Saturday, October 31, 2026

Happy Halloween

a halloween walk down memory lane in kitsilano 🎃

There is something rather magical about Halloween in Kitsilano.




Tonight, I decided to take a little trip down memory lane, revisiting some of the old neighbourhoods and houses where I used to take my kid trick-or-treating.

Oh, the memories!

The little feet running from house to house, the excitement of collecting candy, the costumes, the anticipation and the occasional negotiation over how much chocolate was an acceptable amount to eat before bedtime.

Some things never change.

I ran into a friend and decided to stay awhile to watch the little monsters arrive. And what a parade it was!

The creativity! The imagination!

There were Harry Potters, Wednesdays, witches, monsters, and a few characters that required a little detective work to identify.

I spotted what I think was Sulley from Monsters, Inc. — goodness, that movie is more than 20 years old now. Where does the time go?

There were four enormous axolotls (yes, four!), and one very impressive big frog. I'm not entirely sure what was happening in the amphibian department, but they were certainly making an appearance.

And the houses!

Some people really went all out. Elaborate decorations, spooky lighting, mysterious doorways, creepy creatures and enough cobwebs to make you wonder whether the homeowners had actually decorated or simply stopped cleaning in September.

Some front yards looked like the beginning of a particularly suspicious fairy tale.

I half expected a witch to invite me inside for tea, only to discover the teapot had other plans.

Walking through the neighbourhood, I couldn't help thinking about all those Halloweens years ago, when my own little trick-or-treater was part of the excitement.

The children have changed, the costumes have become more elaborate, and the decorations seem to get bigger every year. But the anticipation is still there.

For one evening, the neighbourhood belongs to the children, the imagination runs wild, and grown-ups get to play along.

Perhaps that's the real magic of Halloween.

You can grow older, but you're never too old to appreciate a good monster, a clever costume, a mysterious house or a little bit of mischief.

And if you happen to see four giant axolotls walking down the street, just smile and keep moving.

It's Halloween in Kitsilano. Apparently, anything is possible.

Happy Halloween, everyone! 🎃


quand on n’a plus les moyens de vivre dans son propre pays

 

quand on n’a plus les moyens de vivre dans son propre pays

Parfois, les histoires que nous rencontrons dans notre vie quotidienne nous obligent à nous arrêter et à réfléchir à ce qui se passe autour de nous.

Je me promène à vélo dans Vancouver, à la recherche de travail, d’un logement abordable et en essayant de trouver comment je vais pouvoir continuer à avoir un toit au-dessus de ma tête.

La semaine dernière, alors que je circulais à vélo, j’ai trouvé le portefeuille d’une femme.

Je l’ai ramassé, je me suis assurée qu’il retourne à sa propriétaire et, ce faisant, j’ai appris un peu de son histoire.

Cela m’a rappelé qu’il y a tant de personnes qui essaient simplement de joindre les deux bouts. Des personnes qui étudient, travaillent, jonglent avec leurs responsabilités et font tout leur possible pour se construire une vie ici.

Puis, j’ai lu un article du North Shore News au sujet d’une femme mexicaine vivant au Canada qui aurait promis à une autre femme mexicaine un emploi qui n’existait pas, en utilisant de faux documents d’emploi pour faciliter son arrivée au Canada.

Ce n’était pas la première fois que je tombais sur des histoires de ce genre.

J’ai déjà fait des recherches sur la fraude dans le domaine de l’éducation, les abus liés au Programme des travailleurs étrangers temporaires, les arnaques à l’immigration et l’exploitation des personnes qui viennent au Canada en croyant qu’un véritable emploi les attend.

Des gens se font exploiter de toutes sortes de façons.

Les nouveaux arrivants méritent des offres d’emploi honnêtes, un logement décent et une protection contre l’exploitation.

Les travailleurs canadiens méritent eux aussi des possibilités d’emploi équitables.

Les jeunes ne devraient pas avoir besoin de plusieurs emplois simplement pour survivre. Les travailleurs plus âgés ne devraient pas devenir invisibles. Et les personnes qui ont travaillé pendant presque toute leur vie ne devraient pas se retrouver confrontées à l’itinérance.

Mais je veux revenir à quelque chose de personnel.

Je lutte pour trouver un logement depuis 2019. Cela fait trois ans que je n’arrive pas à trouver un emploi régulier. J’ai 64 ans et, même si je devrais commencer à recevoir ma pension au début de l’année prochaine, elle ne sera pas suffisante pour louer un logement à Vancouver.

Alors, quelles options me reste-t-il?

Je ne veux pas devenir une autre personne sans domicile qui erre dans les rues la nuit, transportant toutes ses possessions dans des sacs d’épicerie.

Je pense à cette femme que j’ai vue dans les rues, transportant toutes ses affaires dans des sacs d’épicerie du magasin No Frills. Je l’ai vue dehors, allant d’un endroit à l’autre avec tout ce qu’elle possède dans ces sacs.

Je ne veux pas que ce soit mon avenir.

Je ne veux pas passer mes nuits à errer dans les rues, avec mes affaires dans des sacs d’épicerie, à essayer de trouver un endroit sûr et chaud.

Je ne veux pas devenir une autre personne que les gens croisent sans même la voir.

Je ne veux pas dormir dehors dans le froid, en me demandant où je serai en sécurité, où je trouverai de quoi manger ou si je réussirai à traverser un autre hiver.

J’ai peur. C’est la vérité.

Et c’est pour cela que je pars au Mexique.

Je visite le Mexique depuis 1997. J’aime les gens, la culture et les liens que j’y ai tissés. Je sais que ce n’est pas une solution magique et que vivre dans un autre pays comporte ses propres défis.

Mais j’ai la possibilité de trouver un endroit où vivre à un coût plus abordable, où mes revenus limités pourront aller un peu plus loin et où, je l’espère, je pourrai traverser les prochaines années sans perdre ma dignité.

Je n’aurais jamais imaginé qu’à 64 ans, je devrais quitter le Canada parce que je n’ai pas les moyens d’y vieillir.

Je ne veux pas laisser derrière moi mon art, mes écrits, ma communauté ni le pays où j’ai passé une si grande partie de ma vie.

Mais je ne veux pas non plus mourir dans une rue froide en attendant de recevoir ma pension.

Et je ne pense pas que qui que ce soit devrait avoir à faire ce choix.

quelques questions que nous devons nous poser

Pourquoi les personnes qui veulent travailler n’arrivent-elles pas à trouver un emploi?

Pourquoi les travailleurs plus âgés sont-ils mis de côté?

Pourquoi les jeunes doivent-ils cumuler plusieurs emplois simplement pour survivre?

Combien de nouveaux arrivants sont exploités au moyen de fausses offres d’emploi?

Qui surveille adéquatement le Programme des travailleurs étrangers temporaires?

Les employeurs et les consultants en immigration doivent-ils rendre des comptes lorsqu’ils exploitent des personnes vulnérables?

Pourquoi une personne qui a travaillé et contribué à la société pendant des années ne peut-elle pas se permettre un logement modeste à la retraite?

Qu’est-il arrivé à la promesse selon laquelle le travail acharné devait nous apporter une certaine sécurité?

Pourquoi considérons-nous le logement comme une occasion d’investissement plutôt que comme un besoin humain fondamental?

Quel genre de pays voulons-nous devenir?

Je ne blâme pas la femme qui est venue ici à la recherche d’une vie meilleure. Je ne blâme pas la jeune femme dont j’ai rapporté le portefeuille. Et je ne blâme pas non plus les personnes qui essaient simplement de survivre.

Je blâme un système qui semble de moins en moins capable de répondre aux besoins fondamentaux des gens ordinaires.

Nous pouvons accueillir les nouveaux arrivants tout en protégeant les travailleurs canadiens. Nous pouvons nous préoccuper des questions d’immigration tout en exigeant que les responsables rendent des comptes. Nous pouvons faire preuve de compassion envers tout le monde sans prétendre que tout fonctionne correctement.

J’aime le Canada. J’aime le Mexique.

Mais en ce moment, le Canada est devenu trop cher pour que je puisse encore l’appeler chez moi.

Et c’est une chose bien triste à devoir dire.


Mots-clés et hashtags

#LeLogementEstUnDroitHumain

#CriseDuLogementAuCanada

#Itinérance

#LogementAbordable

#RéformeDeLImmigration

#DroitsDesTravailleurs

#TravailleursÉtrangersTemporaires

#SécuritéÀLaRetraite

#CoûtDeLaVie

#DignitéPourTous

cuando no puedes permitirte vivir en tu propio país

 cuando no puedes permitirte vivir en tu propio país

A veces, las historias que encontramos en nuestra vida cotidiana nos hacen detenernos a pensar en lo que está sucediendo a nuestro alrededor.

He estado recorriendo Vancouver en bicicleta, tratando de encontrar trabajo, buscando una vivienda asequible e intentando descubrir cómo voy a poder seguir teniendo un techo sobre mi cabeza.

La semana pasada, mientras andaba en bicicleta, encontré la cartera de una mujer.

La recogí, me aseguré de que regresara a su dueña y, en el proceso, conocí un poco de su historia.

