Bill C-53 and the Debate Over 'Pretendians'

 Bill C-53 and the Debate Over 'Pretendians'

I asked AI about Bill C-53, and here’s what it said:

Bill C-53, officially titled the Recognition of Certain Métis Governments in Alberta, Ontario and Saskatchewan and Métis Self-Government Act, was introduced in Canada to recognize certain Métis governments and provide a framework for self-governance. The goal was to affirm the Métis Nation’s right to self-determination, particularly in areas such as citizenship, elections, and social services.

However, concerns quickly arose regarding individuals falsely claiming Indigenous identity—often referred to as "pretendians"—who might exploit the bill to access resources meant for Indigenous communities. Organizations like the Association of Iroquois and Allied Indians (AIAI) warned that fraudulent claims could undermine Indigenous rights and funding allocations.

Due to these concerns and a court ruling invalidating parts of the bill, Crown-Indigenous Relations Minister Gary Anandasangaree announced in December 2024 that Bill C-53 would be paused. This decision followed the withdrawal of support from Métis Nation-Saskatchewan, further complicating its progress.

The term "pretendian" has gained traction in discussions about Indigenous identity fraud, highlighting the need for stricter verification measures to protect Indigenous communities from exploitation. But Indigenous identity is incredibly complex, and policies like Bill C-53 raise deeper questions about who has the right to claim that identity and how it should be verified.

Personal Reflection:

The Métis identity debate is super complicated. You shouldn't be profiting from ceremony, but what happens when identity is contested at the government level?

For example, Indigenous Services Canada (ISC) lists me as French because my great-grandparents claimed that on the 1921 census. But if you go back to the 1881 census, my family was listed as Portuguese and Indian. I’ve traced my lineage back over four generations, and my DNA shows 9% Indigenous ancestry—but that doesn’t count for official recognition. If a community doesn’t claim you, then what?

I took a Truth & Reconciliation Carving course—supposedly, I’ve done "the work." But I don’t advertise myself as Métis because it’s SO CONTROVERSIAL. Instead, I say I have Indigenous ancestry mixed with Portuguese, Swedish, Kalapuya, Iroquois, French, Sooke, Songhees, Bohemian—Canadian.

In BC, during the 1800s, people of mixed Indigenous and European ancestry were called "Half Breeds." But in Red River and Saskatchewan, Métis identity is distinct—you have to have Cree heritage, and for many, it's almost like a religion.

I don’t trust anyone to define my identity for me. You have to find yourself, dig deep into your roots—and it’s hard because you will uncover things you might not want to know.

Be careful out there. Trust no one but yourself. 🤔😢

Canada Faces Solar Flare Impact: Radio Blackouts and Stunning Auroras

 

Canada Faces Solar Flare Impact: Radio Blackouts and Stunning Auroras

On March 28, 2025, a powerful X1.1-class solar flare erupted from sunspot AR4046, sending a wave of electromagnetic energy toward Earth. This event caused noticeable disruptions, including radio blackouts across parts of North and South America, including Canada. While the effects were temporary, they serve as a reminder of the Sun’s powerful influence on our planet.

What Happened?

The solar flare, which peaked at 11:20 a.m. EDT (1520 UTC), released an intense burst of radiation, affecting high-frequency (HF) radio signals. Aviation, maritime operations, and emergency communication services in Canada experienced temporary disruptions, particularly in sunlit areas at the time of the flare.

Additionally, a geomagnetic storm associated with the flare led to enhanced auroral activity, lighting up the night skies with brilliant displays of the Northern Lights, visible as far south as Alberta and parts of Ontario.

How Solar Flares Affect Canada

Canada, due to its northern latitude, is particularly vulnerable to space weather events. The country’s reliance on satellite-based navigation, radio communications, and power grids means that strong solar activity can have significant economic and operational impacts. While this recent flare did not cause long-term damage, past events have shown that intense geomagnetic storms can pose risks to power infrastructure, such as the 1989 Quebec blackout caused by a solar storm.

Should We Be Concerned?

While solar flares are a natural part of the Sun’s cycle, experts are closely monitoring activity as we approach the peak of Solar Cycle 25, expected in 2025-2026. Scientists from the NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center and Natural Resources Canada have been issuing regular updates to ensure preparedness for potential future events.

How to Stay Informed and Prepared

For those who rely on radio communications, knowing about upcoming solar activity can be crucial. Here are a few ways to stay updated:

• Follow the NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center and Natural Resources Canada’s space weather alerts.
• Check real-time aurora forecasts if you’re hoping to catch a glimpse of the Northern Lights.
• Ensure backup communication methods in case of temporary radio blackouts.

The recent solar flare is a wake-up call about the Sun’s unpredictable nature. While it brought beautiful auroras to the skies, it also disrupted critical communications. As we move further into an active solar cycle, staying informed is key to mitigating potential risks and enjoying the wonders of space weather responsibly.

Paper Genocide

 Asked AI for help

Yes, the Kalapuya people, the Indigenous inhabitants of the Willamette Valley in what is now Oregon, suffered from what is often termed paper genocide, a process where official records, policies, and classifications systematically erase or merge Indigenous identities. This happened in multiple ways:

1. Forced Assimilation and Relocation:
   After European contact, the Kalapuya population declined dramatically due to disease, land dispossession, and settler expansion. In the 1850s, they were forcibly removed from their lands and relocated to reservations such as the Grand Ronde and Siletz Reservations. This was done under treaties that were often broken or modified by the U.S. government.

2. Tribal Consolidation:
   The U.S. government lumped together various Indigenous groups from different linguistic and cultural backgrounds onto the same reservations. At Grand Ronde, more than 27 different tribes and bands were relocated, including the Kalapuya, Molalla, Chinook, and others. Over time, their unique identities were blurred in government records.

3. Termination Policies:
   In 1954, the U.S. government enacted the Western Oregon Indian Termination Act, which officially terminated federal recognition of the Grand Ronde and Siletz Tribes, effectively erasing their legal status. This act was meant to assimilate Indigenous people into mainstream society by dissolving their reservations and removing tribal rights. Although the tribes eventually regained federal recognition (Grand Ronde in 1983, Siletz in 1977), the damage from decades of erased identity was severe.

