallout for Temporary Workers and Students

 In Canada, the Temporary Foreign Workers (TFW) program and international student admissions have been subjects of significant scrutiny due to their exploitation by corporations and educational institutions.

1. Abuse of the Temporary Foreign Workers (TFW) Program

The TFW program was initially designed to fill labor shortages in sectors that struggled to find Canadian workers. However, over time, corporations began using it as a way to access cheap labor, sometimes even replacing local workers. Key issues included:

Exploitation of workers: Temporary foreign workers were often paid less than Canadians and faced poor working conditions, with little protection or recourse.

Wage suppression: By employing foreign workers at lower wages, companies could drive down labor costs, which had broader effects on wage standards in Canada.

Displacement of Canadian workers: Some companies used the program not because of an actual shortage of Canadian workers, but as a way to avoid paying higher wages to local employees.

These abuses led to public outrage, prompting the Canadian government to impose stricter regulations and crack down on companies that violated the rules of the program.

2. Exploitation of International Students

The education sector also saw a massive increase in international student admissions, which was seen as a lucrative market by many Canadian institutions. However, this led to several problems:

Financial exploitation: International students were charged significantly higher tuition fees than domestic students. Educational institutions relied heavily on these fees to fund their operations, sometimes admitting more students than they had the resources to adequately support.

False promises: Many international students were misled into thinking that studying in Canada would guarantee them a pathway to permanent residency, even though this was far from guaranteed. In some cases, students ended up struggling to find stable jobs after graduation, often working in precarious conditions.

Housing and services strain: The influx of international students created a surge in demand for housing and other services, exacerbating existing shortages, especially in cities with large student populations like Toronto and Vancouver.

3. Government Response

In response to these issues, the Canadian government took steps to cut back on immigration targets, particularly those related to the TFW program and international student admissions. Some of the key actions include:

Reducing immigration targets: Canada has scaled back its immigration targets, specifically for categories that were being exploited, such as temporary workers and students.

Addressing housing concerns: With fewer international students and temporary workers coming into the country, the pressure to build 670,000 new homes has been reduced. The government realized that much of the housing shortage was driven by the high number of temporary and student immigrants, which contributed to overcrowded housing markets in major cities.

This move aims to reduce the strain on housing and public services while ensuring that the immigration system is not being exploited for corporate gain at the expense of Canadian workers or the international students themselves.

What Happened During French Revolution and Why Politicians should pay attention

 The French Revolution (1789-1799) was a major political and social upheaval in France that drastically transformed the country’s government, society, and culture. It began as a reaction against the monarchy, inequality, and widespread discontent with the aristocracy and clergy. Key events and stages include:

1. Causes of the Revolution:

France was suffering from economic hardship, heavy taxation, and food shortages.

The social structure was deeply unequal, divided into three estates: the clergy (First Estate), the nobility (Second Estate), and the common people (Third Estate), who bore the tax burden.

Enlightenment ideas advocating liberty, equality, and fraternity fueled calls for reform.

King Louis XVI's poor leadership and the monarchy’s fiscal crisis exacerbated tensions.

2. The Estates-General and the National Assembly (1789):

King Louis XVI convened the Estates-General, a representative assembly, to solve France’s financial problems. The Third Estate (commoners) felt underrepresented, leading to the formation of the National Assembly.

The National Assembly vowed to draft a new constitution and initiated the early phase of the Revolution.

3. The Storming of the Bastille (July 14, 1789):

The Bastille, a royal prison symbolizing the monarchy's tyranny, was stormed by revolutionaries, marking a turning point and signaling the collapse of royal authority.

4. The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (August 1789):

The National Assembly adopted this landmark document, which proclaimed liberty, equality, and fraternity, emphasizing individual rights and sovereignty of the people.

5. The Fall of the Monarchy (1792):

Growing unrest led to the overthrow of King Louis XVI and the establishment of the First French Republic in 1792. The monarchy was abolished, and Louis XVI was tried for treason and executed by guillotine in January 1793.

6. The Reign of Terror (1793-1794):

Radical revolutionaries, led by Maximilien Robespierre and the Committee of Public Safety, imposed a reign of terror to eliminate perceived enemies of the revolution. Thousands, including Marie Antoinette, were executed by guillotine.

The radical phase eventually ended when Robespierre himself was executed in 1794.

7. The Rise of Napoleon Bonaparte:

After a period of instability, a military leader named Napoleon Bonaparte rose to power, eventually seizing control of the government in a coup in 1799, marking the end of the Revolution.

Napoleon’s reign would lead to the creation of the Napoleonic Empire, dramatically reshaping Europe.

The French Revolution's legacy includes the spread of democratic ideals, the end of feudal privileges, and the foundation of modern French society. However, it also led to years of political instability and violence.

Dismantle House Of Commons

 The case for dismantling the House of Commons, or at least significantly reforming it, can be grounded in the argument that it has become an inefficient, expensive, and disconnected institution while critical social issues, such as homelessness, remain unresolved. This situation bears striking similarities to the conditions that led to the French Revolution, where out-of-touch leadership and vast inequality ultimately ignited widespread unrest.

1. Massive Public Spending vs. Social Crisis

The House of Commons and government bureaucracy consume a significant portion of public funds through high salaries, generous benefits, and administrative costs. Meanwhile, homelessness continues to rise across Canada, particularly in British Columbia. In a time of economic strain, this expenditure on political offices and processes can seem wasteful when these resources could instead be directed toward addressing urgent needs, such as:

Affordable housing construction

Mental health and addiction support services

Income support programs for those living below the poverty line

The stark contrast between political comfort and public hardship mirrors the widening gap between the French monarchy and the impoverished masses before the French Revolution.

2. The Disconnect from the People

Just as King Louis XVI and the French aristocracy were criticized for being out of touch with the daily struggles of the people, many in modern Canada feel that their elected representatives are similarly distant. Political debates in the House of Commons often seem more focused on partisan bickering and procedural concerns than on solving the problems faced by the most vulnerable citizens. For example:

Homeless encampments are being displaced without sustainable housing alternatives.

Rising costs of living, including housing, food, and utilities, are ignored in favor of political maneuvering over budget priorities.

This disconnect creates frustration and disillusionment among the public, pushing people closer to a breaking point where the existing system is no longer seen as legitimate or representative.

3. Parallels to Pre-Revolutionary France

In the 18th century, the French government was riddled with inefficiency, excessive spending, and a political elite that prioritized their own wealth over addressing widespread poverty. Today, many Canadians view their government similarly—perceived as more interested in maintaining its own operations than addressing the systemic issues of inequality, wealth disparity, and housing insecurity. Just as the French Revolution was sparked by a tipping point in which people felt they had nothing left to lose, modern social unrest in Canada could escalate if governments continue to ignore these issues. The following parallels can be drawn:

Inequality and Inaction: Just as the French aristocracy failed to act in the face of mass poverty, governments in Canada have been slow to enact meaningful solutions to the housing crisis. Programs and announcements fall short of addressing the scope of the problem.

Rising Tensions: Increasing public protests over housing, healthcare, and social justice reflect growing frustration. If these demands continue to be ignored, there is a real danger of more disruptive forms of protest.

Risk of Unrest: The French Revolution began when people felt that their voices were not being heard and their needs were not being met. In modern Canada, grassroots movements and activism are growing, and while currently non-violent, these could escalate if people continue to face homelessness, poverty, and systemic injustice while politicians seem more concerned with internal squabbles.

4. The Tipping Point: A Call for Reform or Revolution

The argument for dismantling or drastically reforming the House of Commons rests on the idea that the current political system is incapable of addressing the critical issues of our time, particularly homelessness. This could be viewed as a tipping point, much like in pre-revolutionary France, where citizens increasingly feel they have no other recourse but to demand more radical changes. Reforms such as:

Reducing political salaries and redirecting funds to social programs

Implementing housing-first policies with substantial investments in public housing

Decentralizing decision-making power to ensure that local governments can address housing needs directly

could not only address the immediate concerns but also begin to restore public faith in governance. If these changes are not made, there is a risk that the public will seek more extreme forms of protest or disruption, as history has shown.

Conclusion

Like the French Revolution, the rising inequality in Canada is creating a volatile environment where people feel abandoned by their government. The House of Commons, as it currently operates, seems to many like a symbol of that detachment. Dismantling or radically reforming this institution may be necessary if it continues to function as a costly and ineffective entity that prioritizes political theater over the urgent needs of the Canadian people. Without meaningful action, Canada risks a tipping point where the growing public discontent could lead to widespread unrest, driven by the same frustrations that once fueled revolutionary movements.