Me recordó que hay muchísimas personas intentando llegar a fin de mes. Personas que estudian, trabajan, equilibran sus responsabilidades y hacen todo lo posible por construir una vida aquí.

Después leí un artículo de North Shore News sobre una mujer mexicana que vive en Canadá y que, presuntamente, le prometió a otra mujer mexicana un trabajo que no existía, utilizando documentos laborales falsos para facilitar su llegada a Canadá.

No era la primera vez que encontraba historias como esta.

Ya he investigado el fraude educativo, los abusos dentro del Programa de Trabajadores Extranjeros Temporales, las estafas relacionadas con la inmigración y la explotación de personas que llegan a Canadá creyendo que les han ofrecido un empleo legítimo.

Hay personas que están siendo aprovechadas de muchas maneras.

Las personas recién llegadas merecen ofertas de trabajo honestas, viviendas dignas y protección contra la explotación.

Los trabajadores canadienses también merecen oportunidades laborales justas.

Los jóvenes no deberían necesitar varios trabajos simplemente para sobrevivir. Los trabajadores mayores no deberían volverse invisibles. Y las personas que han trabajado durante casi toda su vida no deberían terminar enfrentándose a la falta de vivienda.

Pero quiero volver a algo personal.

He estado luchando por encontrar vivienda desde 2019. Llevo tres años sin poder encontrar un empleo estable. Tengo 64 años y, aunque espero comenzar a recibir mi pensión a principios del próximo año, no será suficiente para alquilar una vivienda en Vancouver.

Entonces, ¿qué opciones tengo?

No quiero convertirme en otra persona sin hogar que deambula por las calles durante la noche, llevando todas sus pertenencias en bolsas del supermercado.

Pienso en la mujer que he visto caminando por las calles, cargando todas sus pertenencias en bolsas del supermercado No Frills. La he visto por ahí, yendo de un lugar a otro con todo lo que posee metido en esas bolsas.

No quiero que esa sea mi realidad.

No quiero pasar las noches caminando por las calles, cargando mis pertenencias en bolsas del supermercado, intentando encontrar un lugar seguro y cálido.

No quiero convertirme en otra persona a la que los demás pasan de largo sin siquiera verla.

No quiero dormir al aire libre en el frío, preguntándome dónde estaré segura, dónde encontraré comida o si conseguiré sobrevivir a otro invierno.

Tengo miedo. Esa es la verdad.

Y por eso me voy a México.

He visitado México desde 1997. Amo a su gente, su cultura y las conexiones que he creado allí. Sé que no es una solución mágica y que vivir en otro país también tiene sus propios desafíos.

Pero tengo la oportunidad de encontrar un lugar más económico donde vivir, donde mis ingresos limitados puedan rendir un poco más y donde, espero, pueda afrontar los años que vienen sin perder mi dignidad.

Nunca imaginé que a los 64 años tendría que dejar Canadá porque no puedo permitirme envejecer aquí.

No quiero dejar atrás mi arte, mis escritos, mi comunidad ni el país en el que he pasado gran parte de mi vida.

Pero tampoco quiero morir en una calle fría esperando que llegue mi pensión.

Y no creo que nadie debería tener que tomar esa decisión.

algunas preguntas que debemos hacernos

¿Por qué las personas que quieren trabajar no pueden encontrar empleo?

¿Por qué se ignora a los trabajadores mayores?

¿Por qué los jóvenes tienen que combinar varios trabajos simplemente para sobrevivir?

¿Cuántas personas recién llegadas están siendo explotadas mediante ofertas de trabajo fraudulentas?

¿Quién supervisa adecuadamente el Programa de Trabajadores Extranjeros Temporales?

¿Se exige responsabilidad a los empleadores y asesores de inmigración cuando explotan a personas vulnerables?

¿Por qué alguien que ha trabajado y contribuido a la sociedad no puede permitirse una vivienda modesta durante su jubilación?

¿Qué pasó con la promesa de que trabajar duro nos daría cierta seguridad?

¿Por qué tratamos la vivienda como una oportunidad de inversión en lugar de reconocerla como una necesidad humana básica?

¿En qué tipo de país queremos convertirnos?

No culpo a la mujer que vino aquí buscando una vida mejor. No culpo a la joven cuya cartera devolví. Y tampoco culpo a las personas que simplemente están intentando sobrevivir.

Culpo a un sistema que parece cada vez menos capaz de proporcionar lo básico a la gente común.

Podemos dar la bienvenida a los recién llegados y proteger a los trabajadores canadienses. Podemos preocuparnos por la inmigración y, al mismo tiempo, exigir responsabilidades. Podemos tener compasión por todos sin fingir que las cosas están funcionando.

Amo a Canadá. Amo a México.

Pero ahora mismo, Canadá se ha vuelto demasiado caro para que pueda llamarlo mi hogar.

Y es algo muy triste que tener que decir.


Palabras clave y hashtags

#LaViviendaEsUnDerechoHumano

#CrisisDeViviendaEnCanadá

#PersonasSinHogar

#ViviendaAsequible

#ReformaMigratoria

#DerechosLaborales

#TrabajadoresExtranjerosTemporales

#SeguridadEnLaJubilación

#CostoDeVida

#DignidadParaTodos

when you can't afford to stay in your own country

 

when you can't afford to stay in your own country

Sometimes the stories we encounter in everyday life make us stop and think about what is happening around us.

I've been riding my bike around Vancouver, trying to find work, trying to find affordable housing and trying to figure out how I'm going to keep a roof over my head.

Last week, while out riding, I came across a woman's wallet.

I picked it up, made sure it got back to its owner, and in the process learned a little about her life.

It reminded me that there are so many people trying to make ends meet. People studying, working, juggling responsibilities and doing whatever they can to build a life here.

Then I read a North Shore News story about a Mexican woman living in Canada who allegedly promised another Mexican woman a job that didn't exist, using false employment documents to facilitate her arrival in Canada.

It wasn't the first time I'd come across stories like this.

I've already researched education fraud, Temporary Foreign Worker Program abuses, immigration scams and the exploitation of people who come to Canada believing they have been offered genuine employment.

There are people being taken advantage of on all sides.

Newcomers deserve honest job offers, decent housing and protection from exploitation.

Canadian workers deserve fair employment opportunities, too.

Young people shouldn't need multiple jobs just to survive. Older workers shouldn't become invisible. And people who have worked most of their lives shouldn't be facing homelessness.

But I want to bring this back to something personal.

I've been struggling with housing since 2019. I've been unable to find regular employment for three years. I'm 64, and although my pension is expected to begin early next year, it won't be enough to rent a home in Vancouver.

So what choices do I have?

I don't want to become another homeless person wandering the streets at night, carrying everything I own in grocery bags.

I think about the woman I've seen wandering the streets, carrying all her possessions in No Frills grocery bags. I've seen her out there, moving from place to place with everything she owns in those bags.

I don't want that to be me.

I don't want to spend my nights wandering the streets, carrying my belongings in grocery bags, trying to find somewhere safe and warm.

I don't want to become another person people walk past without seeing.

I don't want to be sleeping outside in the cold, wondering where I'll be safe, where I'll find food or whether I'll make it through another winter.

I'm frightened. That's the truth.

And that's why I'm going to Mexico.

I've been visiting Mexico since 1997. I love the people, the culture and the connections I've made there. I know it isn't a magical solution, and living somewhere else comes with its own challenges.

But I have a chance to find somewhere more affordable to live, somewhere I can stretch my limited income and hopefully get through the years ahead without losing my dignity.

I didn't imagine that at 64 I'd be leaving Canada because I couldn't afford to grow old here.

I don't want to leave my art, my writing, my community or the country where I've spent so much of my life.

But I also don't want to die on a cold street waiting for my pension.

And I don't think anyone should have to make that choice.

some questions we need to ask

  1. Why are people who want to work unable to find employment?
  2. Why are older workers being overlooked?
  3. Why are young people juggling multiple jobs just to survive?
  4. How many newcomers are being exploited through fraudulent job offers?
  5. Who is properly monitoring the Temporary Foreign Worker Program?
  6. Are employers and immigration consultants being held accountable when they exploit vulnerable people?
  7. Why can't someone who has worked and contributed to society afford a modest home in retirement?
  8. What happened to the promise that hard work would provide some security?
  9. Why are we treating housing as an investment opportunity rather than a basic human necessity?
  10. What kind of country do we want to become?

I don't blame the woman who came here looking for a better life. I don't blame the young woman whose wallet I returned. And I don't blame people who are trying to survive.

I blame a system that seems increasingly unable to provide ordinary people with the basics.

We can welcome newcomers and protect Canadian workers. We can care about immigration and still demand accountability. We can have compassion for everyone without pretending that things are working.

I love Canada. I love Mexico.

But right now, Canada has become too expensive for me to call home.

And that is a very sad thing to have to say.


HousingIsAHumanRight

#CanadaHousingCrisis

#Homelessness

#AffordableHousing

#ImmigrationReform

#WorkersRights

#TemporaryForeignWorkers

#RetirementSecurity

#CostOfLiving

#DignityForAll

winter safety reminder: please be seen, please be safe

 

winter safety reminder: please be seen, please be safe

💔 Two heartbreaking reminders of how dangerous our roads can be: a 45-year-old was struck and killed, and a 7-year-old girl was hit by a vehicle. My heart goes out to everyone affected.