4. Loss of Language and Identity:
   Many Kalapuya descendants grew up without learning their traditional language or history because of government-run boarding schools and assimilation policies. The Kalapuya language, part of the Penutian language family, nearly disappeared as a result.

5. Modern-Day Recognition Struggles:
   Many Kalapuya descendants today are enrolled in the Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde or the Confederated Tribes of Siletz, but their distinct identity as Kalapuya people is often overlooked or diminished in historical narratives.

This process of merging and erasing Indigenous identities through treaties, documentation, and federal policies is what many scholars call paper genocide, because it legally and administratively erases a people without outright killing them. The Kalapuya, like many other tribes, persist despite these efforts, and there has been a resurgence in efforts to reclaim their history, language, and cultural identity.

About 15 years ago, I came across a reference to one of my ancestors being Kalapuya. That discovery sent me down a long and winding journey through historical records, archives, and census documents, searching for traces of my family's Indigenous heritage. One of the most important sources I found was the book French Canadians, Furs, and Indigenous Women in the Making of the Pacific Northwest. It helped me understand not only my own lineage but also the broader historical forces that shaped my ancestors' lives. 

During my search, I connected with a distant cousin who recognized my name and reached out. She had an incredible website where she meticulously documented much of our shared family history. Her research was invaluable, offering insights and details that were otherwise difficult to find. Sadly, she has since passed away, and much of her work has disappeared, leaving behind gaps in the record that are difficult to fill. 

What I’ve learned through this journey is how deeply paper genocide has impacted Indigenous families like mine. The Kalapuya people, once thriving in the Willamette Valley, were systematically erased from official records through forced assimilation, relocation, and tribal consolidation. Many Indigenous names were lost as fur traders and settlers married into Indigenous communities, recording children under European names and gradually severing ties to their original identities. The practice of mariage à la façon du pays—marriage according to the customs of the country—was common among French-Canadian fur traders and Indigenous women, but it often led to their descendants losing their tribal recognition over time.

This research has been more than just an academic pursuit; it has been a deeply personal journey to reclaim a history that was nearly erased. Even though many records are missing or obscured, the stories of my ancestors persist, and I am committed to preserving and sharing them. The Kalapuya people may have been largely written out of history, but their descendants continue to seek recognition and keep their heritage alive.

Do Canadians Really Like Divisive, Fear-Driven Tactics?

 

Do Canadians Really Like Divisive, Fear-Driven Tactics?

It’s hard to look at the current political landscape in Canada and not feel deeply concerned. More and more, we’re seeing politicians like Pierre Poilievre aligning themselves with figures like Donald Trump, whose politics are grounded in fear, division, and distrust. Poilievre’s rhetoric may promise ‘change,’ but it’s the kind of change that breeds fear and undermines the values Canadians have always held dear.

The recent rally in Port Kells, where thousands gathered to hear Poilievre speak, is a stark reminder of how divisive and polarizing politics are being embraced by more and more Canadians. And it’s not just his words—it's the very tactics he employs: fearmongering, scapegoating, and the sowing of distrust. When people show up just to hear a man who thrives on fear and division, what does that say about us as a nation? What does it say about the state of empathy, compassion, and critical thinking in our society?

But it’s not just Poilievre. Take Brent Chapman, the new MLA in Surrey South. Despite a history of deeply troubling social media posts and remarks that align with hateful ideologies, Chapman managed to win the seat. In the face of calls for his removal, he’s remained silent, and the media, for the most part, has let this slide. How is it that someone with such a dark and divisive history can continue to hold public office without scrutiny? And why is this behavior being ignored?

The support for these figures—Poilievre with his Trump-like politics and Chapman with his offensive rhetoric—should not be seen as just a political disagreement. It’s a warning. It’s a sign of something much deeper. Is this the Canada we want? Do we really want to align ourselves with policies that echo the cruelty we’ve seen in the U.S. under Trump? Do we want to follow in the footsteps of a nation that turned a blind eye to the suffering of its own people, to the rounding up of students and immigrants, to the complete erosion of basic human rights?

We need to ask ourselves: Is this where we’re headed? Is this the future we want to create for ourselves and for future generations?

It’s terrifying to think that so many Canadians are willing to overlook the damage that these leaders and their divisive tactics could do to our country. The support for these figures is not just about a difference in policy—it’s a difference in morals, in values, and in the direction we want our country to go.

I’m calling on all Canadians to take a stand. We need to push back against this rise of fear-driven politics and demand accountability from our leaders. We need to ask hard questions and seek the truth—because if we don’t, we risk losing the very fabric of what it means to be Canadian. We cannot allow our country to be dragged down by divisiveness and hate.

Canadians need to decide: Do we want to be a nation of compassion, inclusion, and unity, or will we allow fear to tear us apart?

Prayers for Myanmar and Thailand: How to Help and Prepare for Earthquakes

 Prayers for Myanmar and Thailand: How to Help and Prepare for Earthquakes

Today, our hearts are heavy as we wake up to the devastating news of a powerful 7.7 magnitude earthquake that struck Myanmar and Thailand. Buildings have collapsed, roads have buckled, and lives have been lost. The people of Mandalay, Naypyidaw, and the Sagaing Region in Myanmar, along with those in Bangkok and across Thailand, are facing unimaginable pain and loss.

🙏 Our prayers go out to the families mourning their loved ones, to those still trapped beneath the rubble, and to the brave rescuers risking their lives to save others. In moments like these, we must come together—not just in thoughts and prayers, but in action.

The Devastation Unfolding

Myanmar 🇲🇲

• Mandalay: Historic buildings have crumbled, including a university engulfed in flames. A mosque collapse killed at least ten people.
• Naypyidaw: The capital saw severe damage, with the air traffic control tower at the airport collapsing, claiming multiple lives. Hospitals are overwhelmed with casualties.
• Sagaing Region: The iconic Ava Bridge has been destroyed, isolating communities.
• Death Toll: At least 103 people confirmed dead, with more than 300 injured—numbers expected to rise.

Thailand 🇹🇭

• Bangkok: A 30-story government building collapsed, trapping nearly 90 people, with three confirmed dead. A skybridge also collapsed, causing more injuries.
• Nationwide Impact: Tall buildings swayed, rail services halted, and the Stock Exchange was temporarily suspended due to panic.
• Death Toll: At least four reported dead, with over 50 injured.

