Affordable Housing Policies Deserve More Respect—And Less Condescension

 Counterpoint: Affordable Housing Policies Deserve More Respect—And Less Condescension

It’s disheartening to see an academic like Patrick Condon, who has dedicated his career to urban design, dismiss the critical need for affordable housing with such a flippant use of the word “stupid.” The challenges faced by people struggling to find a home in Metro Vancouver are not a matter of convenience or aesthetic preference; they are a matter of survival.

Condon’s critique of below-market rental units in highrises focuses on the “ugliness” of buildings and reduced amenities. While he is entitled to his opinion, he seems to have forgotten the far more pressing issue—the lack of affordable housing. A UBC professor, who likely makes more in a year than many people in the city do in a decade, has little room to make such dismissive remarks about affordable housing policies that aim to keep people from being pushed out of their homes.

For many, housing insecurity is a daily reality. People are not choosing between “luxury amenities” in their homes—they are wondering where their next meal will come from and how they’ll keep a roof over their heads. To frame policies aimed at helping the vulnerable as “stupid” is not just misinformed—it’s irresponsible.

The Vancouver Sun has a responsibility to engage with the pressing issues of our time thoughtfully, particularly when it comes to the affordable housing crisis. By publishing such a divisive piece, the paper not only spreads a dangerous narrative but also gives space to those who don’t understand the true impact of these policies.

We need more than just fancy buildings and design trends—we need homes for people who are struggling. It’s time for Vancouver to stop prioritizing aesthetics over the well-being of its residents. Affordable housing isn’t an “afterthought” for developers—it’s a necessity for the city’s future.