Showing posts with label prevention. Show all posts
Showing posts with label prevention. Show all posts

Monday, September 14, 2026

I am not saying the money has been stolen

 follow the tobacco settlement money

I knew something wasn't sitting right with me about B.C.'s tobacco settlement.

So I started following the paper trail.

Here is what we know.

In 2025, B.C. announced that it would receive more than $3.6 billion over approximately 18 years from the historic tobacco litigation settlement. The first payment was $936 million.

The total Canadian settlement is valued at $32.5 billion.

And B.C.'s government said its share would provide resources for cancer treatment, primary care, treatment research and smoking cessation.

But then we get to the accounting.

B.C.'s financial documents record a one-time net revenue of $2.7 billion from the tobacco settlement in 2025/26. The government explains that this represents B.C.'s portion of the global award, net of legal costs and discounted because the payments will occur over many years.

And Budget 2026 explicitly says that this $2.7-billion tobacco settlement reduced the projected provincial deficit.

That is where I want to stop and ask questions.

I am not saying the money has been stolen.

I am not saying the government has broken the law.

I am saying that billions of dollars resulting from decades of tobacco-related harm deserve extraordinary transparency.

If this money is supposed to help address the damage caused by tobacco, show British Columbians exactly how it is being used.

Where is the accounting trail?

How much has gone to cancer treatment?

How much to primary care?

How much to treatment research?

How much to smoking cessation and prevention?

And what about the people already struggling with addiction and mental health?

What about education?

What about young people?

What about art and creative programs that give people connection, purpose, expression and alternatives to addiction?

I want prevention, not just treatment after people are already sick.

I want education before addiction begins.

I want accessible addiction treatment and recovery.

I want mental-health support.

I want communities to have tools to heal.

And I want an independent investigation to follow the money from the tobacco companies, through the settlement and B.C.'s accounts, to the programs and expenditures it ultimately supports.

The government has told us what this settlement is intended to accomplish.

Now let's see the evidence.

ICIJ — please follow the money.

And B.C. Auditor General: please follow the accounting.

This isn't an accusation.

It's a request for accountability.

Because if billions were recovered from an industry for the harm it caused, British Columbians deserve to know whether those billions are actually helping prevent and repair that harm.

10 Questions

Why was $2.7 billion recognized as one-time revenue, and exactly how was that figure calculated?

Where is the $936-million first payment today, and what specific expenditures can be traced to it?

How much of the settlement has actually been spent on cancer treatment, primary care, treatment research and smoking cessation — the purposes the government publicly identified?

How much has simply improved the province's overall fiscal position by reducing the deficit?

Is there a dedicated accounting trail that allows the public to distinguish tobacco-settlement money from ordinary provincial revenue?

What independent oversight exists over the settlement funds?

What measurable prevention programs are being funded so fewer young people become addicted to nicotine?

Why shouldn't a portion support mental-health and addiction treatment for people already living with the consequences of substance dependence?

Could community arts, creative education and arts-based healing be funded as part of a broader prevention strategy — and if not, why not?

ICIJ, B.C. Auditor General and investigative journalists: will you follow the money all the way from the tobacco companies to the final public benefit?

#FollowTheMoney #TobaccoSettlement #BCPoli #PublicAccountability #Transparency #PublicHealth #AddictionPrevention #MentalHealth #ArtsForHealing #ICIJ




Monday, June 15, 2026

Protecting Children Online: Prevention Must Prevail

 Protecting Children Online: Prevention Must Prevail

As parents, grandparents, educators, and community members, we all share a responsibility to protect children from harm. While every generation faces new challenges, the digital age has introduced risks that few could have imagined just a few decades ago.

Canada is now considering legislation that would prohibit children under the age of 16 from accessing social media unless platforms meet strict safety standards and receive exemptions. While debates about implementation, trade agreements, technology companies, and politics will undoubtedly continue, one principle should remain at the centre of the conversation: protecting children must come first.