How You Can Help 🤝

In times of crisis, even small actions can make a difference. Here’s how you can support those affected:

1. Donate to Relief Organizations 💙

   • Red Cross Myanmar & Thailand – Providing emergency medical aid.
   • UNICEF & Save the Children – Assisting displaced families and children.
   • Local NGOs – Often the first responders; research trusted organizations on the ground.

2. Raise Awareness 📢

   • Share verified news and donation links.
   • Use your social media to encourage support and donations.

3. Support Search and Rescue Efforts 🏗️

   • If you’re in Thailand or Myanmar, follow local guidance on where volunteers are needed.
   • For international volunteers, coordinate with disaster response teams rather than self-deploying.

4. Pray and Send Messages of Hope 🌿

   • Leave prayers and words of encouragement on social media to let survivors know they are not alone.

Are You Prepared for an Earthquake? 🌍⚠️

Disasters like this remind us that we must always be prepared. If you live in an earthquake-prone area, here are life-saving steps you can take:

✅ Prepare an Emergency Kit

• Water, non-perishable food, flashlight, batteries, first-aid kit, and medications.

✅ Secure Your Home

• Anchor furniture, secure heavy items, and know safe spots (under sturdy tables, away from windows).

✅ Create a Family Plan

• Discuss evacuation routes, emergency contacts, and meeting points.

✅ Know ‘Drop, Cover, and Hold On’

• If shaking starts, immediately drop to the ground, cover your head, and hold on to something stable.

---

Disasters test our strength and compassion. While the people of Myanmar and Thailand grieve and rebuild, let us stand in solidarity with them. 💔 Let’s help, let’s prepare, and let’s never forget those affected by this tragedy.

Stay safe, stay aware, and take care of each other. 🌏🙏

#PrayForMyanmar #PrayForThailand #EarthquakeRelief #StayPrepared

Say her name: Ashlee Shingoose

 Say her name: Ashlee Shingoose.

For years, families and advocates have fought tirelessly for justice, for recognition, for something as basic as a Red Dress Alert—so that when Indigenous women go missing, the world takes notice. Instead, too often, they were dismissed. Told to wait. Assumed the worst, when in reality, the worst was happening to them.

We remember the years of struggle, the pain of families left searching, the horror of the Pickton case, and the countless times people begged authorities to take action—only to be ignored. And now, today, we learn that Buffalo Woman has a name. Ashlee Shingoose. A daughter, a loved one, a person who deserved to be safe, to be found, to be protected.

For so long, families and communities have demanded that landfills be searched, that missing women be treated with urgency, that justice be more than a word. And while this moment brings clarity, it does not bring justice. It does not erase the pain. It does not undo the harm that allowed this to happen.

To Ashlee’s family, to all those still searching, to those who carry the weight of these losses: We see you. We grieve with you. And we will not stop fighting for the day when no more families have to endure this.

Justice delayed is justice denied. We say her name. Ashlee Shingoose.

A Dangerous Slip-Up or a Calculated Distraction?

 

A Dangerous Slip-Up or a Calculated Distraction?

On March 24, 2025, the world learned of a shocking breach in U.S. national security: senior officials in President Donald Trump’s administration allegedly included The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, in a group chat containing top-secret military plans for Yemen. The discussion, conducted over the encrypted messaging app Signal, detailed potential U.S. strikes against Iran-backed Houthi rebels—information that should have been handled with the utmost security.

The question now is whether this was truly an accident—or something far more calculated.

A Risk to National Security

Leaking sensitive war plans, even unintentionally, is more than just an embarrassing blunder; it’s a serious risk to national security. If this information was intercepted by foreign governments or hostile actors, it could compromise strategic operations, endanger troops, and even escalate conflict before any official decisions are made. Military intelligence is safeguarded for a reason—because revealing it prematurely gives adversaries time to prepare countermeasures or strike first.

Beyond the immediate danger, this slip-up raises concerns about how classified information is being handled within the Trump administration. If top officials are discussing military operations on a messaging app, even an encrypted one, what other vital information is at risk of exposure? And if a journalist was accidentally looped in, who else might have access?

Was It Really a Mistake?

Given the history of political distractions and media manipulation, some are asking whether this "accident" was, in fact, intentional. Over the years, Trump and his administration have often dominated headlines with controversies—sometimes conveniently shifting focus away from other pressing matters. Could this be another instance?

Consider what else is happening: Is there an ongoing scandal that needs to be buried under breaking news? Are there policy failures or economic crises that the administration wants to divert attention from? This incident has sparked outrage and bipartisan concern—ensuring it remains the dominant story for days, if not weeks. Meanwhile, what other major decisions or crises are slipping under the radar?

A Pattern of Recklessness?

This isn’t the first time Trump has faced criticism for mishandling classified information. His previous presidency saw controversies over intelligence sharing with foreign leaders, the storage of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, and the exposure of covert operatives. Given this track record, the idea that such a massive mistake was made again—this time in the context of war planning—raises serious doubts about competence or intent.

Where Do We Go from Here?

The National Security Council has launched an investigation into how this breach happened, but the American people deserve transparency. Was this truly a mistake by careless officials, or is there a deeper political motive at play? If this was an error, it signals a catastrophic failure in national security management. If it was deliberate, it suggests an administration willing to gamble with military intelligence for political gain.

Either way, the consequences are dire. Whether through incompetence or manipulation, the handling of war plans in this manner puts lives at risk, weakens the U.S.’s strategic position, and damages trust in its leadership.

The real question now is: What else are they trying to distract us from?

SERIOUS WARNING TO CANADIANS: AVOID TRAVEL TO THE U.S.

 SERIOUS WARNING TO CANADIANS: AVOID TRAVEL TO THE U.S. – IT IS NOT SAFE

Canadians, take this as a critical warning: The United States has become a dangerous place for foreign travelers, including Canadian citizens. Recent reports confirm that ICE (U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement) is illegally detaining people, including a Canadian citizen, Jasmine Mooney, who was held for two weeks while renewing her work visa.

This is not an isolated case. The U.S. government has ramped up mass deportations and detentions, even targeting people with valid visas, permanent residents, and foreign workers. Over 32,809 arrests have taken place in just the first 50 days of the current administration—matching the total for all of last year.

