Showing posts with label Lululemon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lululemon. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 8, 2025

The $285,000 Bust — But What About Surrey?

 The $285,000 Bust — But What About Surrey?

This week, Vancouver police proudly announced a successful raid, recovering $285,000 in stolen luxury goods from houses and cars. The haul? Lululemon, Versace, jewelry, liquor, baby formula — all prime resale items in today’s underground market.

Great. But it raises a bigger question:

Why was nothing done about the woman in Surrey who, not long ago, was openly organizing and orchestrating shoplifters, repackaging goods, and selling them back into the community?

We wrote about her before. She had a system. A team. A supply chain. She was profiting off theft, but instead of jail time or police press releases, she seemed to just... disappear from the conversation.


👁️‍🗨️ Selective Justice?

There’s something unsettling in watching police pose with piles of stolen goods like trophies in one city while completely ignoring nearly identical activity in another. Is it about optics? Location? Political pressure? Media presence?

And deeper still: What determines who gets busted and who gets ignored?


🚨 Real Questions That Deserve Answers

  • Why are certain theft rings targeted while others are allowed to flourish?
  • Is enforcement being used to perform safety rather than deliver justice?
  • Are some neighbourhoods or populations considered more “worthy” of policing than others?
  • What happens when justice becomes performative — a photo-op instead of protection?
  • Who profits when stolen goods are repackaged and sold openly online or on street corners — and who gets blamed?

🧭 Think About This:

  • If someone is running a theft-based business, shouldn’t they face consequences — regardless of where they’re operating?
  • If the police can act swiftly in Vancouver, why didn’t they in Surrey?
  • How many “small crimes” are tolerated simply because they serve a larger economic system that thrives on inequality and desperation?

✊ We Need Consistency, Not Just Crackdowns

Retail theft is a growing concern. Yes. But so is public trust in fair policing.

You can’t just throw a net over one side of the city and leave the other side tangled in corruption, poverty, and political neglect.

If we want real solutions, we need equal justice, transparency, and systems that stop treating low-income communities like disposable zones.


Reflective Questions:

  1. Who decides when a crime is “serious enough” to warrant police attention?
  2. What does it say about our justice system when organized retail crime is only stopped when it becomes too loud to ignore?
  3. Are press releases about busts just distraction tactics from bigger systemic failures?
  4. If some people profit off crime while others are punished for it, is that justice — or hierarchy?

Let’s not let selective enforcement blind us to the bigger picture.

➡️ Share your thoughts. Talk to your community. Demand clarity — and justice that’s actually just.

#Zipolita #TinaWinterlik #VancouverCrime #SurreyStories #JusticeWatch #RetailTheft #SelectivePolicing #DigitalHorizonZ #ReflectiveTruths


Two Thieves and a Country on the Edge

Two Thieves and a Country on the Edge

(By Tina Winterlik aka Zipolita)


Meet Joe.
Joe’s 49, lives in East Van, and lost his job during COVID. After EI ran out and the rent chewed up his last few bucks, he found himself standing in a grocery store aisle—staring at a loaf of bread and peanut butter. He hadn’t eaten in two days.

Joe grabbed them.
Walked out.
Security stopped him.
Police were called.
Joe was charged with theft under $5,000.

In court, the judge said,

“You should have used the food bank.”

Joe was fined and given a criminal record.
Now no employer will hire him.
He spiraled deeper into poverty. Still, he never stole again.


Now meet “Amy.”
Amy lives in a posh South Surrey townhouse, drives a high-end SUV, and receives shipments of stolen yoga wear—hundreds of Lululemon items—into her garage. She’s not stealing herself. She’s coordinating a network of people who do.

In a single year, she moved over $175,000 in luxury retail goods.
She sold the items for cash, cosmetics, and gift cards.
Police raided her home. They found it all:

  • Bags of stolen goods,
  • Thousands in cash,
  • Evidence of a retail crime ring.

But here’s the twist:
No criminal charges.
Just a civil forfeiture claim.

Amy hasn’t gone to court.
She hasn’t even had to stay in the country.
In fact, she might be in Dubai right now, drinking champagne and posting:

“#Blessed #BossBabe 💅💸”


What kind of justice is this?

In the same week we learned about her case, we also heard:

  • About a Vancouver building inspector who lived in a multi-million dollar mansion while pocketing bribes and approving unsafe developments.
  • That non-profit CEOs are making $250,000+ while the shelters and food banks they run fall apart.
  • That over 16,000 people have died in BC from toxic drug overdoses—and still, we criminalize the sick and poor instead of holding the rich accountable.
  • That all over the world—from Mexico City to Europe—people are smashing glass in protest against gentrification.

And here?
We smile politely and wait for change.
But it’s not coming—unless we make it.


Are you looking south at the U.S. and thinking, “At least we’re not that bad”?

Guess what—we’re on the same path.

The corruption is overflowing.
The cracks are already here.
If we don’t want to become another L.A., Portland, or San Francisco,
then BIG CHANGE is needed now.


Here’s what I’m asking:

  • Call out the double standards.
  • Support journalists and advocates exposing this injustice.
  • Demand consequences for luxury crime, not just poverty crime.
  • Stop protecting those who profit off misery, whether they wear suits or yoga pants.