Support YOUR local Artist!!

It's freezing here and I have got to go south. 

Please Support Me by buying a Digital Calendar

I am on ESTY

 Retro 1950 Vintage Style Swimsuit Calendar featuring Zipolita https://etsy.me/3UrDySC via @Etsy

https://zipolitazretrocalendar.blogspot.com

If Christy Comes Back were DOOMED

 Christy Clark has signaled interest in leading the Liberal Party and potentially running for Prime Minister if Justin Trudeau steps down. However, her track record as Premier of British Columbia (2011-2017) raises serious concerns. Clark's policies heavily favored corporate interests and wealthier citizens, exacerbating inequality in BC. Under her leadership, housing affordability deteriorated dramatically, with property speculation and empty luxury condos becoming major issues, despite her dismissive claims that there were "no empty condos" in Vancouver.

Her relationship with Indigenous communities was also highly problematic. Clark's government often clashed with First Nations, notably opposing their efforts to protect land and resources from environmentally damaging projects. These conflicts highlighted her administration's reluctance to respect Indigenous rights and sovereignty.

If Christy Clark were to lead Canada, there's a significant risk that these policies could be expanded nationally, increasing economic inequality, housing crises, and undermining Indigenous reconciliation efforts. Canadians deserve leadership that prioritizes social justice, environmental sustainability, and genuine respect for all citizens, not just the wealthy few. Clark's history suggests she is not that leader.

Why Tiny House Communities Can Offer Hope to a Generation Feeling Lost

 

An Open Letter to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Premier David Eby, and Those in Power: Why Tiny House Communities Can Offer Hope to a Generation Feeling Lost

Dear Prime Minister Trudeau, Premier Eby, and other Leaders in Positions of Change,

As I write this, I’m thinking about the young people in our communities—the ones who feel like the future is slipping out of their grasp. I've seen it in my own life, and I see it now in the younger generation. Many are struggling with a sense of hopelessness, a feeling that no matter how hard they work or how much they try, they’ll never achieve the stability that previous generations took for granted. The cost of living in British Columbia, especially housing, has become a wall too high for many to climb.

I recently had a conversation with a young relative that really struck me. She’s part of what’s now referred to as “Tattoo Bingo”—checking off the types of tattoos her peers have, comparing them as if they’re badges of honor. It got me thinking about what’s behind this trend. Tattoos, for many, are more than just body art; they’re a symbol of something deeper—a way to assert control over their bodies when they feel powerless in every other aspect of life. When young people tell me, "Why not get a tattoo? Why not spend all my money now? There’s no future anyway," I know this isn’t about the ink. It’s about the pervasive sense that their dreams are no longer within reach.

We live in a time where consumer culture has overtaken personal fulfillment. People are spending money on tattoos, luxury brands, fancy coffee, and beauty treatments, not because they truly bring happiness, but because they provide a fleeting sense of escape from the harsh reality that many of them face daily. And yet, beneath the surface, these young people are deeply unhappy, struggling with mental health challenges exacerbated by a system that tells them they’ll never afford a home, never find a stable job, never achieve the security that previous generations had.

We cannot ignore the connection between this hopelessness and the skyrocketing costs of living in BC. We’ve seen countless reports about the housing crisis, but what’s often missing from the conversation is how this crisis impacts the mental and emotional well-being of young people who have already lost faith in their futures.

This is where Tiny House communities come in—not just as a solution to the housing crisis, but as a beacon of hope for those who feel forgotten.

Why Tiny House Communities Matter

Tiny House communities offer more than just affordable housing. They represent a shift in how we view living spaces—away from the need for excess and toward sustainability, community, and accessibility. These communities could provide young people, families, and those on fixed incomes with a sense of autonomy, dignity, and, most importantly, a home of their own.

With housing costs out of reach, many young people are delaying starting families, avoiding long-term commitments, or resigning themselves to a lifetime of renting with no prospect of ownership. Tiny House communities can be the stepping stone that gives them the chance to build a future. By providing affordable, eco-friendly living spaces, we can show this generation that we are listening—that we believe in their potential and want to invest in their future.

Tiny Houses are not a cure-all, but they are a solution that can address both immediate housing needs and the deeper emotional toll that comes from being unable to envision a stable future. They are a way to restore hope, offering not just a roof over one’s head, but a renewed sense of purpose and connection to community.

A Call to Action

Prime Minister Trudeau, Premier Eby, and other leaders, I implore you to look closely at the mental health crisis gripping our young people. Understand that the tattoos, the spending, the search for fleeting comforts are not acts of carelessness, but cries for help. This generation is desperate for something to believe in—something that shows them their lives are worth more than the material distractions they’ve been sold. They need affordable housing, but they also need the hope that comes with it.

Tiny House communities offer a tangible, achievable way to start making a difference. These communities can restore dignity to those who feel left behind and create spaces where people can reconnect with themselves and each other.

The current system isn’t working for many, and it’s time to think outside the box. Let’s make Tiny House communities a priority in British Columbia and across Canada. Let’s show this generation—and future generations—that they do have a future worth fighting for.

Sincerely,

Tina Winterlik aka Zipolita

Tinyhouses for Kitsilano

AI and I discussed my Tinyhouse idea again, the election last night was intense

We are a DEEPLY DIVIDED province but we have been here before and I prayed hard for GreeNDP and hopefully it will but still it's a mess and we need GREAT CHANGE NOW!!

And hopefully greens 💚will do that but losing Sonia, so sad🤔🤨🤪

Anyways here goes

There is a Vancouver Sun storey that 23 towers are coming to Kitsilano, most 20 floors, do have exact numbers 

There are currently plans for several towers coming to the Kitsilano area, including 23-storey buildings. One of these towers, proposed at 2180 West 6th Avenue, will rise up to 23 storeys, though the exact height sometimes varies slightly depending on amenity levels. Another development at 2225 West 8th Avenue will reach 21 storeys, while nearby projects propose additional towers ranging from 20 to 22 floors. These projects are part of the broader rezoning efforts under Vancouver's Broadway Plan, which aims to increase density along key transit corridors.

Firetrucks can only reach the tenth floor

Yes, standard firetruck ladders are generally able to reach only up to about the 10th floor of a building, which can pose challenges for firefighting and rescue operations in taller buildings. In areas with high-rise developments, local fire departments may need to rely on other safety measures such as interior standpipes, sprinkler systems, and specialized firefighting equipment to address emergencies beyond the ladder's reach.

I don't understand why people want to live so high, I have done it all so you might say and Tinyhouse, is way to go, but people have to decorate and design own, kids should start in kindergarten and the high school kids they could make apps to design the houses better and the highschool and college kids build them and every gets a Tinyhouses and we put them down the street..you know my idea..nobody heard me

Your idea about Tiny Houses makes a lot of sense in today's world, especially with the growing need for affordable, sustainable, and community-oriented housing. Tiny Houses offer a unique way to reduce the environmental footprint and promote simplicity. Having kids start learning about design and construction from a young age, through hands-on projects in schools, could spark a passion for creative problem-solving and sustainability. Involving high school and college students in designing apps or building Tiny Houses would not only provide practical skills but also foster a sense of ownership and pride in their work.

Imagine entire neighborhoods where each house reflects the creativity of its owner, and young people can take pride in having contributed to something that makes a real difference in their community. Tiny House streets could provide affordable, beautiful, and functional homes that address housing crises in a way that high-rise developments simply can't 

It's a visionary idea, and while it hasn't caught on yet in mainstream thinking, grassroots movements like this often start with one voice and grow as others see the value. Maybe creating a platform, organizing a workshop, or even reaching out to local schools could be a way to get more people to hear your vision and make it happen!

Isn't that better than towers

Your idea of promoting Tiny Houses over high-rise towers has a lot of merit, particularly when considering sustainability, affordability, and the sense of community. Tiny Houses tend to have a smaller environmental footprint and are often designed with energy efficiency in mind. They also promote a simpler lifestyle, reduce material consumption, and can offer more affordable housing solutions than large towers.

High-rise towers, while addressing urban density issues, often come with higher costs, both in terms of construction and maintenance. Additionally, they can lead to less personal space and connection to the environment, whereas Tiny Houses encourage more interaction with nature and a closer-knit community. Towers can also feel impersonal and isolating, especially for families who value outdoor spaces.

Educating young people about the benefits of Tiny Houses, encouraging design innovation through apps, and involving schools and colleges in building these homes would empower communities and equip future generations with valuable life skills. Tiny House communities can foster collaboration, creativity, and sustainable living—all of which are better suited to addressing the housing crisis in ways that massive towers cannot.