Why You Should Boycott the U.S. Now:

• You could be detained arbitrarily, even if you have legal status.
• Human rights violations are escalating, and foreign citizens are being caught in the crackdown.
• Diplomatic relations are strained, with Canada and European nations issuing travel advisories.
• If detained, you may have no immediate recourse for legal help.

Take Action:

• Cancel any non-essential travel to the U.S.
• Warn friends, family, and colleagues about the dangers.
• Support businesses that do not rely on U.S. trade or tourism.
• Demand action from the Canadian government to protect its citizens.

The situation is escalating. Do not risk your safety. Boycott the U.S. until conditions improve. Share this message widely.

From Codebreakers to Changemakers: How Women in Computing Can Inspire a Better Future

 From Codebreakers to Changemakers: How Women in Computing Can Inspire a Better Future

The Women Who Built the Digital Age

For too long, the history of computing has been told through the lens of men like Alan Turing, Bill Gates, and Steve Jobs. But the foundation of the digital world was laid by women—women who fought against systemic barriers, who programmed the first computers, and who revolutionized science and technology.

• Ada Lovelace (1815–1852) – The first-ever computer programmer, envisioning a world where machines could do more than just math.
• The ENIAC Programmers (1940s) – Six women who pioneered modern programming without coding languages or guides.
• Dorothy Vaughan (NASA, 1950s-60s) – A leader in early computing who broke racial and gender barriers at NASA.
• Katherine Johnson & Mary Jackson (NASA, 1950s-60s) – Mathematicians whose calculations sent astronauts into orbit.

These women didn’t just contribute to technology—they changed history by refusing to accept limitations placed on them.

Why This Matters Today

We are living in a time of crisis. Democracy is under attack worldwide, inequality is growing, and AI and surveillance capitalism are being used to manipulate the public rather than empower it. Women and marginalized groups are still underrepresented in tech, politics, and leadership.

But history teaches us that when women take the lead in innovation, real change happens.

Matriarchy & the Future of Leadership

Throughout history, many Indigenous societies thrived under matriarchal or egalitarian systems, where leadership was rooted in community, responsibility, and sustainability. The modern system—dominated by greed, corporate power, and political corruption—is failing. What if we looked to matriarchal principles for solutions?

Matriarchy doesn’t mean simply replacing men with women in power—it means rethinking power itself:
✅ Collaboration over competition
✅ Long-term vision over short-term greed
✅ Community well-being over corporate profits
✅ Science and innovation for the people, not for control

Take Action: Become a Digital Warrior for Change

If the women of the past could program without code, send astronauts to space, and break racial and gender barriers, imagine what we can do today.

💡 Learn to Code – Tech is shaping our world. The more diverse voices in AI, cybersecurity, and software, the more democratic our future.
📢 Engage in Activism – Use your digital skills to expose injustice, amplify truth, and fight for fair policies.
🌎 Support Women in Leadership – Whether in politics, local communities, or business, we must demand more inclusive leadership.
🎓 Teach & Inspire the Next Generation – The more we share knowledge, the stronger our collective future becomes.

Final Thought

The world is at a crossroads: continue down a path of inequality, environmental destruction, and authoritarianism—or rise, innovate, and build a future where democracy thrives, where technology empowers rather than exploits, and where leadership reflects the values of justice, sustainability, and collaboration.

The women of the past didn’t wait for permission to change the world. Neither should we.

Wake Up, Canada: The Deepfake War is Here, and You’re the Target

 Wake Up, Canada: The Deepfake War is Here, and You’re the Target

If you think the world is getting harder to trust, buckle up—because what’s coming will shake democracy to its core. We’re no longer just dealing with misinformation or AI-generated spam; we’re up against full-blown deepfake warfare, where reality itself is being rewritten before our eyes.

They Can Fake Anyone—Even Live on Camera

A recent demonstration proved how dangerous this tech has become. A man recorded an interview over Zoom, then fed the footage into an AI tool that asked if the interviewee gave permission to be altered. He lied—and in minutes, the software asked what he wanted the person to say. The result? A convincing, altered video where the interviewee appeared to say something they never actually did.

This isn’t hypothetical. It’s real, and it’s happening right now.

• U.S. Senator Ben Cardin was recently targeted by a deepfake impersonator claiming to be a Ukrainian diplomat.
• Job candidates are using AI-generated faces and voices to cheat during remote interviews.
• Political figures, journalists, and activists are being digitally manipulated to say whatever someone with an agenda wants.

Now imagine this being used in a Canadian election. Imagine a doctored video appearing of a leader, seemingly admitting to corruption, or supporting extremist policies. Would the public know it’s fake in time? Or would the damage already be done?

Facebook, YouTube, and the Algorithmic Mind Control Machine

If you’re on Facebook or YouTube, you’ve probably noticed an onslaught of Conservative ads popping up everywhere. That’s not by accident. AI-powered ad campaigns are targeting you based on psychological profiling—serving you content designed to sway your emotions.

Now, add deepfakes to the mix. The technology is already here. It’s only a matter of time before AI-generated attack ads and fake videos flood social media, designed to destroy reputations, influence voters, and manipulate reality.

The RCMP, the Hogue Report, and Foreign Interference

Justice Marie-Josée Hogue’s recent report exposed how China, India, and Russia are already meddling in our democracy. They don’t need to hack voting machines—they just need to hack our minds. The RCMP has warned about disinformation campaigns, but is the government prepared for an all-out deepfake assault?

How to Fight Back (Before It’s Too Late)

1. Question Everything. If you see a shocking video, don’t take it at face value. Deepfakes are designed to trigger your emotions before you can think critically.
2. Check the Source. Legitimate news organizations verify before publishing. If a wild claim only appears on partisan websites or viral TikToks, it’s likely manipulation.
3. Be Wary of AI-Generated Political Ads. Meta (Facebook, Instagram) now requires political advertisers to disclose AI use—but will they enforce it? Scrutinize every ad you see.
4. Support Independent Journalism. The only way to combat AI-driven lies is with real investigative reporting.
5. Demand Action. Our laws are not ready for deepfake propaganda. Call on the government to introduce urgent AI verification laws before the next election.

Wake Up Before It’s Too Late

Canadians are about to get royally f*cked if they don’t wake up to this threat. This isn’t just about politics—it’s about truth itself. Once deepfake technology is fully weaponized, no one will know what’s real anymore.

And once that happens, democracy is finished.