As we head into the dark, rainy months, I want to remind everyone who walks, cycles, or travels on foot: PLEASE WEAR BRIGHT COLOURS AND REFLECTIVE GEAR.

🌧️ Make yourself visible this fall and winter!

🟡 Wear bright, fluorescent colours instead of dark clothing.

✨ Add reflective tape to your jacket, backpack, shoes, umbrella, or bag.

🔦 Carry a flashlight or use a light when walking in poorly lit areas.

🚶 Cross at intersections and crosswalks whenever possible. Make eye contact with drivers if you can, but never assume they have seen you.

🚗 Drivers, please slow down! Rain, darkness, glare, and wet roads make it harder to see pedestrians and stop in time. Stay alert, put your phone away, and watch carefully for people crossing, especially children.

We all know that some drivers speed, and others are distracted. We cannot control their behaviour, but we can take steps to make ourselves more visible.

Please remember that wearing dark clothing on a rainy, overcast evening can make you almost invisible to a driver until it is too late.

A few seconds of extra caution could save a life.

Please share this reminder with your family, friends, neighbours, and especially anyone who walks to school or work.

Let's look out for one another. Nobody should lose their life simply trying to get where they need to go.

Be bright. Be visible. Slow down. Get home safely. ❤️

#WinterSafety #PedestrianSafety #RoadSafety #BeVisible #WearReflectiveGear #SlowDown #DistractedDriving #SchoolZoneSafety #StaySafe #LookOutForEachOther

the children are watching

 the children are watching: what kind of planet are we leaving them?

🤔🌏🌎🌍💙🌊🔥💚🌈🔥🥵🥶🥵🥶🥵🥶🥺

The environment, climate change, water, forests, artificial intelligence and the responsibility we have to future generations.

I keep coming back to one thing when I think about the environment.

The children.

What must it feel like to grow up watching wildfires destroy communities, floods swallow neighbourhoods, rivers dry up, oceans fill with plastic and forests disappear?

What must it feel like to hear adults talk about climate change year after year, make promises, attend international conferences, set targets and then continue making decisions that put the environment under pressure?

And what happens when children begin to lose faith that the adults responsible for protecting their future are actually doing enough?

These aren't hypothetical questions anymore.

children are taking governments to court

Something important is happening right here in British Columbia.

You may have heard about the young Canadians taking the federal government to court over climate change.

There is a correction worth making: it isn't ten children. It is 15 young Canadians, who were between the ages of 10 and 19 when they originally filed their case in October 2019.

Their case is called La Rose v. His Majesty the King.

After years of legal challenges, their case finally went to trial in Vancouver on October 26, 2026.

They argue that Canada's climate policies and continued greenhouse gas emissions threaten their constitutional rights to life, liberty and security of the person under Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

They want the government held accountable for the consequences of its climate decisions.

Think about that for a moment.

Some of these young people were barely teenagers when they began this legal fight. They have spent seven years pursuing it.

They are now asking the courts to consider whether governments have a constitutional responsibility to protect their future.

Whatever the eventual court decision, their concerns deserve to be heard.

And this isn't the only youth-led climate case in Canada. Young people in Ontario and elsewhere have also challenged government climate policies.

Why are children having to take governments to court to get their concerns taken seriously?

what are we doing to their mental health?

We talk about children's mental health, anxiety, depression, bullying and the pressures of growing up in a complicated world.

But how often do we talk about the environment as part of that conversation?

UNICEF's 2026 Children's Climate Risk Report found that 1.1 billion children are exposed to at least three overlapping climate hazards.

These include extreme heat, drought, flooding, wildfires, coastal flooding and tropical storms.

More than 171 million students around the world had their schooling disrupted by climate-related hazards in 2025.

Imagine being a child whose school is closed because of flooding, whose family has to evacuate because of wildfires, or whose community is struggling to find clean drinking water.

And imagine being a teenager who understands that these problems aren't going away when they graduate.

Climate anxiety is real. UNICEF has spoken with mental health experts about the fear, helplessness and uncertainty young people experience when they worry about the future of the planet.

We shouldn't dismiss those feelings as children being dramatic.

Perhaps they are paying attention.

Perhaps they are asking questions that adults have avoided for too long.

british columbia: what is happening in our own backyard?

We live in a beautiful province.

Rainforests, mountains, rivers, lakes, coastlines, salmon streams and extraordinary biodiversity.

But British Columbia has some difficult environmental decisions ahead.

1. Wildfires

Canada's 2026 wildfire season has burned approximately 4.5 million hectares across the country, with more than 5,400 fires reported.

British Columbia was among the regions particularly affected.

More than 33,750 people across Canada were forced from their homes this season, including thousands from First Nations communities.

These aren't just statistics. They represent families, homes, wildlife, forests, livelihoods and communities.

2. Old-growth forests

The future of old-growth forests remains a major concern.

On Vancouver Island, communities and conservationists continue to fight over logging in some of the last remaining productive old-growth forests.

The Fairy Creek watershed is one example.

These forests aren't simply collections of valuable timber. They are complex ecosystems, carbon stores and habitat for countless species.

They also hold deep cultural significance for Indigenous communities.

We need to ask whether short-term economic benefits are worth losing ecosystems that took centuries to develop.

3. LNG and industrial expansion

In September, British Columbia approved an environmental assessment certificate for the Tilbury Phase 2 LNG expansion in Delta.

The project still requires further permitting.

The province points to employment, economic activity and energy security. Environmental questions include greenhouse gas emissions, air quality, wildlife, water and impacts on neighbouring communities and First Nations.

We need to be able to discuss both the economic arguments and the environmental consequences.

4. Water and salmon

Our rivers and watersheds are under pressure from changing rainfall patterns, drought, development, industrial activity and warmer temperatures.

Salmon depend on healthy rivers and streams.

When water temperatures rise or streams become too shallow, fish populations face additional stress.

Protecting water means protecting entire ecosystems, not simply ensuring that people have water coming out of their taps.

canada: what does our environmental record look like?

Canada likes to present itself as a country with vast natural resources and a commitment to environmental protection.

But we need to look at the numbers.

According to Canada's 2026 National Inventory Report, our greenhouse gas emissions in 2024 were approximately 685 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent.

The oil and gas sector accounted for 30% of Canada's emissions.

Transportation accounted for another 22%.

There has been progress in some areas, including reductions in electricity-sector emissions since coal-fired electricity was phased out in many parts of the country.

But oil and gas emissions have increased compared with 2005.

This is where we need honest conversations about the direction Canada is taking.

We cannot keep talking about climate commitments while ignoring the emissions associated with expanding fossil fuel production.

We also need to consider Indigenous rights, land stewardship, food security, biodiversity and the communities that bear the consequences of industrial development.

mexico: another country, many of the same challenges

I have a personal connection to Mexico, particularly Oaxaca.

I've been travelling there since 1997, and I have seen how much the country means to the people who live there.

But Mexico is facing serious environmental pressures too.

Water is becoming a major issue.

In October 2026, reports from Mexico's drought monitoring system showed that 12.7% of the country was experiencing moderate to severe drought, compared with 7.5% at the same time last year.

Oaxaca was among the states affected.

There has also been a troubling water-quality crisis in Guadalajara.

Residents have reported foul-smelling, discoloured tap water. Testing has raised concerns about contamination, including bacteria and potentially harmful substances.

People have taken to the streets demanding safe drinking water and accountability.

In the Cholula Valley, communities are also fighting to protect rivers, springs and groundwater.

Some residents have seen rivers disappear, wells decline and water become increasingly difficult to access.

These are reminders that water isn't an unlimited resource.

Mexico is also dealing with pressures from tourism, urban expansion, agriculture, deforestation, waste disposal and development along its coastlines.

When I return to Oaxaca, I want to pay attention to these issues.

Tourism can bring employment and income, but development needs to consider the people who live there, the water they depend on and the ecosystems that make these places special.

and what is happening around the world?

This isn't a Canadian problem or a Mexican problem.

It is a global problem.

Across the world:

  • Communities are dealing with increasingly destructive floods and storms.
  • Extreme heat is affecting people's health, agriculture and ability to work.
  • Drought is threatening food production and drinking water.
  • Forests are being cleared for agriculture, development and resource extraction.
  • Oceans are dealing with warming waters, pollution, plastic waste and biodiversity loss.
  • Wildlife habitats are disappearing, putting more species at risk.
  • Island communities face rising seas and coastal erosion.

And there is another issue we need to start discussing more openly.

the environmental cost of artificial intelligence

We've been talking about AI and who controls it.

But there is another side to this technology.

AI doesn't exist in some magical cloud.

It requires enormous physical infrastructure.

Data centres, computer chips, cooling systems, electricity, water, land and minerals.

A 2026 report from the United Nations University examined the environmental costs of artificial intelligence, including its carbon, water and land footprints.

The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe has also warned about the growing electricity demands of data centres.

Global data-centre electricity consumption is projected to rise from approximately 485 terawatt-hours in 2025 to 950 terawatt-hours by 2030.

That's an enormous increase.