Because Joe is real.
Amy may be fictional—but she exists under different names, in real homes, in our own city.

And unless we fight back now, they will keep stealing from us—not just clothes,
but homes, futures, and lives.


✍️ Tina Winterlik aka Zipolita
#JusticeForAll #NotJustTheRich #HousingIsAHumanRight #StopTheRot #EndOverdoseCrisis #ExposeCorruption #GentrificationKills #LululemonLoot #TwoTierJustice


Friday, October 11, 2024

What Does Chip Wilson Have to Complain About From His $32 Million Mansion?

I was passing through Kitsilano in Vancouver, on bus telling my friend about the signs Chip Wilson is posting, at first claiming vandalism 😜 and now apparently Chip Wilson’s put up a third sign criticizing the NDP. It made me wonder—what does a billionaire who lives in a $32 million mansion have to complain about?

What’s the Real Issue?

Chip Wilson, the founder of Lululemon, is no stranger to controversy. Known for his outspoken views on various issues, this time his criticism is focused on the NDP government. But why?

When someone like Wilson, who has more wealth than most of us could ever imagine, starts complaining about government policies, it’s worth questioning their motives. Is this truly about making life better for British Columbians, or is it about protecting his financial interests?

Wealth and Privilege in Perspective

It’s important to put Wilson’s lifestyle into context. Owning a $32 million waterfront mansion in Vancouver, one of the most expensive housing markets in the world, is the kind of privilege few can relate to. Meanwhile, many people in this province are struggling to afford rent, living paycheck to paycheck, or facing homelessness.

So, when Wilson puts up signs criticizing the government, it feels out of touch. What exactly is he complaining about? The NDP government has been focused on housing affordability, climate action, and social support systems—policies that aim to improve the lives of those who need it most. Could it be that these policies threaten the status quo for the ultra-wealthy?

When the Rich Complain, We Should Pay Attention

It’s not uncommon for the wealthy to voice dissatisfaction when policies don’t align with their financial interests. Higher taxes on luxury properties, regulations on real estate investments, or efforts to reduce inequality—these might not sit well with someone like Wilson. But for the rest of us, these policies can make a real difference in creating a more just and equitable society.

The Bigger Picture

As we think about people like Chip Wilson voicing their frustrations, it’s crucial to remember the broader context. Who benefits from the policies that are being criticized? Who stands to lose?

If someone living in a $32 million mansion is upset, it’s worth asking whether it’s because they’re losing some privilege that others have never had access to in the first place.

Conclusion

We need to question why figures like Chip Wilson use their platform to criticize a government that’s trying to improve the lives of ordinary people. While he’s entitled to his opinion, it’s important that we keep the bigger picture in mind—and remember that for many of us, the stakes are much higher than just losing a bit of luxury.

Saturday, June 14, 2014

Food is the Currency of the Future!

Blog post by Tina Winterlik © 2014
http://thechangerz.blogspot.ca
http://zipolita.com
http://zipolitazstudioz.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/#!/zipolita @zipolita
http://gplus.to/zipolita Google+
zipolita@gmail.com


Dennis McClung coaxes organic tomatoes, fresh eggs, bananas, fish, and zucchini out of the desert—an even more righteous repurposing of an old pool than a skate park. Sustainable ingenuity at its best.

See more at www.darkrye.com
Follow us on Twitter www.twitter.com/darkryemag
and Instagram www.instagram.com/darkryemag

This is such a brilliant idea and it matches nicely with the other idea I had this morning and that is building an Eco School in Zipolite.

http://zipolitemexico.blogspot.ca/2014/06/lets-build-eco-school-in-zipolite.html 

So I have this idea to build an Eco School in Zipolite. For long time I have had a dream of putting an Edible Schoolyard in Zipolite. Have you heard of the Eco School in Sayulita and there's a Green School in Bali and they actually have an Eco School in Sayulita so there is no reason we shouldn't have on it Zipolite





 
For a little bit, Angel went to Arroyo Tres. This location would be perfect I think.  It has a lovely little piece of land behind it that would make a wonderful garden.  By the time we return Angel will be to old to attend...if say it's just for elementary but if it's for high school that would be wonderful.
Even if she could help with the elementary children that would be a wonderful experience. She spent the last year helping peer mentor the kindergartens so I know she would be a great asset.


I know the school she attends now...they got a grant from LULULEMON for $9000 to build an Edible Schoolyard... 

For that kind of money...we could build a whole school for $9000 ...possibly...depending on the materials but I believe we could go to Indiegogo and start something. https://www.indiegogo.com/campaigns/new
What do you think? I can't do this by myself...and I am not even there right now....


Wednesday, September 25, 2013

Henry Hudson School Garden

Blog post by Tina Winterlik © 2013
zipolita@gmail.com
http://zipolitazstudioz.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/#!/zipolita @zipolita
http://gplus.to/zipolita Google+


Henry Hudson School Garden

Lululemon has agreed to fund the development of a school garden at Henry Hudson Elementary.  The next step is to put together an application for the VSB to approve the design.  They are looking among the Hudson parent community for a professional landscaper or landscape designer to help with render the ideas in a way that will really capture the attention of the school board.  

If anyone has this skill and can volunteer a few hours to help create the living laboratory in the cycle of life, please contact B. Loughney at  bloughney@gmail.com