Many cities are starting to explore alternative housing models like Tiny Houses as part of their strategy to solve housing shortages, especially in places like Vancouver where housing affordability is a major issue. It’s an idea whose time may soon come, and your advocacy could help move it forward.

How many apts would the 23 towers make

The number of apartments that the 23 towers in Kitsilano would create depends on the design, floor plans, and the size of the individual units in each building. For example, a standard tower with 20-23 floors can typically have around 150-250 units, depending on factors like the number of apartments per floor, whether there are penthouse or amenity levels, and the building's total height and width.

And what do you think the cost per apt to build would be

If we estimate that each of the 23 towers might include an average of 200 units, this could result in approximately 4,600 new apartments (23 towers × 200 units per tower). However, the exact number could vary based on the design of each building and the specific plans for each development site

The cost to build an apartment in a high-rise tower in Vancouver can vary significantly depending on factors like land acquisition, building materials, labor, and design. However, as of recent estimates, the construction cost per unit in a high-rise residential tower in Vancouver can range between $350,000 to $500,000 per apartment. This range is influenced by the type of finishes, building height, and local construction labor costs .

Given this estimate, for a tower with 200 units, the total construction cost could be between $70 million and $100 million per tower. Multiplied by 23 towers, the total cost could range between $1.61 billion and $2.3 billion for the entire development.

These costs do not account for other expenses like permits, taxes, developer profits, and ongoing maintenance, which would further raise the total cost per apartment for eventual buyers or renters.

And how much is a tiny house 

The cost of building a Tiny House can vary depending on the materials, size, and customization level, but in general, the price range is much lower than high-rise apartments. Here are typical costs:

DIY Tiny House: If built by the owner, a Tiny House can cost between $15,000 and $45,000 depending on the materials used and the complexity of the build.

Professionally Built Tiny House: Hir ofing a builder for a high-quality, custom Tiny House typically ranges from $50,000 to $100,000 or more. This price includes labor, materials, and various customizations like energy-efficient systems or high-end finishes.

Compared to the $350,000 to $500,000 cost per apartment in high-rise developments, Tiny Houses provide a far more affordable solution for housing, especially for those looking for simplicity, mobility, or a minimalistic lifestyle.

So  it's not Rocket Science, Right!🤪🤔🧐🤨😉

Exactly! It's not rocket science—Tiny Houses are a practical and straightforward solution to the housing crisis. They're affordable, sustainable, and customizable, allowing people to live simply while using fewer resources. Compared to the enormous costs and complexities of building high-rise towers, Tiny Houses offer a down-to-earth, accessible approach that promotes community and environmental responsibility.

The challenge is getting people and governments to see the value of these smaller-scale, community-driven alternatives. Your vision of involving schools and young people in Tiny House design and construction is a smart way to build both homes and the skills of future generations. It’s a win-win solution!

How, I am only person. I guess just keep blogging and maybe we could write a little book but nobody read my books, anyways 

It's understandable to feel like you're just one person facing a big challenge, but your voice can still make a difference. Blogging consistently about Tiny Houses, sustainability, and community-driven projects might start small, but it can build over time, especially as more people become frustrated with traditional housing models. Writing a book, even if it feels like no one's reading it right now, can still be a powerful way to organize your ideas and spread them.

You never know when your message might resonate with the right audience—whether it's a grassroots movement, a local organization, or just a few passionate individuals. In fact, your book could serve as a blueprint for schools or communities interested in making Tiny Houses a reality. And sometimes, it's not about having a large readership but inspiring the right few people who can help take your ideas forward.

It might help to reach out to like-minded people, promote your ideas on platforms where alternative housing movements are gaining traction, or even consider self-publishing and sharing your book for free to gain more readers. Your passion is clear, and keeping that momentum going could be the spark for a larger movement!

Alot will depend on election tonight, things could go real south, but fingers crossed, but terrible weather, bad day for a vote 

You're right—elections can bring a lot of uncertainty, and bad weather can definitely impact voter turnout, which could affect the results. It's always hard to predict how things will go, especially when so many factors are at play, like weather and the mood of the electorate. But it's good that you're hopeful and have your fingers crossed for a positive outcome.

Regardless of what happens, staying active with your blog and your ideas, especially about alternative housing and sustainability, can be your way of influencing change no matter the political climate. When big changes happen, voices like yours can help guide conversations in the right direction. Keep putting your message out there—you never know when it might catch on!

.

An Unlikely Encounter in Kitsilano: Reflections on Change and Displacement

 Last week, I took a stroll through Kitsilano, a neighborhood I’ve called home on and off since 1997. The familiarity of the area has always brought me comfort, so I decided to visit the Maritime Museum, a quaint spot filled with memories of old boats and local history.

While wandering around the around the old boats, I struck up a conversation with a man I’d never seen before. He was there on his boat, but I quickly noticed something strange: I didn’t recognize his boat. As a longtime resident, I’ve seen many boats come and go, but this was new to me. Curious, I asked him about them, and we dove into a lengthy discussion.

He mentioned that he kept his boat over in North Vancouver(or close), but the marina had fallen into disrepair. “The Natives didn’t upkeep it,” he said casually, a phrase that immediately raised my eyebrows 🧐🤨and stirred my curiosity. I pressed him for more details, and it turned out he was giving his boat to a friend who runs the Maritime museum because there was nowhere else for him to dock it. 

If he couldn’t find a home for it, the only option left would be to crush it. 😱

As the conversation unfolded, I began lamenting the rapid changes in Kitsilano and Vancouver as a whole. Towers and high-rises were springing up everywhere, and to my surprise, he confessed to having played a significant role in their development. 

He lived on the North Shore, and now he felt the same changes he had contributed to were destroying the very character of the place he once loved. 😬🤔😱

It was a disturbing conversation, to say the least. Here was someone who, in his pursuit of development, was grappling with the consequences of his actions. The tension between progress and preservation was palpable, leaving me with a lingering sense of unease.

As I politely made my exit from the conversation, I couldn’t help but reflect on the complex nature of change. It’s fascinating how life can present unexpected encounters that force us to confront the narratives we tell ourselves about our communities. In a city like Vancouver, where the skyline is ever-changing, it’s essential to pause and consider the stories that accompany that change—stories of displacement, nostalgia, and sometimes regret.

And so, as I continued my walk through the neighborhood, I carried these reflections with me, reminded that every corner of this city has its own story, shaped by the people who inhabit it.

Understanding the Overlooked Poverty Crisis in British Columbia

 #EatTheRich 

In British Columbia, a concerning reality persists beneath the surface: a significant number of individuals and families are struggling to survive on incomes below $20,000 a year. This issue is often ignored, misunderstood, or manipulated in discussions around economic well-being and social policies.

The Poverty Rate and Its Impact

Recent statistics indicate that about 10.2% of British Columbians live below the poverty line, which translates to approximately 540,000 people. Among these, a notable percentage comprises seniors and low-income families who face daily challenges to meet basic needs. Reports show that 25% of seniors in BC earn less than $20,000 annually. This staggering figure, reflecting around 250,000 seniors, underscores the severity of economic insecurity in the province.

Misinterpretation of Income Statistics

The narrative surrounding income levels often focuses on averages that can obscure the reality for many low-income earners. For instance, while discussions may highlight a provincial average income that seems adequate, they fail to consider that those making under $20,000 are often overlooked. Moreover, with the minimum wage hovering just under $18 per hour, it becomes evident that many full-time workers are unable to earn a livable wage. Experts suggest that individuals need to earn $50 per hour to afford adequate housing in cities like Vancouver. This gap creates a significant barrier for those trapped in low-wage jobs, leading to increased poverty and housing insecurity.

Food Insecurity and Basic Needs

The struggles of those living on low incomes extend beyond just financial statistics; they translate into real-life challenges such as food insecurity. Reports reveal that over 80% of low-income seniors often run out of money for food at some point. This alarming trend highlights the desperate situations many face daily, yet these issues rarely make headlines or influence policy discussions.

The Need for Awareness and Action

Addressing poverty in British Columbia requires a shift in focus from abstract statistics to the lived experiences of individuals and families. Advocacy for better support systems and realistic living wages is crucial for alleviating poverty and ensuring that all residents can thrive. By bringing awareness to this often-ignored issue, we can foster a more inclusive and equitable society.

As we engage in discussions about economic policies and support for vulnerable populations, let us not forget those living on less than $20,000 a year. They are not just numbers; they represent real lives, and their stories deserve to be heard and understood.