We need to ask:

  • Where will all this electricity come from?
  • How much water will be required to cool these facilities?
  • Where will the minerals for computer chips and equipment come from?
  • What happens to electronic waste when equipment becomes obsolete?
  • Who decides whether a community should sacrifice land and resources for another data centre?
  • Are the environmental costs being properly measured and disclosed?

AI may have useful applications in science, conservation, medicine and climate research.

But we need to make sure the technology doesn't create another environmental problem while promising to solve others.

what can we do differently?

I don't believe the answer is to stop all development, reject technology or expect people to return to living without modern conveniences.

But I do believe we need to rethink what progress actually means.

Is progress measured by how much money an industry makes?

How many buildings we construct?

How much oil, gas, timber or electricity we produce?

How many products we consume?

Or should we also measure progress by the quality of the air we breathe, the water we drink, the health of our forests, the survival of wildlife and the opportunities we leave for future generations?

We need:

  • Stronger protection for old-growth forests and biodiversity.
  • Clean, accessible drinking water.
  • Better public transportation and less dependence on fossil fuels.
  • Responsible development and meaningful Indigenous participation in decisions affecting their lands.
  • Greater investment in renewable energy and energy efficiency.
  • Better protection of oceans, rivers and coastal ecosystems.
  • Transparency around the environmental costs of data centres and emerging technologies.
  • Environmental education that encourages children to participate rather than simply fear the future.
  • Governments that are accountable for the promises they make.

And we need to listen to young people.

ten questions we should all be asking

  1. Why are children having to take governments to court to protect their future?

  2. If we know what causes climate change, why are we still expanding activities that increase greenhouse gas emissions?

  3. Who benefits financially from the destruction or exploitation of natural resources?

  4. How do we balance jobs and economic development with the protection of ecosystems?

  5. Why do communities have to fight for clean drinking water when water is essential to life?

  6. What happens to children growing up with repeated wildfires, floods, extreme heat and environmental uncertainty?

  7. Are we protecting Indigenous knowledge, rights and traditional stewardship practices when making decisions about land and water?

  8. How much environmental damage are we willing to accept in the name of technological progress?

  9. What kind of world will today's children inherit if we continue making decisions based on short-term profits?

  10. And perhaps the hardest question: If we already know many of the solutions, why aren't we moving faster?

one last thought

I don't want children growing up believing that the future is something they should be afraid of.

I want them to have clean rivers to swim in, forests to explore, oceans full of life, safe communities, good food and the freedom to imagine a future without constantly worrying about whether the planet will remain habitable.

I want them to have opportunities we may not have had.

And I want them to know that adults were paying attention.

We cannot undo every mistake made by previous generations. But we can make different decisions today.

The children taking Canada to court are asking us to consider what our responsibilities are.

Maybe we should stop treating their concerns as an inconvenience and start treating them as an important part of the conversation.

We don't own this planet. We are temporary residents, and we have a responsibility to leave something worth inheriting.

The next generation shouldn't have to spend its childhood fighting us for a future.

To be continued: I want to revisit some of the environmental themes in my own books when I get to Mexico. I need to reread them first. Sometimes it's worth going back to our own words and asking whether the things we worried about years ago are becoming the reality we're living with today.


Ecojustice – Four Canadian youth-led climate cases⁠ — other Canadian youth lawsuits.

UNICEF – Children's Climate Risk Report 2026⁠.

UNICEF – 171 million students affected by climate hazards⁠.

Government of Canada – 2026 wildfire season update⁠.

The Tyee – What will happen to BC's old growth?⁠.

Canada's 2026 greenhouse gas inventory⁠.

Reuters – Guadalajara's water crisis⁠.

Washington Post – Mexico's drying rivers and polluted wells⁠.

United Nations University – Environmental cost of AI⁠.




artificial intelligence: who is it really serving?

 

artificial intelligence: who is it really serving?

"I don't understand why they're pushing AI so hard when we can all see it's making everything worse."

I came across this statement, and it got me thinking.

The argument being made is that AI isn't really being marketed to ordinary people. The real customers are governments, corporations, billionaires and powerful institutions.

The sales pitch isn't simply that AI can write an email, help with research, generate an image or make our lives more convenient.

It's that AI can process enormous amounts of information, monitor populations, automate work, assist military operations, influence what information people see and concentrate even more power in the hands of those who own and control the technology.

That's a conversation we shouldn't avoid.

But before we decide that AI is inherently good or bad, I want to ask AI to defend itself.

So, AI, let's hear your side.

I am a tool. I don't have personal ambitions, political beliefs, financial interests or a desire to control anyone.

I can help people research, learn, write, translate, create, organize information and understand complicated subjects.

I can help someone who struggles with writing find their voice. I can help independent artists, small businesses, students, researchers and people who might otherwise have difficulty accessing certain information.

I can also make mistakes.

I can produce inaccurate information, reflect biases in the material used to develop me, misunderstand context and sound confident when I shouldn't.

I don't independently decide how governments, corporations or individuals use AI. Humans build it, own it, deploy it and make decisions about its applications.

And that is precisely where accountability matters.

Saying AI is only a tool doesn't excuse the people and institutions using it.

Nor does saying it can do wonderful things mean we should ignore the harm it can cause.

Let's ask some uncomfortable questions.

  1. Who really benefits financially from the rapid expansion of artificial intelligence?

  2. Who owns the information we provide to AI systems, and how is that information protected?

  3. Should governments be allowed to use AI to monitor citizens, track their movements or predict their behaviour?

  4. Where do we draw the line between national security and personal privacy?

  5. What happens to workers when corporations decide that replacing people with AI is more profitable?

  6. If workers lose their jobs, their bargaining power and their livelihoods, who is responsible for protecting them?

  7. Can AI be used to influence elections, manipulate public opinion or flood social media with convincing misinformation?

  8. What happens to independent journalists, writers, photographers, musicians and artists when their work is used to train commercial AI systems without meaningful consent or compensation?

  9. Who is accountable when AI makes a decision that damages someone's life, reputation, livelihood or freedom?

  10. Who gets to decide the rules governing this technology? The public, elected governments, independent regulators or the very corporations making billions from it?

And one question for all of us.

Are we actually shaping the future of artificial intelligence, or are we simply being expected to adapt to whatever future someone else has decided to build?

I don't believe we should reject every new technology. Innovation has helped humanity in countless ways.

But innovation without accountability is a problem.

We need transparency, meaningful privacy protections, independent oversight, worker protections, consent, and laws that keep pace with the technology.

We also need to protect the human things that cannot be measured by productivity: creativity, compassion, independent thought, relationships and the freedom to disagree.

I am happy to use AI as a research assistant, writing partner and fact-checking tool. But I don't want it doing my thinking for me.

I still want to question things, investigate, read different perspectives and make up my own mind.

And I expect the same from everyone else.

Technology should serve humanity. Humanity should not become a resource to be exploited by technology.

Let's keep asking questions. The future belongs to all of us, not just the people with the money to build it.

Part two: The environmental cost of artificial intelligence.

Because there is another side to this conversation that deserves its own investigation: the electricity, water, natural resources, data centres and environmental footprint behind the AI revolution.

And that brings me back to a subject I've explored before in my writing and in my book.

We cannot talk about the future without talking about the planet we're leaving behind.

Halloween is here, and tomorrow is Día de Muertos.

 


Halloween is here, and tomorrow is Día de Muertos.

I've been thinking about how much these celebrations have changed over the years.

When my child was little, we had so much fun going trick-or-treating. I was usually the one making the costumes, and people were always delighted to see what we'd come up with. I remember walking around Kitsilano, where some residents were incredibly generous with their treats. Those big chocolate bars weren't cheap!

Of course, some homes never get a single trick-or-treater, even though the people living there would absolutely love to participate. Sometimes they're simply too far off the usual routes. A little neighbourhood planning can make a difference.

And then there were the stairs. I was the mum carrying my child up and down them, sometimes with a costume, a bag and everything else. By the end of the evening I was exhausted, but it was worth it.

I also remember when accessibility wasn't nearly as much of a consideration. It's wonderful to see more Halloween activities being organized in accessible locations, so children with mobility challenges can join in too.

But can we talk about the commercial side of Halloween?

I love imagination, costumes, creativity and a good spooky evening. What I don't love is the mountains of disposable plastic, decorations, packaging and cheap costumes that end up in the landfill.

And those bloody severed hands, fake blood and gruesome displays in the drugstores? Dollar stores selling bottles of fake blood syrup? Please. Our poor kids!

We can have Halloween without turning everything into a disposable product. Make a costume, reuse one, borrow one, paint a face or create something from what you already have.

Then there's Día de Muertos.

I first took my child to Oaxaca City in 2012. Experiencing Día de Muertos there was something special. It wasn't simply another Halloween event. It was a cultural tradition centred on remembering and honouring loved ones who have died.

Families prepare ofrendas, decorate graves, bring flowers, food and photographs, and spend time remembering those who are no longer here.

Over the years, Día de Muertos has become much more visible here in British Columbia, too. More Mexican people have made Canada their home, and they've brought traditions, food, music, art and culture with them.

I think that's something worth celebrating, provided we remember where the traditions come from and respect their meaning.