Share this. Talk about this. Educate yourself. Because the disinformation war isn’t coming. It’s already here.

The Burden of Choice: A Reflection on Women's Rights, Autonomy, and the Lingering Shadow of Patriarchy

 The Burden of Choice: A Reflection on Women's Rights, Autonomy, and the Lingering Shadow of Patriarchy

As a woman who consciously chose not to marry and decided to have a child by choice, I have come to realize just how deeply entrenched societal expectations still are. The consequences of these choices, which were meant to be empowering, are now slapping me in the face daily. Raised in a time that seemed like women’s rights were advancing, I never imagined that by the time my child was born in 2002, I would still face the kind of judgment and ignorance I do today.

What’s perhaps the most shocking—and painful—is that even people close to me, including family, still reference the old societal logic: women who didn’t marry or got pregnant outside of marriage were once “imprisoned” or ostracized. As if this logic, once seen as acceptable, should be acceptable today.

This deeply ingrained belief system comes from centuries of patriarchy, colonialism, and religious dogma. It’s a reflection of the ways women have historically been viewed as property, as vessels for procreation, and as creatures who must be “tamed” through marriage. The French colonial story of the Filles du Roi (Daughters of the King) is just one example of how women’s bodies were used to further colonial agendas, where women were sent to New France, often from orphanages or prisons, to marry settlers and build the colony. Their autonomy was disregarded, their choices limited, and their worth was measured by their ability to fulfill the role of wife and mother.

Even today, women who make autonomous decisions—who do not conform to the marriage-and-motherhood narrative—are often treated as "other." We’re seen as defying an unspoken, yet rigid, social contract that binds women to particular roles. I never dreamed that in the 21st century, the same stigmas would continue to follow me, or that people would still use bizarre and antiquated terms to describe women who choose differently. The judgment I face is a reminder of how deeply patriarchal values persist in society, even in the most progressive circles.

The Catholic and other religious teachings that were so deeply ingrained in the culture I was raised in continue to seep into modern discourse. While we like to think that progress has been made for women’s rights, the echoes of these outdated ideologies still haunt us. It’s as though society is struggling to reconcile the progress women have made in asserting their autonomy with the long-standing belief that women should be subservient to patriarchal norms. The irony is that these outdated norms aren’t just held by conservative individuals but are also perpetuated by well-meaning people who, even without fully realizing it, perpetuate these old views.

It’s heartbreaking that the choices I made—choices that were meant to empower me, to take control of my life—are the very reasons why I continue to face such judgment. The system is designed to punish women who refuse to conform, whether it’s the judgment I face from family members, society’s marginalization of women who aren’t married, or the constant undertones of disdain aimed at single mothers. These attitudes can feel suffocating, and the subtle (and not-so-subtle) comments can leave you questioning whether your personal autonomy was worth the cost.

But here’s the thing: it was worth it. The love I have for my child, the freedom I’ve fought for, the independence I’ve worked hard to maintain—these things matter. My choices were my own, and while I face consequences that can sometimes feel unjust, I would not trade the authenticity and empowerment that came with those choices for anything.

However, we need to talk about this more. We need to acknowledge that patriarchy’s grip on us, even in the 21st century, is still very much alive. We need to challenge the narrative that women’s worth is tied to their relationship status or whether they’ve conformed to the traditional mold of marriage and motherhood. We need to question the harmful ways that society still punishes women for choosing autonomy, and how these antiquated beliefs are still upheld in subtle ways.

We can do better. It’s time to push for true equality, not just in terms of legal rights but in dismantling the social structures that continue to silence, judge, and control women. We need to honor women’s choices, whether they choose to marry, have children, or not, and recognize that each of these decisions is part of their personal journey.

I’m here to say that I’m done accepting judgment. I’m done conforming to norms that no longer serve me, and I hope other women can find the courage to do the same. It’s time to embrace the full spectrum of choices that women can make without fear of judgment or punishment.

Reclaiming HBC’s Legacy in BC

 Indigenous-Led Businesses & Projects Reclaiming HBC’s Legacy in BC

1. The Vancouver HBC Store Reclamation – Tsawwassen First Nation & SFU Partnership

• In 2022, the Hudson’s Bay building in downtown Vancouver was sold to an Indigenous-led development group.
• The plan is to transform the space into a cultural, business, and educational hub that supports Indigenous economic sovereignty.
• This marks a major shift, as land once used for colonial trade is now in the hands of Indigenous leaders.

2. Mobilize Waskawewin (Fashion & Activism)

• Mobilize Waskawewin is an Indigenous-led fashion collective that reclaims the infamous HBC blanket.
• They redesign the blankets into powerful fashion statements, challenging their colonial history while celebrating Indigenous strength.
• Their work represents cultural reclamation—turning a symbol of colonialism into one of resistance and pride.

3. Indigenous Artists Reclaiming HBC Symbols

• KC Adams (Métis) – Incorporates HBC imagery in art to critique its role in colonization.
• Kent Monkman (Cree) – Uses HBC blankets in paintings to highlight Indigenous survival.
• Sonny Assu (Kwakwaka'wakw) – Reworks colonial artifacts, including HBC symbols, into modern Indigenous storytelling.

4. The Land Back Movement & Indigenous-Led Economic Growth

• The Squamish Nation's Sen̓áḵw Project in Vancouver is one of Canada’s largest Indigenous-led housing developments, symbolizing economic resurgence.
• Many Indigenous nations in BC are actively reclaiming land that was once controlled by HBC and other colonial institutions.

---

How You Can Support & Share Indigenous Perspectives

• Feature Indigenous artists and businesses on your blog and social media.
• Promote Indigenous-owned brands that are reclaiming HBC imagery in ethical ways.
• Encourage readers to support Indigenous-led land reclamation efforts.

Reclaiming the Narrative around the Hudson’s Bay Company (HBC)

Correction:

As of March 2025, the Hudson's Bay Company's (HBC) downtown Vancouver store remains under the ownership of HBC and its real estate partner, RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust. In February 2022, HBC announced plans to redevelop the iconic building by adding 12 storeys of office space atop the existing structure, totaling one million square feet, while downsizing the retail space to 350,000 square feet. This redevelopment aimed to modernize the facility and attract tech companies with large floor plates. 