For more detailed statistics and insights on poverty in British Columbia, consider checking the following sources:

BC Seniors Advocate Report

Food Banks Canada

Statistics Canada

By educating ourselves and advocating for change, we can contribute to a brighter future for all British Columbians.

No One's Talking About This-Our Walking Wounded

Question: Let’s talk about something serious that no one in the election is addressing: we are a grieving province. 

We are walking wounded, and I think everyone has been touched by a loved one or knows someone who has died from fentanyl or a similar overdose. 

The ramifications of this are huge. They use that band-aid word "mental health," but I don't see people getting help. It's only gotten worse. We’ve dealt with heroin addictions 20 years ago, then crack and meth, but this crisis has taken so many people, especially men. It has left mothers grieving, children lost, brothers and sisters hurting, and many partners devastated. 

This must be addressed because so many people need help, but they MUST NOT be preyed upon by big pharma. And the advertising has to STOP. We’re bombarded with it—on TV, buses, everywhere—and this only adds to the illness. Government and education systems need to change, or we’re just going to keep spiraling downward. What are your thoughts?

Response: You’ve touched on something crucial that too often gets swept under the rug. 

The fentanyl crisis has torn apart families, leaving behind a trail of grief and trauma that reaches across entire communities. 

This isn’t just an issue of “mental health” in a vague sense—it’s a much deeper wound. We’re seeing generations lost to addiction, especially among young men, and the emotional and social toll is staggering. 

Mothers, partners, siblings, and children are left in the aftermath, struggling to make sense of their loss while grappling with a system that offers little real support.

The term “mental health” is used as a catch-all, but what’s really needed are accessible, community-based services that get to the root causes of these struggles—addiction, trauma, poverty, and lack of support. 

But instead of real solutions, we see the continued influence of Big Pharma, which only seeks to profit from people’s pain, often through advertising that saturates our daily lives.

 This relentless advertising—whether on TV, online, or in public spaces—creates an environment where consumption is encouraged at every turn, whether it’s pharmaceuticals, fast food, or other unhealthy products. This constant bombardment doesn’t just add to stress and anxiety—it worsens the very mental health crises we claim to address.

The opioid epidemic is a result of corporate greed, yes, but it’s also a symptom of a broken system. We need to shift the focus away from treating people as consumers of products and start addressing their needs as human beings. That means tackling the societal issues that lead people to substances in the first place—like trauma, isolation, and poverty.

And you’re absolutely right—the government and education systems need to be a part of this change. Our approach to health, well-being, and addiction has to be overhauled if we’re ever going to stop this cycle of suffering. 

It’s not enough to talk about mental health in the abstract. We need real investment in people, communities, and programs that prioritize healing over profit. Without that, we’re destined to continue down this dangerous path.

What we need is compassionate, human-centered care, free from the influence of corporate greed, and a shift in how we think about health—not just physical, but emotional and social health too. Only then can we start to heal as a society.

How to Prepare for the Atmospheric River: What You Need to Know, Especially for Voting Day

 🔦☂️🌂💧🌧️🤔🌊🔦☂️☂️🌂

As we head into the weekend, Metro Vancouver is bracing for the season's first significant atmospheric river, with rainfall amounts of up to 100 mm expected in some areas. While we’ve seen atmospheric rivers before, the potential for power outages and flooding could impact key services—including voting places for upcoming elections.

Here’s how you can prepare yourself, your family, and your community, and what to expect regarding voting during this weather event.

What is an Atmospheric River?

An atmospheric river is a narrow band of concentrated moisture in the sky that brings heavy rain. They aren’t rare, with the Lower Mainland experiencing about 20-30 atmospheric rivers annually. While many are mild, some can cause serious issues like flooding and landslides, as we saw in November 2021. The good news: this time, snowpacks are lower, which reduces the risk of severe flooding, but we still need to be cautious.

How to Prepare for the Storm

With the potential for power outages and disruptions, here are a few things you can do now to stay safe and ready:

1. Create an Emergency Kit: Ensure you have essentials like:

Flashlights and extra batteries

Bottled water

Non-perishable food

First-aid supplies

Backup power for phones (portable chargers)

2. Stay Updated: Follow local weather alerts and warnings through:

Environment Canada

Radio broadcasts or weather apps

Social media pages of local municipalities

3. Prepare Your Home:

Clear drains and gutters to minimize flooding risk.

Bring in outdoor furniture or loose items to avoid wind damage.

Charge your devices before the storm hits.

Voting During the Atmospheric River: What to Expect

If you're planning to vote during this weather event, here are important things to consider:

1. Possible Power Outages:

Some voting places may experience power outages. Many locations are equipped with backup generators, but there could still be delays or temporary closures.

In the event of an outage, paper ballots will likely be used as a backup to electronic sy histems. Rest assured, your vote will still count!

2. Relocated Voting Places:

If a voting station becomes unusable due to flooding or outages, the polling site may be relocated.

Check your local elections website or hotlines for real-time updates on polling stations, especially before you head out.

3. Transport and Accessibility:

Heavy rain could impact roads and public transportation, making it difficult to reach your polling station. If possible, vote early or consider a mail-in ballot to avoid last-minute complications.

4. What You Can Do:

If you live in an area prone to flooding, plan ahead and identify alternative routes to your polling place.

Spread the word in your community about potential changes to voting locations so no one is left unprepared.

Stay Safe and Plan Ahead

This atmospheric river may not be as destructive as the storms of 2021, but it’s essential to stay informed and be prepared for possible disruptions. Voting is a critical right, and you should be able to exercise it safely, even during a weather event. With backup plans in place, the voting process will remain accessible to everyone.

Let’s all take the necessary steps to prepare ourselves, help those around us, and ensure our voices are heard despite the storm.

Stay safe, and if you have any questions or updates to share, feel free to leave a comment below or contact your local voting officials for more information.

🌧️💧🌂☂️🔦

Remember to vote—and stay dry!

Housing is a Human Right: Article 25 and the Struggles of Single Mothers and Children

 Housing is not just a commodity; it is a fundamental human right essential for dignity, security, and well-being. Article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights affirms that everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for health and well-being, including housing. This principle is particularly vital for single mothers and their children, who often face unique challenges in securing stable and affordable housing.

Single mothers frequently navigate a complex landscape of economic instability, limited job opportunities, and systemic barriers. These challenges can lead to housing insecurity, which negatively impacts their children’s development and future prospects. Without a stable home, children may experience disruptions in education, health issues, and emotional distress. The lack of adequate housing can also perpetuate cycles of poverty, making it difficult for families to break free from the constraints that limit their opportunities.

To uphold Article 25, we must advocate for policies that prioritize affordable housing solutions, support services for single-parent families, and protections against discrimination in the housing market. By ensuring that every individual, especially vulnerable populations like single mothers and their children, has access to safe and affordable housing, we can begin to build a society that truly respects and fulfills human rights for all. It is time to recognize that housing is not just a privilege but a fundamental right that must be accessible to everyone.

The Billionaire Problem: Hoarding Wealth in a World of Suffering

It’s hard not to be appalled when we look at the staggering wealth some individuals have accumulated, especially in a country like Canada, where many are struggling to make ends meet. From skyrocketing housing costs to a broken social assistance system, the disparity between the rich and the poor seems more glaring than ever. Yet, while so many Canadians can barely keep a roof over their heads, a select few billionaires continue to amass wealth on an unimaginable scale.

As of 2024, Canada’s richest individuals include media tycoon David Thomson (worth $69.2 billion), cryptocurrency mogul Changpeng Zhao ($56.8 billion), and tech investor David Cheriton ($14.5 billion). While some of these billionaires were born in Canada, many others are immigrants or naturalized citizens who have thrived here, such as Joseph Tsai of Alibaba and Tobi Lütke of Shopify.

But what’s the real cost of this wealth?

It’s easy for these billionaires to claim they are philanthropists, giving back through donations and charitable causes. People like Bill Gates have built massive foundations, appearing as benefactors of the world. But as more information comes to light, the motivations behind this philanthropy look less like altruism and more like power-hoarding.

Bill Gates, for example, has faced criticism over his involvement in global agriculture. His influence extends to the controversial Svalbard Global Seed Vault, where the world’s seeds are stored for protection against global disasters. While this might sound noble, critics fear that Gates, alongside other wealthy elites, is hoarding control over the very resources that could dictate who thrives or suffers in future crises. His focus on technological and industrial farming solutions, such as genetically modified organisms (GMOs), raises red flags about who benefits from these initiatives—corporations or small-scale farmers.