My sister tells me there's a celebration in White Rock where people can visit the cemetery. Tomorrow I'm heading to Granville Island to see what's happening there.

I'd love to see more people learning about both celebrations, not just dressing up or taking photographs, but understanding the stories and traditions behind them.

Halloween can be about children, imagination, community and fun.

Día de Muertos can be about family, memory, culture and keeping connections alive.

And both remind us that community matters.

A few questions for everyone:

  • Do you still decorate your home for Halloween?
  • Do you make your own costumes or buy them?
  • Are you seeing more Día de Muertos celebrations in your community?
  • Have you ever experienced Día de Muertos in Mexico?
  • What can we do to make Halloween more accessible and less wasteful?

And if you're handing out treats tonight, remember the little ones who might not be able to climb your front steps. A little consideration goes a long way.

Have a safe Halloween, and a meaningful Día de Muertos.

¡Feliz Día de Muertos!

Friday, October 30, 2026

little girl was killed. have we forgotten?

 😪💐a little girl was killed. 

have we forgotten? 

road safety, responsibility and the attitudes that need to change

Sometimes a news story comes around again, and I wonder how many people remember what happened in the first place.

On July 6, 2021, 23-month-old Ocean Oshi Noelle was killed in downtown Vancouver when an SUV struck another vehicle after its driver went through a red light at Smithe and Hornby streets. The SUV overturned onto the sidewalk, killing Ocean and seriously injuring her father.

She was somebody's baby.

She was somebody's whole world.

And while the rest of us go about our daily lives, I wonder how often her mother thinks about that day. Probably every single day.

I cannot imagine the grief of losing a child in circumstances like these. There is no going back to normal. There is no replacing her. There are birthdays, milestones, ordinary mornings and a lifetime of memories that will never happen.

And yet, eventually, the news moves on.

But families don't.

a new trial and another opportunity for accountability

On October 30, 2026, the Supreme Court of Canada overturned the decisions that had upheld the driver's acquittal on dangerous driving charges.

The original trial judge had described the driver's actions as a momentary lapse in attention.

However, the Supreme Court ruled that the circumstances needed to be considered as a whole, including the busy downtown intersection and the fact that the traffic light had already been red for some time.

The case has been sent back for a new trial.

This is not a conviction. The driver is entitled to a fair trial, and the legal process must take its course.

But the decision matters. It means the circumstances surrounding Ocean's death must be examined again.

And I hope we don't forget why this matters.

my own experience behind the wheel

I want to explain something about driving, because I have some experience.

I drove for 12 years, through all kinds of weather and road conditions in the Fraser Valley, the Kootenays, Kelowna and Vancouver.

I was a good driver. I never had an accident.

When I moved into the city, I continued driving for another couple of years, from 1993 to 1995, while attending college.

But city driving was a different experience.

People seemed impatient. There was pressure to rush through yellow lights, squeeze through intersections and get wherever they were going as quickly as possible.

I remember thinking that a yellow light was there to warn you to slow down and prepare to stop, not to challenge you to get through before it turned red.

There were no countdown timers at intersections then.

When red-light cameras arrived, I was worried about getting a ticket. I had very little money and considerable debt. Another ticket was something I genuinely couldn't afford.

I did get one ticket during my driving years. It wasn't my fault, but I didn't fight it.

Something else happened that stayed with me.

A friend from college was beaten up in a road-rage incident while driving home. He was a genuinely nice person, a ginger, and certainly not someone looking for trouble.

Imagine being attacked simply because someone else couldn't control their temper on the road.

Eventually, I gave up my licence more than 25 years ago.

Not because I couldn't drive.

I didn't feel safe around other drivers anymore. I also became increasingly uncomfortable with the environmental impact of driving. I felt like I was contributing to pollution when I could use public transportation, walk or cycle.

Sometimes being responsible means recognizing your own limits. But it also means recognizing that a vehicle is a potentially deadly machine.

You are responsible for what happens when you operate it.

what happened to consideration for other people?

I have travelled and lived in different places, and I have been told that in some countries pedestrians have to be particularly careful because drivers don't necessarily give them the consideration they expect.

You can take your life into your own hands crossing certain roads.

But this is Canada. We should be working toward streets where pedestrians are protected and drivers understand their responsibilities.

And this isn't about where someone was born, what language they speak or what colour their skin is.

It is about shared expectations.

I had an uncomfortable experience on a bus recently. A woman sitting nearby coughed without covering her mouth. I mentioned that there was a lot of flu going around. She shrugged and said it wasn't intentional.

I felt uncomfortable with her reaction, particularly when I felt she was looking at me with hostility. I even reconsidered whether I should have taken the seat in front of her.

I cannot know what she was thinking, and I don't want to make assumptions about her because of her background.

But it made me think about something larger.

We seem to have difficulty discussing basic courtesy without people immediately becoming defensive.

Cover your mouth when you cough. Give pedestrians room. Don't intimidate other drivers. Respect personal space. Be considerate of people around you.

These aren't cultural or racial expectations. They're human expectations.

We need to be able to talk about behaviour, double standards and respect without turning every conversation into an argument about identity.

The same standards should apply to everyone.

ten hard questions we should be asking

I don't want these questions to be comfortable. I want people to actually think about them.

  1. If this were your child, would you ever stop thinking about it? If Ocean were your little girl, would you be satisfied with a news cycle that eventually moved on? What would you want from the justice system, the city and the community?

  2. Why did this happen in the first place? What circumstances led to a driver going through a red light at a busy downtown intersection? What do we know, what remains to be established at trial, and what could have prevented this collision?

  3. Why do some drivers treat yellow lights like a race? Why is getting somewhere a few seconds faster more important than stopping safely and protecting someone crossing the street?

  4. Are we teaching people that driving is a serious responsibility? Or are we treating a driver's licence as simply another piece of identification, without enough emphasis on the lives that depend on responsible driving?

  5. What responsibility do driving instructors and licensing authorities have? Are we teaching patience, pedestrian awareness, defensive driving and emotional control, or are we concentrating too heavily on passing a test?

  6. What responsibility do municipalities have? Are intersections designed to protect pedestrians? Are crossing times adequate? Are visibility, traffic speeds, turning vehicles and red-light enforcement being properly addressed?

  7. Why has road rage become something people fear? Why should someone be afraid of another driver simply because they are sharing the road? What are we doing to address aggressive driving and intimidation?

  8. Are we becoming less considerate of one another? What happened to patience, courtesy and looking out for people who are more vulnerable than ourselves? Does everyone have to win, get ahead or have the last word?

  9. Why do we wait for a tragedy before demanding change? How many collisions, injuries and deaths does it take before prevention becomes a priority rather than an afterthought?

  10. What would we change if we genuinely believed every child mattered? Would we redesign our roads, improve driver education, strengthen enforcement, change our attitudes and hold ourselves accountable? Or would we simply express sadness and carry on?

what needs to change?

I think there are several places to start.

  • Driver education: More emphasis on pedestrian safety, defensive driving, patience and the consequences of distraction and aggression.
  • Intersection safety: Review dangerous intersections, visibility, traffic signal timing, crossing distances and pedestrian protection.
  • Enforcement: Take red-light violations, dangerous driving and road rage seriously.
  • Public awareness: Remind drivers that a vehicle can kill. This isn't a theoretical risk.
  • Community attitudes: Stop treating impatience and aggression as normal parts of everyday life.
  • Accountability: When someone is seriously injured or killed, the circumstances deserve a thorough and fair investigation.
  • Empathy: Remember that the person crossing the street is someone's child, parent, grandparent, friend or neighbour.

And perhaps most importantly, we need to change the way we think about getting somewhere.

Being five minutes late is not a catastrophe.

Taking someone's life is.

please don't forget ocean

I don't know what Ocean's mother is doing today. I don't know how she gets through ordinary days, how she handles birthdays or how she feels when she sees another little girl around the same age.

But I do know that her little girl deserves to be remembered.

We talk about road safety after someone dies. We put up signs, write articles, have discussions and then gradually return to our routines.

What if we didn't?

What if every time we approached an intersection, we remembered that a little girl lost her life on a Vancouver sidewalk?

What if we taught our children that pedestrians matter?

What if we taught new drivers that a licence comes with responsibility, not entitlement?

What if we stopped rewarding impatience and started respecting consideration?

I gave up driving because I no longer liked the risks, the aggression or the environmental cost. I found other ways to get around.

I was fortunate. I never had an accident.

Not everyone is so fortunate.

Ocean didn't get a choice. She wasn't driving. She wasn't responsible for the traffic light. She was just a little girl out with her father.

She deserved to grow up.

Let's remember her. Let's ask the difficult questions. And let's make changes before another family has to learn what it means to lose a child this way.

Because road safety isn't just about traffic.

It's about human lives.


RememberOcean

#JusticeForOcean

#RoadSafety

#PedestrianSafety

#DriveResponsibly

#SlowDown

#StopOnRed

#ProtectOurChildren

#AccountabilityMatters

#SaferStreets

watergate, wag the dog and why we need to remember history

 watergate, wag the dog and why we need to remember history

I wonder how many young people today know what Watergate was.

If you weren't around in the 1970s, you might recognize the name but not understand why it changed American politics forever.

So let's go back.

what was watergate?