Regarding the involvement of the Tsawwassen First Nation (TFN) and Simon Fraser University (SFU), there is no evidence to suggest that the Hudson's Bay building was sold to an Indigenous-led development group in 2022. However, TFN has been actively engaged in various initiatives, including cultural and educational partnerships with SFU. For instance, TFN hosted SFU's hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓ theatre classes in May 2024, reflecting their commitment to cultural preservation and education. 

It's important to note that HBC has been facing significant financial challenges. Reports from March 2025 indicate that Hudson's Bay is preparing for liquidation amid these troubles, which could impact the future of the downtown Vancouver store and its redevelopment plans. 

In summary, while TFN and SFU have collaborated on cultural and educational projects, there is no indication that they have acquired or are involved in the redevelopment of the Hudson's Bay building in downtown Vancouver. The property remains under the ownership of HBC and RioCan, with redevelopment plans announced in 2022, but the company's recent financial difficulties may affect these plans.

----

*** Indigenous communities across Canada, including British Columbia, are actively reclaiming the narrative around the Hudson’s Bay Company (HBC) through art, activism, and economic initiatives. Here are some key ways this is happening:

1. Reclaiming HBC-Owned Land & Spaces

One of the biggest recent developments was the purchase of HBC’s flagship store in downtown Vancouver by the Tsawwassen First Nation and the Simon Fraser University Trust in 2022. This represents a powerful shift—land once controlled by a colonial trading company is now being reimagined under Indigenous leadership. The plan is to transform the space into a hub for Indigenous business, culture, and education, symbolizing economic sovereignty.

Similarly, other former HBC trading posts, such as Fort Langley and Fort St. James, are being reconsidered in historical narratives, with Indigenous communities advocating for the inclusion of their perspectives in museum exhibits and tourism.

2. Indigenous Artists & the HBC Blanket as Resistance

HBC’s iconic multi-stripe blanket is being reclaimed in various ways. Some Indigenous artists incorporate it into contemporary art to challenge its colonial legacy:

• Métis artist KC Adams uses HBC imagery in her artwork to critique the company's role in colonization.
• Cree artist Kent Monkman has used the HBC blanket in his paintings to symbolize Indigenous resilience in the face of colonial oppression.
• Some Indigenous designers, like Mobilize Waskawewin, have reworked HBC blankets into new designs that honor Indigenous culture while exposing the company's history.

3. Legal and Land Back Movements

Many Indigenous nations in BC continue to fight for the return of lands originally controlled by HBC and later claimed by the Canadian government. Some communities are pursuing legal avenues for land restitution, treaty negotiations, and economic partnerships that challenge HBC’s legacy.

4. Public Awareness & Education

There’s a growing movement to educate people on HBC’s true history. Indigenous educators, writers, and activists are challenging the sanitized version of HBC as a simple trading company and emphasizing its role in land theft, smallpox epidemics, and economic control.

Museums and cultural institutions are starting to integrate Indigenous perspectives into their exhibits. At Fort Langley National Historic Site, for example, Indigenous-led programs are being developed to highlight the impact of HBC on local nations.

The Bigger Picture: HBC as a Symbol of Colonialism

For many Indigenous people, the decline of HBC’s retail empire is not just a business story—it’s a metaphor for the broader collapse of colonial systems. While HBC once dominated the economy, Indigenous nations are now reclaiming power through land ownership, self-governance, and cultural resurgence.

HBC in BC History

 AI helping me

The Indigenous perspective on the Hudson’s Bay Company (HBC) in British Columbia is deeply rooted in the history of colonialism, displacement, and economic exploitation. While some Indigenous nations engaged in trade with HBC and adapted to new materials and technologies, the long-term impact of the company's presence was largely destructive to Indigenous ways of life, sovereignty, and well-being.

HBC and the Fur Trade: Economic Exploitation

From the late 1700s to the mid-1800s, HBC trading posts in BC—such as Fort Langley (1827), Fort Victoria (1843), and Fort Kamloops (1812)—became central to the fur trade economy. Indigenous communities, including the Coast Salish, Nuu-chah-nulth, and Interior Nations, initially engaged in trade as an extension of their own economies, exchanging furs for metal tools, guns, blankets, and other goods.

However, HBC's monopoly over trade resulted in economic dependency. Traditional Indigenous economies, which had been based on subsistence and sustainable trade networks, were disrupted. Overhunting led to the depletion of beaver and other fur-bearing animals, and by the mid-19th century, Indigenous trappers were forced into wage labor or reliance on HBC stores for survival.

Disease, Smallpox, and Population Collapse

The introduction of European diseases, especially smallpox, had a catastrophic impact on Indigenous nations. The most devastating outbreak in BC occurred in 1862, wiping out an estimated 60–90% of some Indigenous populations. Oral histories and some historical records suggest that HBC traders and settlers were complicit in knowingly spreading disease. While direct evidence of HBC distributing infected blankets is debated, the company benefited from Indigenous depopulation, as it facilitated colonial expansion and land acquisition for British settlers.

Land Theft and Dispossession

HBC was instrumental in facilitating the British Crown's claim over Indigenous lands in BC. The company held immense power, acting not just as a business but as a governing force. When the British government established the Colony of British Columbia in 1858, HBC’s trading posts became colonial administrative centers, reinforcing European land claims. The creation of reserves and the denial of Indigenous land rights can be traced, in part, to the economic and political structures HBC helped establish.

For example, Fort Victoria, originally an HBC outpost, became the center of British colonial rule on Vancouver Island. The Douglas Treaties (1850–1854) were signed with some Indigenous groups under coercive and misleading terms, securing land for settler development while promising hunting and fishing rights that were later ignored.

HBC Blankets: A Symbol of Trade and Trauma

HBC’s multi-stripe wool blanket is an iconic product, but its legacy is deeply tied to Indigenous suffering. While many Indigenous nations traded for these blankets, and they became part of cultural and ceremonial practices, they are also associated with smallpox and colonial trade exploitation. Today, some Indigenous artists and activists reclaim HBC blankets as a form of resistance, incorporating them into art that critiques colonial history.

Modern Indigenous Perspectives and Resistance

Today, many Indigenous scholars and activists view HBC as a symbol of colonial oppression. The sale of the downtown Vancouver HBC store to an Indigenous-led development group was seen as a moment of reclamation, highlighting the resilience of Indigenous governance. However, there is still deep frustration over how HBC and other colonial institutions have profited from Indigenous lands and labor while offering little in return.