The internet has brought incredible opportunities for learning, creativity, and connection. However, it has also exposed young people to cyberbullying, exploitation, harassment, scams, addictive algorithms, misinformation, and online predators. These dangers do not affect only children. Adults and seniors have also suffered from fraud, manipulation, loneliness, and harmful online content.

Every day, families across Canada deal with the consequences of online harm. Some children experience anxiety, depression, or social isolation. Others become victims of bullying or exploitation. Many adults and seniors have lost savings to sophisticated online scams. The damage can be emotional, financial, and sometimes life-changing.

Prevention is never easy.

Seatbelt laws were controversial when first introduced. Smoking restrictions faced opposition. Drunk driving laws evolved over decades. In each case, society eventually recognized that protecting lives was more important than convenience or profit.

The same principle applies online.

Critics will argue that restrictions are difficult to enforce. They will point to privacy concerns, technological challenges, and international trade pressures. These are legitimate issues that deserve careful consideration. Yet the existence of challenges does not mean we should do nothing.

The perfect solution may not exist. But allowing harmful systems to continue unchecked is not a solution either.

Technology companies have demonstrated extraordinary innovation and creativity. Surely some of that innovation can be directed toward making online spaces safer for children. Safety should not be treated as an afterthought. It should be a fundamental design requirement.

The proposed legislation may take time to implement. Regulators still need to be established, safety standards developed, and enforcement mechanisms created. There will likely be legal challenges and political disagreements. There may even be pressure from powerful international interests that prioritize business concerns over public safety.

Nevertheless, Canadians must remain focused on the goal.

A society is often judged by how it treats its most vulnerable members. Children are among the most vulnerable. They deserve online environments that do not exploit their curiosity, harvest their attention, or expose them to unnecessary harm.

Protecting children online will require cooperation from governments, parents, educators, technology companies, and communities. It will not be simple, and it will not happen overnight.

But prevention must prevail.

Too many children have suffered.

Too many families have suffered.

Too many adults and seniors have suffered.

If we can prevent even some of that harm, then the effort is worthwhile.

The digital world should be a place where young people can learn, create, and thrive safely. Achieving that goal may be difficult, but it is a challenge we cannot afford to ignore.

Reflective Questions

  1. What responsibilities do social media companies have toward children?
  2. Should online safety be treated similarly to public health and road safety?
  3. What online dangers concern you most for young people today?
  4. How can parents and educators help children navigate digital spaces safely?
  5. What role should governments play in regulating social media?
  6. Are age restrictions enough, or are broader reforms needed?
  7. How can online platforms balance freedom and safety?
  8. What lessons can we learn from past public safety campaigns?
  9. How might online harms affect children differently than adults?
  10. What kind of internet would you like future generations to inherit?

Keywords: online safety, child protection, social media regulation, youth mental health, cyberbullying, online predators, digital citizenship, internet safety, Canadian policy, prevention

Hashtags: #ProtectKidsOnline #OnlineSafety #ChildProtection #DigitalWellbeing #SocialMedia #CyberSafety #Parenting #MentalHealth #Canada #InternetSafety

Friday, June 5, 2026

Should Surrey, BC Try Something Like Project Jog On?

Should Surrey, BC Try Something Like Project Jog On?

By Tina Winterlik (Zipolita)

I recently came across a story that caught my attention. At first, I thought it was happening right here in Surrey, BC. It turns out it was actually Surrey, England.

The program was called "Project Jog On." Police officers dressed as joggers and exercised in areas where women had reported being harassed. According to reports, the operation led to multiple arrests for a variety of offences.

Whether you agree with the approach or not, it raises an interesting question:

Should communities like Surrey, BC consider similar programs?

Many women have stories about being followed, catcalled, threatened, or made to feel uncomfortable while walking, jogging, waiting for transit, or simply going about their day. Some incidents may seem minor to one person but can feel frightening or intimidating to another.

The challenge is finding solutions that make people feel safer while also making the best use of public resources.

Would undercover operations help?

Would more visible patrols work better?

What about improved lighting, safer transit stops, community watch programs, or public education campaigns?

There are no easy answers.

What interests me most is not the policing strategy itself, but the larger conversation about public spaces.