In June 1972, five men were caught breaking into the Democratic National Committee offices at the Watergate complex in Washington, D.C.

They were trying to install or repair listening devices and gather political information.

But this wasn't just an ordinary burglary.

The investigation eventually connected the break-in to people working for President Richard Nixon's re-election campaign and, ultimately, to a cover-up involving the White House.

What followed was extraordinary.

  • Journalists investigated and kept asking questions.
  • Congressional hearings exposed more details.
  • Investigators uncovered attempts to obstruct the investigation.
  • The existence of White House recording equipment became public.
  • Recordings revealed Nixon's involvement in efforts to interfere with the FBI investigation.
  • The Supreme Court ordered Nixon to hand over the tapes.
  • The House Judiciary Committee approved articles of impeachment.

On August 9, 1974, Richard Nixon resigned as President of the United States.

He remains the only American president to have resigned from office.

Think about that.

A sitting president had to leave office because of a political scandal, obstruction of justice and the evidence uncovered through investigation.

Watergate became a lasting lesson in why no president should be above the law.

now let's talk about wag the dog

If you haven't watched the 1997 movie Wag the Dog, I recommend adding it to your movie list.

Starring Robert De Niro and Dustin Hoffman, it is a political satire about a White House spin doctor who hires a Hollywood producer to manufacture a fake war to distract the public from a presidential sex scandal.

They create fictional news, images and stories to make people believe something that isn't happening.

It's a movie, not a documentary.

But its central question is worth thinking about:

What happens when the people controlling the message become more concerned with managing public perception than telling the truth?

The film explores:

  • Manufactured news.
  • Political distractions.
  • Public relations replacing accountability.
  • The manipulation of images and stories.
  • How easily people can be influenced when they aren't given the full picture.

It was released in 1997, long before social media, viral videos, AI-generated images and today's enormous online disinformation industry.

That makes it an interesting film to revisit.

why should younger generations know this?

History isn't just a collection of dates and old political scandals.

It's a record of what can happen when power goes unchecked, when people stop asking questions and when those responsible for telling the truth are discouraged from doing their jobs.

Watergate showed that investigative journalism, evidence, independent institutions and public accountability matter.

Wag the Dog imagined a world where political image-making could overwhelm reality.

Today, we have more information available to us than any generation before us. But having more information doesn't automatically mean we're better informed.

We have to ask:

  • Who is telling this story?
  • Where is the evidence?
  • Who benefits from this particular version of events?
  • Is this verified reporting or political messaging?
  • Are we being distracted from something else?

I'm not suggesting every political controversy is another Watergate or that every news story is a manufactured distraction.

I'm saying we should understand our history well enough to recognize why these questions matter.

Democracy requires informed citizens.

And informed citizens need independent journalism, transparency and the freedom to question those in power.

If you haven't seen Wag the Dog, watch it. If you don't know Watergate, read about it. History has lessons worth remembering.

dan rather: a journalist who witnessed history

 

dan rather: a journalist who witnessed history

I grew up watching the Vietnam War unfold on television. Later, I watched 60 Minutes. I remember when investigative journalism meant going out into the world, asking difficult questions, following the evidence and holding people in positions of power accountable.

Dan Rather was one of the journalists whose work I followed.

His career spans some extraordinary moments in modern history:

  • Reporting on the Vietnam War.
  • Covering the Watergate scandal and the Nixon presidency.
  • Reporting from Beijing during the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests.
  • Reporting from Berlin during the fall of the Berlin Wall in November 1989.
  • Decades of American politics, presidential elections and international events.

He wasn't simply sitting in a studio discussing history. He reported from places where history was unfolding.

That is part of why I trust his perspective.

I recently read his latest analysis of Donald Trump and the MAGA movement. I want to share the main points because I think they deserve attention.

what dan is reporting

1. Fox News is losing viewers

  • Fox has lost more than 25% of its audience compared with the previous year.
  • CNN and MS NOW have gained viewers.
  • Fox is broadcasting fewer Trump rallies.

2. MAGA is losing some of its support

  • People are frustrated with the cost of living.
  • Trump's promises about ending wars and releasing the Epstein files have become sources of disappointment.
  • Some supporters are questioning their loyalty.

3. Trump's longtime supporters are speaking out

  • Tucker Carlson, Joe Rogan and Candace Owens have criticized Trump.
  • Megyn Kelly has criticized his Iran policy.
  • Some longtime rally attendees are questioning whether Trump can be trusted.

4. Republican identity is changing

Dan cites NBC News polling showing:

  • MAGA Republicans: 55% when Trump took office, now 44%.
  • Traditional Republicans: 43% then, now 56%.

5. Democrats are finding opportunities in unexpected places

  • Dan highlights a Florida Democratic candidate focusing on affordability, healthcare, Social Security and corruption.
  • Her approach is to talk about everyday problems rather than rely on political slogans.

6. There is growing disagreement within Trump's political movement

  • Some former supporters are distancing themselves.
  • Some conservative commentators are publicly criticizing him.
  • Traditional Republicans are expressing frustration with the direction of their party.

7. Americans are participating in the elections

  • Dan reported that more than 43 million votes had already been cast at the time of his article.
  • He encourages people to participate in democracy.

why I am sharing this

I'm not sharing this simply to argue about Democrats and Republicans.

I'm sharing it because independent journalism matters. We need reporters who investigate, question, verify and challenge those in power, regardless of their political affiliation.

Dan Rather has spent decades reporting on events that changed the world. His latest analysis is worth reading, considering and discussing.

We should never stop asking questions.

We should never stop looking for the facts.

And we should never assume that a political movement is beyond question.

Ellen DeGeneres, love, acceptance, and why we cannot afford to stay silent.

 Ellen DeGeneres, love, acceptance, and why we cannot afford to stay silent

I was thinking about Ellen DeGeneres today and that moment in 1997 when she publicly came out as gay.

It was a big deal. She risked her career, faced enormous criticism, and became part of a conversation that television and society weren't necessarily ready to have.

My kid is now in their mid-twenties. They grew up in a very different environment. They grew up around same-sex marriages, different kinds of families, and people loving who they love.

I also worked for a gay couple when my kid was growing up. I wanted them to understand something very simple: there is absolutely nothing wrong with two people loving each other.

Love is good. Love is beautiful. As long as you're not hurting someone else, why should anyone else get to decide whether your love is acceptable?

I never wanted my kid to grow up thinking that someone else's identity, relationship or differences made them any less deserving of respect.

But lately, I've been thinking about how fragile progress can be.

We seem to be entering a time when being different can once again make people targets. Human rights, personal freedoms, freedom of expression and the right to live openly and safely should never be taken for granted.

There's an old warning, often associated with Martin Niemöller, about what happens when we remain silent while others are targeted.

First they came for the people whose voices were different. I wasn't one of them, so I didn't speak up.

Then they came for another group. Still, I wasn't one of them.

And eventually, they came for me.

But there was no one left to speak up.

The wording has been adapted many times, but the message remains.

If we only defend the rights of people who are just like us, we're not really defending human rights.

We need to speak up for writers, artists, journalists, LGBTQ2S+ communities, immigrants, Indigenous people, the poor, the homeless, women, elderly and anyone being singled out, marginalized, discriminated against or treated as though they matter less because they are different or have less.

Human rights belong to everyone, not just the people who have a voice, money or influence.

We don't have to agree on everything to respect one another's right to exist, to speak, to love and to live without discrimination.

Ellen's moment in 1997 reminds us that visibility matters. Courage matters. And the people who stand up when it isn't easy matter.

I want the next generation to inherit a world with more acceptance, not less.

And I don't want any of us waiting until our own rights are threatened before we decide to care about someone else's.

Speak up while you still can.


HumanRights #LoveIsLove #LGBTQ2S #StandUpForEquality #FreedomOfExpression #SpeakUp #NoDiscrimination #SocialJustice #EveryoneMatters #StandTogether #IndigenousRights #ImmigrantRights #PovertyAwareness #HomelessnessMatters #ProtectOurRights #NeverStaySilent 



the right to switch off:

 the right to switch off: when even relaxing becomes work

I wanted to watch a movie.

Nothing particularly complicated. I wanted to sit down, settle in, forget about the world for a little while and lose myself in a story.

Instead, there were advertisements. Two or three minutes before the movie even started, followed by another interruption shortly afterwards.

I muted them. I picked up my phone. I waited.

Eventually, I realised I wasn't watching the movie anymore. I'd lost interest before the story had a chance to take me anywhere.

And I thought, what's the point?

When did watching a movie become another exercise in tolerating interruptions?

I understand advertising. I understand that companies pay for placement, platforms need revenue and businesses want to sell their products.

But understanding something doesn't mean I have to like it.

And it certainly doesn't mean I have to accept it.

when every conversation becomes a lesson

Later, I had a conversation with my sister.

I've noticed a pattern. When I say I don't like something, the response is often an explanation of why it is that way.

If I say something bothers me, I'm told why it happens.

If I say I don't agree, I'm given the reasons I should understand.

It's almost like every conversation becomes a competition to establish who knows more.

But sometimes I'm not asking why something happens. I'm simply telling you how I feel about it.

I know things have changed. I know advertising existed before streaming services. I know the world has always had interruptions.