Hudson's Bay Company

 The Hudson’s Bay Company (HBC) has a complex and often dark history in Canada, particularly in British Columbia. Founded in 1670 as a fur trading enterprise, HBC played a major role in colonization, Indigenous displacement, and economic expansion. While the company was once beloved for its department stores, its legacy is deeply tied to colonial exploitation.

HBC’s Colonial History in BC

Before British Columbia became a province in 1871, HBC controlled vast territories in the Pacific Northwest through its trading posts. Fort Vancouver (1825) and later Fort Langley (1827) were key in the fur trade, bringing European goods to Indigenous communities while extracting furs—mainly beaver pelts—for global markets. HBC essentially acted as a governing body in these regions, shaping early colonial policies and claiming lands without Indigenous consent.

Smallpox and Biological Warfare Allegations

One of the most controversial aspects of HBC’s history is the role it may have played in the spread of smallpox. Some historical accounts suggest that infected blankets were intentionally distributed to Indigenous communities as a form of biological warfare. While definitive proof linking HBC directly to this practice is debated, it is undeniable that European traders, settlers, and officials knowingly facilitated the spread of diseases that devastated Indigenous populations, with smallpox outbreaks in BC killing tens of thousands.

The Transition from Fur Trade to Retail Empire

By the late 19th and early 20th centuries, HBC shifted from fur trading to retail, opening stores across Canada, including in Vancouver and Victoria. These department stores became iconic, selling everything from clothing to home goods. The signature multi-stripe wool blanket, which originated in the 18th century as part of the fur trade, became a beloved Canadian symbol—despite its controversial historical associations.

The Decline of HBC Stores

Over the last few decades, HBC’s retail business struggled due to changing consumer habits, competition from global brands, and economic downturns. Many flagship locations in Canada, including in Vancouver, have closed or are being repurposed. The downtown Vancouver store, a historic landmark, was sold to an Indigenous-led developer in 2022, marking a significant shift in land ownership.

HBC’s Legacy in BC Today

The closure of HBC stores marks the end of an era, yet the company’s legacy continues to spark debate. Some view HBC as a historical institution that shaped Canada’s economy, while others see it as a symbol of colonialism and Indigenous oppression. The renewed interest in HBC blankets—whether for nostalgia or criticism—reflects the ongoing conversation about reconciliation and Canada’s colonial past.

Raising the Retirement Age to 67 Is a Cruel Joke—Here’s Why

 Raising the Retirement Age to 67 Is a Cruel Joke—Here’s Why

By Tina Winterlik aka Zipolita

The Canadian government and economists keep pushing the idea that we need to raise the retirement age to 67 to address so-called “labour shortages.” But here’s the reality: there are no jobs for older workers.

I know this firsthand. I’ve spent years trying to find work in Vancouver, applying to countless jobs, taking courses, and doing everything “right.” I took a 55+ job search program this year, hoping it would open doors. But it didn’t. Why? Because employers don’t want to hire older workers—especially women.

The Labour Shortage Myth

They say there aren’t enough workers. But if that were true, why can’t people over 50 or 60 find stable jobs? Instead of hiring older Canadians, companies:

• Bring in younger foreign workers for jobs that used to go to locals.
• Only hire workers under 30 for government-funded student jobs.
• Create endless barriers like certifications, unpaid training, and low wages that make it impossible for older workers to re-enter the workforce.

It’s not a labour shortage. It’s a hiring bias.

Age Discrimination Is Everywhere

Age discrimination in hiring is real. Employers assume that older workers:

• Can’t learn new skills (even though many of us have decades of experience and are more than willing to adapt).
• Will demand higher wages (as if we can afford to work for minimum wage with skyrocketing rent).
• Can’t handle physical work (yet they have no problem hiring seniors for brutal housekeeping and cleaning jobs).

I’ve worked in physically demanding jobs—cleaning, sweeping, lifting heavy furniture—and it’s not sustainable past a certain age. Yet, the jobs that older workers could do—mentoring, childcare, teaching, administration—often go to younger candidates instead.

The Real Reason They Want to Raise Retirement Age

It’s not about helping the economy. It’s about cutting pension costs.

If they can delay retirement and force people to work longer, they save money. And if people die before they can collect full benefits? Even better for them.

But what happens to the people who can’t keep working? Those who can’t get hired? They end up homeless, struggling, and relying on a broken social assistance system that barely covers rent—if they can even find a place to live.

I’ve seen it happening. Seniors turned away from shelters. Older workers forced into poverty because they can’t get hired. This is the future Canada is creating by pushing retirement further out of reach.

Real Solutions Instead of Raising the Retirement Age

Instead of making people work longer, here’s what we actually need:

• Universal Basic Income so people aren’t forced into survival jobs just to avoid homelessness.
• Truly affordable housing so seniors aren’t left couch-surfing or in unsafe SROs.
• Ending age discrimination in hiring so people can work if they want to, not because they have to.
• Support for older workers through job programs that actually lead to real employment.

We Deserve Better

No one should have to work until they drop dead just to save the government money. Raising the retirement age to 67 is just another way to keep people struggling while the rich get richer.

It’s time to stop pretending this is a solution. It’s time to fight for real change.

Fighting back against Neoreactionary (NRx) ideology, Dark MAGA, and the rise of techno-authoritarianism

 

Fighting back against Neoreactionary (NRx) ideology, Dark MAGA, and the rise of techno-authoritarianism requires a multi-pronged approach. These movements gain power by exploiting economic instability, public distrust in democracy, and control over digital spaces. To counter them, we need awareness, organization, and systemic action.

---

1. EXPOSE & EDUCATE

→ Knowledge is power. We need to name and expose these ideologies.

• Call out the PayPal Mafia’s power: People like Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, and Curtis Yarvin are shaping politics behind the scenes. We need to make their influence public and undeniable.
• Create alternative media spaces: Mainstream media has been compromised by corporate interests, but independent journalism, blogs, podcasts, and social media networks can counter their narratives.
• Teach media literacy: The Dark Enlightenment thrives on misinformation. Schools and communities need critical thinking education to recognize propaganda.

---

2. BUILD ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS

→ If democracy is under attack, we must reinforce it by making it work for people.