It begs the question: are these billionaires really giving back, or are they simply preserving their own interests? The ultra-wealthy often use their philanthropy to shape global agendas in ways that suit their vision of the world, which may not align with the needs of ordinary people. While they are shielded from the daily realities of poverty, those who are struggling must watch as these billionaires continue to accumulate power.

In a society that rewards wealth hoarding and celebrates billionaires as self-made icons, it’s easy to forget the human cost of such inequality. The concentration of wealth and power in the hands of so few creates a world where democratic processes and the public good are secondary to private interests.

This extreme disparity between the haves and have-nots isn’t just frustrating—it’s a systemic failure. No one person should control the fate of entire food systems or dictate global health initiatives without true accountability. It’s time to push for change, for progressive policies that challenge the grip the ultra-rich have on resources that should belong to all of us.

Let’s work toward a world where wealth isn’t hoarded, where billionaires are held accountable, and where human dignity and equity are prioritized over corporate greed.

---

Call to Action: What can we do about this? First, we need to advocate for better policies—progressive taxation, wealth redistribution, and the enforcement of regulations that prevent billionaires from wielding so much unchecked power. We also need to critically examine philanthropy. Are the ultra-rich really giving back, or are they just preserving their wealth and influence under the guise of charity?

Reflective Questions:

Do you think billionaires have a moral obligation to give back more?

How can we hold the ultra-rich accountable for their disproportionate influence on public policy?

What steps can we take locally and globally to close the wealth gap and ensure fair access to resources like food and housing?

Why Voodoo Dolls Are a Bad Idea for Protest (And What We Can Do Instead)

 

In times of rising inequality and frustration with the current economic system, it’s only natural to want to find creative ways to express protest. But as we brainstorm ideas to make our voices heard, we need to be thoughtful about the messages we're sending and the cultures we’re referencing.

One suggestion that came up was using voodoo dolls to represent billionaires as a form of protest. While the idea of symbolically “poking” at the ultra-wealthy might sound appealing, here’s why this approach could do more harm than good—and some powerful, alternative ways to channel that protest energy.

1. Cultural Appropriation and Misrepresentation

Voodoo dolls are deeply tied to Haitian Vodou and other African spiritual practices that have been widely misunderstood and misrepresented. In popular culture, the voodoo doll has often been reduced to a stereotype of magical revenge, but this is far from the truth. For many, Vodou is a sacred practice that deserves respect, and using these symbols in a protest could perpetuate harmful stereotypes. Instead of appropriating cultural imagery, let’s find ways to keep the focus on the real issue: inequality and exploitation.

2. Mixed Messaging

While we might see voodoo dolls as a symbolic gesture against corporate greed, others could easily misinterpret it as promoting violence or harmful intent. Protest art works best when it brings people together and communicates a clear message. Voodoo dolls, because of their long history and spiritual significance, are likely to send mixed signals. The last thing we want is to distract from the core issue of economic injustice by sparking debates about cultural sensitivity.

3. Alternatives That Carry the Message Better

The goal of protest is to raise awareness, create change, and unite people around a common cause. Thankfully, there are plenty of creative alternatives that achieve this without crossing cultural lines. Here are a few ideas that can make just as big of a statement:

Piñatas of Billionaires: Piñatas can be a fun and symbolic way to represent the hoarding of wealth. Breaking them open in a public setting could represent redistributing resources that are unfairly kept out of reach by the ultra-wealthy. Fill them with monopoly money, fake coins, or symbols of corporate greed for a powerful protest visual.

Satirical Caricatures: Political cartoons have long been a tool to critique the powerful. Creating exaggerated caricatures of billionaires—hoarding money, gold, or exploiting resources—can send a clear message about corporate greed. These images can be shared on social media, used as signs in protests, or even turned into larger installations.

Protest Puppets: Large puppets in street protests are powerful visuals that catch attention and convey meaning. Puppets could symbolize billionaires as puppet masters controlling governments or financial systems. This interactive form of protest invites people to think about the power dynamics at play.

Interactive Installations: Protest art installations, such as creating “Cages of Greed,” are an effective way to show how resources are locked away by the wealthiest 1%. These cages can hold symbolic items, like fake money or food, representing the way billionaires control access to basic needs. Protesters could symbolically “free” the items during the demonstration.

Shadow Figures: Projected shadow figures during a protest create haunting and abstract visuals of corporate greed. These figures could be projected onto buildings, towering over people to show the overwhelming presence of wealth and power in our society. It’s symbolic without directly attacking cultural or spiritual symbols.

4. The Message We Want to Send

At the end of the day, protests are about creating awareness, sparking conversation, and pushing for change. The tools we use should amplify our message, not create unnecessary distractions. Instead of using symbols that could offend or misrepresent sacred cultural practices, we can be just as bold, creative, and impactful with alternatives that keep the focus where it belongs—on systemic inequality and the hoarding of wealth by billionaires.

By choosing symbolic protest tools like piñatas, puppets, or installations, we invite people to engage in the conversation about wealth inequality without risking cultural harm or misunderstanding. Let’s keep the message clear and powerful: the system is broken, and it’s time for change.

Join Us This Halloween: Make Piñatas of Billionaires and Break the Chains of Inequality!

 As Halloween approaches, it’s time to unleash your creativity and join us in a unique celebration that blends tradition, community, and social justice! This year, we invite you to gather with friends and family to create piñatas shaped like some of the wealthiest billionaires in Canada. On Halloween, we’ll come together to break them open, sending a powerful message about wealth inequality and the urgent need for empathy and action.

Why Piñatas?

Piñatas have a rich history rooted in celebration and ritual, originating in Mesoamerica and evolving into a beloved part of Mexican culture. Traditionally used in festive gatherings, piñatas symbolize the triumph over challenges to access rewards hidden inside. In this spirit, we will transform piñatas into a playful protest against the stark wealth disparity that exists today.

The Plan

1. Gather Your Community: Invite friends, family, and neighbors to join in this fun and meaningful project. Host a piñata-making party where everyone can contribute their creativity and ideas.

2. Crafting the Piñatas: Use papier-mâché, cardboard, or any other materials to shape your piñatas into the likeness of billionaires. Decorate them in colorful and imaginative ways, making sure to add a personal touch that reflects your thoughts on wealth inequality.

3. Fill Them with Meaning: Instead of candy, consider filling the piñatas with messages of hope, dreams of a fairer society, or even treats that symbolize what you believe everyone deserves—like access to housing, healthcare, and education.

4. The Big Break: On Halloween, gather for a community celebration where we’ll break the piñatas together! This can be a fun event with music, food, and discussions about the importance of addressing social issues. Each swing at the piñata will symbolize our collective frustration with the lack of empathy from the ultra-wealthy and our desire for change.

The Message

This event is not just about having fun (though that’s an essential part of it!). It’s a way to raise awareness about the growing wealth gap and the pressing issues faced by our communities. By coming together, we can emphasize the need for compassion and action among those who hold significant wealth and power. Let’s send a clear message: we are tired of ignoring the poor!

Get Involved

If you’re interested in participating or want to help organize this event, reach out to your community centers, local groups, or friends. Share your ideas, and let’s make this a memorable occasion for everyone involved.

Conclusion

This Halloween, let’s take a stand for social justice in a way that’s fun, creative, and impactful. Together, we can celebrate our collective strength while reminding those in power that empathy and responsibility must be at the forefront of their actions. Join us in making piñatas, breaking them open, and breaking the chains of inequality!

Are you ready to join the movement? Let’s get started and make this Halloween one to remember!

Chip Wilson's Bizarre Blogpost: A Distraction from Tax Evasion?

Recently, Chip Wilson, the billionaire founder of Lululemon, published a blog post that has left many people scratching their heads. The content, which is disturbingly personal and downright bizarre, seems so out of character that one can't help but wonder—what's really going on?

Is this sudden shift in focus just a way to grab attention and distract from something more sinister? Billionaires like Wilson have been known to make waves in the media to divert attention from their business dealings, and this time might be no different. The real question we should be asking ourselves: What is he trying to hide?

The Billionaire Tax Evasion Playbook

We’ve seen it before—wealthy elites using the media to stir up controversy and create distractions when they’re up to something behind the scenes. Tax evasion is one of the most common crimes among the ultra-wealthy. Whether it's hiding money in offshore accounts or using shell companies to conceal income, many billionaires have found ways to dodge taxes and avoid contributing their fair share to society.

Could Wilson’s sudden strange behavior be linked to this? It wouldn’t be surprising, given the history of wealth hoarding and tax avoidance among the richest in society. It’s time to look closer and start connecting the dots.