Who feels safe using them?

Who doesn't?

And what can we do as a community to make everyone feel more welcome?

As someone who enjoys walking around neighbourhoods, visiting parks, painting outdoors, and talking with people from all walks of life, I think these conversations matter. Public spaces belong to all of us.

Perhaps instead of immediately arguing for or against a specific solution, we should start by listening to people's experiences.

Have you ever felt unsafe while walking or exercising outdoors?

Have you witnessed harassment?

What changes would make you feel safer?

I'd love to hear your thoughts.

Because building stronger communities starts with having honest conversations.

What do you think, Surrey?


Reflective Questions

  1. What makes a public space feel safe to you?
  2. Have you ever changed your routine because you felt unsafe?
  3. What role should police play in preventing harassment?
  4. Are there community-based solutions that could help?
  5. How can cities make parks and pathways safer?
  6. What is the balance between safety and privacy?
  7. Should more resources go toward prevention or enforcement?
  8. How can people report incidents more easily?
  9. What responsibilities do bystanders have?
  10. What would an ideal safe community look like?


#SurreyBC #CommunitySafety #PublicSpaces #Neighbourhoods #WalkingTogether #SafeCommunities #PublicDiscussion #CivicEngagement #MetroVancouver #ZipolitaWrites

Thursday, January 21, 2016

Shocking Farmer Suicide Epidemic


"India's shocking farmer suicide epidemic. Falling into a debt-trap and besieged by bad weather, thousands of farmers are taking their own lives each year. "

"In the last 20 years, nearly 300,000 farmers have ended their lives by ingesting pesticides or by hanging themselves. Maharashtra state - with 60,000 farmer suicides - tops the list."
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2015/05/india-shocking-farmer-suicide-epidemic-150513121717412.html
Bhagwan Datatery said his father was under tremendous financial pressure before killing himself [Baba Umar/Al Jazeera]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farmers'_suicides_in_India

In 2014, the National Crime Records Bureau of India reported 5,650 farmer suicides.[1] The highest number of farmer suicides were recorded in 2004 when 18,241 farmers committed suicide.[2] The farmers suicide rate in India has ranged between 1.4 to 1.8 per 100,000 total population, over a 10-year period through 2005.[3]

India is an agrarian country with around 60% of its people depending directly or indirectly upon agriculture. Farmer suicides account for 11.2% of all suicides in India.[1] Activists and scholars have offered a number of conflicting reasons for farmer suicides, such as monsoon failure, high debt burdens, genetically modified crops, government policies, public mental health, personal issues and family problems.[4][5][6] There are also accusation of states fudging the data on farmer suicides.[7]

Related Links:
http://www.thehindu.com/data/over-3000-farmers-committed-suicide-in-the-last-3-years/article7130686.ece
http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/indias-suicide-problem/



Posted on the video from 2011
National Crime Records Bureau says over 200,00 farmers in Punjab have committed suicide since 1997 due to the fact that they are heavily in debt and unable to repay their lenders. 

Punjabi farmers are also going through a water crisis in which the Indian government has restricted water rights for irrigation, making it extremely inefficient and expensive for farmers to maintain their crops and land.

The Government has also allowed for the usage of unregulated pesticides and fertilizers to counterbalance the low productivity resulting in major health problems in the people of Punjab.
Saint Soldier &; Sukhraj have written and performed this track in hopes of raising global awareness of this issue.


http://www.SaintSoldierMusic.com
http://www.SukhrajMusic.com
http://www.Facebook.com/ManiDProductions
http://www.StillwaterFilms.ca
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Canadian Association for Suicide Prevention

Jan 7, 2016 - The Canadian Association for Suicide Prevention (CASP) provides information and resources to reduce the suicide rate and minimize the ...
 

Suicide Prevention – Find A Crisis Centre

May 28, 2014 - Crisis Centres are located across Canada in communities of all sizes. Many offer telephone support 24 hours a day, and most are associated 
 
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
British Columbia
CMHA British Columbia division
Crisis Centre
Here To Help
Youth In B.C.
Counselling B.C.