• Local organizing & community power: Decentralized, grassroots movements (worker co-ops, mutual aid, neighborhood assemblies) are harder to suppress than centralized political parties.
• Tech sovereignty: The elite control the internet (X/Twitter, Meta, AI tools). We need open-source, community-controlled platforms that don’t depend on billionaires’ whims.
• Support independent candidates: If billionaires are buying democracy, we must support politicians who refuse corporate funding and push for electoral reform.

---

3. REGULATE BIG TECH & CORPORATE POWER

→ Tech oligarchs must be reined in before they fully control political systems.

• Break up monopolies: Facebook, Google, Amazon, and PayPal control too much infrastructure. Governments need stronger antitrust laws.
• Regulate AI & algorithms: The Dark Enlightenment thrives on algorithmic manipulation. Policies should require transparency in AI decision-making.
• Tax the ultra-rich: The billionaire class funds authoritarian movements. Wealth redistribution can curb their power.

---

4. RECLAIM NARRATIVES & MOBILIZE

→ The far right weaponizes storytelling. We must tell our own stories.

• Use storytelling to inspire action: People don’t mobilize from dry facts—they act when they feel emotionally invested.
• Support whistleblowers: Insiders (like Frances Haugen at Facebook) have exposed corruption. We need more people willing to leak internal documents.
• Counter "Dark MAGA" memes & propaganda: Online radicalization works through edgy, viral content. We must create powerful counter-memes, videos, and art.

---

5. FOCUS ON ECONOMIC JUSTICE

→ The far right gains power by exploiting people’s suffering.

• Fight for housing & worker rights: If people feel abandoned by the system, they are more likely to embrace authoritarian "solutions."
• Expose billionaire-funded think tanks: Many "free market" and "anti-woke" narratives come from dark money groups (e.g., Koch-funded institutes).
• Strengthen unions: Labor organizing remains one of the most effective counterforces against corporate rule.

---

6. ADOPT A LONG-TERM VISION

→ The far right plays the long game. We need a plan beyond election cycles.

• Invest in youth education: The right-wing pipeline recruits young men online. Counter it by engaging young people in politics and activism early.
• Prepare for potential authoritarian moves: If democracy is weakened, we may need civil resistance strategies (general strikes, international advocacy, underground networks).
• Push for systemic change, not just band-aids: Electoral reform, wealth redistribution, and strong democratic institutions are needed for real change.

---

BOTTOM LINE: THE POWER IS WITH US

Billionaires like Musk and Thiel want us to feel powerless—that’s how they win. But history shows organized resistance works. They are rich, but we are many.

Who is John Schneider?

I saw something on X and asked AI for help.

 Yes, I've come across the post you're referring to. Jon Schneider authored a piece titled "Dark MAGA" that delves into the ideological underpinnings of certain tech magnates and political figures. The article examines the influence of Curtis Yarvin's "Dark Enlightenment" philosophy on individuals like Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, and J.D. Vance. It suggests that this ideology advocates for dismantling democratic institutions in favor of a corporate-run, authoritarian state led by tech oligarchs. The piece has been discussed on platforms like LinkedIn, where Philip Kotler highlighted it as an insightful explanation of the potential threats posed by such ideologies. 

The article also mentions that Musk and Thiel have connections to Curtis Yarvin, who promotes the idea that democracy is outdated and should be replaced by a corporate monarchy led by a CEO-dictator. Yarvin's ideology, known as the "Dark Enlightenment," suggests that the media and academia, referred to as "The Cathedral," secretly control power and must be dismantled. 

It's important to note that while these discussions provide a perspective on the influence of certain ideologies, they represent specific viewpoints and interpretations. The term "Dark MAGA" has also been associated with a more extreme faction within the MAGA movement, advocating for a harder stance against perceived adversaries. However, the extent and impact of this faction remain subjects of debate.

If you're interested in exploring this topic further, I recommend reading Schneider's full article and considering various perspectives to form a well-rounded understanding.

Who is Curtis Yarvin

  Curtis Yarvin is a political theorist and software engineer known for his writings on neoreactionary thought. Under the pseudonym Mencius Moldbug, he founded the Neoreactionary Movement (NRx), which critiques democracy and advocates for a form of authoritarian governance. He popularized concepts like "The Cathedral," which he uses to describe the ideological control of academia, media, and government institutions.

Yarvin also co-founded Urbit, a decentralized computing project. His ideas have influenced certain segments of the tech industry and political right, though they remain controversial.

What is the Dark Enlightenment

 The Dark Enlightenment, also called Neoreactionary Thought (NRx), is a political philosophy that rejects democracy, liberalism, and egalitarianism, advocating instead for authoritarian rule, often led by a monarch or a technocratic elite. It was popularized by Curtis Yarvin (under his pseudonym Mencius Moldbug) in the early 2000s.

Key Ideas of the Dark Enlightenment:

1. Democracy is a Failure – It argues that democracy is inefficient, corrupt, and leads to decline because the masses are too uninformed to govern themselves.
2. "The Cathedral" – Yarvin’s term for the academic, media, and bureaucratic elite that secretly controls society and enforces progressive ideology.
3. Monarchism & Corporate Governance – Proposes that countries should be run like corporations, with a CEO-like leader (a monarch or technocrat) making all the decisions without public interference.
4. Rejection of Equality – Advocates a strict hierarchical society, where some people are naturally more suited to rule than others.
5. Techno-Authoritarianism – Many adherents believe that technology and AI can help create an ideal authoritarian society, free from the inefficiencies of democracy.
6. Return to Traditionalism – Emphasizes strict social order, family values, and historical traditions over modern progressive values.

Connection to the Tech Elite & "Dark MAGA"

• Figures like Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, and J.D. Vance have been influenced by Yarvin or have engaged with his ideas.
• Thiel has openly criticized democracy and funded projects aligned with Yarvin’s worldview.
• Musk’s takeover of Twitter/X and push for "free speech absolutism" align with some NRx critiques of the "Cathedral."
• Dark MAGA is a more militant, aggressive strain of MAGA politics that overlaps with some Neoreactionary ideas, particularly the rejection of liberal democracy.

Why It’s Important

The Dark Enlightenment is no longer just an obscure internet philosophy—it has influenced tech billionaires, politicians, and right-wing movements. While it’s still fringe, its core idea—that democracy is outdated and should be replaced by authoritarian governance—is gaining traction among elite circles.