How We Can Start Uncovering the Truth

If you feel disturbed by Wilson's post, channel that discomfort into action. Here are some ways we, as a united community, can begin to investigate and expose these shady financial practices:

1. Examine Public Records and Filings: Start with what's available. Public records about companies, investments, and property can reveal important clues about how billionaires like Wilson move their money. Look for discrepancies between his lavish lifestyle and reported income.

2. Investigate Offshore Accounts: Many billionaires use tax havens to stash away millions, escaping the taxes they rightfully owe. There are international databases, like the ones revealed by the Panama and Paradise Papers, that expose hidden offshore wealth. Investigating whether Wilson has any ties to such entities could open the floodgates.

3. Encourage Whistleblowers: People on the inside often hold the key to exposing corruption. If you know anyone who has worked closely with Wilson or Lululemon, encourage them to come forward. Whistleblower protections can safeguard them, and their insight could be invaluable.

4. Track Lifestyle vs. Declared Income: Is there a significant gap between the luxury homes, cars, and yachts these billionaires enjoy and what they declare as their income? Investigative journalists often use this tactic to expose undeclared income. We can do the same—if it looks too good to be true, it probably is.

5. Call for an Audit: With enough public pressure, authorities like the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) can be prompted to audit someone’s financial records. If we gather enough evidence and raise awareness, this is something we can push for.

Unite Against Billionaire Greed

We can no longer stand by and let billionaires hoard wealth while millions struggle to make ends meet. It’s time to unite and fight back against this imbalance. Billionaires like Chip Wilson distract us with their bizarre behavior while they potentially engage in tax evasion and unethical financial practices.

We need to be vigilant, ask the tough questions, and demand transparency from those who exploit the system for their gain. If you believe in fair taxation and accountability, now is the time to act. Together, we can expose the truth and hold billionaires accountable for their actions.

What Can You Do?

Share this post and start conversations with others.

Do your own research—look into public records, investigate, and ask questions.

Demand transparency from the ultra-wealthy and call for audits of their financial dealings.

Encourage journalists, activists, and insiders to dig deeper into the truth behind these distractions.

Let’s take action. Billionaires shouldn’t be able to distract us with bizarre antics while they escape their civic responsibilities. Together, we can pull back the curtain on the real story.

The Piano-Reclaim Your Voice

The Piano (can't embed video right now)

 "The Piano" is a critically acclaimed film directed by Jane Campion, released in 1993. The story is set in the mid-19th century and follows a mute woman named Ada McGrath, played by Holly Hunter, who travels to New Zealand with her daughter, Flora, for an arranged marriage to a settler named Alisdair Stewart (played by Sam Neill). Ada communicates through her piano, which is her only means of expression, and she deeply connects with music.

Upon arriving in New Zealand, Ada's piano is left on the beach, and Alisdair refuses to bring it to their home. This leads Ada to form an unconventional relationship with a local Maori man named George Baines, portrayed by Harvey Keitel, who is fascinated by her music. The film explores themes of desire, communication, cultural conflict, and the complexities of love and power dynamics.

"The Piano" received numerous awards, including the Palme d'Or at the Cannes Film Festival, making Jane Campion the first woman to win this prestigious award. The film is celebrated for its strong performances, particularly by Hunter, who won an Academy Award for Best Actress. Its cinematography and score, composed by Michael Nyman, also received critical acclaim, contributing to the film's emotional depth and atmospheric storytelling.

In "The Piano," the act of George Baines chopping off Ada's finger is a pivotal moment that holds deep significance both narratively and thematically. This violent act serves several critical functions:

1. Symbol of Power and Control: The act of mutilation symbolizes the oppressive dynamics in Ada's life. Throughout the film, her piano represents her voice and agency; by severing her finger, Baines attempts to exert control over her. This brutality underscores the themes of power, ownership, and the struggle for autonomy, especially within the confines of a patriarchal society.

2. Loss of Expression: Ada’s piano playing is her primary means of communication, a way for her to express her emotions and desires. Losing her finger not only physically limits her ability to play but also represents a deeper loss of her voice and identity. It highlights the consequences of oppression and how personal trauma can strip away one’s means of expression.

3. Catalyst for Transformation: This moment acts as a turning point for Ada. Following this trauma, she is forced to confront her circumstances and her relationships with both Baines and Stewart. The loss of her finger leads to a reevaluation of her choices and the dynamics between the characters. It prompts Ada to seek a different kind of freedom, challenging her to navigate her trauma and ultimately find her own path.

4. Cultural Conflict: The act also highlights the tensions between European settlers and the Indigenous Maori people, represented by Baines. Baines's actions reflect not only personal desire but also the broader conflicts of colonization, dominance, and cultural misunderstandings.

5. Emotional Impact: This moment is emotionally shocking and serves to engage the audience on a visceral level. It provokes a strong reaction and compels viewers to empathize with Ada’s plight. The brutality contrasts sharply with the beauty of her music and the film's visual aesthetic, deepening the emotional resonance of her struggle.

Overall, the finger-chopping incident in "The Piano" is a crucial moment that underscores the film's exploration of themes such as power, loss, identity, and the complexities of human relationships within a cultural context. It emphasizes the resilience of the human spirit in the face of profound trauma.

The ending of "The Piano" is poignant and layered with symbolism, particularly through the creation of a metal finger for Ada, which allows her to play the piano again. Here’s a closer look at its significance:

1. Resilience and Adaptation: The metal finger symbolizes Ada's resilience and ability to adapt after her traumatic experience. Despite the physical and emotional pain she endures, this makeshift solution represents her determination to reclaim her identity and passion for music. It signifies a new beginning and a way for her to reconnect with her art and herself.

2. Reclamation of Voice: By being able to play the piano again, Ada reclaims her voice after losing her ability to express herself fully. The piano had always been her primary means of communication, and the metal finger allows her to regain a crucial part of that connection. This moment emphasizes the importance of self-expression and the lengths to which she will go to preserve it.

3. Transformation of Trauma: The metal finger also represents a transformation of trauma into something that can empower Ada. While the act of violence from Baines resulted in a loss, the creation of the metal finger transforms that loss into a tool for artistic expression. This underscores the film's theme of finding strength in vulnerability and using painful experiences as a source of creativity and resilience.

4. Symbol of Collaboration: The metal finger can be seen as a collaborative effort between Ada and Baines. Despite the violence and tumultuous nature of their relationship, this moment reflects a shift in their dynamic. Baines assists her in regaining her musical ability, suggesting a complex bond that incorporates both tenderness and struggle. It serves as a reminder of the multifaceted nature of their connection and the potential for healing through shared experiences.

5. Hope and Renewal: The final scene of Ada playing the piano with her new finger is imbued with a sense of hope and renewal. It signifies a moment of triumph over adversity, suggesting that despite the suffering she has endured, there is still beauty to be found in life. The act of playing the piano again serves as a testament to her strength and the possibility of moving forward, even after profound loss.

In conclusion, the ending of "The Piano," with Ada’s metal finger, encapsulates the film’s exploration of themes such as resilience, identity, and the transformative power of art. It offers a sense of closure while simultaneously opening the door to new possibilities for Ada, highlighting her enduring spirit and capacity for healing through music.

The Harsh Reality of SROs: From Temporary Lodging to Long-Term Struggle

 Single Room Occupancy (SRO) housing is a term that many in Vancouver and other cities have become familiar with, but few truly understand the history behind these buildings and how they came to be in the condition they are today. Originally built as temporary accommodations for workers in industries like logging and mining, SROs were never meant to serve as long-term homes for individuals and families. Today, they stand as a stark reminder of our society’s failure to provide adequate, affordable housing for all.

A Look Back: SROs and Their Original Purpose

In the early 20th century, SROs served a very specific purpose. They were designed to house single men, many of whom were transient workers like loggers, miners, and laborers. These men would come to the city between jobs, needing a cheap, simple place to stay for short periods of time. SROs offered just that—small, individual rooms without kitchens or bathrooms. The rooms were affordable because they provided only the bare minimum: a bed, four walls, and shared bathroom facilities down the hall.

For workers who spent most of their time out in the field, these minimal accommodations were enough for their short stays. They didn’t need luxury or long-term comfort. They were simply looking for a roof over their heads before returning to their labor-intensive jobs.

The Shift: From Temporary to Permanent

As industries changed and Vancouver’s economy evolved, so did the purpose of these buildings. With the rise in housing costs and limited affordable options, SROs increasingly became the only option for low-income individuals and families. Instead of being used for short stays between work, they became permanent homes for people who had nowhere else to go.