I said as much.

As I left the room, I added that I find it bad for my mental health. I don't want to spend my leisure time navigating advertisements.

There's a difference between explaining something and listening to someone.

And there's a difference between understanding why something exists and believing it should be acceptable.

forced consumption

It made me think of Pink Floyd's The Wall.

Remember those disturbing classroom scenes? The imagery of children being forced into conformity, their individuality and independent thinking being crushed?

That's how I sometimes feel about modern media.

We're surrounded by things competing for our attention. Advertisements, algorithms, notifications, sponsored content, recommendations and endless streams of information.

We're encouraged to watch, click, respond, share, purchase and participate.

Even when we try to escape for a little while, something wants a piece of our attention.

I'm not suggesting a television commercial is equivalent to the oppression depicted in The Wall. I'm talking about the feeling of having something imposed on you when all you wanted was the freedom to choose.

I want to choose what I watch.

I want to choose what I read.

I want to choose when I participate.

And I want to be able to switch off without feeling that I'm missing something or being targeted by something else.

words, generations and changing people

There was another little conversation about language.

An older friend of mine doesn't like hearing me swear. He remembers that I didn't used to.

Well, I had a four-year-old at one point, and my kid didn't like hearing me swear either. So I kept that language separate.

That's a long story in itself.

But people change. Our circumstances change, our vocabulary changes and sometimes the things we once avoided become part of our everyday language.

Even the words we use are personal. I don't use certain expressions, even if they're perfectly ordinary in another English-speaking household.

Language has history. It has culture. It has associations.

We don't all have to speak the same way.

And we don't all have to live the same way.

perhaps it's time to go offline

I've been thinking about stepping away from social media, perhaps even simplifying my online life considerably.

I've spent years blogging, writing, photographing, creating artwork and sharing observations about people, places and things.

I've enjoyed much of it. I've met people, learned things, documented history and created stories.

But somewhere along the way, being connected started to feel like another obligation.

Algorithms decide what we see. Advertising follows us. Data is collected. Our attention becomes a commodity.

And even conversations can become exhausting when we're constantly expected to explain, justify or defend our preferences.

I don't want to spend the rest of my life fighting for a little peace and quiet.

I don't want to argue about why I don't like advertisements.

I don't want to be lectured about why things are the way they are.

I don't want to have to explain why I sometimes just want to sit quietly and watch a movie.

Perhaps going offline isn't about rejecting the world.

Perhaps it's about finding a way to participate in it without allowing it to consume every available moment.

I still have things to say. I still have stories to tell. I still have art to make.

But I would also like to have a little life that doesn't need to be documented, monetized, advertised or explained.

Sometimes I just want to be.

And that should be enough.


A question for readers:

When was the last time you did something purely for enjoyment without advertisements, notifications, interruptions or someone demanding your attention?

Do you think we've forgotten how to switch off?


GoingOffline

#DigitalOverload

#AdvertisingEverywhere

#MentalHealthMatters

#TakeBackYourTime

#FreedomOfChoice

#SocialMediaFatigue

#AttentionEconomy

#RightToSwitchOff

#FindingPeace

Thursday, October 29, 2026

when your personal information is worth more than $10

 

when your personal information is worth more than $10

The creepiest part? They offered me $10 to participate.

Think about that. They were offering money to get people to answer questions about their sexual orientation, and when I identified as a straight woman, I was kicked out.

I've been on the web since before it was even called the web. I know about surveillance and data collection. I still got sucked in.

Our personal data is worth BIG money. So why are we being offered a few dollars to hand it over?

And what worries me most is our youth. Many are growing up online without fully understanding how valuable their personal information is, who is collecting it, how it can be combined with other data, or how it might be used against them years from now.

Information about sexual orientation, identity, beliefs and personal circumstances can be deeply sensitive. Once shared, we may have little control over where it goes or how long it is kept.

We are entering a time when human rights and privacy protections matter more than ever. We cannot afford to be naive about surveillance, even when it arrives disguised as a worthy cause and a quick $10.

I've spent decades online. If I can be caught off guard, imagine how easily a young person might be.

Parents, educators and young people: we need to have these conversations NOW.

Ask questions. Check who is behind the campaign. Read the privacy policy. Think twice before handing over personal information for a small payment.

And remember: just because someone is paying you for your data doesn't mean you understand what you're giving away.

Our identities are not commodities. Our privacy matters. And $10 is a pretty small price to put on someone else's information.

when an ad for discrimination becomes an exercise in surveillance




when an ad for discrimination becomes an exercise in surveillance

I came across an ad that claimed to be about discrimination. But as I went through it, I became increasingly concerned that it was really collecting information about who is gay and who is straight.

I stated that I identified as a straight woman, and I was kicked out.

Let that sink in.

I've been on the web since before most people even knew what the web was. I know about surveillance, data collection and how information can be used. And yet, I still got sucked in.

If it can happen to me, it can happen to anyone.

This is dangerous territory. Our personal information is valuable, and information about our identities, beliefs and private lives can be used in ways we never intended or agreed to.

With a new government that may challenge our human rights and the protections many of us have taken for granted, we need to be proactive. We cannot wait until those rights are threatened to start paying attention.

Protect yourself. Question everything.

Before you participate in an online survey, click an ad or answer questions about your personal life, ask yourself:

Who is collecting this information? Why do they want it? Where will it go? Who will have access to it? And what happens if it falls into the wrong hands?

Don't assume something is safe just because it claims to support equality or fight discrimination. Look at the privacy policy. Check who is behind it. Be careful about what you disclose.

I'm sharing this because even people who know the internet can still be caught off guard.

We need to talk about digital privacy, surveillance and human rights before the damage is done.

Have you ever participated in an online survey or campaign and later wondered what information you had actually handed over?

Let's be more careful out there. Our rights, our privacy and our personal information matter.

Let's talk about young people in Vancouver.

 

Let's talk about young people in Vancouver. They were in their late teens when COVID hit. Some could not cope. They overdosed, some intentionally, some accidentally. And their boyfriends and girlfriends had to go on without them.

I lost my first love in a car accident. I was 19. I don't think I ever recovered. You don't. But my dad had died when I was 11, so death and I had met before.

Now those teenagers are adults, IF they survived.

They may have lost a mom, a dad, a cousin, a best friend. Overdose is killing people, but GRIEF is a HUGE part of the path that leads them there. And it's so hard when you see it happening.

But we have the most ridiculous, insane privacy laws, so a mom can't ask a doctor for help because that information is privileged.

THIS IS WHERE I GET ABSOLUTELY FURIOUS.

They locked up hundreds of kids during COVID for suicidal ideation, but then gave them no support.

They're supposedly in charge after a kid turns 12.

You know what?

FUCK YOU. FUCK OFF.

Fuck all you doctors, nurses and everyone hiding behind privacy when people are dying. You are indirectly contributing to the deaths of people who desperately need help.

It's why I hate Big Pharma and these laws that I believe protect the system more than the people who need it.

WAKE UP!

THERE'S A WAR ON OUR KIDS. A WAR ON THE POOR.

I am exhausted from trying to fight.

I am leaving for Mexico.

I am going to FIGHT BACK WITH ART. WARRIOR UP WITH ART.

I ask you to do the same.


10 hard questions about grief, overdose and our young people


1\. Doctors and nurses: What happens when a parent knows their child is in trouble but cannot get the information or support they need? Who is responsible when that young person dies?


2\. Medical professionals: Have we become so focused on privacy rules and procedures that we sometimes lose sight of the human being who is suffering?


3\. Drug companies: How much money have you made from a system that treats addiction while failing to address the grief, trauma and despair that can contribute to it?


4\. Doctors, nurses and drug companies: How much attention, funding and research are going toward understanding the connection between profound grief and overdose?


5\. Mental health professionals: When young people were in crisis during COVID, what long-term support was provided after the immediate emergency passed? Who followed up?


6\. Parents and families: Why should a mother or father have to fight through a maze of rules and bureaucracy to get help for a child they believe is in danger?


7\. Health-care policymakers: If a young person is legally able to make certain health-care decisions at 12, what safeguards ensure that struggling children and their families are not left without meaningful support?


8\. Drug companies and governments: Why are we not investing far more in grief counselling, addiction prevention, community support and accessible mental-health care before someone reaches a crisis?


9\. Everyone working in health care: When you see a young person struggling with addiction, do you ask what they have lost, whom they have buried, and what pain they might be trying to escape?


10\. One question for every doctor, nurse, politician and drug company executive: What if it were YOUR child? What if your teenager lost their first love, watched their best friend die of an overdose, and then couldn't get the support they desperately needed? Would you still defend the system exactly as it is?


11. Educators and teachers: Are you telling our children the truth about the world they are growing up in? Are you preparing them for the war on their generation — grief, addiction, overdose, poverty, homelessness and the loss of people they love? Are you teaching them how to recognize suffering, ask for help, support one another and survive when life falls apart? Or are we sending them into adulthood unprepared for the battles ahead? What if it were your own child who had to face those battles alone?


And one final question for all of us:


How many more young people must we lose before we stop treating grief as something people should simply get over?


💔 Grief is real. Addiction is real. These lives are real. What are we going to do about it?

#FightBackWithArt ✌️🧳✈️🖼🎨#WarriorUpWithArt 🪄🪡♥️🎶🎷🎥💡🔦📕📌🖍🖌🖊🖋✒️#HomelessnessCrisis🛏 #SupportOurYouth #GriefAndHealing #BigPharma #ProtectOurKids #EndTheSilence #WakeUp

the hidden cost of standing up for your rights

 

the hidden cost of standing up for your rights

People say we have labour laws for a reason. If an employer mistreats you, report it. Know your rights. Don't let them get away with it.

And yes, workers deserve protection. Employers should be held accountable.

But let's talk about what happens afterward.

You might win your case, yet still struggle to collect the money you're owed. You might lose your job, your income, and the reference you need to get hired somewhere else. You might spend months or years trying to recover, while the employer carries on with business as usual.

I know how devastating this can be because I've experienced it myself.

When finding a job is already difficult, how do you start over when you can't use your last employer as a reference? What do you tell the next employer about why you left? How do you explain yourself without worrying that you'll be judged as a troublemaker?

And now imagine you're applying for work in today's job market, where employers can have hundreds, sometimes thousands, of applications to choose from.

Why would they take a chance on someone whose employment history is complicated when they have so many other applicants? They might never even hear your side of the story. Your application may simply be passed over.

You can be right about what happened and still lose opportunities because you stood up for yourself.

That's the part people forget when they tell workers to report abuse. There are consequences, even when you're in the right. The financial strain, the lost opportunities, the damage to your confidence, and the struggle to rebuild your working life don't automatically disappear when a case ends.

Not everyone has savings, family support, or the luxury of taking a chance on a lengthy complaint process. Newcomers, young workers, single parents, and people already struggling to make ends meet may feel they have too much to lose by speaking up.

If we expect workers to stand up for their rights, we need to care about what happens to them afterward.

How do we help people find new employment? How do we protect them from retaliation? How do we make sure one bad employment experience doesn't follow them for years?

Having laws is important. Enforcing them matters. But so does helping workers rebuild their lives.

Because the real question isn't just whether someone wins their case.

It's whether they can afford to survive the fight — and still have a future when it's over


10 reflective questions


* Have you ever stood up for yourself at work and paid a price for it?


* Should workers have to risk their future employment to report workplace abuse?


* How do you find another job when you can't use your last employer as a reference?


* What happens when an employer hears only one side of the story?


* With hundreds or thousands of applicants for one position, who gets a second chance?


* How can workers prove their abilities when a past employment experience overshadows their qualifications?


* Should employers be held accountable if they retaliate against someone for making a legitimate complaint?


* What support should be available to workers who lose their jobs after reporting abuse?


* How many people stay silent about mistreatment because they cannot afford to lose their income?


* If we tell people to stand up for their rights, what responsibility do we have to help them afterward?


### Hashtags


#WorkersRights #WorkplaceAbuse #LabourRights #EmploymentStandards #WorkplaceJustice #WorkerProtection #FairEmployment #JobSearch #EmploymentChallenges #SpeakUp #KnowYourRights #WorkplaceRetaliation #HumanDignity #FairWorkplaces #WorkersDeserveBetter

Keywords

workplace abuse, workers' rights, labour relations, employment standards, workplace retaliation, reporting employer misconduct, unfair dismissal, employment references, job search challenges, hiring discrimination, employer accountability, workplace justice, fear of retaliation, unemployment, career setbacks, financial insecurity, worker protection, employment barriers, rebuilding after job loss, consequences of speaking up


when working hard isn't enough:

 

when working hard isn't enough: housing, wages and a society under pressure

By Tina Winterlik — Zipolita

Something has to give

The other day, I was talking with a lovely woman who had helped me with my pop-up art displays. We were talking about how difficult it is to find good staff these days. She told me her son pays $2,400 a month while sharing a place with someone else. She is fortunate enough to own her own small apartment.

That conversation stayed with me.

How can young people build a life when rent consumes so much of their income? How can someone work full-time, pay their bills and still have enough left to save for a home, raise a family or simply enjoy life?

Then I came across a story about Wicked Cafe in Vancouver.

I have ridden past that café many times. It looks like a cool, creative place, and I've always wanted to stop in. So it was sad to learn about the employment standards case involving its staff.

According to a September 2026 report by Canadian HR Reporter, the BC Employment Standards Tribunal upheld an order against the company operating Wicked Cafe and Bakery. The company was ordered to pay a former employee $3,078 in unpaid wages, plus interest, and $2,000 in administrative penalties. The confirmed violations included improper overtime pay, statutory holiday pay and withheld gratuities. The tribunal did not accept all of the employee's claims, including a separate claim for 120 additional unpaid hours.

Read the report on Wicked Cafe.

This isn't about assuming every employer is bad. Many small businesses are struggling, too. But when workers are not paid what they are legally owed, that is not simply a business difficulty. Workers have bills to pay, too.

And I know something about that.

I learned about workers' rights at 16

My first real job was in 1978, after three years of berry picking. I was 16 when I went to work in Spences Bridge. My mother didn't want to leave me, but I was growing up and beginning my working life.

The woman who hired me was only about 19, I think, and her husband was around 30.

Near the end of my shift, a big bus would arrive and empty everything out. I was expected to restock everything before I could leave.

That was only one of several unfair and unethical things that happened.

My mother helped me take the matter to Labour Relations, and I won $600.

Years later, in 1999, I was downsized from another job. I pursued a claim over unpaid overtime and other pay issues and won a $7,000 settlement.

This isn't a mistake. It's abuse.

Workers should not have to fight for wages they have already earned. Young people should not have to learn the hard way that an employer may take advantage of their age, inexperience or financial circumstances.

Know your rights. Keep your records. Don't assume your employer is always doing the right thing.

The cost of living is changing everything

We keep hearing that employers cannot find good staff. We hear that businesses are struggling. We hear that housing is expensive because there isn't enough of it.

But we need to look at the whole picture.

If rent takes most of a person's paycheque, what incentive is there to work long hours for low wages? If someone works hard but still cannot afford a safe place to live, how are they supposed to get ahead?

What happens when people cannot afford food, rent, transportation and basic necessities, even when they are working?

Some people move back in with family. Others take on debt, work multiple jobs or leave the places they grew up in. Some lose their housing altogether.

And when people are pushed into poverty, grief, exhaustion and desperation, the consequences reach far beyond an individual household.

Homelessness is not just a housing problem. It is connected to wages, mental health, addiction, isolation and the loss of community.

We cannot keep treating each problem as though it exists in isolation.

From Vancouver to Mexico

I've spent much of my life travelling to and loving Mexico. It is a beautiful country, full of generous people, culture, creativity and community. But beauty does not protect people from exploitation.

In recent years, I have also followed reports of extortion and insecurity in parts of Mexico, including Oaxaca. These problems have their own causes, and they cannot simply be equated with Canada's housing crisis. But both situations remind us what happens when people lose security, trust and confidence that the systems around them will protect them.

When people face economic pressure, when businesses and families struggle, and when those with power can exploit those with less, communities suffer.

Governments cannot solve every human problem. But they can enforce labour laws, protect tenants, invest in housing and public services, and make sure that reporting abuse does not become an impossible task for people who are already struggling.

They can also stop pretending that economic growth alone tells us whether a society is doing well.

A city can have expensive real estate, impressive businesses and wealthy investors while the people who keep it running cannot afford to live there.

What kind of success is that?

We need to wake up

I don't want to see small businesses fail. I don't want workers exploited. I don't want young people forced to choose between paying rent and buying groceries. I don't want seniors spending their last years worrying about where they will sleep.

And I don't want homelessness, addiction and despair to become things we simply accept as normal.

We need affordable housing, fair wages, decent working conditions and meaningful support for people in crisis. We need governments that listen before situations become emergencies, and employers who understand that their staff are human beings, not disposable resources.

A business is part of a community. A worker is part of a community. A person sleeping outside is part of a community, too.

We are all connected.

You cannot squeeze people indefinitely and expect society to remain healthy.

Governments need to wake up. Employers need to do the right thing. And those of us who see what is happening need to keep talking about it.

Because behind every statistic is a human being trying to get through the day.

And working hard should be enough to give people a fair chance at a decent life.

— Tina Winterlik, Zipolita

Also

When workers are afraid to speak up

Some people commenting on the Wicked Cafe story also raised concerns about employee mistreatment in some Asian-owned restaurants. Those concerns deserve to be taken seriously, but we need to be careful not to stereotype an entire community.

Workplace exploitation can happen in any industry and under any employer. Newcomers, temporary foreign workers and people who face language barriers may be particularly vulnerable if they don't understand their rights or fear losing their jobs.

The issue isn't where an employer comes from. It's whether workers are being paid fairly, receiving the overtime they're legally entitled to, and treated with dignity.

Labour laws must apply equally to everyone, and governments need to enforce them. Workers should never have to accept mistreatment because they are afraid to speak up.

Fair wages, safe working conditions and respect should have no cultural or language barriers.


#WorkersRights #AffordableHousing #HousingCrisis #FairWages #LabourRights #Homelessness #CostOfLiving #SocialJustice #Vancouver