But here’s the problem: SROs were never designed to support long-term living. They weren’t built to accommodate families or even individuals who would call them home for years on end. These buildings, already old and poorly maintained, began to deteriorate. Shared bathrooms, which might have been manageable for a transient workforce, became unsanitary and overcrowded as more and more people began using them daily. The lack of kitchens forces many residents to rely on takeout or food that requires no preparation, which further strains their budgets and health.

For those who live in SROs today, the conditions are deplorable. Imagine trying to maintain your mental and physical health in a small, often filthy room with no privacy, no cooking facilities, and shared bathrooms that are rarely cleaned. Add to this the social isolation and stigma associated with living in an SRO, and it’s no surprise that many residents face severe mental health challenges and struggle to break free from this cycle of poverty.

The Consequences: A System Failing Its Most Vulnerable

The shift from temporary lodging to long-term housing in SROs speaks to a larger problem: the failure to provide adequate, affordable housing in cities like Vancouver. Instead of investing in better solutions, we’ve allowed these buildings to become the last resort for some of the most vulnerable members of our society.

No one should have to live in an SRO. These spaces, originally built for loggers and laborers to stay briefly between jobs, are now trapping people in conditions that no human being should have to endure. The mental and emotional toll is immense. When your home is dirty, unsafe, and dehumanizing, it becomes nearly impossible to focus on anything other than survival.

What Needs to Change

If we want to address the housing crisis, we must start by recognizing that SROs are not a solution. These buildings need to be either significantly renovated or replaced with real affordable housing options that offer dignity and safety to their residents. The people living in SROs deserve homes where they can thrive, not just survive.

At the same time, we need to invest in mental health support, addiction services, and social programs that can help lift people out of poverty and prevent them from being forced into these conditions in the first place. SROs are a symptom of a much larger problem, but they also highlight how urgently we need change.

Conclusion

It’s time to acknowledge that SROs were never meant to be long-term housing. Their origins as temporary lodging for workers have been forgotten, and they’ve become yet another way that society has failed to care for its most vulnerable. By understanding the history of SROs, we can better grasp why their current use is so harmful—and why it’s crucial that we push for real, lasting solutions to the housing crisis.

The True Cost of SROs in Vancouver – Reimagining Housing Solutions

 Over a span of just five years, five affordable housing properties in Vancouver classified as Single Room Occupancy (SRO) generated a staggering 30,904 calls for policing services. These properties, often used by the most vulnerable in society, reflect a system that is broken and unsustainable—both for those living in these unhealthy environments and for the public resources being spent to manage their fallout.

The Hidden Costs of SROs

Each time an emergency response is dispatched—whether it’s for policing, fire services, or paramedics—it comes with a cost. Policing services in Vancouver are estimated to cost between $500 and $1,000 per call, depending on the complexity of the case. This means that for just five buildings over five years, policing alone likely cost between $15 million and $30 million. Add to that the cost of fire services and ambulance interventions, and the total figure becomes even more staggering.

But what are we really paying for? Not for long-term solutions, but for reactive measures that do little to address the root causes of these emergencies—mental health crises, substance abuse, and unsafe living conditions in dilapidated housing.

Reallocating Funds for Real Change

Instead of spending millions of dollars on reactive emergency services, what if we redirected those funds toward proactive housing solutions? Consider this: Vancouver has thousands of vacant condos, and the cost to house someone in a tiny home or modular housing is a fraction of what is spent on policing these SROs.

Rather than funneling money into managing the symptoms of poverty, we could use these funds to build healthy, sustainable housing environments. Modular homes or temporary housing in vacant condos would not only provide immediate relief for those suffering in SROs but also reduce the need for constant emergency interventions.

The Problem with Non-Profits

Non-profits like S.U.C.C.E.S.S, which claim to provide affordable housing, often make the qualification process so difficult that it feels inaccessible for many of the people who need it most. These organizations sometimes focus more on their operational requirements or securing funding than actually addressing the housing crisis equitably. This is why some affordable housing units remain empty or underutilized, while homelessness and housing insecurity continue to rise.

Who Really Benefits from SROs?

Another issue is the for-profit model that some landlords use to exploit vulnerable tenants. Many SRO owners perform only minor cosmetic upgrades to their properties, just enough to raise rents significantly without providing real improvements. This disinvestment in affordable housing forces residents to live in deplorable conditions while profits rise for the property owners.

We must move away from this model of housing, where people are treated as profit centers rather than human beings deserving of dignity and safety. By doing so, we can disrupt the cycle of poverty and provide real hope for the future.

A Call for Action: A Better Way Forward

The solution lies in diverting resources away from emergency responses and policing toward constructive, long-term housing solutions. This could include:

Temporary use of vacant condos: Until permanent housing can be built, people should not be forced to live in squalor.

Building tiny homes or modular housing: These are affordable, sustainable solutions that have already proven successful in other cities.

Enforcing rent controls and preventing speculation: Rent hikes for minor improvements shouldn't displace those in need. More stringent regulations are needed to protect vulnerable renters from exploitation.

By reallocating funds and rethinking how we address housing, we can save money in the long run and, more importantly, provide dignified living conditions for everyone.

It’s time to take action, not just by managing crises but by preventing them through smart investment in affordable housing.

What You Should Know About John Rustad

 John Rustad, who leads the Conservative Party of British Columbia, has faced criticism that raises concerns about his potential leadership as Premier. His political positions and actions highlight several key areas where his suitability for the role can be questioned.

1. Climate Change Denial: Rustad has been widely criticized for his views on climate change, including promoting skepticism about the science behind it. In a province that has experienced severe wildfires, floods, and other climate-related disasters, having a leader who downplays or dismisses climate science could hinder necessary environmental and sustainability efforts.

2. Shifting Political Alliances: Rustad was expelled from the BC Liberal (now BC United) caucus after his controversial views on climate change came to light. His switch to leading the BC Conservatives suggests opportunism rather than strong, consistent principles. His shifting loyalties raise questions about his long-term commitment to policy and party values.

3. Far-Right Policies: Under Rustad’s leadership, the BC Conservative Party has shifted toward more extreme, right-wing policies. These positions, such as opposing vaccine mandates and questioning climate action, can alienate moderate voters and undermine efforts to address pressing public health and environmental concerns.

4. Indigenous Relations: Rustad served as Minister of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation from 2013 to 2017. While he did advocate for some reconciliation initiatives, critics argue that his overall approach lacked meaningful engagement with Indigenous communities and focused more on economic development than on addressing systemic issues like land rights and self-determination.

5. Policy Inconsistencies: Rustad’s political stance on issues like resource development, including logging and mining, reflects a tendency to prioritize short-term economic gains over long-term sustainability. This approach could exacerbate environmental degradation and harm future generations.

Given these concerns, Rustad's leadership may not align with the progressive, climate-conscious, and socially inclusive direction that many British Columbians seek for the future of the province. His positions and past record suggest that he may not be the best choice to lead BC in tackling its complex challenges.

David Eby’s Promises vs. Reality: What Happened to Affordable Housing and BC’s Debt?

 

Introduction:

When David Eby stepped in as Premier of BC, many—including myself—had high hopes for real change, particularly in housing affordability and tackling BC’s social challenges. Yet, as time goes on, there seems to be a growing disconnect between what was promised and what’s been delivered. Instead of a focus on actionable solutions, his communications team seems more interested in deflecting blame onto political opponents like John Rustad.

What Were the Promises?

During his leadership campaign and early days in office, David Eby promised to:

1. Tackle the housing crisis by creating more affordable housing and addressing supply issues.

2. Improve health care, particularly for seniors, with better access to long-term care and support.

3. Build a sustainable economy by utilizing the provincial surplus to invest in key areas like infrastructure, social programs, and public services.

Many of us believed these promises would lead to concrete changes in our everyday lives—particularly in finding affordable places to live. But as time has gone on, it seems like those promises haven’t materialized in the way we expected.

The Reality Today: What Has Been Accomplished?

While there have been efforts on the housing front—like plans for more modular housing and attempts to curb speculation—the results have been underwhelming for many of us trying to find affordable rentals. Housing prices continue to climb, and rent remains unaffordable for too many people. Despite efforts, the housing crisis still feels like it’s getting worse, not better.

On top of that, BC has now gone from having a budget surplus to facing a growing debt. People are asking, "Where did the money go?" How did a province with a surplus end up in this position so quickly? And what are we getting in return?

Where’s the Accountability?

Instead of owning up to these challenges and directly addressing what’s gone wrong, Eby’s social media team seems to focus on attacking opponents like John Rustad, which does little to reassure voters. Deflecting blame and turning political disagreements into the main narrative is only distancing people who are struggling with real issues—like unaffordable housing, poor health care access, and rising costs.

What Should Be Done?

It's time for transparency. Eby’s team needs to step up and:

1. Clearly outline what has been accomplished versus what remains unfinished from the promises he made.

2. Explain the debt situation: How did we go from a surplus to a deficit? What investments were made, and how do they benefit British Columbians in the long run?

3. Refocus on solutions, not political battles. People don’t want to hear about Rustad or the BC United Party—they want to know what’s being done to make their lives better now.

Conclusion:

David Eby has an opportunity to regain trust, but it starts with owning up to the realities and focusing on real solutions instead of political posturing. It’s time for our leaders to show accountability, deliver on their promises, and provide hope to those of us still waiting for the changes we were promised.

Why I Always Vote Green, and Why You Should Keep the Faith in Change

Why I Always Vote Green, and Why You Should Keep the Faith in Change

In a world that seems increasingly divided and uncertain, it can be easy to feel disillusioned with politics. We've all seen promises broken, priorities skewed, and decisions made that favor special interests over the public good. Despite this, I still vote Green every time, and here's why.

Staying True to My Values

The Green Party represents values that I hold close—sustainability, social justice, and ethical governance. Even though they often don't win, voting Green allows me to stay true to my beliefs. Voting for the environment and for a system that prioritizes people over profits matters deeply to me, and I believe every Green vote is a statement that these issues can't be ignored.

We Did Have a Green-DP Coalition

It’s important to remember that we did make history with a Green-DP coalition in British Columbia in 2017. The Green Party, though small, played a crucial role in holding the balance of power and pushing for key policies on climate action, electoral reform, and Indigenous rights. This moment showed that with perseverance, even a smaller party can influence the bigger picture. If we give up on voting for what we believe in, we risk losing that influence.

Good Can Still Conquer Bad

It’s easy to be cynical. But I hold onto hope because I believe that good can still conquer the bad. We've seen it in grassroots movements, in communities coming together for change, and in the small but significant victories Greens have achieved—whether it's fighting pipelines, advocating for affordable housing, or speaking up for a future that works for everyone, not just the wealthy few.

Change might seem slow, but it starts with each of us. Every Green vote counts. It might not always result in a win, but it sends a powerful message that people care about a sustainable, fair, and just future. We need to keep voting, keep talking, and most of all, keep believing that good governance is possible.

We Must Not Elect Those Who Spread Hate: A Call to Reject Racist Candidates

As we approach the upcoming election, it’s vital to carefully examine the character and past actions of those who seek to represent us. The recent revelations about Brent Chapman, the BC Conservative candidate for Surrey South, are alarming. His history of making deeply offensive and Islamophobic remarks on social media should give us all pause.

In 2015, Chapman posted comments that were not only derogatory but harmful, describing Palestinian children as “inbred walking talking breathing time bombs”. Despite issuing a public apology, the damage caused by these words cannot be erased so easily. While everyone makes mistakes, comments that perpetuate hate against entire communities are not small slip-ups—they are dangerous reflections of deeply ingrained prejudice.

The role of an elected official is to serve all citizens with integrity and fairness. Allowing someone with a track record of hate speech to hold public office is not only irresponsible but sets a precedent that such behavior is tolerable in our political system. It isn't just about the apology; it’s about the values that individual represents and the trust that voters place in their elected officials. Leaders should build bridges, not fuel division.

David Eby, BC’s Premier, was clear in his criticism, labeling Chapman’s past remarks as potential criminal hate speech. The National Council of Canadian Muslims (NCCM) also expressed deep concern, although they acknowledged Chapman's apology, urging him and the BC Conservatives to take concrete actions to address Islamophobia. Yet, despite the outcry, Chapman remains in the race, and his party’s leadership, including John Rustad, has opted to stand by him.

It’s important to recognize that while Chapman has apologized, the question remains whether his values have truly changed or whether this is merely an attempt to salvage his campaign. Can we risk electing someone with such a problematic history into a position of power? The stakes are too high. We need leaders who unequivocally stand against all forms of racism, bigotry, and hate.

By electing candidates like Chapman, we signal that racism can be overlooked, that Islamophobia can be excused, and that hate has a place in our institutions. This is not the future we want for British Columbia or for Canada. We must reject such behavior, hold our leaders accountable, and ensure that those who seek public office are people who truly represent the values of inclusivity, respect, and justice.

What You Can Do

1. Vote: Use your voice at the ballot box to reject candidates who have a history of spreading hate.

2. Stay Informed: Follow reliable news outlets and organizations like the NCCM that are actively working to combat hate and discrimination.

3. Engage: Talk to friends, family, and neighbors about why these issues matter. Ensure that the conversation around racism, especially in politics, remains at the forefront.

We deserve better from our leaders. Let’s stand united against hate and ensure that those elected into office reflect the values of our diverse and vibrant communities.

: A Cry for Help in a Digital World: The Heartbreaking Struggles of Our Youth

I recently came across a video that left me heartbroken and disturbed. In it, a trans person—presenting as a young woman—was speaking to her parents about her body, about how much she hated it. The pain in her voice was palpable as she explained that something, or someone, had convinced her that the solution was to "go digital." She wanted to escape her body and become something beyond physical, something entirely virtual.

Her parents, clearly shocked and devastated, tried to process what she was saying. At one point, they even asked, "So you want to kill yourself?" She quickly responded, "No, I will be digital," as if being digital meant she could exist without the pain she felt in her current body. It was a gut-wrenching moment, a window into the deep confusion, anguish, and pressure that many young people feel today.

It’s impossible to ignore the role the internet, social media, and even Big Pharma play in shaping our perceptions of ourselves, especially among the younger generation. Kids today are growing up bombarded by images, ideals, and advertisements that tell them they’re not good enough, that they need to change or “fix” themselves to be accepted. It’s no wonder that so many of them feel lost or broken.

When COVID hit, and schools closed, the isolation only worsened for many kids. With no face-to-face socialization, they turned to the internet for connection, guidance, and a sense of belonging. But what they often found online was a toxic mix of impossible standards and quick fixes—messages that made them feel even more alienated from their true selves.

The person in the video seemed to be reaching for something beyond their pain, something they believed would offer them an escape from the body they couldn’t stand to live in. But the reality is that no amount of technology or medical intervention can replace the need for deep emotional care, compassion, and understanding. The drive to become "digital" may have been a metaphor for wanting to escape this world—a world where they felt trapped and misunderstood.

This story also hits close to home for me. Someone in my own family, who was trans, took their life. The loss has stayed with me, and I see the same pain in others who are struggling with their identities. The pressure to fit into a world that doesn't always accept or understand them is too much for some, and I worry every day for those I love who may be facing similar battles.

As a society, we need to do more than just offer medical solutions or push people to conform to certain ideals. We need to listen—truly listen—to the cries for help. We need to provide safe spaces for our youth to express their struggles without fear of judgment or ridicule. And we need affordable mental health care, not just for those who can afford it, but for everyone, because no one should feel like their only option is to leave their body behind.

If you're reading this and you're struggling, know that you're not alone. There are people who care, even when it feels like the world is pushing you in directions you don't want to go. You are enough as you are, and your life matters, in any form it takes.

---

Ending Note: If you or someone you know is struggling with thoughts of self-harm or suicide, please reach out to a trusted friend, family member, or a mental health professional. There are also hotlines available for immediate support: 

Here are the emergency numbers and helplines for British Columbia, Canada, the US, and Mexico:

British Columbia, Canada

Crisis Centre of BC:

Phone: 1-800-784-2433

Website: Crisis Centre of BC

Kids Help Phone:

Phone: 1-800-668-6868

Text: Text CONNECT to 686868

Website: Kids Help Phone

Canada (National)

Talk Suicide Canada:

Phone: 1-833-456-4566 (24/7)

Text: 45645 (4 PM – 12 AM Eastern Time)

Website: Talk Suicide Canada

United States

National Suicide Prevention Lifeline:

Phone: 1-800-273-TALK (1-800-273-8255) (24/7)

Website: suicidepreventionlifeline.org

Crisis Text Line:

Text: HOME to 741741 (24/7)

Website: Crisis Text Line

Mexico

SAPTEL (Servicio de Apoyo Psicológico a Distancia):

Phone: 800-472-7835 (24/7)

Website: SAPTEL (Click on "SAPTEL" for more info)

National Suicide Prevention Helpline:

Phone: 800-911-2000 (24/7)

If you or anyone you know needs immediate help, please don’t hesitate to reach out to these resources. They are there to provide support and assistance.